Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Romanian Shootout & HostSolutions Alternatives - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Romanian Shootout & HostSolutions Alternatives

13»

Comments

  • ArkasArkas Moderator
    edited August 2021

    deutschland uber alles.
    Do you like to drive a Lada or dream of a Mercedes or a BMW? Do you like Hetzner, Contabo, php-friends or a post soviet server?
    communism is shit.

  • jenkkijenkki Member
    edited August 2021

    @dedicatserver_ro said: dedicatserver_ro

    Moldova join Soviet Union as a part after 1939, before WW2 So they was a part of winners at these times.

  • jenkkijenkki Member
    edited August 2021

    @Arkas said: deutschland uber alles.

    Do you like to drive a Lada or dream of a Mercedes or a BMW?

    How many astronauts in Germany? You like a unsuspected kid :smiley:

  • ArkasArkas Moderator

    About 11 astronauts. However, we have this https://www.esa.int
    Why you don't love us? We feel very sad, we came so close to ruling you, even though we are a much smaller country, fighting on multiple fronts. :wink:

  • jenkkijenkki Member
    edited August 2021

    @Arkas said: Why you don't love us?

    Why? I just reply a some historical facts you cannot skip. All best things in 20-th century build by communists. Blame them as a shit not acceptable.

    @Arkas said: About 11 astronauts.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_German_astronauts

    All of them use a Soviet/Russian Soyuz or STS and space technology. Do they produce a shit?

  • ArkasArkas Moderator

    @jenkki said: All best things in 20-th century build by communists. Blame them as a shit not acceptable.

    You are delusional. Communists were the biggest killers after WWII. The quality of communist products is not acceptable.

  • jenkkijenkki Member
    edited August 2021

    @Arkas said: You are delusional. Communists were the biggest killers after WWII. The quality of communist products is not acceptable.

    Did you remind about DDR? Dude, quality of life takes over a quality of product for your body.

    Goverment provide a new modern flats at no cost to factory workers. 160 millions flats are out. School education at no cost. High education at no cost. Campuses for students at no cost. Quality medichine and hospitals at no cost. Do you can this shit? Just curious.

  • LeviLevi Member

    Get a room you two. Thread is not about your political bs.

    Thanked by 4BBTN jsg skorupion bdl
  • jenkkijenkki Member
    edited August 2021

    @Arkas said: The quality of communist products is not acceptable.

    How many Kalashnikov guns sold around the World?

  • ArkasArkas Moderator
    edited August 2021

    I have to get some work done, gotta upload files to 3 different servers.
    I'm German of Italian decent, my grandparents were Scandinavian, I was born in Japan.
    :smiley:

  • bdlbdl Member

    This thread is definitely turning into a Romanian Shootout

  • @bdl said: This thread is definitely turning into a Romanian Shootout

    Headline will match fillup inside ;)

  • @bdl said:
    This thread is definitely turning into a Romanian Shootout

    I really thought about this reading title thought there was shootout by mad people to get thier money back

    Thanked by 1bdl
  • intovpsintovps Member, Host Rep

    @jsg sign up for an account and PM me your order no. to add $10 credit for benchmarks.

    https://intovps.com/plans.html

    Thanks.

    Thanked by 2jsg niknar1900
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @intovps said:
    @jsg sign up for an account and PM me your order no. to add $10 credit for benchmarks.

    https://intovps.com/plans.html

    Thanks.

    Will do. As I said I'll gladly benchmark/mini review every romanian (or moldavian) provider. When I'm done I'll append the results here.

    Thanked by 1intovps
  • virtonovirtono Member, Patron Provider

    @jsg said:
    The next candidate, Virtono / @virtono, is a provider I've come to like as a super-cheap provider with reasonably decent products at insane prices. The VPS I benchmarked is a (KVM based, of course) "Cloud VPS S" for € 23.70/year which is a bit less than €2/month (if payed annually). There is also an even cheaper a bit smaller VPS available for just €14.95/year.

    Here are the results

    Machine: amd64, Arch.: amd64, Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz
    OS, version: FreeBSD 12.2, Mem.: 988 MB
    CPU - Cores: 1, Family/Model/Stepping: 6/62/4
    Cache: 32K/32K L1d/L1i, 256K L2, 30M L3
    Std. Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
              pse36 cflsh mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss sse3 pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 pcid
              sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline aes xsave osxsave avx f16c
              rdrnd hypervisor
    Ext. Flags: fsgsbase tsc_adjust smep erms syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm lahf_lm
    
    ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 223.7 - min 216.9 (97.0 %), max 229.5 (102.6 %)
    ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 220.8 - min 213.7 (96.8 %), max 227.5 (103.0 %)
    ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 222.0 - min 215.3 (97.0 %), max 227.8 (102.6 %)
    
    --- Disk - Buffered ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 196.97 - min 78.98 (40.1%), max 415.69 (211.0%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 1074.73 - min 205.90 (19.2%), max 3680.59 (342.5%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 384.49 - min 48.96 (12.7%), max 487.00 (126.7%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 3223.53 - min 1673.49 (51.9%), max 4903.94 (152.1%)
    --- Disk - Sync/Direct ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 45.47 - min 30.88 (67.9%), max 46.87 (103.1%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 115.76 - min 105.15 (90.8%), max 120.56 (104.1%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 577.36 - min 333.53 (57.8%), max 651.82 (112.9%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 299.07 - min 259.47 (86.8%), max 319.94 (107.0%)
    
    --- Network ---
    US LAX lax.download.datapacket.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 34.5 - min 31.2 (90.7%), max 37.6 (109.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 186.2 - min 177.3 (95.2%), max 199.2 (107.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 188.7 - min 179.6 (95.2%), max 219.6 (116.4%)
    
    NO OSL speedtest.osl01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 97.8 - min 92.8 (94.9%), max 105.6 (108.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 54.6 - min 19.5 (35.7%), max 59.4 (108.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 60.5 - min 55.2 (91.3%), max 624.6 (1032.9%)
    
    US SJC speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 33.8 - min 31.0 (91.6%), max 36.5 (107.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 182.5 - min 174.6 (95.7%), max 185.9 (101.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 248.5 - min 174.6 (70.3%), max 1405.3 (565.5%)
    
    IQ UNK mirror.earthlink.iq [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 52.9 - min 43.3 (81.9%), max 63.5 (120.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 104.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 155.8 (149.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 123.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 695.0 (562.3%)
    
    AU MEL speedtest.c1.mel1.dediserve.com [F: 20]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 20.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 24.1 (119.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 279.9 - min 117.1 (41.8%), max 310.6 (111.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 281.7 - min 117.1 (41.6%), max 375.2 (133.2%)
    
    JP TOK speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com [F: 20]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 19.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 23.1 (118.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 286.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 295.5 (103.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 288.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 306.1 (106.2%)
    
    NZ UNK opensuse.mirrors.uf1.nz [F: 110]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 8.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 21.8 (246.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 297.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 380.8 (128.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 301.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 522.5 (173.5%)
    
    IT MIL speedtest.mil01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 115.5 - min 108.3 (93.7%), max 127.8 (110.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 47.3 - min 45.3 (95.8%), max 49.6 (104.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 53.7 - min 45.4 (84.5%), max 1338.2 (2490.3%)
    
    TR_UNK  185.65.204.169 [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 80.3 - min 78.3 (97.5%), max 82.7 (103.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 43.6 - min 40.6 (93.2%), max 48.2 (110.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 44.1 - min 40.9 (92.8%), max 106.7 (242.1%)
    
    ZA UNK centos-mirror.datakeepers.co.za [F: 103]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 11.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 30.4 (255.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 213.3 - min 211.7 (99.2%), max 279.0 (130.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 219.2 - min 211.7 (96.6%), max 770.5 (351.5%)
    
    FR PAR speedtest.par01.softlayer.com [F: 5]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 132.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 158.8 (119.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 37.7 - min 37.4 (99.3%), max 41.7 (110.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 66.0 - min 37.4 (56.7%), max 1191.7 (1805.7%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.sg.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 33.2 - min 30.9 (93.0%), max 35.7 (107.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 189.0 - min 185.4 (98.1%), max 194.1 (102.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 189.3 - min 185.4 (97.9%), max 197.1 (104.1%)
    
    BR SAO speedtest.sao01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 26.1 - min 23.6 (90.5%), max 28.6 (109.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 223.6 - min 219.6 (98.2%), max 235.1 (105.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 237.5 - min 219.6 (92.4%), max 1149.5 (483.9%)
    
    IN CHN speedtest.che01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 31.9 - min 28.8 (90.1%), max 35.4 (110.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 182.4 - min 173.9 (95.3%), max 202.6 (111.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 204.2 - min 174.1 (85.3%), max 1121.4 (549.3%)
    
    GR UNK speedtest.ftp.otenet.gr [F: 162]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 41.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 293.9 (701.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 2.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 18.8 (722.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 7.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 759.2 (10510.0%)
    
    PH CEB mirror.rise.ph [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 27.0 - min 21.9 (81.1%), max 28.6 (106.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 222.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 236.7 (106.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 276.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 418.4 (151.1%)
    
    MY SEL ubuntu.gbnetwork.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 33.7 - min 31.2 (92.4%), max 37.6 (111.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 183.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 234.1 (127.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 184.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 234.1 (126.7%)
    
    CN HKG mirror.xtom.com.hk [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 31.5 - min 29.3 (93.0%), max 34.4 (109.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 212.3 - min 197.6 (93.1%), max 221.0 (104.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 219.7 - min 197.6 (89.9%), max 307.2 (139.8%)
    
    RU MOS mirror.yandex.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 84.7 - min 75.2 (88.8%), max 94.4 (111.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 72.1 - min 71.8 (99.5%), max 78.3 (108.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 80.1 - min 71.8 (89.7%), max 370.5 (462.7%)
    
    US WDC mirror.wdc1.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 49.7 - min 46.8 (94.1%), max 53.5 (107.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 122.7 - min 117.9 (96.1%), max 129.0 (105.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 123.5 - min 117.9 (95.5%), max 147.4 (119.4%)
    
    CN BEJ mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn [F: 15]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 32.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 42.4 (130.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 168.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 275.3 (163.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 195.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1126.0 (575.3%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 91.0 - min 83.3 (91.6%), max 99.3 (109.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 59.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 65.5 (109.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 60.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 68.0 (112.9%)
    
    US DAL speedtest.dal05.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 41.0 - min 38.8 (94.7%), max 43.6 (106.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 147.2 - min 142.3 (96.7%), max 152.3 (103.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 159.6 - min 142.3 (89.2%), max 956.2 (599.3%)
    
    UK LON speedtest.lon02.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 130.8 - min 117.4 (89.7%), max 163.7 (125.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 42.9 - min 36.4 (84.8%), max 46.5 (108.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 54.6 - min 36.7 (67.2%), max 1353.7 (2478.2%)
    
    US NYC nyc.download.datapacket.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 52.1 - min 19.8 (38.0%), max 55.4 (106.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 123.4 - min 112.7 (91.4%), max 139.9 (113.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 125.0 - min 113.5 (90.8%), max 148.6 (118.9%)
    
    RO BUC 185.183.99.8 [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 368.2 - min 243.7 (66.2%), max 428.8 (116.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 0.6 - min 0.5 (84.0%), max 1.0 (168.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 9.7 - min 0.7 (7.2%), max 341.7 (3523.2%)
    
    KR UNK ftp.kaist.ac.kr [F: 71]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 13.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 22.2 (167.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 307.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 399.8 (130.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 334.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1478.9 (442.0%)
    
    CN_HK  mirror.hk.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 22.3 - min 22.3 (100.0%), max 22.3 (100.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 219.0 - min 219.0 (100.0%), max 219.0 (100.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 219.0 - min 219.0 (100.0%), max 219.0 (100.0%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.0x.sg [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 23.9 - min 20.3 (84.9%), max 25.7 (107.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 273.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 282.9 (103.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 274.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 315.8 (115.0%)
    
    ID UNK mirror.labkom.id [F: 13]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 30.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 35.5 (117.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 194.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 204.5 (105.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 215.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 462.8 (214.8%)
    
    DE FRA fra.lg.core-backbone.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 211.5 - min 195.3 (92.3%), max 227.2 (107.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 25.1 - min 24.8 (98.8%), max 29.3 (116.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 26.2 - min 25.0 (95.4%), max 29.9 (114.1%)
    
    KE NAI centos.mirror.liquidtelecom.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 32.4 - min 29.4 (90.6%), max 35.4 (109.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 189.0 - min 180.5 (95.5%), max 198.5 (105.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 211.0 - min 180.5 (85.5%), max 396.6 (188.0%)
    

    The processor performance is a bit lower than others but still quite decent and the AES flag is available. And as the numbers show performance is steady with very low spread.

    The 25 GB SSD seems to be less impressive than the now trendy NVMes but in direct/sync mode it's actually faster than some of the NVMes seen in this shootout. It's certainly no speed demon but I'd feel better running a DB (e.g. a dynamic web site) on this SSD than on the dedicatserver NVMe.

    As for the network (traffic volume 2TB/mo) it's decent, not quite as good as dedicatserver but still the most important european targets are above 100 Mb/s. If really good low latency connectivity is important for your use case you might be better served alsewhere though.

    As I happen to have their smaller 'XS' VPS since about 2 years I can report about my experience. In short, I've been really pleased. The VPS is a wee bit more "expensive" than the cheapest one can find (for less than $10/yr) but I wouldn't want to exchange. The Virtono support has always been reasonably fast (in the tens of minutes to a few hours range), friendly, and competent. Plus and more importantly IIRC that VPS which serves a one of my main name servers has never let me down (and if it did, it was fixed quickly so I didn't notice).

    The panel is standard and offers a remote console and while (afaik) one can't upload custom ISOs I do remember that when I asked support they (quickly) took care of it and provided me with the ISO I wanted. Another point I really like that I'm not limited to template installations but I can configure everything to my liking. Not a big thing, you might think, but my experience shows that very low price and flexibility usually don't go hand in hand.

    TL;DR A rather small but decent and reliable VPS with good support and a very attractive price (if payed annually).

    Thanks for sharing!

    However, please note that we have changed our whole infrastructure(we just finished a few days ago) with new nodes that have newer cpu models (xeon gold), ddr4 memory, nvme & ssd storage, etc.

  • Do any cheap VPS ($5/mth) hosts exist in the Voxility datacenter in Bucharest, with connectivity/DDOS protection provided by Voxility?

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @JoeMerit said:
    Do any cheap VPS ($5/mth) hosts exist in the Voxility datacenter in Bucharest, with connectivity/DDOS protection provided by Voxility?

    I know of at least one provider, but one with caveats: @dedicatserver_ro
    The caveats are: they apparently spy on their users (log into their VPS) and you absolutely must stick to and obey their AUP/TOS.

  • ArkasArkas Moderator
    edited August 2021

    @jsg said: I know of at least one provider, but one with caveats: @dedicatserver_ro The caveats are: they apparently spy on their users (log into their VPS)

    Well, that's a serious reason NOT to recommend them.

    Thanked by 1dahartigan
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @Arkas said:

    @jsg said: I know of at least one provider, but one with caveats: @dedicatserver_ro The caveats are: they apparently spy on their users (log into their VPS)

    Well, that's a serious reason NOT to recommend them.

    I didn't. I merely answered to a question - plus I included an appropriate warning.

    Thanked by 1Arkas
  • @jsg said: I didn't. I merely answered to a question - plus I included an appropriate warning.

    Thank you. They only include 5gbps protection and upgrading to higher levels (that still are not very high) is very expensive. Looking for Voxility 1.2tbit protection in their 'home' datacenter.

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @JoeMerit said:

    @jsg said: I didn't. I merely answered to a question - plus I included an appropriate warning.

    Thank you. They only include 5gbps protection and upgrading to higher levels (that still are not very high) is very expensive. Looking for Voxility 1.2tbit protection in their 'home' datacenter.

    I'm afraid that's a game all or at least most providers play. "Free DDOS protection" usually boils down to "couple of Gb/s protection and more for hard $$". Actually 5 Gb/s protection is already on the better side it seems.

    Please, don't get me wrong, I'm as appalled as many are by @dedicatserver_ro's spying on customers, but the question I answered wasn't "Do you like dedicatserver?" nor "which one would you prefer and recommend?".

    The question was

    @JoeMerit said:
    Do any cheap VPS ($5/mth) hosts exist in the Voxility datacenter in Bucharest, with connectivity/DDOS protection provided by Voxility?

    and that's what I responded to, again, with a warning hint.

  • dedicatserver_rodedicatserver_ro Member, Host Rep
    edited August 2021
    1. we are in Voxility from 2009 ( it was called Limehost on the time ) , but we have our own DDOS protection
    2. the BS with jsg warning ... is for for those who believe

    @jsg

    • were you or maybe you are still a client, did someone enter your server ?if you still placed an order have you read what you ordered ?it seems not ...cut the crap!
    • Do you have any proof of what you say? ...like you wanted to be impartial....

    @JoeMerit

    • you will not find, the protection from Voxility costs minim 750 € per month for provider ( without the trafic , the trafic cost are calculkated as a 95/5 rule), those who sell VPS ($5/mth) will not pay this money.There are many who boast that they have but it is not true.
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker
    edited August 2021

    @dedicatserver_ro

    Your defense is attacking me personally? Well, thanks for confirming the allegations against you by, instead of dismounting the allegations, attacking me.

    And pardon me asking but are you stupid? Because a mentally stable provider certainly wouldn't attack one of the extremely few who still at least mention his company albeit with a caveat.

    Your reaction clearly indicates that you can't take any criticism - at all, plus that you are unable to handle it in a way that is at least vaguely professional.

    Still being a paying customer I also thank you for demonstrating so clearly what your customers can expect from you wrt respect and politeness.

    @all: Stay away from dedicatserver_ro!

  • dedicatserver_rodedicatserver_ro Member, Host Rep
    edited August 2021

    @jsg said: Your defense is attacking me personally?

    • really ?

    @jsg said: instead of dismounting the allegations

    I see that no one was interested, and the other clients from LET, including the research, did not validate what a client who has no idea about linux said. But a few members still persist, including you , you and your friends who are still customers ( why? ).Which is somehow a fracture of logic.

    @jsg said: And pardon me asking but are you stupid?

    • Did you ask yourself this question too?

    @jsg said: Your reaction clearly indicates that you can't take any criticism

    • after 30 years of activity in the field I was criticized by someone who just opened his eyes ....with lies and insults...it's kind of hard to accept....maybe I missed the constructive criticism
    • make a business first ,so you know about what you're talking...
  • intovpsintovps Member, Host Rep
    edited August 2021

    @JoeMerit said:
    Do any cheap VPS ($5/mth) hosts exist in the Voxility datacenter in Bucharest, with connectivity/DDOS protection provided by Voxility?

    Actually, we have Voxility DDOS protection in Bucharest.

    We're in M2 47 DC in Bucharest and have 2 dedicated fibers from the Voxility POP in NXDATA.

    The distance between each two of the 3 data centers is 0.5 km or 1 km.

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • FlorinMarianFlorinMarian Member, Host Rep

    We have also VPS Servers in Romania, covered by Voxility AntiDDoS (1 Tbps).
    We're located in Bacau, Romania but ping says just 5ms spent to arrive in Bucharest.

    Best regards, Florin.

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @virtono said:
    However, please note that we have changed our whole infrastructure(we just finished a few days ago) with new nodes that have newer cpu models (xeon gold), ddr4 memory, nvme & ssd storage, etc.

    No problem, I'll just review you again ;)

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    Et voilà, here is the @intovps review (Bucharest location), based on over 200 runs.

    Machine: amd64, Arch.: amd64, Model: AMD EPYC Processor (with IBPB)
    OS, version: FreeBSD 13.0, Mem.: 1.990 GB
    CPU - Cores: 1, Family/Model/Stepping: 23/1/2
    Cache: 64K/64K L1d/L1i, 512K L2, 16M L3
    Std. Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
              pse36 cflsh mmx fxsr sse sse2 sse3 pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16 sse4_1
              sse4_2 popcnt aes xsave osxsave avx f16c rdrnd hypervisor
    Ext. Flags: fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb
              rdtscp lm lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm cr8_legacy lzcnt sse4a misalignsse
              3dnowprefetch osvw
    
    ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 341.8 - min 335.4 (98.1 %), max 345.5 (101.1 %)
    ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 337.3 - min 332.8 (98.7 %), max 342.2 (101.5 %)
    ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 337.2 - min 330.9 (98.1 %), max 342.2 (101.5 %)
    

    AMD Epyc and the matching performance, lovely! Unfortunately my test VPS is only a single-core 'M2-new' with 1 vCPU, 2 GB memory, and 20 GB disk but based on what I see I thinks it's safe to presume that the multi-core result would also match other good Epyc based VPS.
    Also, all the desirable flags are available. Plus, note the very low spread! What a nice start for a review.

    Here's the disk results

    --- Disk - Buffered ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 1235.31 - min 1079.09 (87.4%), max 1369.91 (110.9%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 7226.38 - min 6012.05 (83.2%), max 8035.60 (111.2%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 1405.55 - min 1240.36 (88.2%), max 1569.44 (111.7%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 5162.09 - min 4254.05 (82.4%), max 5789.91 (112.2%)
    --- Disk - Sync/Direct ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 100.92 - min 99.05 (98.1%), max 102.11 (101.2%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 199.01 - min 194.11 (97.5%), max 203.64 (102.3%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 2967.17 - min 2708.72 (91.3%), max 3313.57 (111.7%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 694.76 - min 632.83 (91.1%), max 787.09 (113.3%)
    

    Nice! Keep in mind that this is SSD storage and for SSDs that is a very decent result! In fact I've tested quite a few NVMe based products with worse results. I'm getting enchanted in part also with the very low spread which means that you can really expect those results. Lovely.

    Now to what became my favourite in this benchmark series, the network

    US LAX lax.download.datapacket.com [F: 6]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 42.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 64.3 (150.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 181.9 - min 174.5 (95.9%), max 195.2 (107.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 184.8 - min 174.6 (94.5%), max 195.2 (105.6%)
    
    NO OSL speedtest.osl01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 173.8 - min 172.1 (99.1%), max 181.1 (104.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 57.2 - min 56.8 (99.4%), max 87.9 (153.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 57.2 - min 56.8 (99.3%), max 87.9 (153.6%)
    
    US SJC speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 54.2 - min 23.7 (43.8%), max 57.1 (105.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 176.9 - min 176.7 (99.9%), max 180.0 (101.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 212.4 - min 176.7 (83.2%), max 1414.0 (665.8%)
    
    AU MEL speedtest.c1.mel1.dediserve.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 35.4 - min 30.5 (86.1%), max 38.0 (107.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 283.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 412.7 (145.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 284.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 412.7 (145.0%)
    
    JP TOK speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 40.2 - min 37.4 (93.0%), max 42.5 (105.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 276.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 303.0 (109.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 279.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 307.3 (110.0%)
    
    IT MIL speedtest.mil01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 232.9 - min 226.4 (97.2%), max 244.5 (105.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 42.6 - min 42.1 (98.9%), max 50.9 (119.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 52.6 - min 42.1 (80.1%), max 1052.1 (2001.0%)
    
    TR UNK 185.65.204.169 [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 87.2 - min 83.0 (95.1%), max 87.5 (100.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 43.4 - min 42.8 (98.7%), max 66.5 (153.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 44.0 - min 43.3 (98.5%), max 66.5 (151.3%)
    
    FR PAR speedtest.par01.softlayer.com [F: 15]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 221.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 251.1 (113.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 41.5 - min 41.3 (99.5%), max 50.2 (120.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 95.0 - min 41.3 (43.5%), max 1373.3 (1446.3%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.sg.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 59.6 - min 57.5 (96.5%), max 63.5 (106.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 189.4 - min 125.6 (66.3%), max 195.9 (103.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 189.8 - min 174.9 (92.1%), max 195.9 (103.2%)
    
    BR SAO speedtest.sao01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 42.5 - min 40.3 (94.7%), max 44.5 (104.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 236.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 238.6 (100.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 240.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 646.8 (268.9%)
    
    IN CHN speedtest.che01.softlayer.com [F: 29]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 50.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 62.6 (123.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 166.4 - min 157.1 (94.4%), max 185.4 (111.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 185.4 - min 157.1 (84.7%), max 1069.1 (576.7%)
    
    GR UNK speedtest.ftp.otenet.gr [F: 99]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 325.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 624.9 (192.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 9.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 20.9 (218.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 17.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1216.9 (7066.3%)
    
    US WDC mirror.wdc1.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 98.1 - min 90.2 (92.0%), max 100.9 (102.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 111.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 118.2 (106.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 112.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 118.2 (104.9%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 185.9 - min 165.8 (89.2%), max 215.8 (116.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 53.9 - min 51.5 (95.5%), max 56.9 (105.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 59.1 - min 51.6 (87.3%), max 66.0 (111.6%)
    
    US DAL speedtest.dal05.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 55.8 - min 45.2 (81.2%), max 59.0 (105.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 173.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 175.6 (101.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 190.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1305.1 (686.2%)
    
    UK LON speedtest.lon02.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 246.0 - min 241.7 (98.2%), max 260.4 (105.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 40.2 - min 39.9 (99.3%), max 42.1 (104.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 71.0 - min 40.0 (56.3%), max 1402.4 (1974.8%)
    
    US NYC nyc.download.datapacket.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 91.1 - min 82.7 (90.7%), max 95.0 (104.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 121.6 - min 119.2 (98.0%), max 127.7 (105.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 122.4 - min 119.3 (97.4%), max 207.3 (169.3%)
    
    RO BUC 185.183.99.8 [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 913.9 - min 626.6 (68.6%), max 962.4 (105.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 0.5 - min 0.4 (83.7%), max 2.8 (586.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 1.3 - min 0.6 (47.0%), max 23.4 (1831.4%)
    
    NL AMS mirror.nl.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 308.5 - min 224.6 (72.8%), max 332.1 (107.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 35.6 - min 35.5 (99.8%), max 36.9 (103.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 37.1 - min 35.5 (95.8%), max 356.5 (961.6%)
    
    CN HK mirror.hk.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 50.9 - min 47.4 (93.1%), max 55.2 (108.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 220.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 234.7 (106.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 223.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 265.3 (119.0%)
    
    DE FRA fra.lg.core-backbone.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 397.2 - min 381.2 (96.0%), max 433.3 (109.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 28.7 - min 28.5 (99.3%), max 39.1 (136.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 29.1 - min 28.6 (98.2%), max 39.1 (134.2%)
    

    San Jose, California over 50 Mb/s - from Europe, mind you -, US East-Coast 90 - 100 Mb/s, even Brazil about 40 Mb/s, Tokyo ca. 40 Mb/s, Singapore even ca. 60 Mb/s, HongKong 50 Mb/s, and even Melbourne in Ozzyland about 35 Mb/s, wow, me impressed. And yes, of course you get good connectivity within Europe, too; almost all targets between 200 and 300 Mb/s and some even above that.

    What a nice surprise!

    Yes, they aren't the cheapest one can find in Romania and Moldavia but you get a really good VPS for your money with a modern processor, plenty of memory even in the smallest VPS (which I tested) and connectivity that is very decent all around the world. And no, they are not greedy, as is demonstrated by asking only $1 for an additional IP, they simply sell a really good product and when looking at what you get for your money they are actually cheap. I for one do not know any other provider in Romania selling that kind of quality VPS for that price.

    Their support seems to be friendly, helpful and relatively quick and the only thing I personally subjectively didn't like is that the whole operation is based on Fleio, but hey, others may see that as an advantage. When I asked for an ISO (which I couldn't set myself) they quickly put it up and clearly explained how I could mount and install from it. Worked flawlessly.

    I'm really glad that intovps offered me the opportunity to get to know their services/products, because I feel that I discovered a gem. Great product, well balanced, really nice quality and speed. I love it.

    Thanked by 2intovps bdl
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker
    edited September 2021

    And one more ...

    @FlorinMarian kindly provided me with access to one of his VPSs to benchmark it.

    And with that we already are at a major point and good news: I enhanced vpsbench based on user feedback. Many users want to see disk results for multiple block sizes and now they get that: 4 KB, 64 KB, and 1 MB block/slice sizes.

    Here you go, first the processor and memory info and results:

    Version 2.3.0, (c) 2018+ jsg (->lowendtalk.com)
    Machine: amd64, Arch.: amd64, Model: QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    OS, version: FreeBSD 12.2, Mem.: 986 MB
    CPU - Cores: 1, Family/Model/Stepping: 6/13/3
    Cache: 32K/32K L1d/L1i, 2M L2, 16M L3
    Std. Flags: fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36
              cflsh mmx fxsr sse sse2 sse3 cx16 x2apic hypervisor
    Ext. Flags: syscall nx lm lahf_lm
    
    ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 243.8 - min 210.3 (86.3 %), max 258.5 (106.0 %)
    ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 238.3 - min 213.8 (89.7 %), max 253.3 (106.3 %)
    ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 243.2 - min 221.1 (90.9 %), max 254.8 (104.8 %)
    

    Unfortunately, neither AES nor VMX, but the spread is OK.

    Now the drive:

    --- Disk 4 KB - Buffered ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 44.83 - min 35.85 (80.0%), max 60.31 (134.5%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 64.22 - min 53.88 (83.9%), max 81.98 (127.7%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 70.13 - min 50.39 (71.8%), max 121.47 (173.2%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 73.88 - min 63.23 (85.6%), max 88.58 (119.9%)
    --- Disk 4 KB - Sync/Direct ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 2.60 - min 0.72 (27.7%), max 5.34 (205.5%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 2.85 - min 1.10 (38.7%), max 5.44 (191.2%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 7.60 - min 1.82 (23.9%), max 13.79 (181.3%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 6.86 - min 1.95 (28.4%), max 13.31 (194.2%)
    
    --- Disk 64 KB - Buffered ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 149.75 - min 83.54 (55.8%), max 267.07 (178.3%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 635.34 - min 515.50 (81.1%), max 1039.36 (163.6%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 315.80 - min 168.17 (53.3%), max 793.93 (251.4%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 759.98 - min 282.34 (37.2%), max 997.51 (131.3%)
    --- Disk 64 KB - Sync/Direct ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 22.89 - min 17.60 (76.9%), max 43.50 (190.0%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 28.17 - min 14.92 (53.0%), max 44.60 (158.3%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 185.22 - min 134.62 (72.7%), max 351.47 (189.8%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 93.97 - min 72.07 (76.7%), max 127.13 (135.3%)
    
    --- Disk 1 MB - Buffered ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 159.91 - min 55.10 (34.5%), max 253.99 (158.8%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 1528.57 - min 915.24 (59.9%), max 2046.91 (133.9%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 197.29 - min 102.20 (51.8%), max 342.14 (173.4%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 1329.77 - min 753.55 (56.7%), max 1806.71 (135.9%)
    --- Disk 1 MB - Sync/Direct ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 37.52 - min 26.77 (71.3%), max 55.31 (147.4%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 101.56 - min 79.80 (78.6%), max 127.63 (125.7%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 217.59 - min 63.09 (29.0%), max 422.79 (194.3%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 206.21 - min 171.93 (83.4%), max 360.26 (174.7%)
    

    And finally the network results:

    US LAX lax.download.datapacket.com [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 32.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 38.9 (121.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 181.8 - min 173.1 (95.2%), max 251.6 (138.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 183.3 - min 176.5 (96.3%), max 251.6 (137.2%)
    
    NO OSL speedtest.osl01.softlayer.com [F: 4]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 49.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 74.0 (148.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 64.0 - min 60.3 (94.2%), max 72.0 (112.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 68.5 - min 60.3 (88.0%), max 573.1 (836.7%)
    
    US SJC speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com [F: 6]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 29.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 34.2 (114.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 179.3 - min 176.8 (98.6%), max 187.3 (104.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 198.4 - min 178.3 (89.9%), max 1092.9 (550.8%)
    
    AU MEL speedtest.c1.mel1.dediserve.com [F: 107]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 1.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 21.4 (1929.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 313.4 - min 293.5 (93.6%), max 346.8 (110.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 313.5 - min 293.5 (93.6%), max 346.8 (110.6%)
    
    JP TOK speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com [F: 68]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 8.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 23.6 (279.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 285.5 - min 281.6 (98.7%), max 303.6 (106.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 286.2 - min 281.6 (98.4%), max 303.6 (106.1%)
    
    IT MIL speedtest.mil01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 70.8 - min 50.6 (71.5%), max 104.7 (147.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 44.4 - min 41.3 (93.0%), max 58.4 (131.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 45.3 - min 41.3 (91.1%), max 137.6 (303.7%)
    
    TR UNK 185.65.204.169 [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 80.9 - min 74.0 (91.5%), max 85.7 (105.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 48.2 - min 38.4 (79.7%), max 71.3 (148.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 48.4 - min 38.9 (80.3%), max 71.5 (147.7%)
    
    FR PAR speedtest.par01.softlayer.com [F: 10]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 109.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 143.4 (130.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 44.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 53.3 (121.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 65.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1353.2 (2080.0%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.sg.leaseweb.net [F: 58]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 11.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 30.5 (272.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 264.2 - min 186.8 (70.7%), max 314.6 (119.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 265.1 - min 187.0 (70.5%), max 314.6 (118.7%)
    
    BR SAO speedtest.sao01.softlayer.com [F: 60]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 10.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 26.2 (256.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 221.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 228.7 (103.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 229.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 779.5 (339.4%)
    
    IN CHN speedtest.che01.softlayer.com [F: 7]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 23.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 33.2 (142.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 164.0 - min 156.4 (95.4%), max 278.5 (169.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 178.8 - min 156.7 (87.6%), max 872.9 (488.1%)
    
    GR UNK speedtest.ftp.otenet.gr [F: 47]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 26.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 59.2 (219.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 42.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 82.9 (195.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 43.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 160.4 (368.7%)
    
    US WDC mirror.wdc1.us.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 39.9 - min 29.7 (74.4%), max 52.2 (130.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 122.8 - min 121.3 (98.8%), max 131.1 (106.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 124.1 - min 121.4 (97.8%), max 132.7 (106.9%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 55.3 - min 42.3 (76.6%), max 85.4 (154.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 63.2 - min 49.3 (78.1%), max 78.7 (124.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 65.1 - min 50.2 (77.1%), max 79.5 (122.1%)
    
    US DAL speedtest.dal05.softlayer.com [F: 4]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 35.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 39.8 (112.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 158.3 - min 154.7 (97.7%), max 165.1 (104.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 176.9 - min 154.7 (87.5%), max 1159.0 (655.2%)
    
    UK LON speedtest.lon02.softlayer.com [F: 6]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 111.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 136.1 (121.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 45.9 - min 44.2 (96.3%), max 57.0 (124.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 82.0 - min 44.7 (54.5%), max 1274.2 (1553.8%)
    
    US NYC nyc.download.datapacket.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 50.0 - min 41.4 (82.7%), max 55.5 (111.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 123.9 - min 114.1 (92.1%), max 130.7 (105.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 125.5 - min 119.5 (95.2%), max 146.8 (116.9%)
    
    RO BUC 185.183.99.8 [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 465.8 - min 341.3 (73.3%), max 757.7 (162.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 6.6 - min 6.1 (92.9%), max 7.9 (120.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 8.3 - min 6.3 (76.2%), max 118.8 (1436.0%)
    
    NL AMS mirror.nl.leaseweb.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 89.6 - min 57.5 (64.2%), max 135.3 (151.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 40.1 - min 37.5 (93.6%), max 48.8 (121.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 40.7 - min 37.5 (92.2%), max 51.5 (126.6%)
    
    CN HK mirror.hk.leaseweb.net [F: 22]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 17.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 28.1 (158.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 269.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 293.7 (109.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 270.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 315.0 (116.5%)
    
    DE FRA fra.lg.core-backbone.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 87.2 - min 64.9 (74.4%), max 140.0 (160.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 39.4 - min 37.6 (95.4%), max 50.6 (128.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 39.6 - min 37.7 (95.2%), max 50.6 (127.8%)
    

    Asia/Oceania connectivity might profit from some love by the provider.
    This review is based on about 120 result sets.

    Final - and important, I think - remark: Based on his way to provide a test system and our communication FlorinMarian seems to be really nice guy and I'd be surprised if their support were anything but great.

    Thank you, FlorinMarian, for making this short review possible!

    Thanked by 1FlorinMarian
Sign In or Register to comment.