New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
I don't know but virtualizor already has this now.
solusvm is way behind virtualizor
do not think they will get multi-virtualization on...
It's not on our roadmap at the minute. Our aim is to push towards stability and adding something like that works against what we are trying to do.
Features maybe. But Solus does something virtualizor doesnt, work. Work simply
It would be really nice to see, though I would like to see something more of V2 first, because it all kinda went silent on that front...
I tired both out and liked both but I couldn't get virtualizer to work well with configurable options to work right. I did like virtualizer cp with the control panel installs though.
Coming this month . you needed to sign up to the private beta
I have, I just meant I had heard nothing new from it since I signed up.
its a good silence. I know some docs are being prepared for third party developers this week, but that's mainly API related.
The silence is intentional to keep people second guessing
I thought about that in the past, it took proxmox a lot of time to get to a stable state, the virtualizor guys are afaik php/mysql dev's primarily so my confidence is very low in them maintaining and more importantly releasing updates when vulnerabilities are released over 4 different OS's in a timely manner.
Frankly I think if you used this in production at this stage you have to be crazy, you could just nest OVZ inside a KVM node, lose about 1% on performance and have a much safer management and recovery plan.
Proxmox has quality commercial support, virtualizor support the panel and the first response to ANYTHING is please give us root login details to your node.
Honestly I am glad solusvm are not rushing in to this, the amount of work required to maintain it vs. the benefit is just silly imo.
@SolusVM may i know if the SW load balancer concept in OnApp coming to Solus?
If OpenVZ would finally incorporate a modern kernel a OpenVZ/KVM hybrid would be fairly easy as it'd be just two things in userspace.
SW load balancer needs a lot of work within OnApp too. This will take a bit of time until this is ready to replace HW ones.
The progress of going to the RHEL 7 kernel is in progress now
Virtualizor works fine.
crazy to use virtualizor at all, or just the multivirt bit of virtualizor?
Both
I'd like to know more. care to expand on that?
What exactly is wrong with virtualizor? You keep making these posts, yet I haven't heard a good detailed version why yet..
This.
Just imo.
Simple tasks which take a few clicks in solus takes laods of clicks in virtualizor. Someone who runs both recently pointed this out and I agree 100%
Not sure on this one. I done see it on the roadmap or the development docs as of yet.
Should be making you happy shortly then!
thats awesome
@SolusVM mind adding a reseller api while you're at it? Also, resource modification for resellers' VPS servers is another feature I'd like to have.
See this http://lowendtalk.com/discussion/54780/whmcs-module-for-solusvm-reseller#latest
Truly the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen a provider post. You are years behind on a release and not behind even on your own timetable to current customers and you think it is funny to joke about the lack of information?
Its Mike THW ipv4 exhaustion, they Start to run when its to late.