Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Advertise on LowEndTalk.com
Storage and NVMe goodness :)
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

Storage and NVMe goodness :)

hosthatchhosthatch Member, Top Provider

Hi guys,

We have the following offers available.

2 GB RAM
15 GB NVMe
2 TB bandwidth
$2.5 per month, or $20 per year
Pay for 2 years upfront for 2x RAM and 2x bandwidth

Available in: Los Angeles, Stockholm, Madrid, Milan, New York, Warsaw

8 GB RAM
40 GB NVMe
5 TB bandwidth
$5.5 per month, $50 per year
Pay for 2 years upfront for 2x RAM and 2x bandwidth

Available in: Los Angeles, Stockholm, Madrid, Milan, New York, Warsaw

Multiple packages can be stacked.

512 MB RAM
250 GB usable storage
3 TB bandwidth
$18 per year

Available in: Amsterdam, Stockholm, Los Angeles, London and Chicago

These will be available for one week, unless they are extended. If they are sold out, the links will stop working.

They cannot be changed/modified with old VMs. We also offer BGP sessions in all of our locations for customers spending at least $180/year or $25 per month in total account spend.

IPv6 is available in all of our locations.

Deploy excellent quality VMs in 14 global locations - hosthatch.com

«13

Comments

  • lentrolentro Member, Provider

    If I understand correctly, the second plan, if paid biannually, provides a better GB RAM-to-price ratio than to the BF deals (other than the bandwidth, storage, and core count reduction)... nice :)

  • How many core per plan ? and if stacked ?

  • For the first plan, if I pay for 2 years, can you do 2x storage space instead of 2x RAM?

    Are you looking for some textual fun?

  • hosthatchhosthatch Member, Top Provider

    @ben47955 said:
    How many core per plan ? and if stacked ?

    You can see the CPU on the order page. CPU cores are not added when stacking, only dedicated %.

    @ramesh_vish said:
    For the first plan, if I pay for 2 years, can you do 2x storage space instead of 2x RAM?

    Unfortunately not :(

    Deploy excellent quality VMs in 14 global locations - hosthatch.com

  • JabJabJabJab Member

    @hosthatch said: Multiple packages can be stacked.

    Can I stack storage too? And if yes how it actually works, I don't see any +1 before ordering - order two, message support? Merge button will show up? :)

  • DecicusDecicus Member

    @JabJab said:

    @hosthatch said: Multiple packages can be stacked.

    Can I stack storage too? And if yes how it actually works, I don't see any +1 before ordering - order two, message support? Merge button will show up? :)

    Based on the previous thread I did the following:

    • Order a service
    • Add funds to account credit to cover extra stacking
    • Support ticket and request upgrade

    Granted my service was for an NVMe server, but it doesn't explicitly say storage isn't considered, so it's probably fine.

    Thanked by 1JabJab
  • @hosthatch said: You can see the CPU on the order page. CPU cores are not added when stacking, only dedicated %.

    Maybe it's me, but cpu allocation seem low for the quantity of RAM.

    Thanked by 2pbx yoursunny
  • hosthatchhosthatch Member, Top Provider

    @JabJab said:

    @hosthatch said: Multiple packages can be stacked.

    Can I stack storage too?

    Yes :)

    Deploy excellent quality VMs in 14 global locations - hosthatch.com

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member
    edited March 29

    https://hosthatch.com/features#datacenters
    Madrid and Milan looking glass are not working.
    Can you post their IP (both v4 and v6)?


    How much CPU am I allowed to use persistently on the 2GB x2 plan?
    What CPU model is that?

    Thanked by 2Ganonk pbx

    I snagged Deal of the Year: $6.9/year, 6 vCPU, 8GB RAM, 105GB NVMe - but it got away.

  • Daniel15Daniel15 Member
    edited March 29

    Your site isn't loading for me.

    @yoursunny said: What CPU model is that?

    Most of their locations are either E5-2680 v2 or E5-2690 v2

    @yoursunny said: Madrid and Milan looking glass are not working.
    Can you post their IP (both v4 and v6)?

    FWIW I'm using a HostHatch Madrid server for https://dnstools.ws/. You can do pings/traceroutes from there or ping/traceroute es.worker.dns.tg if you like.

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • nobizzlenobizzle Member
    edited March 30

    Any chance to make the second deal possible in amsterdam? I had a similar ticket open a few days ago.

    Thanked by 1pbx
  • jxpaljxpal Member

    Hello, is the price of storage 250g in lax set wrong?

  • Daniel15Daniel15 Member
    edited March 30

    @jxpal said:
    Hello, is the price of storage 250g in lax set wrong?

    Interesting... I'm seeing the same thing too (now that the site is loading for me). It's showing $75/year rather than $18/year

    FWIW based on my own anecdotal testing I'd recommend Chicago over Los Angeles for storage if the ping times aren't too bad from your location. Faster disks and slightly faster CPU. Both are really good for the price though!

    Thanked by 1pbx
  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member
    edited March 30

    @Daniel15 said:
    FWIW I'm using a HostHatch Madrid server for https://dnstools.ws/. You can do pings/traceroutes from there or ping/traceroute es.worker.dns.tg if you like.

    I want one server for serving all of Europe.

    Stockholm: Telia, supposed to good but a little too north
    Warsaw: Cogent, bad reputation in the US
    Madrid: M247, all the traffic goes to France and sometimes UK

    @yoursunny said: What CPU model is that?

    Most of their locations are either E5-2680 v2 or E5-2690 v2

    Order page says 12.5% CPU.
    This CPU model is Ivy Bridge 3.00 GHz, so 12.5% is only 375 MHz.

    If RAM is doubled but CPU isn't, this would be underpowered.
    If both are doubled, it's more reasonable.

    @hosthatch do you double both RAM and CPU percentage, or is it still at 12.5%?

    I snagged Deal of the Year: $6.9/year, 6 vCPU, 8GB RAM, 105GB NVMe - but it got away.

  • @yoursunny said: Order page says 12.5% CPU.

    That means 12.5% dedicated. You're free to use 12.5% CPU constantly, and can burst to 100%, but you can't constantly use 100%. Other providers have similar limits but they just say "fair use" and don't explain what "fair use" actually means. At least HostHatch is clear about it :)

    Thanked by 1pbx
  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member
    edited March 30

    @Daniel15 said:

    @yoursunny said: Order page says 12.5% CPU.

    That means 12.5% dedicated. You're free to use 12.5% CPU constantly, and can burst to 100%, but you can't constantly use 100%. Other providers have similar limits but they just say "fair use" and don't explain what "fair use" actually means. At least HostHatch is clear about it :)

    The "other providers" I have all have specified limits that are higher than this.
    Without naming names:

    • 25% core, 1GB RAM, $8.40/year
    • 33% core, 384MB RAM, $4/year
    • 33% core, 1GB RAM, $1.50/month
    • 50% core, 1GB RAM, $16/year
    • 66% core, 1920MB RAM, $8.88/year

    12.5% for 4GB is low in comparison.
    If I run an application similar to an in-memory database, I'm concerned that I'll exceed CPU allocation.

    Thanked by 1Daniel15

    I snagged Deal of the Year: $6.9/year, 6 vCPU, 8GB RAM, 105GB NVMe - but it got away.

  • Daniel15Daniel15 Member
    edited March 30

    @yoursunny said: 12.5% for 4GB is low in comparison.

    Yeah, I didn't say that it's a high limit, just that they're clear about what the limit is. :smile:

    For comparison, I've got a 16GB RAM / 80GB NVMe VPS and it's got 100% dedicated core. On the other hand, I also have some 1GB RAM / 10GB NVMe VPSes from their Black Friday sale and they're either 25% or 30% dedicated depending on location 🤔

    @yoursunny said: The "other providers" I have all have specified limits that are higher than this.

    Are the prices of those providers comparable though? For example, BuyVM offer 100% CPU for 4GB but they're $15/month which is way higher.

    Edit: I see you added the prices now :)

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • mcgreemcgree Member

    I wanted to pay for two years, but I only paid for one year, what can I do?

    Because one year is $18 and two years is $32, I think it's a better deal.

  • RemonRemon Member

    @yoursunny said:

    @Daniel15 said:

    @yoursunny said: Order page says 12.5% CPU.

    That means 12.5% dedicated. You're free to use 12.5% CPU constantly, and can burst to 100%, but you can't constantly use 100%. Other providers have similar limits but they just say "fair use" and don't explain what "fair use" actually means. At least HostHatch is clear about it :)

    The "other providers" I have all have specified limits that are higher than this.
    Without naming names:

    • 25% core, 1GB RAM, $8.40/year
    • 33% core, 384MB RAM, $4/year
    • 33% core, 1GB RAM, $1.50/month
    • 50% core, 1GB RAM, $16/year
    • 66% core, 1920MB RAM, $8.88/year

    12.5% for 4GB is low in comparison.
    If I run an application similar to an in-memory database, I'm concerned that I'll exceed CPU allocation.

    Name it,looks very good deal.

  • notarobonotarobo Member
    edited March 30

    @yoursunny said:

    @Daniel15 said:

    @yoursunny said: Order page says 12.5% CPU.

    That means 12.5% dedicated. You're free to use 12.5% CPU constantly, and can burst to 100%, but you can't constantly use 100%. Other providers have similar limits but they just say "fair use" and don't explain what "fair use" actually means. At least HostHatch is clear about it :)

    The "other providers" I have all have specified limits that are higher than this.
    Without naming names:

    • 25% core, 1GB RAM, $8.40/year
    • 33% core, 384MB RAM, $4/year
    • 33% core, 1GB RAM, $1.50/month
    • 50% core, 1GB RAM, $16/year
    • 66% core, 1920MB RAM, $8.88/year

    12.5% for 4GB is low in comparison.
    If I run an application similar to an in-memory database, I'm concerned that I'll exceed CPU allocation.

    but you do know that virmach cores are already throttled and yet steal is easily more than 20.0 right?

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • I also want to change the payment period to 2 years?
    How should we do?

    @mcgree said:
    I wanted to pay for two years, but I only paid for one year, what can I do?

    Because one year is $18 and two years is $32, I think it's a better deal.

  • I bought plan 3 at Stockholm, and have payed the invoice, but it has been showing "Finalising" for about 3 hours. Is it normal? Please check the Invoice #230733. Thanks.
    @hosthatch

  • is there chance to get this offer again, HostHatch 10TB storage for $10/month, I don't have vps with hosthatch but I would like to try if it has this plan.

  • @soulnice said:
    I bought plan 3 at Stockholm, and have payed the invoice, but it has been showing "Finalising" for about 3 hours. Is it normal? Please check the Invoice #230733. Thanks.
    @hosthatch

    Same here, but I think it’s normal. Searching for “finalizing” got many results.

  • cazrzcazrz Member

    @soulnice said:
    I bought plan 3 at Stockholm, and have payed the invoice, but it has been showing "Finalising" for about 3 hours. Is it normal? Please check the Invoice #230733. Thanks.
    @hosthatch

    Yes, its normal. They manually provision promo servers. Im still waiting for my 7 vps but 2 got already delivered.

  • mcgreemcgree Member

    n1.png
    n2.png

    $20 per year but $50 per 2 years???

  • @mcgree said:
    n1.png
    n2.png

    $20 per year but $50 per 2 years???

    I think it is 2 years with 2x ram and 2x bandwidth

  • Any 10TB storage? :D

    Thanked by 1darkimmortal

    My favorite providers : hostsolutions hosthatch

  • lentrolentro Member, Provider

    @delimiter said: I think it is 2 years with 2x ram and 2x bandwidth

    For the other ones it's correct, for this one it is wrong

  • lentrolentro Member, Provider

    @yoursunny said: I want one server for serving all of Europe.

    +1

    In some cases, one location with very good connectivity should be prioritized over a myriad of different data centers, each with average connectivity. Fiber should be ~10 ms per 1000 miles, so a single location with amazing connectivity should theoretically be sufficient to serve a web app across all of Europe with sub-30 ms latency.

    Think some users would be willing to pay extra for a location with premium bandwidth.

    Although, the pricing on these is great for other things like compute and cool if you want to build your own load balanced systems. I'm using some to play around with k8s, and latency doesn't matter on that given it's just for fun and testing.

  • @cazrz said:

    @soulnice said:
    I bought plan 3 at Stockholm, and have payed the invoice, but it has been showing "Finalising" for about 3 hours. Is it normal? Please check the Invoice #230733. Thanks.
    @hosthatch

    Yes, its normal. They manually provision promo servers. Im still waiting for my 7 vps but 2 got already delivered.

    Thanks.

  • @notarobo said:
    but you do know that virmach cores are already throttled and yet steal is easily more than 20.0 right?

    I didn't know.
    I feel cheated.

    Nevertheless, these are not VirMach:

    • 25% Ryzen 3950, 1GB RAM, $8.40/year, Dallas
    • 33% EPYC 7302, 1GB RAM, $1.50/month, Amsterdam
    • 50% Ryzen 3950, 1GB RAM, $16/year, Seattle

    @lentro said:

    @yoursunny said: I want one server for serving all of Europe.

    In some cases, one location with very good connectivity should be prioritized over a myriad of different data centers, each with average connectivity. Fiber should be ~10 ms per 1000 miles, so a single location with amazing connectivity should theoretically be sufficient to serve a web app across all of Europe with sub-30 ms latency.

    I currently have a server in Amsterdam for serving all of Europe.
    It works well with 60% of viewers receiving 720p video resolution, but I'm afraid the provider would call me stupid and block my account at some point.

    This offer has similar prices and I can get 4x the RAM.
    However, the 12.5% CPU is a turn-off.
    Also, connectivity seems to be worse.

    Thanked by 1lentro

    I snagged Deal of the Year: $6.9/year, 6 vCPU, 8GB RAM, 105GB NVMe - but it got away.

  • @lentro said:

    @delimiter said: I think it is 2 years with 2x ram and 2x bandwidth

    For the other ones it's correct, for this one it is wrong

    sorry, I just realized it should be 40.

  • tetechtetech Member

    @yoursunny said: Nevertheless, these are not VirMach:

    25% Ryzen 3950, 1GB RAM, $8.40/year, Dallas
    33% EPYC 7302, 1GB RAM, $1.50/month, Amsterdam
    50% Ryzen 3950, 1GB RAM, $16/year, Seattle

    But at least the first and last of these were some pretty crazy deals with very limited stock (e.g. 5 available), requiring you to video yourself doing obscene acts etc.

    Strictly your point might be correct, but I think if you compare to other offers with similar availability it isn't bad.

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • @Merlincool said:
    is there chance to get this offer again, HostHatch 10TB storage for $10/month, I don't have vps with hosthatch but I would like to try if it has this plan.

    They said they're not going to offer that deal again:

    @hosthatch said: These are also once in a life time deals as we have some unbalanced free storage on some nodes

    They don't allow transfers any more either, so even a customer that already has one can't transfer it to you :(

    Thanked by 1pbx
  • SirFoxySirFoxy Member
    edited March 30

    @yoursunny said:

    @notarobo said:
    but you do know that virmach cores are already throttled and yet steal is easily more than 20.0 right?

    I didn't know.
    I feel cheated.

    Nevertheless, these are not VirMach:

    • 25% Ryzen 3950, 1GB RAM, $8.40/year, Dallas
    • 33% EPYC 7302, 1GB RAM, $1.50/month, Amsterdam
    • 50% Ryzen 3950, 1GB RAM, $16/year, Seattle

    @lentro said:

    @yoursunny said: I want one server for serving all of Europe.

    In some cases, one location with very good connectivity should be prioritized over a myriad of different data centers, each with average connectivity. Fiber should be ~10 ms per 1000 miles, so a single location with amazing connectivity should theoretically be sufficient to serve a web app across all of Europe with sub-30 ms latency.

    I currently have a server in Amsterdam for serving all of Europe.
    It works well with 60% of viewers receiving 720p video resolution, but I'm afraid the provider would call me stupid and block my account at some point.

    This offer has similar prices and I can get 4x the RAM.
    However, the 12.5% CPU is a turn-off.
    Also, connectivity seems to be worse.

    hosthatch is regurgitated dog shit with a perception it's good

    Thanked by 1yoursunny

    lurking in the shadows like a wombat or some shit

  • pbxpbx Member

    @yoursunny said: I want one server for serving all of Europe.

    Their AMS location if they make it available again in a next sale?

  • pbxpbx Member

    @Daniel15 said: They don't allow transfers any more either, so even a customer that already has one can't transfer it to you

    That's a shame. I can understand why they do that (better to have customers idling their VPS than actually using it, and the ressources will become available next years to be sold again, potentially to a LET addict that will let this VPS idle again) but it's a better long term strategy IMO to have customers using and enjoying your services. Transfers are great for that: the service can move until it finds the user for which this VM with its limits will be the perfect server.

  • Daniel15Daniel15 Member
    edited March 30

    @pbx said: I can understand why they do that (better to have customers idling their VPS than actually using it, and the ressources will become available next years to be sold again,

    Yeah my guess is that disallowing transfers is a tactic to phase out less profitable plans over time (to stop them from just being passed from person to person indefinitely)... Either that or it takes too much support time that could be used for other things.

    I'm not too surprised as many providers don't allow transfers - I think providers like VirMach that are very flexible with transfers are outliers.

    @SirFoxy said: hosthatch is regurgitated dog shit with a perception it's good

    Not a fan of hosthatch? I think they're pretty good for the price.

    Thanked by 1pbx
  • Anyone with Benchmark from nvme vps?

  • zappatazappata Member
    edited March 30

    Provisioned 30min after order, NY 8GB
    Ubuntu, fresh install:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-12-29                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Mar 30 09:01:01 BST 2021
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2999.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk       : 38.4 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 207.26 MB/s  (51.8k) | 2.35 GB/s    (36.8k)
    Write      | 207.80 MB/s  (51.9k) | 2.37 GB/s    (37.0k)
    Total      | 415.07 MB/s (103.7k) | 4.72 GB/s    (73.8k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.04 GB/s     (3.9k) | 1.93 GB/s     (1.8k)
    Write      | 2.14 GB/s     (4.1k) | 2.06 GB/s     (2.0k)
    Total      | 4.19 GB/s     (8.1k) | 4.00 GB/s     (3.9k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                    |                           |                 |                
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 2.50 Gbits/sec  | 2.20 Gbits/sec 
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 2.93 Gbits/sec  | 1.36 Gbits/sec 
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 2.34 Gbits/sec  | 1.84 Gbits/sec 
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | busy            | busy           
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 3.33 Gbits/sec  | 2.85 Gbits/sec 
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 3.11 Gbits/sec  | 1.43 Gbits/sec 
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.95 Gbits/sec  | 1.17 Gbits/sec 
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 301 Mbits/sec   | 1.59 Gbits/sec 
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 592                           
    Multi Core      | 1142                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/7191370
    
    Thanked by 2pbx default
  • Madrid and Milan are still 1GBit/s and not 10GBit/s?

  • govac8govac8 Member
    edited March 30

    @Merlincool here I am with $2.5 instance from Warsaw

    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2999.998 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔️ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.8 GiB
    Swap       : 64.0 MiB
    Disk       : 14.7 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 202.65 MB/s  (50.6k) | 1.39 GB/s    (21.7k)
    Write      | 203.18 MB/s  (50.7k) | 1.39 GB/s    (21.8k)
    Total      | 405.83 MB/s (101.4k) | 2.79 GB/s    (43.6k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 2.21 GB/s     (4.3k) | 2.36 GB/s     (2.3k)
    Write      | 2.33 GB/s     (4.5k) | 2.52 GB/s     (2.4k)
    Total      | 4.54 GB/s     (8.8k) | 4.88 GB/s     (4.7k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 681 Mbits/sec   | 606 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 691 Mbits/sec   | 606 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 689 Mbits/sec   | 607 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | busy            | busy
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 640 Mbits/sec   | 577 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 634 Mbits/sec   | 507 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 633 Mbits/sec   | 214 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | busy            | busy
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 684
    Multi Core      | 687
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/7191603
    
  • @tetech said:
    But at least the first and last of these were some pretty crazy deals with very limited stock (e.g. 5 available)

    • 25% Ryzen 3950, 1GB RAM, $8.40/year, Dallas, push-ups special otherwise 10 in stock for $12
    • 33% EPYC 7302, 1GB RAM, $1.50/month, Amsterdam, 7 in stock
    • 50% Ryzen 3950, 1GB RAM, $16/year, Seattle, 15 in stock

    requiring you to video yourself doing obscene acts etc.

    My push-ups are not obscene acts!

    Strictly your point might be correct, but I think if you compare to other offers with similar availability it isn't bad.

    If I already have a server in my .ssh/config, I compare to them, not "other offers" that I don't have.


    @SirFoxy said:

    hosthatch is regurgitated dog shit with a perception it's good

    Top result of "hosthatch review" agrees with you:
    https://hostadvice.com/hosting-company/hosthatch-reviews/

    I snagged Deal of the Year: $6.9/year, 6 vCPU, 8GB RAM, 105GB NVMe - but it got away.

  • @yoursunny said:

    @SirFoxy said:

    hosthatch is regurgitated dog shit with a perception it's good

    Top result of "hosthatch review" agrees with you:
    https://hostadvice.com/hosting-company/hosthatch-reviews/

    Can agree. Their pricing is the only reason to go with them.

  • skorousskorous Member

    @Daniel15 said: Either that or it takes too much support time that could be used for other things.

    I believe they've actually said this is the case.

  • ZignetZignet Member

    I would like Amesterdam for the 1st plan stack *2 ?

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • skorousskorous Member

    @yoursunny said: Top result of "hosthatch review" agrees with you

    Top three reviews: person pissed off for getting kicked off, person pissed off for getting kicked off, person pissed off about not getting TUN/TAP to work and trying to get refund. Not sure this is truly representative ...

    @Daniel15 said: Not a fan of hosthatch? I think they're pretty good for the price.

    Hosthatch is like SirFoxy's bad ex- . They can't communicate and he just can't let it go.

  • hosthatchhosthatch Member, Top Provider

    @jxpal said:
    Hello, is the price of storage 250g in lax set wrong?

    It was, fixed it, sorry.

    @mcgree said:
    I wanted to pay for two years, but I only paid for one year, what can I do?

    Because one year is $18 and two years is $32, I think it's a better deal.

    Please open a ticket and we'll get it done for you.

    @pbx said:

    @Daniel15 said: They don't allow transfers any more either, so even a customer that already has one can't transfer it to you

    That's a shame. I can understand why they do that (better to have customers idling their VPS than actually using it, and the resources will become available next years to be sold again, potentially to a LET addict that will let this VPS idle again) but it's a better long term strategy IMO to have customers using and enjoying your services. Transfers are great for that: the service can move until it finds the user for which this VM with its limits will be the perfect server.

    Honestly, it has nothing to do with that. Transfers are temporarily unavailable. There was a 'secondary market' for our promotional servers. The problem is that we were getting tens of requests per day after Black Friday, and it puts huge stress on the support queue - add to that the fact that the new user might try to hold us responsible if the seller misrepresented something to them.

    We will bring transfers back in a while. As you said, it is in our long term interest that people use their services and renew them and allowing transfers is a good way of ensuring that.

    Thanked by 3brueggus _MS_ pbx

    Deploy excellent quality VMs in 14 global locations - hosthatch.com

  • xetsysxetsys Member

    I am on verge of buying another storage server. But have few queries:

    Is it a KVM VPS or OpenVZ based?

    What happens after the traffic bandwidth is exhausted? Are users allowed limited connectivity till next renewal?

Sign In or Register to comment.