New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Wow. Who's that with? I have only seen those numbers come from KiloServe :P
root@buyvm5 i guess BuyVM.
What happens if you make count=32k?
Didn't see that, i have just got my second BuyVM for our main site (DDoS filtering). Not done any tests yet, will do now though
Depending on what node he's on (I found two services with that name)...
Nice :P What drive set up are you using @Aldryic
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.98197 s, 270 MB/s
OpenVZ eh?
That's on KVM
270MB/s is low for Kiloserve.
Is that with us? What node are you on, you should be getting better results than that -_-;
@Aldryic Yes KVM04, using Virtio :-|
I know they're using Either 8 Drive RAID 10, But joel not long ago told me Fran ordered a few 12 Bay servers so I assume the new stock is on them 12 Bay servers.
KVM Results do always seem to come out lower from what i have seen. IE performing the test on the actual hardware node always comes back higher than within a VM.
@DotVPS Not sure, They might use them for both OpenVZ and Backup plans.
I don't think backup plans are being released anytime soon though, not really heard anything about stock being added for them.
@Aldryic should I make a ticket for this?
Nah, it's ok, I'll be taking a look as soon as I'm done with this audit. Had someone signup for filtered IPs just to try and DoS from those IPs, so I've got a bit of a mess to clean at the moment XD
Sounds like the equivalent of spitting into the wind!
Check the awesome results I posted on WHT
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpost.php?p=8035208&postcount=2
500GB Backup VPS
Initially it was around 900MB/s but now its a bit down since there are other people using the same node obviously
Heh, yup. My best guess is that they saw the IPs could take 10Gbit inbound and assumed they could push the same downstream as well. We still run our Autonull for that range, so it catches any attempted attacks. I guess they just wanted to ruin my morning >_<
i still got some more optimizing to do to storage, but for sure that raid50 is insane.
Francisco
I'm not sure how 270MB/sec is slow, but yes, kiloserve is rockin' it for sure
Francisco
cd into /dev/shm
Run dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
??Profit
I wasn't saying 270MB/s was slow, just that it's low for Kiloserve.
@Derek only if you have 2G+ RAM though
My host loves me
Welp, kiloserve runs a good ship then I think they run 15k SAS?
Francisco
According to their site, yes.
Why is everyone on this forum so hung up on large file single read/write speeds? This, along with "guaranteed/burst" RAM seems to be the main marketing gimmicks that get passed around as gospel here...
another hate post...
It's really the only way to realistically provide IO statistics. The higher the single read/write typically the random read/writes are fast as well.