New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
100 IPv6?
Yes
1 vCore is equals to 50% HWT
Which mean 2 vCore is 1 Dedicated Core
Edited: It's clearly written here: https://fiberia.io/terms-of-service
Thank you for the clarification that 2 vCore is a dedicated cpu core with both HWT. But, if pass through is not enabled, the cpu performance will be degraded.
And adding to the fact, it is a weak cpu does not help either
2vCore = 1 dedicated HWT core
Yes passthrough is disabled by default and we have no plan to enable it for these Silver CPUs
That's why the pricing of these VMs are so cheap even with High RAM and large SSD storage.
We are planning to launch new plans with EPYC CPU and Nvme disk. We will try to enable Passthrough on those nodes by default.
I disagree with your observation that pricing of your plans is cheap, considering the cpu performance is so weak. of course, you are entitled to your opinion.
My VPS
2 dedicated CPU HWTs
16 gb RAM
80 gb SSD storage
I can post YABS benchmark too, if you are interested.
Yes you can disagree, that's the best thing of democratic world.
BTW, We are not comparing with others. But for us $2.90 monthly with a dedicated IPv4 and these resources are cheap and affordable.
We are almost charging nothing for resources if you see the latest pricing of IPv4
And yes we are totally with you that the CPU performance is relatively low.
But it's not that bad for that price (Our opinion ofcourse)
Anyway it's totally fine. Hope you will try our service once we launch our EPYC Nvme series in future.
Custom ISO?
///nvm i'm blind
Yes you can upload your own ISO anytime you want.
definitely, if the price is right.
Wishing you the very best for upcoming upgrade and expansion
Thank you so much. We will try to do our best
Why? Also the kvm32/kvm64 CPU models are not recommended and only supported for compatibility with ancient versions of qemu.
one of the possible reasons could be that the max cpu performance is limited for every VPS user. with high memory and bigger ssd, VPS could be still use case for some of the users, even with single core geekbench5 score of less than 360
We appreciate your feedback. We did some changes,
This Geekbench 5 score is pretty low, in my opinion.
It's nice you finally enabled aes-ni and virtualization. Could I get them enabled in my vps by opening a ticket?
Yes it's low if you compare with other CPUs.
But we are always transparent and mentioned that these budget VMs are not for CPU intensive tasks.
We will definitely add more powerful processors in future to improve the performance
Of course we will enable it for you. Rules are same for all.
Kindly please open a ticket.
You are missing the main point.
The geekbench 5 score for Xeon Silver 4110 2.1 dedicated core thread should be in the range of 650-680. But we are seeing score around 330 (even after enabling both the flags)
That means, most likely, overloaded node.
Nodes are not even full yet..
So it's strange to see these score level..
We are still looking for the issue to fix it..
Thank you again for your feedback
If you prefer, I can take one VPS for 5-day trial and run benchmark tests. You are free to assign me the VPS on the best possible node.
After testing for few hours we have found there's no issue on our servers and Geekbench score is fine.
Let me explain.
As you know our vCore is 50% of HTW power,
and the lowest plan $2.90 vServer-S has only 1 core
That's why the Geekbench score is showing 320-335
So yes for 50% of CPU 327 score is expected as we already said. There's no issue with node
# For users who is looking for powerful CPU we would recommend to use at least from vServer-M plan
Here's a test we have done recently on the same machine but with 100% CPU power.
i think to prevent future misunderstandings its better to either:
Instead of fine prints in AUP.
I think it would be naive to assume customers would not expect full HWT power given that it's advertised as silver/epyc.
vCore has 50% power of single cpu hw thread
This should be clearly mentioned both in the ad here as well as on the order page
Transparency requires that.
Thank you for your suggestions.
TOS page have all informations but yes we will definitely consider to put them on our order page too.
And we are testing EPYC servers right now. But as it's not launched yet so we will definitely remove that from the order page as it's misleading our customers.
Thank you again for your feedbacks and suggestions.
We are transparent from the beginning and always said 1 vCore is 50% HWT.
It's also clearly mentioned on our TOS page. And customers should read them as they are accepting our TOS during order process.
But we fully respect your opinion and we are always open to suggestions.
We will definitely consider to add these details on order page too untill the EPYC launch.
Transparency, in my opinion, means mention of all key bullet points (especially if something is different from norm such as vCore is allotted 50% of hwt). Reputation is built that way.
About reading TOS pages, you are right, but we all know most customers just skim the TOS details.
+1 for you for taking the time and explaining your viewpoint.
If I may offer a suggestion, I would personally prefer $3.90 plan with features of $2.90 plan with 2 vCores instead of one. And, on similar lines, $6.90 plan with features of $5.90 plan + extra 2 vCores. (Total of four vCores)
Best wishes for your expansion and business growth.
Thank you for your reply.
Viridweb always happy to hear feedbacks no matter if it's negative or positive.
We have decided to update our order page and add information about our vCore there within next few days.
For your suggestion about pricing, it's not possible to give 2 vCore even at $3.90 as it's not worth it considering server pricing but we will try to increase CPU limits (Of course fair share and not 24/7) at the $2.90.
if you have any suggestion or feedback, we are always here and will listen
@ViridWeb
As a customer, I will look for value element along with quality and customer service.
Just on value part, I see better options.
I am sure your marketing team is evaluating competition as well.
Best wishes.
fair enough.. will try our best.
Regards
if this decision can be approved within the next 10 days i will cancel my cancellation.
apart from CPU limit everything is great. for me its taking really long to install a low end web panel for staging purposes. my guess is if its throttled to 50% of a HWT, the typical processing time isnt just doubled, but somehow more than that.
Thank you for your reply.
We have removed the restriction and the Fair Share policy already updated on our TOS page.
We have also send emails to all our client to inform about these changes.
Regards,