Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Delimiter - New OpenVZ Storage VPS lineup!
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Delimiter - New OpenVZ Storage VPS lineup!

theroyalstudenttheroyalstudent Member
in General

Just received this, just sharing here :)

New OpenVZ Storage VPS lineup!
Facebook Page & Free Servers?
We finally got a Facebook page! Head over an give us a like: https://www.facebook.com/delimitervps/

We'll be running some server giveaways on Facebook, so make sure you like & enable notifications. Check out the video here on how to enable notifications so you never miss a deal or giveaway.

OpenVZ Storage & Double Disk Space for February
Today we're announcing our new OpenVZ storage VPS lineup. Tons of storage, powered by ZFS and NVMe SSD cached for speed - starting at $21/quarter ($7/month).

To kick things off, we're launching a Double Disk Space promo on annual orders which will run until the end of February.

Storage 500
500GB Storage (1TB on annual billing with DoubleStorageVPS coupon)
2TB Bandwidth @ 1Gbps
512 MB Ram
1 CPU Core
1 IPv4 Address
Location: Atlanta, GA

$21/quarter or $84/year

Order Storage500: https://cc.delimiter.com/cart/storagevps/

Storage 1000
1TB Storage (2TB on annual billing with DoubleStorageVPS coupon)
4TB Bandwidth @ 1Gbps
1 GB Ram
1 CPU Core
1 IPv4 Address
Location: Atlanta, GA

$42/quarter or $168/year

Order Storage1000: https://cc.delimiter.com/cart/storagevps/

Storage 2000
2TB Storage (4TB on annual billing with DoubleStorageVPS coupon)
8TB Bandwidth @ 1Gbps
2 GB Ram
1 CPU Core
1 IPv4 Address
Location: Atlanta, GA

$75/quarter or $300/year

Order Storage2000: https://cc.delimiter.com/cart/storagevps/


Questions?

Shoot me an email: [email protected]

--
Michael Yurechko
Sales Manager, Delimiter
[email protected]
Thanked by 3MarkTurner berryboy pechspilz
«13

Comments

  • berryboyberryboy Member
    edited February 2016

    When a host offers 1 vCPU core, fair share is still implied right? Thats not a dedicated core for my VM, correct? Maybe dedicated is the wrong word, but i think you all understand my question

    Thanked by 1DreamCaster
  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    Well 84$ for 0.5TB, is that HA or such?

    Since for 21$ i get 0.5TB from Time4VPS.

  • vfusevfuse Member, Host Rep

    @Neoon said:
    Well 84$ for 0.5TB, is that HA or such?

    Since for 21$ i get 0.5TB from Time4VPS.

    I think it's 1tb of storage on yearly payments.

  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran
    edited February 2016

    @vfuse said:
    I think it's 1tb of storage on yearly payments.

    Dam, but however 1TB is still cheaper at Time4VPS. I even can buy a 2TB Drive for that.

  • MarkTurnerMarkTurner Member

    Neoon said: Dam, but however 1TB is still cheaper at Time4VPS. I even can buy a 2TB Drive for that.

    You are not comparing like with like.

  • sirmbhesirmbhe Member

    Well if they have time to make a facebook page and sending pop tart, why they have no time to make a reply on the ticket. Almost 2 weeks by now. Creating a facebook page must be really time consuming.

    Thanked by 1Junkless
  • DustlabDustlab Member

    I'm just excited for the new locations ;D

    Thanked by 1MarkTurner
  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran
    edited February 2016

    @MarkTurner said:

    Well

    1TB vs 1TB Storage

    4TB vs 2TB Bandwidth

    1024MB vs 512MB

    39$ vs 84$

    So I would go with Time4VPS, it's a better deal even your VPS has 512GB Storage and is just double because of a Promo which makes it even worse.

    I am getting things for cheap as possible as long the quality is good, otherwise I will pay more but since Time4VPS offers good quality its okay.

    Thanked by 1k0nsl
  • MarkTurnerMarkTurner Member

    1MB Block size:

    _Delimiter StorageVPS 500GB_

    fio --filename=test --direct=0 --sync=0 --rw=write --bs=1m --numjobs=20 --iodepth=10 --runtime=60 --time_based --group_reporting --name=test --size=10G

    write: io=110523MB, bw=1839.9MB/s, iops=1839, runt= 60071msec

    _Time4VPS StorageVPS 500GB_

    fio --filename=test --direct=0 --sync=0 --rw=write --bs=1m --numjobs=20 --iodepth=10 --runtime=60 --time_based --group_reporting --name=test --size=10G

    write: io=22600MB, bw=385007KB/s, iops=375 , runt= 60109msec

    4KB Block size:

    _Delimiter StorageVPS 500GB_

    fio --filename=test --direct=0 --sync=1 --rw=write --bs=4k --numjobs=20 --iodepth=10 --runtime=60 --time_based --group_reporting --name=test --size=10G

    write: io=4978.7MB, bw=84965KB/s, iops=21241, runt= 60003msec

    _Time4VPS StorageVPS 500GB_

    fio --filename=test --direct=0 --sync=1 --rw=write --bs=4k --numjobs=20 --iodepth=10 --runtime=60 --time_based --group_reporting --name=test --size=10G

    write: io=99668KB, bw=1660.1KB/s, iops=415 , runt= 60008msec

    Summary

    Data transfer:

    1MB Blocks - 1.8GB/s (Delimiter) vs 0.385GB/s (Time4VPS)

    4KB Blocks - 84MB/vs (Delimiter) vs 1.66MB/s (Time4VPS)

    IOPS:

    1MB Blocks - 1839 IOPS (Delimiter) vs 375 IOPS (Time4VPS)

    4KB Blocks - 21,241 IOPS (Delimiter) vs 415 IOPS (Time4VPS)

    Thanked by 2ehab fbcpck
  • JonchunJonchun Member

    @MarkTurner said:
    You are not comparing like with like.

    It's not a fair comparison when only one of them comes with power.

    Thanked by 19AshleyUk hawc Junkless GIANT_CRAB netomx Brad vpsGOD msg7086 cassa imagine gitreset elflord inthecloudblog JahAGR BeardyUnixGuy Amitz raindog308 Infinity Darwin
  • MarkTurnerMarkTurner Member

    Jonchun said: It's not a fair comparison when only one of them comes with power.

    You need a new repertoire, this one is becoming more like cliché.

    Thanked by 2Junkless daily
  • tommytommy Member

    Time4vps for sure. They get better and better.

  • alexnjhalexnjh Member

    Hmm for backups I don't think people require such good performance unless their always reading and writing to to box.

    Time4Vps seems like a better choice if its cold backups while delimeter is better if constant read and write is required.

    Thanked by 4MarkTurner pechspilz risharde DreamCaster
  • berryboyberryboy Member

    CPU on the time4VPS has a clock of 1.9ghz. what are the delimiter boxes running at?

  • akhfaakhfa Member

    I think Time4VPS's storage is slower than the common VPS. I have one with them and pay biennially.

    If you look for cheap (just 1 euro / month for 500 GB biennially) and "acceptable" storage speed, you can choose Time4VPS. But if you need more storage speed, you should choose delimiter :)

    Thanked by 1MarkTurner
  • tommytommy Member

    If you need faster iops, purchase normal vps and mount storage vps there :)

    Soooo much cheaper and they don't bashing another provider.

  • MarkTurnerMarkTurner Member

    masterqqq said: Hmm for backups I don't think people require such good performance unless their always reading and writing to to box.

    If you are running regular backups or using something like R1Soft then the high performance helps.

    berryboy said: CPU on the time4VPS has a clock of 1.9ghz. what are the delimiter boxes running at?

    2.27Ghz

    tommy said: If you need faster iops, purchase normal vps and mount storage vps there :)

    Which storage VPS would you mount?

  • vimalwarevimalware Member

    I think many may have missed this snippet because of the way the OP quoted the email (side scroll issue for me)

    Tons of storage, powered by ZFS and NVMe SSD cached for speed

    Is there anything like a BBU equivalent mechanism on zfs array for power-loss events?

    Is this array zfsonlinux or freebsd zfs?

    If zfs can handle all sorts of bit corruption (including power loss), then this product would be attractive to a particular kind of customer.

    I welcome new products with value-adds like this.

    Thanked by 1MarkTurner
  • HackedServerHackedServer Member

    MarkTurner said: Summary

    >

    Data transfer:
    1MB Blocks - 1.8GB/s (Delimiter) vs 0.385GB/s (Time4VPS)
    4KB Blocks - 84MB/vs (Delimiter) vs 1.66MB/s (Time4VPS)

    >

    IOPS:
    1MB Blocks - 1839 IOPS (Delimiter) vs 375 IOPS (Time4VPS)
    4KB Blocks - 21,241 IOPS (Delimiter) vs 415 IOPS (Time4VPS)

    Isn't this a new launch for Delimiter? Meaning it isn't loaded with clients like Time4VPS which has been offering their plans for a long time. Hard to say what long term speeds will be like, but everything has great speeds before clients start using it.

    What is your RAID or redundancy setup?

  • MarkTurnerMarkTurner Member

    vimalware said: Is there anything like a BBU equivalent mechanism on zfs array for power-loss events?

    ZFS will write first to the SSD, then copy from the NVMe SSD to the spinning disk. So in ways, the SSD is acting like quasi-write cache.

    vimalware said: Is this array zfsonlinux or freebsd zfs?

    OpenVZ is only supported on Linux, so its Linux. I have personally run ZFS on Solaris and FreeBSD and of course ZFS natively implemented. But having the ZFS 'Goodness' on Linux gives a nice, fast and robust filesystem for the OpenVZ VMs.

  • GIANT_CRABGIANT_CRAB Member

    Seen many providers using ZFS, why not BTRFS? It's opensource and developed by Oracle, FB, and many other big companies as well.

  • MarkTurnerMarkTurner Member

    HackedServer said: Isn't this a new launch for Delimiter? Meaning it isn't loaded with clients like Time4VPS which has been offering their plans for a long time. Hard to say what long term speeds will be like, but everything has great speeds before clients start using it.

    The box I did that testing on is actually quite loaded with various test VMs running various workbenches.

    Remember the performance here is coming from the PCI connected SSD. By fronting it with a ultrahigh speed read/write cache you quickly alleviate contention on the disks.

    The build we settled on was 10 x 5TB in RAIDZ2 configuration. RAIDZ2 is ZFS's version of RAID6.

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • MarkTurnerMarkTurner Member

    GIANT_CRAB said: Seen many providers using ZFS, why not BTRFS? It's opensource and developed by Oracle, FB, and many other big companies as well.

    BTRFS isn't as stable as ZFS in my experience.

    There is some general data here https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/32cu9w/zfs_vs_btrfs/

  • vimalwarevimalware Member

    5tb drives? I'm definitely out of touch with new launches.

  • HadrielHadriel Member

    More a curiosity than anything, but why 5TB and not 6TB drives?

  • MarkTurnerMarkTurner Member

    Hadriel said: More a curiosity than anything, but why 5TB and not 6TB drives?

    I believe it came down to performance. 5TB delivered better performance per slot than 6TB.

  • dragon2611dragon2611 Member

    Any migration path from the Cloud Storage VPS?

  • MarkTurnerMarkTurner Member

    dragon2611 said: Any migration path from the Cloud Storage VPS?

    Different products, one is KVM, one is OpenVZ.

  • Mahfuz_SS_EHLMahfuz_SS_EHL Host Rep, Veteran

    Still They can't beat Time4VPS ;)

  • risharderisharde Patron Provider, Veteran

    The line isnt badly priced per say for what you get but for purely backup purposes, the Tim4vps is cheaper and does the job and I sure dont backup at 1.8 gb per second. Would only consider this if there werent other solutions out there. I am a bit uneasy hearing about the power problems and data loss with the zfs

    Thanked by 1Jonchun
Sign In or Register to comment.