New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
is 1 vcore and 1024MB enough?
Hi everyone!
I found this site while looking for coupons for a VPS on Google.
I have a forum that has been hosted at a friend's dedicated server for about a year.
I now need to move it as he can no longer host my site there as he is changing dedicated servers through his company and he can't host my site.
is a VPS with 1 vcore and 1GB of RAM enough to host a forum with about 5k-7k unique visitors per day and about 100 concurrent registered members?
Can I also host 2-3 other wordpress sites in such a setup?
TIA!
Comments
It depends whether its a shared or dedicated core; and what the core is. 1 core of Core2Duo isn't much use.
From experience: 2GB Ram for vBulletin are not enugh!
1 Core to 1GB is a strange ratio. More cores are usually provided with more RAM. If that 1 core is shared then we really need to know what CPU is running.
I have no idea... What do they mean when they say 1 core or vcore?
Does that mean that If a server has 4 cores, I get 1, right?
Which forum software as well?
Thanks for the help! How do I know what CPU the VPS is runing on?
its running on smf forum software
Run the following in SSH
cat /proc/cpuinfo
ok, i'll do that, thanks!
I have an IP.Board forum with about 2k uniques per day, running on a 512+256 box with an E5 core.
I do notice slowdowns sometimes after moving from a box with access to 24 cores, but IP.Board is quite a heavy/bloated forum and it uses plugins like a shoutbox open to everyone, so I guess you could squeeze it onto a 1core/1GB (if it's a decent core) box if it's just basic SMF and Wordpress installations.
Does this help?
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 3300.022
cache size : 4096 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse3 6 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm unfair_spinlock pni cx16 hypervisor la hf_lm
bogomips : 6600.04
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 3300.022
cache size : 4096 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse3 6 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm unfair_spinlock pni cx16 hypervisor la hf_lm
bogomips : 6600.04
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 3300.022
cache size : 4096 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse3 6 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm unfair_spinlock pni cx16 hypervisor la hf_lm
bogomips : 6600.04
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 3300.022
cache size : 4096 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse3 6 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm unfair_spinlock pni cx16 hypervisor la hf_lm
bogomips : 6600.04
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
Each one of those is a core, so you would have access to 4 3.3 GHz cores. Should be adequate.
Likely a E3-1240 should be fine
Thanks! I feel better now!
Yeah you have access to 4 cores there
How can I have access to 4 cores when it says 1vcore?
Do I have any core that is allocated only to me?
I know I must sound stupid...I design websites, not much of a techie.
Overselling / Hyper-Threading
(HT is basically a form of software "virtual" Core, but nothing like a real core)
Well that's not good
I thought it meant I have access to 1 core.
Heck, I can get a dedi for under $60...
Not really. What the OP has there is four cores (KVM). On a processor with hyperthreading, 8 cores are shown and 8 can theoretically be added to a KVM guest, but four of them are virtual (Hyperthreaded).
What I'm getting at is that from inside the VPS, you can't distinguish what is real or virtual (Hyperthreaded) and I don't know how overselling would come into it.
Your provider is giving you four KVM virtual cores, they clearly wrongly advertised it as one or set it up wrong. Either way you have access to four so you win
I doubt any of them are "Dedicated" to you, though. They're probably shared.
Unless the provider specifically states that the cores are dedicated then they will just be shared across all the users on the server. Your processes are fighting to CPU time like everyone else.
Thats why I mentioned at the start were they shared or dedicated cores. We sell a dedicated core VPS product which is aimed at people who want to max out their core 24x7 without interfering with others on the same system.
Corrected that for you
a dedicated server for $10...... Seriously?
they can still be oversold. they are not "dedicated" as such.
I know that, but I read it as this.
Why do I see four cores? > Overselling / Hyper-Threading. When actually neither of those answer his question.
Yes, some of the cheapest and fine dedicated providers are Kimsufi, DelimiterVPS, Dacentec and ServDiscount. But for 10$ you won't get a cpu which is able to serve all these visitors / users quickly so it'll be better going with a VPS first of all. Further you should be (more) experienced when having a dedicated in terms of Linux, server management and properly security.
Thanks. I prefer your honest opinion. You are correct.
They do but rather indirectly.
If you meant me: you're welcome, and.. Just FYI: with every post comes a Thanks link you can click.
Corrected Again
Angling for thanks is never a good look.