New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
@sleddog I wonder if @sin used conv=fdatasync when he benchmarked that; dd gives inaccurate results without it...
root@vps:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k conv=fsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 0.668765 s, 401 MB/s
root@vps:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fsync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.80586 s, 383 MB/s
seems good
root@desolate:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync; rm test
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.96477 s, 362 MB/s
@hotsnow @sin lol, my sleepy ass used /dev/urandom instead of /dev/zero. no wonder... i'm going to bed now
Hehe glad you're seeing some decent speeds now!
Guess I should've opened a ticket. Now it's gone. Damn