Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


(WTB) Highly reliable VPS
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

(WTB) Highly reliable VPS

sijie123sijie123 Member
edited January 2016 in Requests

Switching over from Wordpress.com because they're being a douche.

Looking for a VPS that's less than 20 USD yearly.

Criteria:

+Most importantly, I need a reliable host. #gvh

+Low latency to Asia, specifically Singapore. - That pretty much exclude the EU.

+Min 512MB RAM. The site has quite a bit of traffic, so 512MB is quite essential for a wordpress.

+15GB+ HDD - No need SSD, HDD with cache would be good enough.

Please give me some suggestions!

P.S. I have server management knowledge, don't worry about that. Only used wordpress.com because I couldn't be bothered to set one up.

Comments

  • Ramnode

  • Some phrases that do not belong in the same sentence:

    less than 20 USD yearly.

    .

    Highly reliable VPS

  • @Jonchun said:
    Some phrases that do not belong in the same sentence:

    @xaitmi said:
    Ramnode

    @jonchun Ramnode is one. I personally use Ramnode (15USD Yearly) but it doesn't fit my requirements this time. It has dispropotionately more disk space than RAM.
    Kudos to them, still, for the great service though!

  • http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/72029/impact-vps-winter-holiday-2015-50-off-recurring-and-double-credits

    The $12/yr 512MB is short on storage (10GB), but the $24/yr 1GB has 15GB. Been reliable for me and based in Seattle, so it's a pretty good location for Asia.

  • xaitmixaitmi Member
    edited January 2016

    HostUs.

    Their thread http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/51204/hostus-custom-control-panel-768mb-10-y-2gb-35-y-6gb-18-q

    It says $10 a year, but it's actually $12 due to a recent price increase.

    Special 2 (768MB)
    
    768MB RAM 
    768MB vSwap 
    1 vCPU Core (Fair Share) 
    20GB Disk space 
    2TB Bandwidth 
    1Gbit/s port 
    1 x IPv4 Address 
    Free IPv6 Addresses 
    Atlanta, GA | Los Angeles, CA | Dallas, TX 
    Thanked by 1sijie123
  • bersybersy Member
    edited January 2016

    Seems http://littlehappycloud.net/ Singapore is out of stock at this moment. I have been using them (NL location) for six months, InceptionHosting is reliable enough, it's value for money.

    Thanked by 1sijie123
  • edited January 2016

    @xaitmi said:
    HostUs.

    @sijie123 said:
    Low latency to Asia, specifically Singapore.

    testing from Singtel:

    HostUS Atlanta, USA:

    PING 162.245.216.243 (162.245.216.243): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=304.037 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=462.486 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=444.234 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=351.776 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=313.171 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=466.190 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=450.280 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=7 ttl=52 time=229.915 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=243.802 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=245.566 ms
    64 bytes from 162.245.216.243: icmp_seq=10 ttl=52 time=246.405 ms
    ^C
    --- 162.245.216.243 ping statistics ---
    11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 229.915/341.624/466.190/92.994 ms
    

    HostUS Washington DC, USA:

    PING 216.189.157.2 (216.189.157.2): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=263.160 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=270.530 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=250.134 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=258.125 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=270.582 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=264.279 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=6 ttl=52 time=256.603 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=268.016 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=8 ttl=52 time=268.283 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=9 ttl=52 time=251.881 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.157.2: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=269.828 ms
    ^C
    --- 216.189.157.2 ping statistics ---
    11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 250.134/262.856/270.582/7.193 ms
    

    HostUS Dallas #2, USA:

    PING 104.128.239.2 (104.128.239.2): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=46 time=201.296 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=222.384 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=219.989 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=44 time=217.616 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=44 time=213.466 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=5 ttl=46 time=404.647 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=6 ttl=46 time=385.242 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=7 ttl=46 time=369.282 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=8 ttl=46 time=228.429 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=9 ttl=46 time=461.378 ms
    64 bytes from 104.128.239.2: icmp_seq=10 ttl=44 time=428.641 ms
    ^C
    --- 104.128.239.2 ping statistics ---
    11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 201.296/304.761/461.378/98.593 ms
    

    HostUS Dallas #2, USA (best):

    PING 45.58.55.2 (45.58.55.2): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=265.285 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=309.422 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=289.505 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=269.444 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=45 time=192.405 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=5 ttl=45 time=206.051 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=6 ttl=47 time=215.587 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=7 ttl=45 time=206.871 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=8 ttl=45 time=193.850 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=9 ttl=47 time=204.035 ms
    64 bytes from 45.58.55.2: icmp_seq=10 ttl=47 time=215.854 ms
    ^C
    --- 45.58.55.2 ping statistics ---
    11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 192.405/233.483/309.422/39.803 ms
    

    HostUS Los Angeles, USA (close to being the best):

    PING 216.189.149.3 (216.189.149.3): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=209.862 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=211.989 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=202.040 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=226.461 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=230.417 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=207.123 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=330.652 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=413.728 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=200.823 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=9 ttl=51 time=195.177 ms
    64 bytes from 216.189.149.3: icmp_seq=10 ttl=51 time=185.321 ms
    ^C
    --- 216.189.149.3 ping statistics ---
    11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 185.321/237.599/413.728/66.987 ms
    

    EDIT: I personally use DigitalOcean for any WP sites that I host, they're pretty decent.

    Thanked by 1sijie123
  • @bersy said:
    Seems http://littlehappycloud.net/ Singapore is out of stock at this moment. I have been using them (NL location) for six months, InceptionHosting is reliable enough, it's value for money.

    Benchmark started on Sun Jan 17 07:25:03 GMT 2016
    Full benchmark log: /root/bench.log
    
    System Info
    -----------
    Processor   : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
    CPU Cores   : 1
    Frequency   : 2400.072 MHz
    Memory      : 112 MB
    Swap        : 127 MB
    Uptime      : 4 days, 13:29,
    
    OS      : Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS
    Arch        : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel      : 3.13.0-24-generic
    Hostname    : unicorns
    
    Speedtest (IPv4 only)
    ---------------------
    Your public IPv4 is unicorns
    
    Location        Provider    Speed
    CDN         Cachefly    5.06MB/s
    
    Atlanta, GA, US     Coloat      1.45MB/s 
    Dallas, TX, US      Softlayer   1.54MB/s 
    Seattle, WA, US     Softlayer   1.71MB/s 
    San Jose, CA, US    Softlayer   1.87MB/s 
    Washington, DC, US  Softlayer   614KB/s 
    
    Tokyo, Japan        Linode      3.94MB/s 
    Singapore       Softlayer   71.6MB/s 
    
    Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net     1.58MB/s
    Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb    1.28MB/s 
    
    
    Disk Speed
    ----------
    I/O (1st run)   : 152 MB/s
    I/O (2nd run)   : 156 MB/s
    I/O (3rd run)   : 121 MB/s
    Average I/O : 143 MB/s
    
  • For good latency to singapore and reliable that budget is going to be abit hard.

    I personally use DO, LSW,Vultr,Inception LES. but i think most exceed your budget.

    LA could be good but latency will be around 180+ - 200+.

  • Why VPS? Why not a normal shared hosting account?

  • @Junkless said:
    Why VPS? Why not a normal shared hosting account?

    Better isolation from noisy neighbours and more importantly, better protection from retarded providers.
    The last time I used a shared hosting I was kicked off for "high CPU and bandwidth usage".
    I'd also like root access, that's why.

  • You might want to increase your budget then.

  • LA's your best bet, reliable and $20 yearly don't really work well together

  • edited January 2016

    @century1stop said:
    LA's your best bet, reliable and $20 yearly don't really work well together

    Or @sijie123 could try LittleHappyCloud SG (when its available again), and maybe get suspended for abusive CPU and/or disk I/O usage?

    LHC SG is the only cheap solution if a really low latency connection is needed, though.

    Anyway, on LHC SG, I run my cron backup job that causes peak 20mb/s disk I/O for a minute or two every hour, basically compressing a folder filled with Git repos and uploading them to Amazon Cloud Drive, that doesn't seem to get me suspended (just yet?)

    If you want, I can let you test out one of my LHC nodes, just contact me via PM and I will get it wiped.

  • @sijie123 said:
    Switching over from Wordpress.com because they're being a douche.

    Looking for a VPS that's less than 20 USD yearly.

    Criteria:

    +Most importantly, I need a reliable host. #gvh

    +Low latency to Asia, specifically Singapore. - That pretty much exclude the EU.

    +Min 512MB RAM. The site has quite a bit of traffic, so 512MB is quite essential for a wordpress.

    +15GB+ HDD - No need SSD, HDD with cache would be good enough.

    Please give me some suggestions!

    P.S. I have server management knowledge, don't worry about that. Only used wordpress.com because I couldn't be bothered to set one up.

    Get a VPS in LA

    HostUS is a great company cheap,reliable,amazing service and support 11$/year or 12

    and use CF for some DDOS and CDN protection

    or get a 256 MB vps Hostus at Hongkong $25/year that will give you some routing benefits

  • @simonindia said:
    256 MB vps Hostus at Hongkong $25/year that will give you some routing benefits

    $25/year for a 256MB box sounds too overpriced, but provided its in HK, sounds okay, though I wouldn't go for that still, since as OP said, "The site has quite a bit of traffic, so 512MB is quite essential for a wordpress.".

    LA would be good for serving stuff to SG, though.

    CF is fine, but if OP wants to burn some money, he could maybe get something else 2-3 hops away from local users if it makes such a big difference... EdgeCast (via JoDiHost) sounds fine.

    I get 150-160mbps from EdgeCast CDN, when I was downloading firmware files via direct URLs, through my PC, I would prefer them over CF in the future when I want to push something important to production.

  • @theroyalstudent said:
    I get 150-160mbps from EdgeCast CDN, when I was downloading firmware files via direct URLs, through my PC, I would prefer them over CF in the future when I want to push something important to production.

    i created a page rule to cache everything under a particular url then i place things like script and other there so when i request they are lightning fast but regarding OP's requirement i would suggest some thing in LA that's the best any one can do at this point

Sign In or Register to comment.