New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
EazyVPS Review II
SimpleNode
Member
So it seems like EazyVPS has now officially "launched".
NOTE: I am a provider, so this review may be biased.
Ordering:
I see it now shows IPv4 addresses. Awesome!
Still need more OSes on the order form, still have my hopes up for more in SolusVM
Those IPs are pretty expensive.
Pretty standard WHMCS...
Only payment method is PayPal
ToS page is not fancy (not that it matters)
4. EazyVPS Not Obligated To Review Activities or Notify of Violations: EazyVPS is under no obligation to review Client's and/or any of Client.s Sub-User.s (the term .Client.s Sub-User. is defined below) activities to determine if a violation of this TOS Agreement (which includes EazyVPS.s AUP) has occurred. Further, EazyVPS does not assume any responsibility by virtue of this TOS Agreement (which includes EazyVPS.s AUP) to monitor, enforce or police Internet-related activities or to notify Client of any actual or suspected violations.
It's like someone has gone find and replace " or ' with .
WHMCS still has the old, dodgy logo. :L
Mail still going to SPAM (Google Apps/Gmail)
I actually got an activation email! Woohoo! (still goes to spam)
You probably need more helpdesks 
Standard SolusVM interface
Still need more templates.
VPS:
root@complicatedno:~# vmstat procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 0 0 459552 1348 17020 0 0 166 6 51 85 0 0 98 1
VMStat
root@complicatedno:~# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/xvda1 50G 841M 46G 2% / tmpfs 256M 0 256M 0% /lib/init/rw udev 256M 0 256M 0% /dev tmpfs 256M 4.0K 256M 1% /dev/shm
Around 850MB Used Disk
Network:
root@complicatedno:~# wget -O /dev/null cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test --2012-12-04 04:47:02-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `/dev/null' 100%[===========================================================================>] 104,857,600 4.10M/s in 23s 2012-12-04 04:47:25 (4.31 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [104857600/104857600]
root@complicatedno:~# wget -O /dev/null http://speedtest.sng01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip --2012-12-04 04:49:13-- http://speedtest.sng01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip Resolving speedtest.sng01.softlayer.com... 119.81.28.170 Connecting to speedtest.sng01.softlayer.com|119.81.28.170|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104874307 (100M) [application/zip] Saving to: `/dev/null' 5% [======> ] 5,868,435 370K/s eta 5m 28s
root@complicatedno:~# wget -O /dev/null http://speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip --2012-12-04 04:50:46-- http://speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip Resolving speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com... 50.23.64.58 Connecting to speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com|50.23.64.58|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104874307 (100M) [application/zip] Saving to: `/dev/null' 6% [======> ] 6,357,860 416K/s eta 5m 25s
root@complicatedno:~# wget -O /dev/null http://speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip --2012-12-04 04:51:39-- http://speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip Resolving speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com... 67.228.112.250 Connecting to speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com|67.228.112.250|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104874307 (100M) [application/zip] Saving to: `/dev/null' 5% [=====> ] 5,783,002 633K/s eta 2m 42s
traceroute to speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com (67.228.112.250), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 snelis.com (77.95.230.1) 9.867 ms 10.636 ms 11.240 ms 2 100ge.cr1.smartdc.i3d.net (188.122.95.81) 0.590 ms 0.577 ms 0.300 ms 3 109.200.218.85 (109.200.218.85) 11.172 ms 11.433 ms 11.419 ms 4 bbr01.eq01.ams01.networklayer.com (195.69.146.82) 2.354 ms 1.969 ms 2.323 ms 5 ae7.bbr02.eq01.ams02.networklayer.com (50.97.18.213) 2.308 ms 2.294 ms 2.602 ms 6 ae0.bbr02.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.210) 11.820 ms 46.144 ms 11.412 ms 7 ae7.bbr01.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.206) 7.832 ms 7.297 ms 7.286 ms 8 ae1.bbr02.tl01.nyc01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.204) 86.647 ms 75.260 ms 75.237 ms 9 ae1.bbr01.eq01.chi01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.132) 97.483 ms 97.853 ms 98.078 ms 10 ae7.bbr02.eq01.chi01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.171) 97.583 ms 98.464 ms 98.145 ms 11 ae1.bbr02.cs01.den01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.131) 121.927 ms 122.631 ms 122.613 ms 12 ae7.bbr01.cs01.den01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.168) 122.155 ms 122.141 ms 122.115 ms 13 ae0.bbr01.wb01.sea02.networklayer.com (173.192.18.144) 148.137 ms 148.112 ms 148.501 ms 14 ae0.dar02.sr01.sea01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.159) 175.358 ms ae0.dar01.sr01.sea01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.199) 148.071 ms ae0.dar02.sr01.sea01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.159) 175.317 ms 15 po2.fcr01.sr01.sea01.networklayer.com (67.228.118.138) 151.330 ms 151.321 ms 151.557 ms 16 speedtest.sea01.softlayer.com (67.228.112.250) 148.894 ms 148.304 ms 149.494 ms
traceroute to lg.simpleno.de (23.29.127.98), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 snelis.com (77.95.230.1) 11.798 ms 12.126 ms 12.495 ms 2 100ge.cr1.smartdc.i3d.net (188.122.95.81) 0.289 ms 100ge.cr0.smartdc.i3d.net (188.122.95.89) 8.675 ms 100ge.cr1.smartdc.i3d.net (188.122.95.81) 0.261 ms 3 cr1-cr0.smartdc.i3d.net (109.200.218.89) 5.217 ms 5.478 ms ethernet11-2.ar9.lon3.gblx.net (159.63.51.185) 16.628 ms 4 ethernet11-2.ar9.lon3.gblx.net (159.63.51.185) 13.905 ms 16.607 ms 16.596 ms 5 te2-1-10G.asr1.DAL2.gblx.net (67.16.143.242) 113.832 ms te1-1-10G.asr1.DAL2.gblx.net (67.17.79.110) 113.823 ms te2-1-10G.asr1.DAL2.gblx.net (67.16.143.242) 113.813 ms 6 te1-1-10G.asr1.DAL2.gblx.net (67.17.79.110) 114.115 ms highwinds-network-group.tengigabitethernet2-2.asr1.dal2.gblx.net (208.48.236.130) 113.327 ms te2-1-10G.asr1.DAL2.gblx.net (67.16.143.242) 113.933 ms 7 premium-network.incero.com (209.105.225.46) 117.210 ms 116.945 ms 114.545 ms 8 23.29.112.74 (23.29.112.74) 114.506 ms premium-network.incero.com (209.105.225.46) 114.657 ms 114.640 ms 9 23.29.127.98 (23.29.127.98) 113.764 ms 113.501 ms 23.29.112.74 (23.29.112.74) 114.609 ms
Hit post limit, more coming soon.
Comments
Disk:
More coming soon
Crappy DL speeds, good review though.
Complicatedno.de
More Disk:
More VPS:
4 Cores from the above CPU
ServerBear is running, I will post a link to results here soon
Also, this bothers me.
no 32bit linux distro? 64bit will consume more RAM than 32bit...
@SimpleNode do you forget to remove the IP from SolusVM screenshot or it on purpose ?
That pure security is pure BS. Not possible. In no damn way
Thanks, Fixed
@SimpleNode : one more on distro selection
Thanks, fixed
Especially without looking at your data...
Being a Brit, they are terrible. Our young friend @infinity might agree.
How can it be secure if your provider is looking at your VPS/Data to see if it is secure?
I think provider reviews of other providers is a slippery slope of drama that most will agree will not end very well
It is called autosecure© by dewlance.
@bamn
He requested it, so I did it.
I did offer a disclaimer at the top that my review may be biased.
@Arif257 why have not i got a reply to my ticket yet? been over 24 hours!!
Here is the @ServerBear
http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/12/04/2HNSQ4fsWmLhiztg
lol @Taz Brit or not: at the moment it's a mess. I add'd @Arif257 on Skype a day or two ago and have been giving a bit of advice.
@simpleNode The logo on the cart section of WHMCS was updated. I believe you didn't refresh your browser cache that's why it showed the old logo.
@joshuah did you submit your ticket before EazyVPS was laucned? If so that may be the reason we haven't responded as we cleared all our support tickets and clients for the launch.
Please resubmit your ticket.
Thank You.
@simpleNode We beleive the IPv4 addresses are at a fair price, they may seem rather expensive to you as you are a provider your self, but we believe we have provided them for a fair price.
Keeps spam / SEO clowns from signing up for your $3/mo VPS and ordering 15 $1-2 IPs for their next spam run
Just don't allow that many IPs to be ordered at once? Abuse is NOT a means to increase price.
Can't increase the price on..... a brand new company.
It's his new company policy and let him deal with it. I figure it's a couple of bucks markup on his part.
Decent review format, excellent constructive feedback that the company can use to improve
Yep, my opinion too.
Regarding the IP price, that will probably become mainstream sooner rather than later.
The SEO ppl might want it, but a spammer no, he will pay for them and then get suspended the next day, so, probably not a good deal.
@Arif257 this is now the second time ive sent an email and no response..
ive tried to use your live chat 3 times already and sat waiting for over 30 minutes each time.. as i write this i am actually sitting on hold ...
Not impressed..
@joshuah Please understand our support team receive many chat requests so it may take some time to respond to your request but we can assure you we will assist you as soon as possible.
@joshuah May I ask how did you submit your support ticket which method did you use? Did you use the Live help chat or did you submit your ticket through the contact us page or through the WHMCS panel? This will help our support team in finding your ticket and having it dealt with sooner.
Thank You.
@Arif257 i was on live chat with you earlier, and was chatting with -you- and then you stopped replying to my questions, i waited 15 minutes and after multiple messages "Hello are you there?!!?" i disconnected.
All the emails were directly by "contact us page" not WHMCS or live chat.