Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Free speech VPS/KVN hosting for both right-wing and left-wing dissident content?
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Free speech VPS/KVN hosting for both right-wing and left-wing dissident content?

apples2apples2 Member
edited November 2020 in General

Hi, I host a number of websites. Most are generic centrist or non-ideological, but a few are radical-left and radical-right sites.

None of our sites host illegal content or incitements to crime/violence.

We've had issues with our current provider taking all our sites offline for a while, without enough notice for us, for non-illegal misogyny on one of the left-leaning sites. And we had to delete content that wasn't illegal. So we are moving.

So... feel in a bit of a pickle. Most of the free speech places advertized here seem hostile to the left-wing stuff. Like Francisco saying, "communists aren't people", here, although he's a good guy who runs a good business and we are thinking of using his service. And then Njalla seems hostile to the right-wing stuff, with their "we don't like fascists" attitude, outright banning people they don't like with little notice.

Anyway, is there a politically neutral political-free-speech VPS/KVN host (preferably in the USA) that isn't super expensive and also provides DDOS protection. Thx! :smile:

«1

Comments

  • Allow me to introduce you to @Francisco / buyshared.

  • apples2apples2 Member
    edited November 2020

    @dahartigan said:
    Allow me to introduce you to @Francisco / buyshared.

    Yea we did purchase one of BuyVMs servers as a backup recently. But got hit with "fraud" during sign-up. So hopefully a photocopy of a birth certificate is enough to "unfraud" us cuz I'm a weirdo without a driver license at the moment.

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @apples2 said:

    @dahartigan said:
    Allow me to introduce you to @Francisco / buyshared.

    Yea we did purchase one of BuyVMs servers as a backup recently. But got hit with "fraud" during sign-up. So hopefully a photocopy of a birth certificate is enough to "unfraud" us cuz I'm a weirdo without a driver license at the moment.

    Livin' off the grid man.

    Anyway, should be fine. Let me know if billing blocks you but assuming everything matches you'll be fine.

    Let em know in PM what you're after VPS wise (besides the backup) and i'll check our inventory.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 1apples2
  • apples2apples2 Member
    edited November 2020

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said:

    @dahartigan said:
    Allow me to introduce you to @Francisco / buyshared.

    Yea we did purchase one of BuyVMs servers as a backup recently. But got hit with "fraud" during sign-up. So hopefully a photocopy of a birth certificate is enough to "unfraud" us cuz I'm a weirdo without a driver license at the moment.

    Livin' off the grid man.

    Anyway, should be fine. Let me know if billing blocks you but assuming everything matches you'll be fine.

    Let em know in PM what you're after VPS wise (besides the backup) and i'll check our inventory.

    Francisco

    ah, ok thanks, that works :smile: We might also just use the KVM we purchased from you as a VPS replacement and our current as the backup.

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @apples2 said: Like Francisco saying, "communists aren't people",

    Correct, communism isn't OK. That's a personal opinion though, I don't mix those in with business.

    Our stance is a simple "law of the land" approach. If it's legal in the country it's hosted in, we're good. I don't agree with everything that's hosted with me (I have batshit things from both sides), and that's OK. That's the point of freedom of speech.

    Francisco

  • @Francisco said: Our stance is a simple "law of the land" approach. If it's legal in the country it's hosted in, we're good.

    Good to read a clarification from you on that point.

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @pbx said: Good to read a clarification from you on that point.

    It's documented as such in our TOS :)

    There's literally a section about "law of the land" in there.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 1apples2
  • @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said: Like Francisco saying, "communists aren't people",

    Correct, communism isn't OK. That's a personal opinion though, I don't mix those in with business.

    Our stance is a simple "law of the land" approach. If it's legal in the country it's hosted in, we're good. I don't agree with everything that's hosted with me (I have batshit things from both sides), and that's OK. That's the point of freedom of speech.

    Francisco

    Although he needs DDoS protection which he would have to use Cloudflare Transit for and they've deplatformed controversial sites.

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @SirFoxy said: Although he needs DDoS protection which he would have to use Cloudflare Transit for and they've deplatformed controversial sites.

    True. We've had a fine time for now. It being on my own ASN helps.

    Francisco

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran
    edited November 2020

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said: Like Francisco saying, "communists aren't people",

    Correct, communism isn't OK. That's a personal opinion though, I don't mix those in with business.

    Our stance is a simple "law of the land" approach. If it's legal in the country it's hosted in, we're good. I don't agree with everything that's hosted with me (I have batshit things from both sides), and that's OK. That's the point of freedom of speech.

    Francisco

    You can definitely trust that Fran will protect opinions that don't match his own. The word "integrity" doesn't seem to apply to a lot of people these days, but I'd say it fits there.

    I try to take a page from his book. I protect mailing lists for socialists and communists, and I strongly disagree with them on a personal level. Everyone deserves a voice, may the best ideas win.

  • oplinkoplink Member, Patron Provider

    We would be happy to help and offer ddos protection. Check out our AUP. I think you would find us very open.

    Thanks,
    Oplink.net

    Thanked by 1apples2
  • Consider the recent censorship of all big companies amoung the US, I don't think US is capable to claim to be free-speech anymore.

    Thanked by 4jar pbx jsg that_guy
  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    @elliotc said:
    Consider the recent censorship of all big companies amoung the US, I don't think US is capable to claim to be free-speech anymore.

    There are pockets of safe places but yeah, if it gets much worse there could be a full on free market removal of free speech on the internet.

  • @Francisco said: It's documented as such in our TOS

    I know but I could have had the same interpretation as @apples2.

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @jar said: I try to take a page from his book. I protect mailing lists for socialists and communists, and I strongly disagree with them on a personal level. Everyone deserves a voice, may the best ideas win.

    Free helicopter rides for all!

    Francisco

    Thanked by 2jar riot
  • apples2apples2 Member
    edited November 2020

    @SirFoxy said:

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said: Like Francisco saying, "communists aren't people",

    Correct, communism isn't OK. That's a personal opinion though, I don't mix those in with business.

    Our stance is a simple "law of the land" approach. If it's legal in the country it's hosted in, we're good. I don't agree with everything that's hosted with me (I have batshit things from both sides), and that's OK. That's the point of freedom of speech.

    Francisco

    Although he needs DDoS protection which he would have to use Cloudflare Transit for and they've deplatformed controversial sites.

    My current provider claimed Cloudflare forwarded them the anonymous abuse complaint along with our IP address. I didn't know Cloudflare did that. When I asked my provider why they were taking us down despite, nothing illlegal, they said "ask Cloudflare". But the email Cloudflare send to the provider said that they don't deal with content issues.

    I sent a message to Cloudflare asking why they are forwarding clearly bogus anynous abuse complaints to my provider, (assuming it was them and not someone pretending to be them) and didn't get a response.

    Is it normal for Cloudflare to forward anonymous abuse-report emails to server companies?

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @apples2 said: Is it normal for Cloudflare to forward anonymous abuse-report emails to server companies?

    CF forwards all complaints but they don't give the DST IP unless they get a court order from what I've seen.

    At most they're just told who the host is.

    Francisco

  • @oplink said:
    We would be happy to help and offer ddos protection. Check out our AUP. I think you would find us very open.

    Thanks,
    Oplink.net

    Someone here mentioned "Cloudflare transit", is that what most VPS people here provide, and you as well? Thanks

  • apples2apples2 Member
    edited November 2020

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said: Is it normal for Cloudflare to forward anonymous abuse-report emails to server companies?

    CF forwards all complaints but they don't give the DST IP unless they get a court order from what I've seen.

    At most they're just told who the host is.

    Francisco

    Well Cloudflare gave the server IP to my provider that the provider already knew as confirmation, and there was no mention of a court order. So I dunno. The pages in question had absolutely nothing illegal on them.

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @apples2 said: Well they gave the server IP that the provider already knew as confirmation, and there was no mention of a court order. So I dunno. The pages in question had absolutely nothing illegal on them.

    So how it works is like this:

    • User REEEEE's at Cloudflare
    • Cloudflare forwards the complaint to the provider with the aforementioned domain & IP address that's being proxied
    • Cloudflare responds to the complaint, sometimes with the name of the host

    Now that the user has the name of the host they can go reach out and say 'this domain is being mean to me!', the host can then check their abuse email and likely find it.

    But, Cloudflare doesn't divulge backend IP addresses without a court order from what I've seen.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 1apples2
  • @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said: Well they gave the server IP that the provider already knew as confirmation, and there was no mention of a court order. So I dunno. The pages in question had absolutely nothing illegal on them.

    So how it works is like this:

    • User REEEEE's at Cloudflare
    • Cloudflare forwards the complaint to the provider with the aforementioned domain & IP address that's being proxied
    • Cloudflare responds to the complaint, sometimes with the name of the host

    But, Cloudflare doesn't divulge backend IP addresses without a court order from what I've seen.

    Francisco

    "Cloudflare forwards the complaint to the provider with the aforementioned domain & IP address that's being proxied"

    that's what happened yea

    is that what you mean by "backend IP", the proxied IP address?

  • because they didn't divulge the proxied IP to the person reporting afaik, only to the provider

  • @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said: Well they gave the server IP that the provider already knew as confirmation, and there was no mention of a court order. So I dunno. The pages in question had absolutely nothing illegal on them.

    Now that the user has the name of the host they can go reach out and say 'this domain is being mean to me!', the host can then check their abuse email and likely find it.

    yea it was just Cloudflare itself that forwarded the abuse report along with the proxied IP, and not the user, allegedly. That wouldn't be associated with a court order I don't think. Especially as these were pages that just had generic misogyny and no calls for violence/rape etc

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @apples2 said:

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said: Well they gave the server IP that the provider already knew as confirmation, and there was no mention of a court order. So I dunno. The pages in question had absolutely nothing illegal on them.

    Now that the user has the name of the host they can go reach out and say 'this domain is being mean to me!', the host can then check their abuse email and likely find it.

    yea it was just Cloudflare itself that forwarded the abuse report along with the proxied IP, and not the user, allegedly. That wouldn't be associated with a court order I don't think. Especially as these were pages that just had generic misogyny and no calls for violence/rape etc

    CF forwards all complaints automatically. I've had more than a few where the person rolled their head over their keyboard in the complaint field.

    Francisco

    Thanked by 3benj0x apples2 wdmg
  • @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said:

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said: Well they gave the server IP that the provider already knew as confirmation, and there was no mention of a court order. So I dunno. The pages in question had absolutely nothing illegal on them.

    Now that the user has the name of the host they can go reach out and say 'this domain is being mean to me!', the host can then check their abuse email and likely find it.

    yea it was just Cloudflare itself that forwarded the abuse report along with the proxied IP, and not the user, allegedly. That wouldn't be associated with a court order I don't think. Especially as these were pages that just had generic misogyny and no calls for violence/rape etc

    CF forwards all complaints automatically. I've had more than a few where the person rolled their head over their keyboard in the complaint field.

    Francisco

    I think if you really want to be able to stand on your own without worrying about the upstream you'll have to look inwards for DDoS protection though. Anything controversial is going to need protection and using Cloudflare for it is a ticking time bomb.

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • @SirFoxy said:

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said:

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said: Well they gave the server IP that the provider already knew as confirmation, and there was no mention of a court order. So I dunno. The pages in question had absolutely nothing illegal on them.

    Now that the user has the name of the host they can go reach out and say 'this domain is being mean to me!', the host can then check their abuse email and likely find it.

    yea it was just Cloudflare itself that forwarded the abuse report along with the proxied IP, and not the user, allegedly. That wouldn't be associated with a court order I don't think. Especially as these were pages that just had generic misogyny and no calls for violence/rape etc

    CF forwards all complaints automatically. I've had more than a few where the person rolled their head over their keyboard in the complaint field.

    Francisco

    I think if you really want to be able to stand on your own without worrying about the upstream you'll have to look inwards for DDoS protection though. Anything controversial is going to need protection and using Cloudflare for it is a ticking time bomb.

    who uses CF upstream?

  • SirFoxySirFoxy Member
    edited November 2020

    @apples2 said:

    @SirFoxy said:

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said:

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said: Well they gave the server IP that the provider already knew as confirmation, and there was no mention of a court order. So I dunno. The pages in question had absolutely nothing illegal on them.

    Now that the user has the name of the host they can go reach out and say 'this domain is being mean to me!', the host can then check their abuse email and likely find it.

    yea it was just Cloudflare itself that forwarded the abuse report along with the proxied IP, and not the user, allegedly. That wouldn't be associated with a court order I don't think. Especially as these were pages that just had generic misogyny and no calls for violence/rape etc

    CF forwards all complaints automatically. I've had more than a few where the person rolled their head over their keyboard in the complaint field.

    Francisco

    I think if you really want to be able to stand on your own without worrying about the upstream you'll have to look inwards for DDoS protection though. Anything controversial is going to need protection and using Cloudflare for it is a ticking time bomb.

    who uses CF upstream?

    Buyvm if you need DDoS protection, cogent if you don't.

    https://www.cloudflare.com/magic-transit/

  • apples2apples2 Member
    edited November 2020

    @SirFoxy said:

    @apples2 said:

    @SirFoxy said:

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said:

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said: Well they gave the server IP that the provider already knew as confirmation, and there was no mention of a court order. So I dunno. The pages in question had absolutely nothing illegal on them.

    Now that the user has the name of the host they can go reach out and say 'this domain is being mean to me!', the host can then check their abuse email and likely find it.

    yea it was just Cloudflare itself that forwarded the abuse report along with the proxied IP, and not the user, allegedly. That wouldn't be associated with a court order I don't think. Especially as these were pages that just had generic misogyny and no calls for violence/rape etc

    CF forwards all complaints automatically. I've had more than a few where the person rolled their head over their keyboard in the complaint field.

    Francisco

    I think if you really want to be able to stand on your own without worrying about the upstream you'll have to look inwards for DDoS protection though. Anything controversial is going to need protection and using Cloudflare for it is a ticking time bomb.

    who uses CF upstream?

    Buyvm if you need DDoS protection, cogent if you don't.

    https://www.cloudflare.com/magic-transit/

    what's the reason for using CF upstream if cloudflare is already available for free + already hides IP addresses?
    im a dummy excuse my questions

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @apples2 said:

    @SirFoxy said:

    @apples2 said:

    @SirFoxy said:

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said:

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said: Well they gave the server IP that the provider already knew as confirmation, and there was no mention of a court order. So I dunno. The pages in question had absolutely nothing illegal on them.

    Now that the user has the name of the host they can go reach out and say 'this domain is being mean to me!', the host can then check their abuse email and likely find it.

    yea it was just Cloudflare itself that forwarded the abuse report along with the proxied IP, and not the user, allegedly. That wouldn't be associated with a court order I don't think. Especially as these were pages that just had generic misogyny and no calls for violence/rape etc

    CF forwards all complaints automatically. I've had more than a few where the person rolled their head over their keyboard in the complaint field.

    Francisco

    I think if you really want to be able to stand on your own without worrying about the upstream you'll have to look inwards for DDoS protection though. Anything controversial is going to need protection and using Cloudflare for it is a ticking time bomb.

    who uses CF upstream?

    Buyvm if you need DDoS protection, cogent if you don't.

    https://www.cloudflare.com/magic-transit/

    what's the reason for using CF upstream if cloudflare is already available for free + already hides IP addresses?
    im a dummy excuse my questions

    We use cloudflare magic transit which provides us ddos mitigation. It allows people to host any application they want instead of just web services.

    Francisco

  • apples2apples2 Member
    edited November 2020

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said:

    @SirFoxy said:

    @apples2 said:

    @SirFoxy said:

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said:

    @Francisco said:

    @apples2 said: Well they gave the server IP that the provider already knew as confirmation, and there was no mention of a court order. So I dunno. The pages in question had absolutely nothing illegal on them.

    Now that the user has the name of the host they can go reach out and say 'this domain is being mean to me!', the host can then check their abuse email and likely find it.

    yea it was just Cloudflare itself that forwarded the abuse report along with the proxied IP, and not the user, allegedly. That wouldn't be associated with a court order I don't think. Especially as these were pages that just had generic misogyny and no calls for violence/rape etc

    CF forwards all complaints automatically. I've had more than a few where the person rolled their head over their keyboard in the complaint field.

    Francisco

    I think if you really want to be able to stand on your own without worrying about the upstream you'll have to look inwards for DDoS protection though. Anything controversial is going to need protection and using Cloudflare for it is a ticking time bomb.

    who uses CF upstream?

    Buyvm if you need DDoS protection, cogent if you don't.

    https://www.cloudflare.com/magic-transit/

    what's the reason for using CF upstream if cloudflare is already available for free + already hides IP addresses?
    im a dummy excuse my questions

    We use cloudflare magic transit which provides us ddos mitigation. It allows people to host any application they want instead of just web services.

    Francisco

    oh, I bought it in case I got bumped off cloudflare. Well I guess using your magic transit routed IPs wouldn't cause any additional overhead as compared to non-magic-transit IPs? I'm going to be using it with regular Cloudflare.

    that was my last question, sorry for all the questions

Sign In or Register to comment.