Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Advertise on LowEndTalk.com
Hostclean and awful network
New on LowEndTalk? Please read our 'Community Rules' by clicking on it in the right menu!

Hostclean and awful network

Hello LET Users. My small review about Hostclean.

Story start when i saw greate offer, that i think it was, "10$ YR VPS SERVER !!!! The offer is valid for 1 month for the annual HCR - VPS 1 payment: 10.08.2018-10.09.2018" from Hostclean.

Special 512 MB VPS

    15GB storage
    512 MB RAM
    512 MB Burst RAM
    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz
    CPU 1 core
    Bandwidth UNMETERED
    Port 1 Gbit Shared
    1 IPv4
    /112 IPv6
    SolusVM Panel
    Full Root Access
    Choice of Linux OS
    OpenVZ
    Location: Europe, Romania, Bucharest, Orange DataCenter

I wanted to order it but decided test other plan before. I wanted use it for own OpenVPN and Proxy. Orded this one

Special 1024 MB VPS

    20GB storage
    1024 MB RAM
    1024 MB Burst RAM
    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz
    CPU 1 core
    Bandwidth UNMETERED
    Port 1 Gbit Shared
    1 IPv4
    /112 IPv6
    SolusVM Panel
    Full Root Access
    Choice of Linux OS
    OpenVZ
    Location: Europe, Romania, Bucharest, Voxility DataCenter
    Location: Europe, Romania, Bucharest, Orange DataCenter

$2 /Month

After ordered. First problem was that it not start at all after activation. I'm open ticket, waited 1-2 days until it will be fixed. When provider fixed it, i tried to connect to SSH but port was blocked. Again gone to tickets, after 1 day it was fixed. Ok i connect to it and start to test it. And what i saw was awful. Results of test below. Then i asked about network and get answer "In This time to do works on the internet network, that's why it's so slow. Please try now.". I tried but nothing change. Asked again and answer "We're not done yet, work. We let you know when it's ready, test it again." 2 weeks gone and nothing change, 4 weeks gone and nothing change.Then asked again and ask refund. Got answer "Your server is in a connected shared port, that means more users use that port. There is still a small modification of the network, and everything will work properly."

My Conclusions:

Do not recommend it. Better buy from Hostsolutions (@cociu is much better) if you need Romania location. I use hostsolutions about 3 month and did not have any problems except old templates (now Hostsolutions support new templates if right i'm understand).

I think that is awful provider because:

First. Provider must info if he have problem with network before customer buy it. I mean not about small problem that can be fixed in 1-3 days. Provider can't fix it almost month, maybe it not work properly untill now. I'm still waiting message from provider telling to me that network fixed.

Second. I'm have waited about 3 days or more until my VPS will work properly. I mean i paid for it and it was activate but it can't start until Hostclean fixed it.

Third. I have asked refund because 4 weeks gone but network was not fix. I think it not normal to wait so long. I would not buy it if I knew that the network is so bad. But have answer "Your server is in a connected shared port, that means more users use that port. There is still a small modification of the network, and everything will work properly."It is not big money for me but i'm not like pay for awful product that waste my time.

I'm post this review only because dont want that someone like i waste time with this provider. I think LET is great community with quality cheap providers that help you save not only money but you time too. For example Hostsolutions @cociu , Inception Hosting @AnthonySmith , OVH @ninzo59 , first-root @FR_Michael and many many others share great products with greate quality.

If you have the same problems write post in comment. I know that @zknet have problem with network too from post Post of zknet .

Screenshout of support ticket
Very Big Screenshout of support ticket
choose original size below to read it.

Server Test

Serverscope
https://serverscope.io/trials/95z0

Bench.sh

----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2450L 0 @ 1.80GHz
Number of cores      : 1
CPU frequency        : 1200.000 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 20.0 GB (0.7 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 1024 MB (84 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime        : 1 days, 12 hour 10 min
Load average         : 0.16, 0.03, 0.01
OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 8
Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel               : 2.6.32-042stab133.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run)   : 74.9 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run)   : 69.4 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run)   : 93.0 MB/s
Average I/O speed    : 79.1 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         1.15MB/s      
Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          1015KB/s      
Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            1.07MB/s      
Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           1.06MB/s      
Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           1.12MB/s      
Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             1.06MB/s      
Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           974KB/s       
Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          922KB/s       
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            1.16MB/s      
Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           1004KB/s      
Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          1.11MB/s      
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Last Test

Last login: Wed Sep 26 06:26:58 2018 from 
[email protected]:~# speedtest
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Testing from HOSTCLEAN S.R.L (VPS IP)...
Selecting best server based on latency...
Hosted by HOSTERION SRL (Cluj-Napoca) [136.01 km]: 26.711 ms
Testing download speed........................................
Download: 6.15 Mbits/s
Testing upload speed..................................................
Upload: 2.62 Mbits/s
[email protected]:~# speedtest
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Testing from HOSTCLEAN S.R.L (89.)...
Selecting best server based on latency...
Hosted by HOSTERION SRL (Cluj-Napoca) [136.01 km]: 24.444 ms
Testing download speed........................................
Download: 7.51 Mbits/s
Testing upload speed..................................................
Upload: 3.34 Mbits/s
[email protected]:~# speedtest
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Testing from HOSTCLEAN S.R.L (89.)...
Selecting best server based on latency...
Hosted by HOSTERION SRL (Cluj-Napoca) [136.01 km]: 26.852 ms
Testing download speed........................................
Download: 7.39 Mbits/s
Testing upload speed..................................................
Upload: 2.88 Mbits/s
[email protected]:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net  
iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later
[email protected]:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net
iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later
[email protected]:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net
iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later
[email protected]:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net -p 5209
Connecting to host ping.online.net, port 5209
[  4] local 89. port 39542 connected to 62.210.18.40 port 5209
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  2.34 MBytes  19.6 Mbits/sec    3    256 KBytes       
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  2.13 MBytes  17.9 Mbits/sec    0    246 KBytes       
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  2.34 MBytes  19.7 Mbits/sec    0    273 KBytes       
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  2.40 MBytes  20.1 Mbits/sec    0    379 KBytes       
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  2.36 MBytes  19.8 Mbits/sec    0    375 KBytes       
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  2.39 MBytes  20.1 Mbits/sec    0    363 KBytes       
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  2.14 MBytes  18.0 Mbits/sec    0    373 KBytes       
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  2.41 MBytes  20.2 Mbits/sec    0    369 KBytes       
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  2.15 MBytes  18.0 Mbits/sec    0    379 KBytes       
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  2.43 MBytes  20.4 Mbits/sec    0    380 KBytes       
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  23.1 MBytes  19.4 Mbits/sec    3             sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  22.5 MBytes  18.9 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.
[email protected]:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net -p 5209 -R
Connecting to host ping.online.net, port 5209
Reverse mode, remote host ping.online.net is sending
[  4] local 89. port 54780 connected to 62.210.18.40 port 5209
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  1.13 MBytes  9.51 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.18 MBytes  9.87 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.17 MBytes  9.83 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.18 MBytes  9.87 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  1.08 MBytes  9.08 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  1.18 MBytes  9.87 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.17 MBytes  9.85 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  1.17 MBytes  9.82 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.17 MBytes  9.80 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.17 MBytes  9.85 Mbits/sec                  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.9 MBytes  9.95 Mbits/sec   69             sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.7 MBytes  9.84 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.
[email protected]:~# iperf3 -c 37.215.78.207 -p 56693 -R
Connecting to host 37., port 56693
Reverse mode, remote host 37.215.78.207 is sending
[  4] local 89. port 42344 connected to 37. port 56693
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec   821 KBytes  6.73 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.34 MBytes  11.3 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.16 MBytes  9.73 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.02 MBytes  8.56 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  1.16 MBytes  9.73 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  1.16 MBytes  9.75 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.16 MBytes  9.73 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  1.16 MBytes  9.74 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.16 MBytes  9.72 Mbits/sec                  
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.16 MBytes  9.73 Mbits/sec                  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.8 MBytes  9.94 Mbits/sec  313             sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.4 MBytes  9.57 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.
[email protected]:~# iperf3 -c 37. -p 56693   
^C- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
Segmentation fault
[email protected]:~# iperf3 -c 37. -p 46627
Connecting to host 37., port 46627
[  4] local 89. port 49202 connected to 37. port 46627
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec   747 KBytes  6.12 Mbits/sec    2   98.4 KBytes       
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.26 MBytes  10.6 Mbits/sec    0    131 KBytes       
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.91 MBytes  16.1 Mbits/sec    0    200 KBytes       
[  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  2.20 MBytes  18.4 Mbits/sec    0    190 KBytes       
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  2.08 MBytes  17.4 Mbits/sec    0    212 KBytes       
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  2.18 MBytes  18.3 Mbits/sec    0    218 KBytes       
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  2.18 MBytes  18.3 Mbits/sec    0    207 KBytes       
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  2.03 MBytes  17.0 Mbits/sec    0    212 KBytes       
[  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  2.18 MBytes  18.3 Mbits/sec    0    207 KBytes       
[  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  2.05 MBytes  17.2 Mbits/sec    0    207 KBytes       
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  18.8 MBytes  15.8 Mbits/sec    2             sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  18.6 MBytes  15.6 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.

Comments

  • Never seen the cachefly speed test so low in my life

    HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Provider

    They likely rate limit around 10mbit.

    Francisco

    BuyVM - Free DirectAdmin, Softaculous, & Blesta! / Anycast Support! / Windows 2008, 2012, & 2016! / Unmetered Bandwidth!
    BuyShared - Shared & Reseller Hosting / cPanel + Softaculous + CloudLinux / Pure SSD! / Free Dedicated IP Address
  • First-RootFirst-Root Member, Provider

    Thanks for mention ;)

  • That's horribly overcrowded node.

  • @FR_Michael said:
    Thanks for mention ;)

    you have good product. that why i mention you.

    @Francisco said:
    They likely rate limit around 10mbit.

    Francisco

    Don't think so because they said about limit if it was but they said "In This time to do works on the internet network, that's why it's so slow." but it was more then 4 weeks.
    Sorry forget mention you @Francisco. I test your LU location and it was awsome.

    @MasonR said:

    Never seen the cachefly speed test so low in my life

    Hey. This is slowest provider that i have seen too.

    Thanked by 1Francisco
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Provider

    ofit said: Sorry forget mention you @Francisco. I test your LU location and it was awsome.

    Give in to the Slice side.

    Francisco

    BuyVM - Free DirectAdmin, Softaculous, & Blesta! / Anycast Support! / Windows 2008, 2012, & 2016! / Unmetered Bandwidth!
    BuyShared - Shared & Reseller Hosting / cPanel + Softaculous + CloudLinux / Pure SSD! / Free Dedicated IP Address
  • Hostdirty

    Senior Level 30 Microsoft Certified Technician

  • Do they have you on a Dell Optiplex from 2002? Yikes.... Thanks for sharing your review.

  • packetnextpacketnext Member
    edited November 2018

    removed

  • DavernoDaverno Member
    edited November 2018

    @ofit said:
    Hello LET Users. My small review about Hostclean.

    Story start when i saw greate offer, that i think it was, "10$ YR VPS SERVER !!!! The offer is valid for 1 month for the annual HCR - VPS 1 payment: 10.08.2018-10.09.2018" from Hostclean.

    > Special 512 MB VPS
    > 
    >     15GB storage
    >     512 MB RAM
    >     512 MB Burst RAM
    >     Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz
    >     CPU 1 core
    >     Bandwidth UNMETERED
    >     Port 1 Gbit Shared
    >     1 IPv4
    >     /112 IPv6
    >     SolusVM Panel
    >     Full Root Access
    >     Choice of Linux OS
    >     OpenVZ
    >     Location: Europe, Romania, Bucharest, Orange DataCenter
    > 

    I wanted to order it but decided test other plan before. I wanted use it for own OpenVPN and Proxy. Orded this one

    > Special 1024 MB VPS
    > 
    >     20GB storage
    >     1024 MB RAM
    >     1024 MB Burst RAM
    >     Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz
    >     CPU 1 core
    >     Bandwidth UNMETERED
    >     Port 1 Gbit Shared
    >     1 IPv4
    >     /112 IPv6
    >     SolusVM Panel
    >     Full Root Access
    >     Choice of Linux OS
    >     OpenVZ
    >     Location: Europe, Romania, Bucharest, Voxility DataCenter
    >     Location: Europe, Romania, Bucharest, Orange DataCenter
    > 
    > $2 /Month
    > 

    After ordered. First problem was that it not start at all after activation. I'm open ticket, waited 1-2 days until it will be fixed. When provider fixed it, i tried to connect to SSH but port was blocked. Again gone to tickets, after 1 day it was fixed. Ok i connect to it and start to test it. And what i saw was awful. Results of test below. Then i asked about network and get answer "In This time to do works on the internet network, that's why it's so slow. Please try now.". I tried but nothing change. Asked again and answer "We're not done yet, work. We let you know when it's ready, test it again." 2 weeks gone and nothing change, 4 weeks gone and nothing change.Then asked again and ask refund. Got answer "Your server is in a connected shared port, that means more users use that port. There is still a small modification of the network, and everything will work properly."

    My Conclusions:

    Do not recommend it. Better buy from Hostsolutions (@cociu is much better) if you need Romania location. I use hostsolutions about 3 month and did not have any problems except old templates (now Hostsolutions support new templates if right i'm understand).

    I think that is awful provider because:

    First. Provider must info if he have problem with network before customer buy it. I mean not about small problem that can be fixed in 1-3 days. Provider can't fix it almost month, maybe it not work properly untill now. I'm still waiting message from provider telling to me that network fixed.

    Second. I'm have waited about 3 days or more until my VPS will work properly. I mean i paid for it and it was activate but it can't start until Hostclean fixed it.

    Third. I have asked refund because 4 weeks gone but network was not fix. I think it not normal to wait so long. I would not buy it if I knew that the network is so bad. But have answer "Your server is in a connected shared port, that means more users use that port. There is still a small modification of the network, and everything will work properly."It is not big money for me but i'm not like pay for awful product that waste my time.

    I'm post this review only because dont want that someone like i waste time with this provider. I think LET is great community with quality cheap providers that help you save not only money but you time too. For example Hostsolutions @cociu , Inception Hosting @AnthonySmith , OVH @ninzo59 , first-root @FR_Michael and many many others share great products with greate quality.

    If you have the same problems write post in comment. I know that @zknet have problem with network too from post Post of zknet .

    Screenshout of support ticket
    Very Big Screenshout of support ticket
    choose original size below to read it.

    Server Test

    Serverscope
    https://serverscope.io/trials/95z0

    Bench.sh

    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2450L 0 @ 1.80GHz
    > Number of cores      : 1
    > CPU frequency        : 1200.000 MHz
    > Total size of Disk   : 20.0 GB (0.7 GB Used)
    > Total amount of Mem  : 1024 MB (84 MB Used)
    > Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
    > System uptime        : 1 days, 12 hour 10 min
    > Load average         : 0.16, 0.03, 0.01
    > OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 8
    > Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    > Kernel               : 2.6.32-042stab133.2
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > I/O speed(1st run)   : 74.9 MB/s
    > I/O speed(2nd run)   : 69.4 MB/s
    > I/O speed(3rd run)   : 93.0 MB/s
    > Average I/O speed    : 79.1 MB/s
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
    > CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         1.15MB/s      
    > Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          1015KB/s      
    > Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            1.07MB/s      
    > Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           1.06MB/s      
    > Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           1.12MB/s      
    > Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             1.06MB/s      
    > Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           974KB/s       
    > Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          922KB/s       
    > Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            1.16MB/s      
    > Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           1004KB/s      
    > Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          1.11MB/s      
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > 

    Last Test

    > Last login: Wed Sep 26 06:26:58 2018 from 
    > [email protected]:~# speedtest
    > Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
    > Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
    > Testing from HOSTCLEAN S.R.L (VPS IP)...
    > Selecting best server based on latency...
    > Hosted by HOSTERION SRL (Cluj-Napoca) [136.01 km]: 26.711 ms
    > Testing download speed........................................
    > Download: 6.15 Mbits/s
    > Testing upload speed..................................................
    > Upload: 2.62 Mbits/s
    > [email protected]:~# speedtest
    > Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
    > Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
    > Testing from HOSTCLEAN S.R.L (89.)...
    > Selecting best server based on latency...
    > Hosted by HOSTERION SRL (Cluj-Napoca) [136.01 km]: 24.444 ms
    > Testing download speed........................................
    > Download: 7.51 Mbits/s
    > Testing upload speed..................................................
    > Upload: 3.34 Mbits/s
    > [email protected]:~# speedtest
    > Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
    > Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
    > Testing from HOSTCLEAN S.R.L (89.)...
    > Selecting best server based on latency...
    > Hosted by HOSTERION SRL (Cluj-Napoca) [136.01 km]: 26.852 ms
    > Testing download speed........................................
    > Download: 7.39 Mbits/s
    > Testing upload speed..................................................
    > Upload: 2.88 Mbits/s
    > [email protected]:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net  
    > iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later
    > [email protected]:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net
    > iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later
    > [email protected]:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net
    > iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later
    > [email protected]:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net -p 5209
    > Connecting to host ping.online.net, port 5209
    > [  4] local 89. port 39542 connected to 62.210.18.40 port 5209
    > [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd
    > [  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  2.34 MBytes  19.6 Mbits/sec    3    256 KBytes       
    > [  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  2.13 MBytes  17.9 Mbits/sec    0    246 KBytes       
    > [  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  2.34 MBytes  19.7 Mbits/sec    0    273 KBytes       
    > [  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  2.40 MBytes  20.1 Mbits/sec    0    379 KBytes       
    > [  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  2.36 MBytes  19.8 Mbits/sec    0    375 KBytes       
    > [  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  2.39 MBytes  20.1 Mbits/sec    0    363 KBytes       
    > [  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  2.14 MBytes  18.0 Mbits/sec    0    373 KBytes       
    > [  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  2.41 MBytes  20.2 Mbits/sec    0    369 KBytes       
    > [  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  2.15 MBytes  18.0 Mbits/sec    0    379 KBytes       
    > [  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  2.43 MBytes  20.4 Mbits/sec    0    380 KBytes       
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
    > [  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  23.1 MBytes  19.4 Mbits/sec    3             sender
    > [  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  22.5 MBytes  18.9 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    > 
    > iperf Done.
    > [email protected]:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net -p 5209 -R
    > Connecting to host ping.online.net, port 5209
    > Reverse mode, remote host ping.online.net is sending
    > [  4] local 89. port 54780 connected to 62.210.18.40 port 5209
    > [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
    > [  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  1.13 MBytes  9.51 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.18 MBytes  9.87 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.17 MBytes  9.83 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.18 MBytes  9.87 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  1.08 MBytes  9.08 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  1.18 MBytes  9.87 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.17 MBytes  9.85 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  1.17 MBytes  9.82 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.17 MBytes  9.80 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.17 MBytes  9.85 Mbits/sec                  
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
    > [  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.9 MBytes  9.95 Mbits/sec   69             sender
    > [  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.7 MBytes  9.84 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    > 
    > iperf Done.
    > [email protected]:~# iperf3 -c 37.215.78.207 -p 56693 -R
    > Connecting to host 37., port 56693
    > Reverse mode, remote host 37.215.78.207 is sending
    > [  4] local 89. port 42344 connected to 37. port 56693
    > [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
    > [  4]   0.00-1.00   sec   821 KBytes  6.73 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.34 MBytes  11.3 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.16 MBytes  9.73 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.02 MBytes  8.56 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  1.16 MBytes  9.73 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  1.16 MBytes  9.75 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.16 MBytes  9.73 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  1.16 MBytes  9.74 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.16 MBytes  9.72 Mbits/sec                  
    > [  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.16 MBytes  9.73 Mbits/sec                  
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
    > [  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.8 MBytes  9.94 Mbits/sec  313             sender
    > [  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.4 MBytes  9.57 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    > 
    > iperf Done.
    > [email protected]:~# iperf3 -c 37. -p 56693   
    > ^C- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
    > Segmentation fault
    > [email protected]:~# iperf3 -c 37. -p 46627
    > Connecting to host 37., port 46627
    > [  4] local 89. port 49202 connected to 37. port 46627
    > [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr  Cwnd
    > [  4]   0.00-1.00   sec   747 KBytes  6.12 Mbits/sec    2   98.4 KBytes       
    > [  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.26 MBytes  10.6 Mbits/sec    0    131 KBytes       
    > [  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.91 MBytes  16.1 Mbits/sec    0    200 KBytes       
    > [  4]   3.00-4.00   sec  2.20 MBytes  18.4 Mbits/sec    0    190 KBytes       
    > [  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  2.08 MBytes  17.4 Mbits/sec    0    212 KBytes       
    > [  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  2.18 MBytes  18.3 Mbits/sec    0    218 KBytes       
    > [  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  2.18 MBytes  18.3 Mbits/sec    0    207 KBytes       
    > [  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  2.03 MBytes  17.0 Mbits/sec    0    212 KBytes       
    > [  4]   8.00-9.00   sec  2.18 MBytes  18.3 Mbits/sec    0    207 KBytes       
    > [  4]   9.00-10.00  sec  2.05 MBytes  17.2 Mbits/sec    0    207 KBytes       
    > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    > [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
    > [  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  18.8 MBytes  15.8 Mbits/sec    2             sender
    > [  4]   0.00-10.00  sec  18.6 MBytes  15.6 Mbits/sec                  receiver
    > 
    > iperf Done.
    > 
    > 

    well no one was believing me about the hosting situation in romania , dont worry cociu isnt any better he is even proud of illegal activities on let with his friends , next time try an international brand hosting in romania like m247.ro anyways even most romanians prefer to host in western europe as they are disgusted .

  • @Daverno said:

    well no one was believing me about the hosting situation in romania , dont worry cociu isnt any better he is even proud of illegal activities on let with his friends , next time try an international brand hosting in romania like m247.ro anyways even most romanians prefer to host in western europe as they are disgusted .

    What's up with your disgust of Romania and any hosting company operating from there? Did you get busted for hosting something bad from Romania?

  • Well. I removed my post because I don´t want to be a sourpuss when I am new in town..

    However;

    Hostmaze and Hostclean previously shared the same uplink, which made me suspicious because Hostclean only accepts card payments, and Hostmaze also accepts crypto payments.

    It turned out that Hostmaze did not have their Solusvm server on SSL. At that time, I just thought that they were incompetent (take a look at their ip range at any malware reporting website, and check out the high amounts of junk hosted on their network)

    However in hindsight, maybe their solusvm just or also was not licensed.

    Currently Hostclean is using Hostmaze as an uplink. So I wouldn´t be surprised if they are also using the same hardware.

  • ... What I forgot to mention.

    Hostmaze did not answer their support emails in a LONG time

    So it is rather strange that Hostclean now suddenly uses them as an uplink

    https://www.trustpilot.com/review/hostmaze.com

    I would advice to avoid Hostmaze and Hostclean for now

  • deankdeank Member, Troll

    @solaire said:
    What's up with your disgust of Romania and any hosting company operating from there? Did you get busted for hosting something bad from Romania?

    I believe he was castrated in Romania.

    Thanked by 1solaire

    There are two things that make Earth spin: Money and PMS.

  • @deank said:

    @solaire said:
    What's up with your disgust of Romania and any hosting company operating from there? Did you get busted for hosting something bad from Romania?

    I believe he was castrated in Romania.

    Now where are the impartial admins in response to personal attacks aka hate speech?

  • I am using host clean net hosting from last 6 months. I am very much satisfied with it. I recommended many of my friends to use this hosting. Now i renewed this for 1 years.

    Jhonny Jackson


    I have worked on many other hosting but for me as an romania host clean is best cause its cheap reliable as well as its fast and i am using their unlimited plan and its awesome.

    Mark Andrew

    I like what she said, not what it means.

  • @Chuck said:
    I am using host clean net hosting from last 6 months. I am very much satisfied with it. I recommended many of my friends to use this hosting. Now i renewed this for 1 years.

    Jhonny Jackson


    I have worked on many other hosting but for me as an romania host clean is best cause its cheap reliable as well as its fast and i am using their unlimited plan and its awesome.

    Mark Andrew

    Are those fake reviews lel?

  • @Daverno said:

    @Chuck said:
    I am using host clean net hosting from last 6 months. I am very much satisfied with it. I recommended many of my friends to use this hosting. Now i renewed this for 1 years.

    Jhonny Jackson


    I have worked on many other hosting but for me as an romania host clean is best cause its cheap reliable as well as its fast and i am using their unlimited plan and its awesome.

    Mark Andrew

    Are those fake reviews lel?

    I thought google removed all fake news? Does this mean google lied to people? should we sue google?

    I like what she said, not what it means.

  • You thought wrong.

    Catch me over at Primary DNS. If you want to chat I am done with this cesspool.

  • Only place that review can be found is on the hostclean site itself. Dated 2014 by them.

    I like my uptime down low and my servers all hacked. Can see me droppin' twenty-fours with a router in the rack.
    Ya like ya Switch-Ports hot and ya servers all hacked. If ya pings real high and ya networks pitch black.

  • "Port 1 Gbit Shared" Looks like they stack more than 100 customers per node.

  • You should take hostdirty. Definitely cleaner.

    Thanked by 1eol

    hostwp.net -- Wordpress Hosting for Developers.

  • ResearcherResearcher Member
    edited November 2019

    I think hostclean is a dead pool now, From last 2 months vps is down and no reply to support tickets and even the live support is not responding and i can see the live chat people are online. I believe they are packing up and getting ready to vanish soon.

    Any comment ?

  • @Researcher said:
    I think hostclean is a dead pool now, From last 2 months vps is down and no reply to support tickets and even the live support is not responding and i can see the live chat people are online. I believe they are packing up and getting ready to vanish soon.

    Any comme

    1...2...3... You're out

    UpCloud free $25 through this aff link - Linode, DigitalOcean and Vultr alternative, multiple location, IPv6.

  • not a clean network at all

Sign In or Register to comment.