All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Hostclean and awful network
Hello LET Users. My small review about Hostclean.
Story start when i saw greate offer, that i think it was, "10$ YR VPS SERVER !!!! The offer is valid for 1 month for the annual HCR - VPS 1 payment: 10.08.2018-10.09.2018" from Hostclean.
Special 512 MB VPS 15GB storage 512 MB RAM 512 MB Burst RAM Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz CPU 1 core Bandwidth UNMETERED Port 1 Gbit Shared 1 IPv4 /112 IPv6 SolusVM Panel Full Root Access Choice of Linux OS OpenVZ Location: Europe, Romania, Bucharest, Orange DataCenter
I wanted to order it but decided test other plan before. I wanted use it for own OpenVPN and Proxy. Orded this one
Special 1024 MB VPS 20GB storage 1024 MB RAM 1024 MB Burst RAM Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz CPU 1 core Bandwidth UNMETERED Port 1 Gbit Shared 1 IPv4 /112 IPv6 SolusVM Panel Full Root Access Choice of Linux OS OpenVZ Location: Europe, Romania, Bucharest, Voxility DataCenter Location: Europe, Romania, Bucharest, Orange DataCenter $2 /Month
After ordered. First problem was that it not start at all after activation. I'm open ticket, waited 1-2 days until it will be fixed. When provider fixed it, i tried to connect to SSH but port was blocked. Again gone to tickets, after 1 day it was fixed. Ok i connect to it and start to test it. And what i saw was awful. Results of test below. Then i asked about network and get answer "In This time to do works on the internet network, that's why it's so slow. Please try now.". I tried but nothing change. Asked again and answer "We're not done yet, work. We let you know when it's ready, test it again." 2 weeks gone and nothing change, 4 weeks gone and nothing change.Then asked again and ask refund. Got answer "Your server is in a connected shared port, that means more users use that port. There is still a small modification of the network, and everything will work properly."
My Conclusions:
Do not recommend it. Better buy from Hostsolutions (@cociu is much better) if you need Romania location. I use hostsolutions about 3 month and did not have any problems except old templates (now Hostsolutions support new templates if right i'm understand).
I think that is awful provider because:
First. Provider must info if he have problem with network before customer buy it. I mean not about small problem that can be fixed in 1-3 days. Provider can't fix it almost month, maybe it not work properly untill now. I'm still waiting message from provider telling to me that network fixed.
Second. I'm have waited about 3 days or more until my VPS will work properly. I mean i paid for it and it was activate but it can't start until Hostclean fixed it.
Third. I have asked refund because 4 weeks gone but network was not fix. I think it not normal to wait so long. I would not buy it if I knew that the network is so bad. But have answer "Your server is in a connected shared port, that means more users use that port. There is still a small modification of the network, and everything will work properly."It is not big money for me but i'm not like pay for awful product that waste my time.
I'm post this review only because dont want that someone like i waste time with this provider. I think LET is great community with quality cheap providers that help you save not only money but you time too. For example Hostsolutions @cociu , Inception Hosting @AnthonySmith , OVH @ninzo59 , first-root @FR_Michael and many many others share great products with greate quality.
If you have the same problems write post in comment. I know that @zknet have problem with network too from post Post of zknet .
Screenshout of support ticket
Very Big Screenshout of support ticket
choose original size below to read it.
Server Test
Serverscope
https://serverscope.io/trials/95z0
Bench.sh
---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2450L 0 @ 1.80GHz Number of cores : 1 CPU frequency : 1200.000 MHz Total size of Disk : 20.0 GB (0.7 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 1024 MB (84 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 1 days, 12 hour 10 min Load average : 0.16, 0.03, 0.01 OS : Debian GNU/Linux 8 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 2.6.32-042stab133.2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed(1st run) : 74.9 MB/s I/O speed(2nd run) : 69.4 MB/s I/O speed(3rd run) : 93.0 MB/s Average I/O speed : 79.1 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 1.15MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 1015KB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 1.07MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 1.06MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 1.12MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 1.06MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 974KB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 922KB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 1.16MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 1004KB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 1.11MB/s ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Test
Last login: Wed Sep 26 06:26:58 2018 from root@s9:~# speedtest Retrieving speedtest.net configuration... Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Testing from HOSTCLEAN S.R.L (VPS IP)... Selecting best server based on latency... Hosted by HOSTERION SRL (Cluj-Napoca) [136.01 km]: 26.711 ms Testing download speed........................................ Download: 6.15 Mbits/s Testing upload speed.................................................. Upload: 2.62 Mbits/s root@s9:~# speedtest Retrieving speedtest.net configuration... Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Testing from HOSTCLEAN S.R.L (89.)... Selecting best server based on latency... Hosted by HOSTERION SRL (Cluj-Napoca) [136.01 km]: 24.444 ms Testing download speed........................................ Download: 7.51 Mbits/s Testing upload speed.................................................. Upload: 3.34 Mbits/s root@s9:~# speedtest Retrieving speedtest.net configuration... Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Testing from HOSTCLEAN S.R.L (89.)... Selecting best server based on latency... Hosted by HOSTERION SRL (Cluj-Napoca) [136.01 km]: 26.852 ms Testing download speed........................................ Download: 7.39 Mbits/s Testing upload speed.................................................. Upload: 2.88 Mbits/s root@s9:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later root@s9:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later root@s9:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net iperf3: error - the server is busy running a test. try again later root@s9:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net -p 5209 Connecting to host ping.online.net, port 5209 [ 4] local 89. port 39542 connected to 62.210.18.40 port 5209 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 2.34 MBytes 19.6 Mbits/sec 3 256 KBytes [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 2.13 MBytes 17.9 Mbits/sec 0 246 KBytes [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.34 MBytes 19.7 Mbits/sec 0 273 KBytes [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.40 MBytes 20.1 Mbits/sec 0 379 KBytes [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.36 MBytes 19.8 Mbits/sec 0 375 KBytes [ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.39 MBytes 20.1 Mbits/sec 0 363 KBytes [ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.14 MBytes 18.0 Mbits/sec 0 373 KBytes [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 2.41 MBytes 20.2 Mbits/sec 0 369 KBytes [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.15 MBytes 18.0 Mbits/sec 0 379 KBytes [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 2.43 MBytes 20.4 Mbits/sec 0 380 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 23.1 MBytes 19.4 Mbits/sec 3 sender [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 22.5 MBytes 18.9 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@s9:~# iperf3 -c ping.online.net -p 5209 -R Connecting to host ping.online.net, port 5209 Reverse mode, remote host ping.online.net is sending [ 4] local 89. port 54780 connected to 62.210.18.40 port 5209 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.13 MBytes 9.51 Mbits/sec [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.18 MBytes 9.87 Mbits/sec [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.17 MBytes 9.83 Mbits/sec [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.18 MBytes 9.87 Mbits/sec [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.08 MBytes 9.08 Mbits/sec [ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 1.18 MBytes 9.87 Mbits/sec [ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 1.17 MBytes 9.85 Mbits/sec [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.17 MBytes 9.82 Mbits/sec [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.17 MBytes 9.80 Mbits/sec [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 1.17 MBytes 9.85 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 11.9 MBytes 9.95 Mbits/sec 69 sender [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 11.7 MBytes 9.84 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@s9:~# iperf3 -c 37.215.78.207 -p 56693 -R Connecting to host 37., port 56693 Reverse mode, remote host 37.215.78.207 is sending [ 4] local 89. port 42344 connected to 37. port 56693 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 821 KBytes 6.73 Mbits/sec [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.34 MBytes 11.3 Mbits/sec [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.16 MBytes 9.73 Mbits/sec [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.02 MBytes 8.56 Mbits/sec [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.16 MBytes 9.73 Mbits/sec [ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 1.16 MBytes 9.75 Mbits/sec [ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 1.16 MBytes 9.73 Mbits/sec [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.16 MBytes 9.74 Mbits/sec [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.16 MBytes 9.72 Mbits/sec [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 1.16 MBytes 9.73 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 11.8 MBytes 9.94 Mbits/sec 313 sender [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 11.4 MBytes 9.57 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. root@s9:~# iperf3 -c 37. -p 56693 ^C- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Segmentation fault root@s9:~# iperf3 -c 37. -p 46627 Connecting to host 37., port 46627 [ 4] local 89. port 49202 connected to 37. port 46627 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd [ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 747 KBytes 6.12 Mbits/sec 2 98.4 KBytes [ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.26 MBytes 10.6 Mbits/sec 0 131 KBytes [ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.91 MBytes 16.1 Mbits/sec 0 200 KBytes [ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.20 MBytes 18.4 Mbits/sec 0 190 KBytes [ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.08 MBytes 17.4 Mbits/sec 0 212 KBytes [ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.18 MBytes 18.3 Mbits/sec 0 218 KBytes [ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.18 MBytes 18.3 Mbits/sec 0 207 KBytes [ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 2.03 MBytes 17.0 Mbits/sec 0 212 KBytes [ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.18 MBytes 18.3 Mbits/sec 0 207 KBytes [ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 2.05 MBytes 17.2 Mbits/sec 0 207 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 18.8 MBytes 15.8 Mbits/sec 2 sender [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 18.6 MBytes 15.6 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done.
Comments
Never seen the cachefly speed test so low in my life
They likely rate limit around 10mbit.
Francisco
Thanks for mention
That's horribly overcrowded node.
you have good product. that why i mention you.
Don't think so because they said about limit if it was but they said "In This time to do works on the internet network, that's why it's so slow." but it was more then 4 weeks.
Sorry forget mention you @Francisco. I test your LU location and it was awsome.
@MasonR said:
Hey. This is slowest provider that i have seen too.
Give in to the Slice side.
Francisco
Hostdirty
Do they have you on a Dell Optiplex from 2002? Yikes.... Thanks for sharing your review.
removed
well no one was believing me about the hosting situation in romania , dont worry cociu isnt any better he is even proud of illegal activities on let with his friends , next time try an international brand hosting in romania like m247.ro anyways even most romanians prefer to host in western europe as they are disgusted .
What's up with your disgust of Romania and any hosting company operating from there? Did you get busted for hosting something bad from Romania?
Well. I removed my post because I don´t want to be a sourpuss when I am new in town..
However;
Hostmaze and Hostclean previously shared the same uplink, which made me suspicious because Hostclean only accepts card payments, and Hostmaze also accepts crypto payments.
It turned out that Hostmaze did not have their Solusvm server on SSL. At that time, I just thought that they were incompetent (take a look at their ip range at any malware reporting website, and check out the high amounts of junk hosted on their network)
However in hindsight, maybe their solusvm just or also was not licensed.
Currently Hostclean is using Hostmaze as an uplink. So I wouldn´t be surprised if they are also using the same hardware.
... What I forgot to mention.
Hostmaze did not answer their support emails in a LONG time
So it is rather strange that Hostclean now suddenly uses them as an uplink
https://www.trustpilot.com/review/hostmaze.com
I would advice to avoid Hostmaze and Hostclean for now
I believe he was castrated in Romania.
Now where are the impartial admins in response to personal attacks aka hate speech?
I am using host clean net hosting from last 6 months. I am very much satisfied with it. I recommended many of my friends to use this hosting. Now i renewed this for 1 years.
Jhonny Jackson
I have worked on many other hosting but for me as an romania host clean is best cause its cheap reliable as well as its fast and i am using their unlimited plan and its awesome.
Mark Andrew
Are those fake reviews lel?
I thought google removed all fake news? Does this mean google lied to people? should we sue google?
You thought wrong.
Only place that review can be found is on the hostclean site itself. Dated 2014 by them.
"Port 1 Gbit Shared"
Looks like they stack more than 100 customers per node.You should take hostdirty. Definitely cleaner.
I think hostclean is a dead pool now, From last 2 months vps is down and no reply to support tickets and even the live support is not responding and i can see the live chat people are online. I believe they are packing up and getting ready to vanish soon.
Any comment ?
1...2...3... You're out
not a clean network at all