Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


ZeptoVM - 10Gbps SSD KVM VPS in St. Petersburg - 50% OFF recurring - $6.49/mo
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

ZeptoVM - 10Gbps SSD KVM VPS in St. Petersburg - 50% OFF recurring - $6.49/mo

avelineaveline Member, Patron Provider

About us

Misaka Network LLC is a Wyoming registered LLC (Filling ID 2017-000756675).

We are a RIPE NCC LIR member and also run our own network AS57695.

Features

  • SolusVM Powered
  • Native IPv6
  • BGP Session Available
  • 3 day Money Back Guarantee
  • Full root access

Offer

Use coupon code LET170817 for 50% OFF lifetime recurring discount in any plan.

Test results of RU-LED-SSD1024:

Looking Glass: http://ru-led01.lg.zeptovm.com/

IPv4: 185.209.85.5

IPv6: 2a0b:4342:2000:1::1

RU-LED-SSD1024 6.49 USD

  • CPU 1 vCPU (E5-2630 v4)
  • Memory 1G DDR4
  • Storage 10G SSD (HW RAID10)
  • Bandwidth 1T (In + Out)
  • Uptime 2 * 10Gbps
  • IPv4 1 * /32
  • IPv6 1 * /128
  • BGP Session + $15 Setup Fee

Purchase

Plans with higher specification can be found here

Comments

  • RhysRhys Member, Host Rep

    Full table or just default route?

  • avelineaveline Member, Patron Provider

    @Rhys said:
    Full table or just default route?

    Full table by default, default route only is also okay if you like.

  • Picked up one of these last time around. Some quick test results:

    CDN Cachefly 92.6MB/s

    Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 11.5MB/s

    Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 11.8MB/s

    Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 10.6MB/s

    San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 8.71MB/s

    Washington, DC, US Softlayer 5.14MB/s

    Tokyo, Japan Linode 6.97MB/s

    Tokyo2, Japan Linode 5.50MB/s

    Singapore Softlayer 4.71MB/s

    Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 16.1MB/s

    Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 45.5MB/s

    I/O (1st run) : 65.8 MB/s

    I/O (2nd run) : 207 MB/s

    I/O (3rd run) : 704 MB/s

    Average I/O : 325.6 MB/s

    Thanked by 1HJSC
  • KevinjoaKevinjoa Member
    edited August 2017

    Looking glass server is in Canada not russia. Seems fixed now.

  • avelineaveline Member, Patron Provider
    edited August 2017

    So here's speedtest from my own servers (not official speedtest server):

    Provider Location IPv4 address Download Speed Latency Vultr Amsterdam, NL 45.63.43.x 109MB/s 36.611ms Vultr Frankfurt, DE 45.32.158.x 271MB/s 26.452ms Vultr Paris, FR 45.32.151.x 224MB/s 47.996ms Vultr London, GB 108.61.197.x 75.8MB/s 40.262ms Vultr Santa Clara, US 104.156.230.x 16.6MB/s 189.583ms Vultr New Jersey, US 107.191.38.x 33.8MB/s 117.774ms Vultr Los Angeles, US 45.76.67.x 72.7MB/s 199.413ms Vultr Seattle, US 45.32.227.x 58.9MB/s 197.457ms Vultr Miami, US 104.156.246.x 65.2MB/s 153.156ms Vultr Chicago, US 45.76.19.x 16.4MB/s 139.939ms Vultr Dallas, US 45.32.192.x 30.2MB/s 163.500ms Vultr Atlanta, US 45.32.218.x 75.0MB/s 142.330ms Vultr Sydney, AU 45.63.26.x 62.4MB/s 342.642ms Vultr Tokyo, JP 45.32.27.x 11.5MB/s 288.745ms Vultr Singapore, SG 45.76.158.x 15.1MB/s 289.103ms SoftLayer Hong Kong, HK 103.56.55.x 39.2MB/s 345.862ms SoftLayer Tokyo, JP 45.116.14.x 52.0MB/s 277.324ms SoftLayer Washington, US 206.217.193.x 41.9MB/s 124.262ms EDIS Saint Petersburg, RU 213.183.54.x 51.4MB/s 11.181ms Melbicom Moscow, RU 213.183.48.x 68.4MB/s 11.151ms G-Core Khabarovsk #1, RU 92.223.80.x 100MB/s 110.738ms G-Core Khabarovsk #2, RU 92.223.72.x 33.2MB/s 110.253ms i3d Ashburn, US 104.153.86.x 31.0MB/s 121.957ms Interoute Frankfurt, DE 213.39.55.x 114MB/s 40.037ms Interoute Hong Kong, HK 203.95.212.x 63.1MB/s 347.002ms LeaseWeb Hong Kong, HK 103.75.117.x 75.4MB/s 229.914ms LeaseWeb Singapore, SG 209.58.177.x 59.9MB/s 214.170ms Linode Tokyo 2, JP 172.104.90.x 75.6MB/s 293.300ms VPS247 Frankfurt, DE 185.94.194.x 105MB/s 59.716ms VPS247 Paris, FR 185.94.189.x 82.6MB/s 64.359ms Alicloud Hong Kong, HK 47.89.x.x 18.4MB/s 358.226ms Alicloud Shenzhen, CN 120.76.x.x 25.2MB/s 162.121ms Alicloud Hangzhou, CN 120.27.x.x 23.8MB/s 164.174ms Alicloud Shanghai, CN 106.15.x.x 25.2MB/s 162.075ms Alicloud Beijing, CN 47.93.x.x 25.0MB/s 133.349ms NetEase Hangzhou, CN 59.111.x.x 49.7MB/s 141.583ms Meituan Beijing 4, CN 101.236.x.x 66.9MB/s 119.454ms China Mobile Zhenjiang, CN 221.181.x.x 27.9MB/s 279.797ms China Unicom Zhenjiang, CN 58.241.x.x 47.3MB/s 150.197ms

    Test files are generated using following command:
    /bin/dd if=/dev/urandom of=1G bs=1M count=1G

  • I am surprised to see you getting such good results to Japan. When I traceroute from my VPS, the route to JP goes through EU to US and across the Pacific... As you can see, I'm getting 1/10 the throughput to the official Linode test server. What explains this difference?

  • avelineaveline Member, Patron Provider
    edited August 2017

    @szarka said:
    I am surprised to see you getting such good results to Japan. When I traceroute from my VPS, the route to JP goes through EU to US and across the Pacific... As you can see, I'm getting 1/10 the throughput to the official Linode test server. What explains this difference?

    Route to my JP VPS (Vultr JP, Linode JP 2) is same with the official test server.

    Perhaps official server is congested, so I suggest you create one from Vultr or Linode to test if you need, results will be much better than official one.

    And IIJ works better than NTT / KDDI. Here is test result from lg.spb:

    root@lg:~# mtr nrt07-cg02.egw.ioslb.net --report-wide
    Start: Thu Aug 17 10:42:03 2017
    HOST: lg.led01.ru.misaka.io         Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
      1.|-- sdn-c.led01.ru.misaka.io       0.0%    10    0.2   0.1   0.1   0.2   0.0
      2.|-- 10.55.179.1                    0.0%    10    0.5   5.6   0.3  52.5  16.4
      3.|-- 01.spb.net.selectel.ru         0.0%    10    1.4   1.2   1.1   1.4   0.0
      4.|-- 02.spb.net.selectel.ru         0.0%    10    1.2   1.2   1.1   1.2   0.0
      5.|-- xe102.RT.SL.SPB.RU.retn.net    0.0%    10    2.1   1.4   1.2   2.1   0.0
      6.|-- ae1-9.RT.TC2.LON.UK.retn.net   0.0%    10   41.1  40.0  39.8  41.1   0.3
      7.|-- ldn001bb10.iij.net             0.0%    10   40.2  40.3  40.1  42.2   0.6
      8.|-- ldn001bb11.IIJ.Net             0.0%    10   90.1  46.6  40.1  90.1  15.6
      9.|-- tky001bb11.IIJ.Net             0.0%    10  211.0 211.0 210.9 211.0   0.0
     10.|-- tky009bb01.IIJ.Net             0.0%    10  211.6 211.7 211.6 211.8   0.0
     11.|-- tky009ip58.IIJ.Net             0.0%    10  211.3 211.4 211.3 211.4   0.0
     12.|-- 210.138.9.142                  0.0%    10  211.6 213.2 211.5 226.9   4.8
     13.|-- rr-mx480-1-ae0.data-hotel.net  0.0%    10  211.6 211.7 211.5 212.5   0.0
     14.|-- 125-6-112-10.data-hotel.net    0.0%    10  208.9 208.9 208.8 208.9   0.0
     15.|-- 203-174-66-242.data-hotel.net  0.0%    10  211.9 214.5 211.8 236.5   7.7
     16.|-- 203-174-64-218.data-hotel.net  0.0%    10  209.8 210.3 209.7 211.3   0.3
     17.|-- 203-104-199-18.data-hotel.net 10.0%    10  229.3 226.3 223.6 229.3   2.1
     18.|-- 203-104-206-24.data-hotel.net 10.0%    10  211.9 211.9 211.8 212.0   0.0
    
  • I'm not too worried about it. But, FYI, I am seeing different routes to speedtest.tokyo.linode.com and speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com than to your test server. For example:

    2 10.55.179.1 (10.55.179.1) 25.694 ms 25.685 ms 25.662 ms

    3 01.spb.net.selectel.ru (188.93.17.8) 1.156 ms 1.151 ms 1.124 ms

    4 81-27-252-146.rascom.as20764.net (81.27.252.146) 1.735 ms 1.842 ms 1.866 ms

    5 80-64-96-229.rascom.as20764.net (80.64.96.229) 12.587 ms 12.658 ms 12.649 ms

    6 xe-9-2-0.bar1.Stockholm1.Level3.net (213.242.110.113) 11.942 ms 11.897 ms 11.826 ms

    7 * * *

    8 4.53.212.94 (4.53.212.94) 183.525 ms 186.992 ms 186.979 ms

    9 sjeGCS001.int-gw.kddi.ne.jp (111.87.3.145) 185.943 ms sjeGCS002.int-gw.kddi.ne.jp (111.87.3.221) 175.671 ms sjeGCS002.int-gw.kddi.ne.jp (111.87.3.149) 179.328 ms

    10 pajbb001.int-gw.kddi.ne.jp (59.128.3.206) 184.997 ms pajbb001.int-gw.kddi.ne.jp (59.128.3.190) 186.315 ms pajbb001.int-gw.kddi.ne.jp (59.128.3.186) 183.112 ms

    11 otejbb206.int-gw.kddi.ne.jp (106.187.8.17) 301.688 ms otejbb206.int-gw.kddi.ne.jp (203.181.100.69) 273.335 ms 273.308 ms

    12 cm-fcu204.kddnet.ad.jp (124.215.194.181) 284.085 ms 293.610 ms cm-fcu204.kddnet.ad.jp (124.215.194.165) 293.843 ms

    13 124.215.199.170 (124.215.199.170) 281.829 ms 278.999 ms 291.260 ms

    14 speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148) 286.699 ms 284.592 ms 291.248 ms

  • avelineaveline Member, Patron Provider

    @szarka said:
    I'm not too worried about it. But, FYI, I am seeing different routes to speedtest.tokyo.linode.com and speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com than to your test server.

    If you mean routes to tokyo and tokyo2 is different, it's right because they're in different datacenter with different BGP blend (KDDI single homed / NTT + PCCW + TATA)

    And the lowest latency path from St. Petersburg to Tokyo I can find is Khabarovsk (we also sell VPS in Khabarovsk) + Linode Tokyo 1 / Data Hotel (for example https://cloudgarage.jp).

    Start: Fri Aug 18 02:59:29 2017
    HOST: lg.led01.ru.misaka.io        Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
      1.|-- sdn-c.led01.ru.misaka.io      0.0%    10    0.2   0.2   0.1   0.2   0.0
      2.|-- ae01b.r03.spb01.ru.misaka.io  0.0%    10    0.7   0.7   0.4   1.0   0.0
      3.|-- et322.r01.khv01.ru.misaka.io  0.0%    10  113.4 113.3 112.9 114.2   0.0
      4.|-- et2e2.r01.nrt01.jp.misaka.io  0.0%    10  141.2 138.3 137.7 141.2   1.0
      5.|-- ac-51-6c-af.access.misaka.io  0.0%    10  139.3 139.7 139.3 140.3   0.0
    
  • szarkaszarka Member
    edited August 2017

    Yes, latency and performance is good from Khabarovsk to JP.

    You said that the route from St. Petersburg to the official Linode (?) speedtest servers was the same as to your VPS, but that is not what I see from my VPS there. I should have posted the traceroute to JP2 (below). Routes to both Linode test IPs go through the US, though.

    2 10.55.179.1 (10.55.179.1) 0.328 ms 0.271 ms 0.245 ms

    3 01.spb.net.selectel.ru (188.93.17.8) 0.961 ms 1.039 ms 1.010 ms

    4 02.spb.net.selectel.ru (188.93.17.2) 1.241 ms 1.109 ms 1.081 ms

    5 xe102.RT.SL.SPB.RU.retn.net (87.245.228.221) 1.062 ms 1.027 ms 1.037 ms

    6 ae1-5.RT.IRX.FKT.DE.retn.net (87.245.232.245) 56.996 ms 45.141 ms 45.064 ms

    7 213.198.77.213 (213.198.77.213) 45.143 ms 45.128 ms 45.185 ms

    8 ae-5.r24.frnkge08.de.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.4.162) 46.473 ms 45.063 ms 45.033 ms

    9 ae-4.r25.nycmny01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.4) 127.154 ms 127.174 ms 128.642 ms

    10 ae-1.r24.nycmny01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.206) 130.344 ms 130.338 ms 130.414 ms

    11 ae-2.r20.sttlwa01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.4.13) 196.013 ms 195.975 ms 193.390 ms

    12 ae-13.r30.tokyjp05.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.4.143) 290.714 ms 290.715 ms 293.534 ms

    13 ae-2.r02.tokyjp05.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.22) 290.304 ms 284.390 ms 282.064 ms

    14 192.80.16.6 (192.80.16.6) 288.176 ms 287.974 ms 285.814 ms

    15 139.162.64.6 (139.162.64.6) 291.575 ms 139.162.64.4 (139.162.64.4) 303.489 ms 139.162.64.6 (139.162.64.6) 290.102 ms

    16 speedtest.shg1.linode.com (139.162.65.37) 282.356 ms 283.001 ms 281.062 ms

    Sorry for the confusion.

  • avelineaveline Member, Patron Provider

    @szarka said:
    Yes, latency and performance is good from Khabarovsk to JP.

    You said that the route from St. Petersburg to the official Linode (?) speedtest servers was the same as to your VPS, but that is not what I see from my VPS there. I should have posted the traceroute to JP2 (below). Routes to both Linode test IPs go through the US, though.

    Hi, could you PM me IP address of yours? Thanks.

Sign In or Register to comment.