All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Avoro: AMD EPYC-Special 2020 / 1 dedicated core, 5 GB RAM, 50 GB SSD, 10 GBit/s shared
Many of you already know us. As a small special for our new AMD host systems, we are currently offering our "EPYC Special" for a limited time. With all of our products, nested virtualization is already activated free of charge, additional IP addresses can be booked:
AMD EPYC special
1 dedicated CPU core
5 GB DDR4 ECC RAM
50 GB SSD
10 Gbit / s shared
1x IPv4 & 1x IPv6 / 64
2 TB traffic
DDoS Protection
Location: First Colo / Frankfurt am Main
LG: https://lg.harmony-solutions.de/
Order link: https://avoro.eu/cp/cart.php?a=add&pid=64
Price: EUR 12.60 / quarterly (including VAT)
The product is KVM virtualized, our support will be happy to install the server with a Windows server version of your choice. The product can be canceled and refunded via our support within 14 days.
I am available for any questions
Comments
💯
What kind of pricing for gbit shared unmetered or 100m unmetered?
(deleted)
It's a tempting offer. Is there a link to the offer?
May I ask what control panel you use? Do you allow a (publicly available) custom ISO?
At the moment we cannot offer 1 Gbit/s oder 100 Mbit/s unmetered, sorry
You can order here: https://avoro.eu/cp/cart.php?a=add&pid=64
A SolusVM is running in the background. Own ISO is not a problem and can be integrated via our support
Any bench of it , can we use 100% of CPU all the time ?
Yes you can use the CPU 100 % all the time (dedicated core). Regarding benchmarks maybe a customer can post one?
Nice, that's a pretty good deal.
@Avoro
Just to clarify, I looked at your policy regarding cancellation of the contract:
This says that one needs to cancel the contract at least one week before the end of the contract except for Rootservers, which need to be canceled at least four weeks before the end of the contract. Since this product is a vServer, I assume that one would need to cancel one week (and not four weeks) before the end of the contract, correct?
(You don't seem to have Rootservers among your current products.)
Unixbenchmark please.
In general, we also offer root servers on request. Since root servers are not our core business, we no longer offer them regularly on the website, a new overview page is already being planned.
This product is a prepaid product. That means you have to extend it explicitly, if you don't, the product will simply expire. We do not send reminders (I think some users can confirm that).
The wording is somewhat inappropriate. I will discuss this on Monday and we'll adjust that.
I see, so the customer has to extend the contract explicitly, otherwise the contract will not be extended automatically. I guess that one extends the contract by ticket?
Correct, you can extend via our webinterface for yourself at any time
Dedicated core or dedicated thread?
At this price, it's not going to be pinned to a physical core
YABS
here are the other BMs:
https://underworldstartup.com/avoro-amd-epyc-frankfurt/
Geekbench4 :
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/15206423
Note:
For non-EU residents, at the time of check out, do not pay the invoice, wait till a new invoice (which excludes the VAT) is generated. You will get an email - watch out for the word "Rechnung" and the magic number (10.59)
This AMD CPU is too hot to ignore. I have one Avoro VPS that I got about a month ago. Earlier it had Gold 6140 and 2 days back, Avoro moved it to AMD Node. So far, I am just loving it.
@vyas11
Interesting.
When i run yabs iperf3, i got ~20 min null route. (ipv6 work fine, but ipv4 first drop everything)
Support excellent, i recommend it.
Same. It happened before migration too. Good to such limit in place though.
Run a second time it should work .
Were you running Ubuntu 18.04 by any chance?
Edit:
Monitor the bandwidth usage before and after running YABS. And would you mind PM ‘ing me? Interested in the bandwidth consumption per instance of YABS.
@dragon1993
Ref your message below: good for you mate! Budapest and Bengaluru both start with a B but different distances from Frankfurt unfortunately
Now i tried again. I don't got block.
@vyas11 My speedtest result much better.
DL: 5310 UP: 1835 Server ID: 2073
https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/a05622f5-92bc-43e8-bddf-323dbd57f317
Are you able to combine multiple offers into one larger package?
Example
3 of the current offer into:
3 dedicated CPU core
15 GB DDR4 ECC RAM
150 GB SSD
6 TB traffic
... etc
Just to point out that the benchmarks posted above aren't literally of the VPS being offered in this thread (initially, I thought otherwise). They're still useful as an indication, of course.
Would have been amazing if it was 1 dedicated CPU core, i.e. 2 threads. OP missed the v in vCPU
Hm
Edit:
@angstrom to your message below: I thought that excluding the processor, rest seemed to be in line- I believe this is the same as the "Groundhog Day" offer that Avoro has posted.
I cannot comment on those who got the upgrade since I did not get any other plan from them before this wee.
You mean they are?
I understand: it's just that if one posts a benchmark in a particular offer thread without further clarification, others assume (by default, as I did) that the benchmark is of the offer in question.
But I agree: the benchmark is still relevant (given that it's the same provider, etc.).
Lol
there was a reason why I said “excluding the processor “. They mentioned AMD Epyc, BM shows the same. But you may notice BM shows “2”.
That is a conundrum best left for the learned and the wise to comment on.
I noticed this when I scanned the benchmark for a second time!
I merely wanted to explicitly note that the benchmarks posted aren't literally of the offer in question, but that they are indicative nevertheless.
Makes me wonder: Does that apply to this specific offer or every offer or BM?
Because in the past week one BM for a vps with ssd showed speeds comparable to hdd. The person who posted it intended to show network performance only, but did not explicitly note as such when they posted it.
Another BM had an extra cpu and RAM than base offer, the poster did not explicitly note that they had opted for optional upgrades till someone asked.
A BM posted today had no date or time stamp, so the 12 plus day uptime and other indicators have to be interpreted on an assumption of recency. Which is rather dangerous .
Then there’s a host who have posted a 7 month old BM in their offer thread. But have not clarified explicitly or provided updates about how busy the node is and so on.
p.s: does one write “a host has” or “ a host have” ? Not planning to take the 84 dollar English lessons
Cheers