Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Compare Kimsufi 2G Celeron 1.2GHz and Atom 1.6GHz
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Compare Kimsufi 2G Celeron 1.2GHz and Atom 1.6GHz

edited May 2013 in Help

I have kimsufi 2GB but it use Celeron 1.2GHz
model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 220 @ 1.20GHz

Now, kimsufi 2GB change to Atom 230/D425 1.6GHz

it seen Atom is better, but Atom 230 is "1 core 1 thread" and Atom D425 is 2 thread 1.8GB

What's better? Celeron 1.2GHz or Atom 1.6GHz, and How to take Atom D425 1.8GB

Comments

  • flyfly Member

    wat

  • Atom D425 1.8GB????? what.

  • matthewvzmatthewvz Member, Host Rep

    I think hes asking which is better?

  • mnpeepmnpeep Member

    I think it's trying to communicate, what do we do?

  • bcrlsnbcrlsn Member

    I have an atom 1.6ghz w/ 2gb ram at WII - It's decent, I'm running a benchmark on it at the moment. But I wouldn't use it for more than backups and webserver. It's not super powerful.

  • lbftlbft Member
    edited May 2013

    Kimsufi CPUs with their Passmark scores, bigger number is better:

    CPU  Passmark Score
    Intel Atom 230 @ 1.60GHz    311
    Intel Celeron 220 @ 1.20GHz    337
    Intel Atom D425 @ 1.80GHz    389
    Intel Atom 330 @ 1.60GHz    595
    Intel Atom N2800 @ 1.86GHz    644
    Intel Core i3-2130 @ 3.40GHz  4031

    tl;dr: Celeron 220/Atom 230/Atom D425 are all pretty similar in performance.

  • JyleeJylee Member, Host Rep
    edited May 2013

    My N2800 is excellent.

Sign In or Register to comment.