New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Compare Kimsufi 2G Celeron 1.2GHz and Atom 1.6GHz
sieuvocmaytinh
Member
I have kimsufi 2GB but it use Celeron 1.2GHz
model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 220 @ 1.20GHz
Now, kimsufi 2GB change to Atom 230/D425 1.6GHz
it seen Atom is better, but Atom 230 is "1 core 1 thread" and Atom D425 is 2 thread 1.8GB
What's better? Celeron 1.2GHz or Atom 1.6GHz, and How to take Atom D425 1.8GB
Comments
wat
Atom D425 1.8GB????? what.
I think hes asking which is better?
I think it's trying to communicate, what do we do?
I have an atom 1.6ghz w/ 2gb ram at WII - It's decent, I'm running a benchmark on it at the moment. But I wouldn't use it for more than backups and webserver. It's not super powerful.
Kimsufi CPUs with their Passmark scores, bigger number is better:
tl;dr: Celeron 220/Atom 230/Atom D425 are all pretty similar in performance.
Here's a Atom 330 Benchmark - http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2013/05/10/VbhFh7vljAJve6fR
My N2800 is excellent.