Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


VPS Providers peered with Akamai
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

VPS Providers peered with Akamai

Hey guys, any VPS providers here or that you know of that are peered with Akamai?

Thanks!

«1

Comments

  • for nike, most of my stuff is @ www.nyi.net

    0.7ms from nike.com.

    Thanked by 2WSS doughmanes
  • @hzr said:
    for nike, most of my stuff is @ www.nyi.net

    0.7ms from nike.com.

    I think I'm blind and stupid, but I can't find anywhere on that site to order a VPS.

  • RazzaRazza Member
    edited February 2017

    Not too sure why you even need to use a provider peered with Akamai, i tested store.nike.com from a number of my server at different host's most were sub 3ms and quite a number were sub 1ms none of them are at host's peered with Akamai.

    Have fun with your limited edition Nike shoes sales.

  • That's pretty much the point of Akamai - they have Edge nodes virtually everywhere, so you're rarely more than a few ms away from one.

    China is a bit different, obviously.

    Thanked by 1Maounique
  • Hi @Annointed
    Our Network is peered with Akamai if you are after services in Australia :)

  • You could have good chance in Germany with provider who are present at DE-CIX and are using the RouteServer. Akamai is also using RouteServer, so that no explicit peering between both parties is needed.

  • @Razza said:
    Not too sure why you even need to use a provider peered with Akamai, i tested store.nike.com from a number of my server at different host's most were sub 3ms and quite a number were sub 1ms none of them are at host's peered with Akamai.

    Have fun with your limited edition Nike shoes sales.

    Stop assuming I'm using this for Nike!

    Also, I'm looking for US locations, thanks.

  • if the provider/its upstream has a presence is public peering facilities like equinix, likely they have peering, as akamai has pop at most major public peering facilities.

  • RazzaRazza Member
    edited February 2017

    Annointed said: Stop assuming I'm using this for Nike!

    I might of been wrong guessing Nike, but based on your other post's it will probably be for a bot to buy some limited edition item from some other online store using Akamai cdn.

  • Still looking! :)

  • CloudconeCloudcone Member, Patron Provider

    Hi @Annointed, we are peered with Akamai, PM me your request if LA, USA location is good for you.

  • @Annointed said:

    @hzr said:
    for nike, most of my stuff is @ www.nyi.net

    0.7ms from nike.com.

    I think I'm blind and stupid, but I can't find anywhere on that site to order a VPS.

    You aren't blind and stupid that way, NYI's a transit provider and not VPS.
    You need to find someone who uses them as their DC/one of their carriers in DC

  • @tmwc said:

    @Annointed said:

    @hzr said:
    for nike, most of my stuff is @ www.nyi.net

    0.7ms from nike.com.

    I think I'm blind and stupid, but I can't find anywhere on that site to order a VPS.

    You aren't blind and stupid that way, NYI's a transit provider and not VPS.
    You need to find someone who uses them as their DC/one of their carriers in DC

    Gotcha, thanks.

    Still looking for Akamai peered providers who have US locations!

  • For sneakers?

    One of our LA sites and our NYC site is peered with Akamai. We have clients who sell Windows VPS for this.

    PM me for their URL. Not posting them publicly.

  • @VortexMagnus said:
    For sneakers?

    One of our LA sites and our NYC site is peered with Akamai. We have clients who sell Windows VPS for this.

    PM me for their URL. Not posting them publicly.

    I have PM'd you, hope to hear back from you soon! :)

  • jhjh Member

    Most big DCs have an Akamai presence - that's Akamai's selling point. Anything with Equinix etc should be fine.

  • @jh said:
    Most big DCs have an Akamai presence - that's Akamai's selling point. Anything with Equinix etc should be fine.

    Any examples?

  • From VPS247 Manchester.

  • @kcaj said:
    From VPS247 Manchester.

    Are the US locations peered with Akamai? Or only Manchester?

  • online.net is 1.4ms from store.nike.com

  • VortexMagnusVortexMagnus Member
    edited February 2017

    For us...

    LA:

    PING a471.q.akamai.net (184.28.188.184) 56(84) bytes of data.

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=0.422 ms

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=0.476 ms

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=0.509 ms

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=4.34 ms

    --- a471.q.akamai.net ping statistics ---

    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3007ms

    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.422/1.438/4.348/1.680 ms

    NYC:

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=1.34 ms

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=1.35 ms

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=1.30 ms

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=1.24 ms

  • mfsmfs Banned, Member

    @kcaj said:
    From VPS247 Manchester.

    There's something missing in that mtr or is it me?

    Anyway, Prometeus (CDLAN, MIX-IT)

    # mtr -c 4 --report-wide --aslookup store.nike.com
    Start: Sun Feb 19 20:00:28 2017
    HOST: milano-21             Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
      1. AS34971 XXX.prometeus.net   0.0%     4    0.5   0.6   0.5   0.7   0.0
      2. AS20836 217.171.38.129       0.0%     4    0.3   0.4   0.3   0.5   0.0
      3. AS20836 gin-cam.cdlan.net    0.0%     4    0.8   0.5   0.3   0.8   0.0
      4. AS???   akamai.mix-it.net    0.0%     4    1.1   1.1   1.0   1.3   0.0
      5. AS20940 2.18.240.65          0.0%     4    0.6   0.5   0.4   0.6   0.0
    
    # hping3 -S -p 443 --count 5 --faster store.nike.com
    HPING store.nike.com (eth0 2.18.240.59): S set, 40 headers + 0 data bytes
    len=44 ip=2.18.240.59 ttl=61 DF id=0 sport=443 flags=SA seq=0 win=29200 rtt=0.4 ms
    len=44 ip=2.18.240.59 ttl=61 DF id=0 sport=443 flags=SA seq=1 win=29200 rtt=0.3 ms
    len=44 ip=2.18.240.59 ttl=61 DF id=0 sport=443 flags=SA seq=2 win=29200 rtt=0.3 ms
    len=44 ip=2.18.240.59 ttl=61 DF id=0 sport=443 flags=SA seq=3 win=29200 rtt=0.3 ms
    len=44 ip=2.18.240.59 ttl=61 DF id=0 sport=443 flags=SA seq=4 win=29200 rtt=0.3 ms
    
    --- store.nike.com hping statistic ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max = 0.3/0.3/0.4 ms
    
    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • For us location London:

    PING a471.q.akamai.net (72.247.177.91) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from a72-247-177-91.deploy.akamaitechnologies.com (72.247.177.91): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=0.622 ms
    64 bytes from a72-247-177-91.deploy.akamaitechnologies.com (72.247.177.91): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=0.667 ms
    64 bytes from a72-247-177-91.deploy.akamaitechnologies.com (72.247.177.91): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=0.681 ms
    64 bytes from a72-247-177-91.deploy.akamaitechnologies.com (72.247.177.91): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=0.584 ms
    
    --- a471.q.akamai.net ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 2999ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.584/0.638/0.681/0.045 ms
    
  • @VortexMagnus said:
    For us...

    LA:

    PING a471.q.akamai.net (184.28.188.184) 56(84) bytes of data.

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=0.422 ms

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=0.476 ms

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=0.509 ms

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=4.34 ms

    --- a471.q.akamai.net ping statistics ---

    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3007ms

    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.422/1.438/4.348/1.680 ms

    NYC:

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=1.34 ms

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=1.35 ms

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=1.30 ms

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=1.24 ms

    Is that from VortexNode.com? or the Hype one you PM'd me.

  • @Annointed said:

    @VortexMagnus said:
    For us...

    LA:

    PING a471.q.akamai.net (184.28.188.184) 56(84) bytes of data.

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=0.422 ms

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=0.476 ms

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=0.509 ms

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=4.34 ms

    --- a471.q.akamai.net ping statistics ---

    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3007ms

    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.422/1.438/4.348/1.680 ms

    NYC:

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=1.34 ms

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=1.35 ms

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=1.30 ms

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=1.24 ms

    Is that from VortexNode.com? or the Hype one you PM'd me.

    Hype are hosted in our network, they're a customer of ours.

    The above results are from our Looking Glass for those locations.

  • @VortexMagnus said:

    @Annointed said:

    @VortexMagnus said:
    For us...

    LA:

    PING a471.q.akamai.net (184.28.188.184) 56(84) bytes of data.

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=0.422 ms

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=0.476 ms

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=0.509 ms

    64 bytes from a184-28-188-184.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (184.28.188.184): icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=4.34 ms

    --- a471.q.akamai.net ping statistics ---

    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3007ms

    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.422/1.438/4.348/1.680 ms

    NYC:

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=1.34 ms

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=1.35 ms

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=1.30 ms

    64 bytes from a173-222-238-81.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com (173.222.238.81): icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=1.24 ms

    Is that from VortexNode.com? or the Hype one you PM'd me.

    Hype are hosted in our network, they're a customer of ours.

    The above results are from our Looking Glass for those locations.

    Too bad you guys don't have Windows VPS :(

  • @Annointed said:
    Too bad you guys don't have Windows VPS :(

    Buy from Hype then. They sell Windows VPS in our network.

  • @VortexMagnus said:

    @Annointed said:
    Too bad you guys don't have Windows VPS :(

    Buy from Hype then. They sell Windows VPS in our network.

    They're way too overpriced. Thanks though.

  • @Annointed said:

    @VortexMagnus said:

    @Annointed said:
    Too bad you guys don't have Windows VPS :(

    Buy from Hype then. They sell Windows VPS in our network.

    They're way too overpriced. Thanks though.

    That is what the market commands.

    You want to make hundreds if not thousands of dollars from sneakers? Pay an appropriate price for the server you need, like the rest of that market seems to be.

  • @VortexMagnus Hype is weird but there is niche market for sneakers so its co-exists

Sign In or Register to comment.