Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Post your VPS iops
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Post your VPS iops

blackblack Member
edited February 2013 in General

Run with

./ioping -c 10 .

ipxcore:
10 requests completed in 9001.8 ms, 9940 iops, 38.8 mb/s

hostigation (CLT location):
10 requests completed in 9017.6 ms, 5123 iops, 20.0 mb/s

urpad (LA location):
10 requests completed in 9003.6 ms, 3519 iops, 13.7 mb/s

ramnode (ssd cached):
10 requests completed in 9004.5 ms, 3132 iops, 12.2 mb/s

stylexnetworks:
10 requests completed in 9035.0 ms, 300 iops, 1.2 mb/s

chicagoVPS (Chicago location):
10 requests completed in 9134.4 ms, 75 iops, 0.3 mb/s

What kind of iops do you guys get?

«134567

Comments

  • Damn @black. 75 iops at CVPS.... That's a quality company right there :) Seems to be how their discs spin in Chicago, floppy style.

    Onehost Asia:
    10 requests completed in 9002.0 ms, 9091 iops, 35.5 mb/s

    DotVPS Maidenhead, UK:
    10 requests completed in 9017.9 ms, 8503 iops, 33.2 mb/s

    Ramnode SSD cached:
    10 requests completed in 9003.0 ms, 4444 iops, 17.4 mb/s

    BuyVM Buffalo:
    10 requests completed in 9019.0 ms, 3956 iops, 15.5 mb/s

    Simpleno.de Dallas:
    10 requests completed in 9005.8 ms, 3778 iops, 14.8 mb/s

    BuyVM Storage Vegas:
    10 requests completed in 9010.1 ms, 2569 iops, 10.0 mb/s

    Prometeus:
    10 requests completed in 9005.2 ms, 2298 iops, 9.0 mb/s

    PrismaVPS:
    10 requests completed in 9024.9 ms, 420 iops, 1.6 mb/s

    Unnamed CVPS "reseller" in Chicago:
    10 requests completed in 9095.9 ms, 111 iops, 0.4 mb/s

  • Prometeus:

    10 requests completed in 9003.3 ms, 4907 iops, 19.2 mb/s

    UrPad:

    10 requests completed in 9003.8 ms, 3557 iops, 13.9 mb/s
  • Ouch, those CVPS results are crap..

  • Fliphost (Dallas, TX) Storage deal they posted the other day
    10 requests completed in 9002.5 ms, 8123 iops, 31.7 mb/s

    Hostigation (Rock Hill, SC)
    10 requests completed in 9003.3 ms, 4822 iops, 18.8 mb/s

    BoostVPS (Chicago, IL)
    10 requests completed in 9003.4 ms, 4866 iops, 19.0 mb/s

  • Come on @KernelSanders CVPS is fine. You just aren't drinking the kool-aid either. :)

    Seriously, embarassing IOPs.

  • I guess selling 2GB RAM VPS at LEB prices has some repercussions huh @pubcrawler

  • Nah, CVPS is not always that slow. At times it gives pretty nice results >10k iops, at other times it gives as low as 20 iops. Every test I did wasn't the same result, it was last month though before I cancelled my 2GB plan.

  • I just had a container restart and everything to test this Chicago instance... Whew.

    A floppy would certainly outperform this. In all fairness, it's just probably CVPS/CC gear. Since someone else manages the server (or so I believe) it's not their fault.

    Horrendous.

    root@il-usa:~# ioping -c 10 .
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=1 time=4.5 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=2 time=31.9 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=3 time=22.0 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=4 time=14.7 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=5 time=202.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=6 time=742.3 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=7 time=6.6 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=8 time=34.4 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=9 time=29.3 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=10 time=26.1 ms

    --- . (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
    10 requests completed in 10120.2 ms, 9 iops, 0.0 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 4.5/111.4/742.3/217.3 ms
    root@il-usa:~# ioping -c 10 .
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=1 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=2 time=18.4 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=3 time=14.8 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=4 time=9.5 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=5 time=8.7 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=6 time=10.4 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=7 time=5.7 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=8 time=10.0 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=9 time=12.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=10 time=14.5 ms

    --- . (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
    10 requests completed in 9109.4 ms, 96 iops, 0.4 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/10.4/18.4/4.8 ms
    root@il-usa:~# ioping -c 10 .
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=1 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=2 time=50.0 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=3 time=28.7 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=4 time=14.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=5 time=17.7 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=6 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=7 time=12.8 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=8 time=67.7 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=9 time=16.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=10 time=15.4 ms

    --- . (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
    10 requests completed in 9228.1 ms, 45 iops, 0.2 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/22.3/67.7/20.3 ms

  • @pubcrawler said: Damn @black. 75 iops at CVPS.... That's a quality company right there :) Seems to be how their discs spin in Chicago, floppy style.

    Yeah, I thought it was a bit low too. I'm actually running a few tests and as @DalComp said, it varies greatly. I'll keep an eye on it though, to see if I can get this resolved.

  • AmitzAmitz Member
    edited February 2013

    Ramnode SSD Cached:
    (while mainly idle)

    10 requests completed in 9002.6 ms, 5760 iops, 22.5 
    mb/s 

    Prometeus VZSSD:
    (while under serious load)

    10 requests completed in 9005.1 ms, 2762 iops, 10.8 
    mb/s 

    BuyVM NY:
    (while mainly idle)

     10 requests completed in 9022.5 ms, 1819 iops, 7.1 m
    b/s

    KnownHost:
    (while serving some small sites)

    10 requests completed in 9008.5 ms, 10616 iops, 41.5
     mb/s
  • pubcrawlerpubcrawler Banned
    edited February 2013

    Wow @Amitz KnowHost has some serious IOPs...

  • DalCompDalComp Member
    edited February 2013

    FtpIt trial plan:

    10 requests completed in 9032.9 ms, 315 iops, 1.2 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/3.2/12.1/4.0 ms

    RamNode 512MB CVZ:

    10 requests completed in 9002.5 ms, 5889 iops, 23.0 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/0.5/0.2 ms

    UrPad Black Friday:

    10 requests completed in 9003.0 ms, 4658 iops, 18.2 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/1.3/0.4 ms

    StormVZ 2GB US:

    10 requests completed in 9001.8 ms, 9470 iops, 37.0 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.1/0.0 ms

    LiquidHost 1,5GB:

    10 requests completed in 9016.7 ms, 921 iops, 3.6 mb/s`
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/1.1/8.5/2.5 ms

    DirectSpace $15/year plan:

    10 requests completed in 9102.9 ms, 108 iops, 0.4 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/9.3/29.5/11.3 ms

    FrontRangeHosting 128MB OpenVZ:

    10 requests completed in 9005.1 ms, 2625 iops, 10.3 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.4/2.7/0.8 ms
  • @pubcrawler said: Wow @Amitz @KnowHost has some serious IOPs...

    Yeah that's a very very good result @Knownhost :)

  • See Directspace with their 108 iops. That has to be one of the worst providers ever. The last LEB offer got its share of negative comments.

  • Knownhost is by far the most impressive managed provider that I ever came across in ALL aspects. They are outstanding. And I have been with managed "Gems" like WiredTree, Rackspace, Gigenet, FutureHosting and ServInt. Knownhost/RocketVPS are awesome. But they are clearly not in the LEB sector while still cheap for their service quality.

  • CVPS_ChrisCVPS_Chris Member, Patron Provider
    edited February 2013

    Something doesn't seem right here. Please Pm me the node you got these results from.

    @pubcrawler, I love being your everything :) love you baby

  • @pubcrawler said: See Directspace with their 108 iops. That has to be one of the worst providers ever. The last LEB offer got its share of negative comments.

    Yea, it's my second LEB which I bought before familiarize myself with LET. So I didn't really checked the reviews, etc. Frequent downtime too. Now it is pretty much idling or for script tests only.

  • pubcrawlerpubcrawler Banned
    edited February 2013

    :) Hey if I just stopped @CVPS_Chris everyone would forget about you :)

    Just send me my affiliate money. And I don't accept Rials.

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    @pubcrawler said: 10 requests completed in 10120.2 ms, 9 iops, 0.0 mb/s

    Well, the lowest I ever saw was 2, however, 9 is not very far.

  • Currently getting:

    10 requests completed in 10759.7 ms, 4 iops, 0.0 mb/s

    Host is looking at the problem now, so I'd rather not post who to see if they can resolve it first.

  • That's good @prae5. They have cavemen transcribing your data to stone tablets.

  • Awmusic12635Awmusic12635 Member, Host Rep
    edited February 2013

    Not sure if I am allowed to post my own. However SSD2 :

    
    [root@test ioping-0.6]# ./ioping -c 10 .
     ioping statistics ---
    10 requests completed in 9001.7 ms, 12422 iops, 48.5 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.1/0.0 ms
    
    
  • DalCompDalComp Member
    edited February 2013

    Ups, I was wondering why I didn't see RamNode's normally above awesome performance. I just remembered I was running a pretty extensive script, so I stopped the script for some minutes and re-run the test:

    10 requests completed in 9001.6 ms, 12255 iops, 47.9 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.1/0.0 ms

    'Nuff said, @Nick_A!

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    @pubcrawler said: They have cavemen transcribing your data to stone tablets.

    Actually, that was a great one :) I laughed out loud :)

  • belinikbelinik Member
    edited February 2013

    got some very different result in cvps compare to others... perhaps I got lucky as other mentioned

    cvps 2gb

    10 requests completed in 9001.5 ms, 13624 iops, 53.2 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.1/0.0 ms

    secure dragon 96mb

    10 requests completed in 9002.7 ms, 6452 iops, 25.2 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/0.2/0.0 ms

    hostigation 512 la

    10 requests completed in 9020.0 ms, 6549 iops, 25.6 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/0.3/0.1 ms

  • Those are great numbers @belinik. Surprised at the top one. Has to be an empty node or something.

  • DO AMS1

    10 requests completed in 9005.7 ms, 2578 iops, 10.1 mb/s
  • @pubcrawler said: Those are great numbers @belinik. Surprised at the top one. Has to be an empty node or something.

    @belinik is the result consistent over several tests?

  • @DalComp I think it was between 5 minute interval as initially I was doing it with centmin's ioping script and have similar result. Then I look around for the original script as the format was different.

    just did it again:
    10 requests completed in 9001.5 ms, 13928 iops, 54.4 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.1/0.1/0.0 ms

    @pubcrawler I recall my vps was provisioned 1-2 weeks ago.

  • jamsonjamson Member
    edited February 2013

    Hostigation in LA on KVM

    10 requests completed in 9002.3 ms, 9372 iops, 36.6 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.1/0.0 ms

    DigitalOcean in NY

    10 requests completed in 9015.5 ms, 896 iops, 3.5 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.4/1.1/7.5/2.1 ms

    OneProvider in Australia

    10 requests completed in 9063.5 ms, 180 iops, 0.7 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/5.6/20.9/8.3 ms

    (Not sure what's going on here, usually higher than that - only around ~800 though...)

    HTTPZoom

    10 requests completed in 9511.0 ms, 20 iops, 0.1 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/49.9/185.6/66.5 ms

    (Again, not sure what's going on here - usually higher as well)

Sign In or Register to comment.