New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Congrats on the enhanced service
looking good, sadly(or more like luckily) i moved out of the area and no longer need direct ct connection or else i would jump on it.
certainly not cheap, but do you have better deals?
Just to clarify, the service is a flat fee, there is no burst / overage charge.
Any chance for something smaller, say, 512MB RAM like your recent promos in other locations? Pricing using this promo code is very attractive, to be sure, but I, for one, have no need for a 2GB box. If I take it, I know how this'll end: after the novelty wears off, sooner or later I won't be able to justify another idling box and will cancel a couple months down the road.
Hi Andrew,
Not in Hong Kong no. It's an expensive, premium location and we can't justify doing small plans there at this time.
How exactly are you offering 1Mbit @95th percentile with 10M burst when you are selling dedi at 50EUR. Sorry, I'm not sure I understand the pricing structure.
In any case, is this actually coming from CT or a re-seller of CT?
We're absorbing the cost into our overall cloud revenues and service in that location.
If you want / need dedicated transit, then we pass it on at our cost rate $50 per Mbps.
Which carrier?
$50 or EUR?
According to my traceroutes, it looks like PCCW.
You could read the first post in the thread:
>
>
CT --> PCCW --> Dediserve HK
CU --> PCCW --> Dediserve HK
From my observations, not actually directly through CT, CU or even CN2 backbone. PCCW is fairly reliable though.
We're buying direct transit from PCCW to China, on dedicated links.
@dediserve I have to say, disappointed.
The day you guys "plug in" the routes, all the HK nodes down at the same time, without notice/email, explanation, or even tweets. Indeed were all happened within 15 minutes or so, but who the hell could bare if live streaming were happening that time, through dediserve HK node?
Seriously, why not be uptime sensitive?
Hi lifehome,
Have you a ticket open and I can check for you, as we'd no platform issues or outages in HK ?
Part of the Ticket #261896 (created 26/08/2015 15:48:25):
So server goes down and "just did a reboot". All my file transfers and backups was disrupted, but not outages! How ironic this could be? Plus no memo or email about this upgrade would affect users? :duh:
Individual Hypervisors can (rarely) need a reboot, I am sure the team can give you more details in the ticket should you need it. We provide HA Loadbalancer solutions https://dediserve.com/loadbalancers ) which you can combine with servers spread over many hypervisors to provide you with more assured uptime.
expensive.
compare to OneCloud(KVM), HostUS, HostwithLinux, CloudsVM, Hosthatch(OpenVZs)
On a like:like basis our pricing is extremely competitive
yes true, just sad you didn't use softlayer HK as your default HK DC, addon EUR15/m for 1m burst 10mbps is really expensive, or even $50 /m dedicated.
We're running out of Equinix Hong Kong, and the transit cost for both burst and dedicated is pretty hard to beat, for the services we offer. You get what you pay for
They can't use SL HK - New SL contracts have the much lower BW alloc and 1TB costs like 50EUR.
Offtopic: Seems your signature's CAPS change frequently.
I did and found no direct CT route. So I asked. And finally we get an answer that it's not direct CT but via PCCW. Which makes sense because CT is much more expensive.
Technically that is still cheaper than $50 /M. 1TB is equivalent to 3Mbit, so it would cost $150 from PCCW.
@dediserve, are you saying you buy dedicated China bandwidth from PCCW or that PCCW has direct route to China and you buy international bandwidth from PCCW.
Meaning you sell China Only bw for $50 /M and that does not include any international route.
Funnily enough the softlayer website shows prices of over $100 per TB for servers in Hong Kong.
We provide two networks in HK. Our default includes a range of carriers and peers and we provide a default 250mbps uplink.
When you add the China option you get a second uplink and IP to PCCW transit. This link includes all routes but is optimized for the China peering.
Didn't catch up with your idea. Will I get anther ipv4 if I choose hongkong location? or is there an option to choose which one i'm going to use? I notice that there are two test IPs for hongkong.
Exactly. The China direct add on gets you a new nic and ip4 on the direct network.
FYI, (unrelated but you are maybe still interested in this information):
Perth, Australia (103.241.0.207) <-> Your HK LG location doesn't work:
Looking Glass -> Perth, Australia
HOST: speedtest.c1.hkg1.dediserve.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev1. 103.53.199.1 0.0% 10 1.2 0.5 0.3 1.2 0.3
2. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3. teleglobe1-10G.hkix.net 0.0% 10 2.7 5.2 2.4 22.8 6.4
4. 116.0.67.34 0.0% 10 118.2 120.8 117.2 127.5 3.3
5. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6. syd-sot-ken-wgw1-be-20.tpgi.com.au 0.0% 10 131.7 135.0 131.7 141.7 3.7
7. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Perth, Australia -> Looking Glass
Host Loss% Drop Rcv Snt Last Best Avg Wrst StDev Gmean Jttr Javg Jmax Jint1. 201-20-88-118.dcwest.net.au 0.0% 0 102 102 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
2. 193-16-88-118.dcwest.net.au 0.0% 0 101 101 0.7 0.3 1.4 5.2 0.7 1.2 0.5 0.7 4.1 11.6
3. gi0-1-770.rtr1.p1.au.as58511.net 0.0% 0 101 101 1.7 0.9 6.5 204.5 23.2 2.5 19.9 8.2 202. 128.
4. 59-100-216-37.per.static-ipl.aapt.com.au 0.0% 0 101 101 2.9 2.1 7.9 223.7 29.4 3.8 0.1 9.7 219. 104.
5. te2-3.pgrosdist02.aapt.net.au 1.0% 1 100 101 45.0 42.9 45.0 72.8 3.4 44.9 0.2 2.7 28.7 30.7
6. te2-1-110.pgrosdist01.aapt.net.au 0.0% 0 101 101 44.0 42.8 46.8 200.3 17.9 45.4 1.0 6.3 155. 108.
7. te0-3-4-0.pgroscore01.aapt.net.au 0.0% 0 101 101 45.1 43.5 71.9 2778. 272.0 46.7 0.9 55.1 2733 1135
8. te0-0-1-0.mflincore01.aapt.net.au 0.0% 0 101 101 43.7 43.2 51.6 751.9 70.4 45.9 0.4 14.9 707. 728.
9. te2-2.mflindist01.aapt.net.au 0.0% 0 101 101 44.7 42.7 46.3 204.4 16.4 45.2 0.5 4.6 160. 29.1
10. bu8.mflinbrdr11.aapt.net.au 0.0% 0 101 101 45.9 43.3 44.4 46.7 0.8 44.4 2.5 0.8 3.1 14.1
11. nme-sot-dry-wgw1-be-30.tpgi.com.au 0.0% 0 101 101 45.0 43.2 44.6 57.3 1.9 44.5 1.8 1.2 13.6 25.1
12. 203-219-155-2.tpgi.com.au 0.0% 0 101 101 54.9 53.4 56.0 60.3 1.4 56.0 1.4 1.7 4.7 26.3
13. 203-219-106-229.tpgi.com.au 0.0% 0 101 101 53.9 53.0 55.5 60.9 1.5 55.5 3.4 1.5 5.1 27.3
14. syd-gls-har-int2-be-20.tpgi.com.au 0.0% 0 101 101 53.0 52.7 55.9 60.1 1.4 55.9 3.6 1.4 7.4 36.7
15. ???
Same with
Adelaide, Australia (103.25.56.238) <-> LG
LG -> Adelaide, Australia
HOST: speedtest.c1.hkg1.dediserve.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev1. 103.53.199.1 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.1
2. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Adelaide, Australia -> LG
Host Loss% Drop Rcv Snt Last Best Avg Wrst StDev Gmean Jttr Javg Jmax Jint1. 119-252-16-38.rc1dd.adl.colocity.com 0.0% 0 120 120 1.1 0.9 2.4 20.9 3.2 1.8 0.0 2.2 19.8 13.8
2. g2-1.c45.dc1.colocity.com 0.0% 0 120 120 2.0 0.8 3.0 17.2 3.1 2.2 1.1 2.8 16.2 43.1
3. g2-9.49m.dc1.colocity.com 0.0% 0 120 120 1.9 0.6 4.6 150.4 17.6 1.7 3.6 6.6 148. 50.1
4. te1-1.c45.dc2.colocity.com 0.0% 0 120 120 3.4 0.6 2.1 21.6 2.7 1.5 2.7 1.9 21.0 22.5
5. g0-1.bdr2.dc2.colocity.com 0.0% 0 120 120 2.0 0.5 6.1 161.1 22.9 1.9 3.9 7.3 158. 71.6
6. ge-0-0-2-106.bdr02.adl01.sa.VOCUS.net.au 0.0% 0 120 120 1.6 0.4 1.8 14.2 1.9 1.3 0.8 1.8 13.2 20.5
7. ge-0-0-0-1.cor01.adl01.sa.VOCUS.net.au 0.0% 0 120 120 136.8 136.6 138.2 148.9 2.2 138.2 0.4 1.7 11.7 24.5
8. ten-0-1-0-1.cor01.mel11.vic.VOCUS.net.au 0.0% 0 119 120 137.0 136.5 138.3 147.9 1.9 138.3 0.2 2.0 11.0 28.4
9. ten-0-1-0-0.cor01.cbr01.act.VOCUS.net.au 0.0% 0 119 120 137.0 136.5 138.0 143.4 1.6 138.0 0.0 1.5 6.4 22.8
10. ten-0-2-0-1.cor01.syd04.nsw.VOCUS.net.au 0.0% 0 119 119 136.5 136.5 137.9 153.4 2.3 137.9 0.4 1.7 16.3 13.8
11. ten-0-0-0.bdr01.hkg01.hkg.VOCUS.net 0.0% 0 119 119 137.4 136.3 137.8 151.8 2.4 137.8 0.9 1.8 13.3 21.2
12. ???
Same with
Vienna, Austria (151.236.10.36) <-> LG
LG -> Vienna, Austria
HOST: speedtest.c1.hkg1.dediserve.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev1. 103.53.199.1 0.0% 10 0.6 1.8 0.3 8.6 3.0
2. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Vienna, Austria -> LG
Host Loss% Drop Rcv Snt Last Best Avg Wrst StDev Gmean Jttr Javg Jmax Jint1. ae4-358.RT.IRX.VIE.AT.retn.net 0.0% 0 71 71 0.5 0.5 6.6 65.4 12.9 1.6 0.0 6.6 64.8 51.7
2. xe002-9.RT.IAD.HKG.CN.retn.net 0.0% 0 70 71 214.7 214.5 214.6 220.1 0.7 214.6 0.1 0.2 5.5 2.7
3. ???
Same with
Auckland, New Zealand (185.99.132.5) <-> LG
LG -> Auckland, New Zealand
HOST: speedtest.c1.hkg1.dediserve.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev1. 103.53.199.1 0.0% 10 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.1
2. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Auckland, New Zealand -> LG
Host Loss% Drop Rcv Snt Last Best Avg Wrst StDev Gmean Jttr Javg Jmax Jint1. 113.21.224.133 0.0% 0 18 18 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4
2. 103.2.123.190 0.0% 0 18 18 1.1 1.0 1.4 3.5 0.4 1.3 0.5 0.4 2.3 3.4
3. ten-2-1-0-308.bdr01.alb01.akl.VOCUS.net.nz 0.0% 0 18 18 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.8
4. ten-0-1-0-2.cor01.alb01.akl.VOCUS.net.nz 0.0% 0 18 18 138.1 138.1 138.2 138.4 0.0 138.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.1
5. ten-0-0-0-2.cor03.syd03.nsw.VOCUS.net.au 0.0% 0 18 18 138.0 138.0 138.1 138.4 0.0 138.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.9
6. ten-0-5-0-1.cor01.syd04.nsw.VOCUS.net.au 0.0% 0 17 18 138.0 137.9 138.3 142.0 0.9 138.3 0.1 0.6 4.1 5.4
7. ten-0-0-0.bdr01.hkg01.hkg.VOCUS.net 0.0% 0 17 17 137.8 137.7 137.9 138.6 0.0 137.9 0.0 0.1 0.8 1.4
8. ???
› hostcmd OpenNIC "(fgrep syslocation /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf; fping -qc 10 103.53.199.50 2>&1) | tr '\n' ' '" | sort -t/ -rnk8[OpenNIC] 41.185.78.25 - syslocation Cape Town, South Africa 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/9/10%, min/avg/max = 465/470/483
[OpenNIC] 185.65.206.121 - syslocation Istanbul, Turkey 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 387/393/407
[OpenNIC] 92.222.80.28 - syslocation Strasbourg, France 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 369/373/378
[OpenNIC] 178.17.170.224 - syslocation Chisinau, Moldova 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 372/373/376
[OpenNIC] 41.215.240.141 - syslocation Cairo, Egypt 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 370/371/373
[OpenNIC] 185.61.149.228 - syslocation Riga, Latvia 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 361/362/364
[OpenNIC] 94.46.12.224 - syslocation Lisbon, Portugal 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 351/359/371
[OpenNIC] 151.236.24.245 - syslocation Hafnarfjordur, Iceland 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 352/359/368
[OpenNIC] 84.200.83.161 - syslocation Frankfurt, Germany 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 351/356/364
[OpenNIC] 78.47.34.12 - syslocation Falkenstein, Germany 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 351/356/363
[OpenNIC] 91.229.79.104 - syslocation Kiev, Ukraine 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 349/355/370
[OpenNIC] 193.182.144.83 - syslocation Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 354/355/361
[OpenNIC] 95.129.41.126 - syslocation Athens, Greece 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 353/354/355
[OpenNIC] 217.78.6.191 - syslocation Dublin, Ireland 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/9/10%, min/avg/max = 349/354/363
[OpenNIC] 185.81.165.90 - syslocation Vilnius, Lithuania 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 350/352/356
[OpenNIC] 185.112.156.159 - syslocation Budapest, Hungary 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 347/351/360
[OpenNIC] 46.108.39.139 - syslocation Bucharest, Romania 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 349/350/350
[OpenNIC] 176.62.0.26 - syslocation Zagreb, Croatia 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 348/349/350
[OpenNIC] 5.134.117.239 - syslocation Madrid, Spain 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 338/342/350
[OpenNIC] 91.247.228.155 - syslocation Oslo, Norway 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 340/341/342
[OpenNIC] 95.154.236.104 - 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 325/337/349
[OpenNIC] 192.121.47.47 - syslocation Milan, Italy 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 336/337/339
[OpenNIC] 31.220.5.106 - syslocation Stockholm, Sweden 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/9/10%, min/avg/max = 333/334/339
[OpenNIC] 95.175.99.231 - syslocation Ulvila, Finland 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 322/332/349
[OpenNIC] 212.117.180.145 - syslocation Roost, Luxembourg 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 328/332/346
[OpenNIC] 62.141.38.230 - syslocation Dusseldorf, Germany 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 328/329/330
[OpenNIC] 185.97.7.7 - syslocation Frankfurt, Germany 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 325/326/335
[OpenNIC] 192.71.249.83 - syslocation Oostkamp, Belgium 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 318/322/329
[OpenNIC] 31.220.43.191 - syslocation Amsterdam, Netherlands 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 318/320/332
[OpenNIC] 192.121.170.22 - syslocation Zurich, Switzerland 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 319/319/320
[OpenNIC] 79.133.43.124 - syslocation Vienna, Austria 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 311/318/326
[OpenNIC] 88.82.109.119 - syslocation Balzers, Liechtenstein 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 314/314/315
[OpenNIC] 46.151.215.199 - syslocation Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 103.53.199.50 : duplicate for [4], 96 bytes, 290 ms 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%return = 9/10/111%, min/avg/max = 289/291/295
[OpenNIC] 37.235.55.46 - syslocation Douglas, Isle of Man 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/9/10%, min/avg/max = 267/277/291
[OpenNIC] 93.158.205.94 - syslocation Amsterdam, Netherlands 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 274/276/281
[OpenNIC] 74.207.232.103 - syslocation Atlanta, USA 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 268/274/292
[OpenNIC] 163.47.20.30 - syslocation Sydney, Australia 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 269/270/273
[OpenNIC] 163.47.21.44 - syslocation Auckland, New Zealand 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 265/268/284
[OpenNIC] 104.245.39.112 - syslocation Orlando, USA 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 253/255/260
[OpenNIC] 123.30.137.66 - syslocation Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 234/246/258
[OpenNIC] 111.223.227.125 - syslocation Melbourne, Australia 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 242/246/253
[OpenNIC] 69.28.67.83 - syslocation Toronto, Canada 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 234/238/247
[OpenNIC] 104.237.144.172 - syslocation Newark, USA 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 218/220/224
[OpenNIC] 104.219.55.89 - syslocation Dallas, USA 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 210/212/224
[OpenNIC] 104.237.136.225 - syslocation Dallas, USA 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 203/206/215
[OpenNIC] 104.245.33.185 - syslocation San Francisco, USA 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 179/180/180
[OpenNIC] 74.207.241.202 - syslocation Fremont, USA 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 177/178/183
[OpenNIC] 23.226.230.72 - syslocation Seattle, United States 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 170/174/186
[OpenNIC] 103.250.184.85 - syslocation Pune, India 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 99.8/100/101
[OpenNIC] 106.185.41.36 - syslocation Tokyo, Japan 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 46.3/48.5/51.7
[OpenNIC] 103.25.202.192 - syslocation Chai Chee, Singapore 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/9/10%, min/avg/max = 36.4/40.7/48.8
[OpenNIC] 103.53.199.71 - syslocation Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/10/0%, min/avg/max = 0.19/0.40/1.96
[OpenNIC] 94.242.57.130 - syslocation Saint Petersburg, Russia 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/0/100%
[OpenNIC] 185.99.132.5 - syslocation Auckland, New Zealand 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/0/100%
[OpenNIC] 151.236.10.36 - syslocation Vienna, Austria 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/0/100%
[OpenNIC] 103.25.56.238 - syslocation Adelaide, Australia 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/0/100%
[OpenNIC] 103.241.0.207 - syslocation Perth, Australia 103.53.199.50 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 10/0/100%
@Fusl he doesn't care, I posted the same thing 2 weeks ago, http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/1269029/#Comment_1269029
still not resolved; and haven't got any test IPv6 either.