Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Advertise on LowEndTalk.com

Latest LowEndBox Offers

    Any experience with OVH VPS? - Page 2
    New on LowEndTalk? Please read our 'Community Rules' by clicking on it in the right menu!

    Any experience with OVH VPS?

    2»

    Comments

    • Benchmark for the OVH VPS SSD 2016 located in Gravelines:

      CPU model :  Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge)
      Number of cores : 1
      CPU frequency :  2394.442 MHz
      Total amount of ram : 1962 MB
      Total amount of swap : 0 MB
      System uptime :   5:13,
      Download speed from CacheFly: 12.1MB/s
      Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 2.49MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 9.87MB/s
      Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 5.81MB/s
      Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 11.9MB/s
      Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 11.9MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 4.96MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 8.41MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 9.09MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 10.7MB/s
      I/O speed :  447 MB/s
      

      Network traceroutes when the firewall has been set to permanent mitigation (traceroute from DigitalOcean NL to the OVH VPS):

      Before (traceroute):

      1  188.166.64.254 (188.166.64.254)  0.690 ms  0.657 ms  0.663 ms
       2  5.101.110.233 (5.101.110.233)  0.317 ms 5.101.110.237 (5.101.110.237)  0.259 ms 5.101.110.229 (5.101.110.229)  0.240 ms
       3  * * 5.101.110.249 (5.101.110.249)  0.308 ms
       4  * * gra-g2-a9.fr.eu (213.251.128.28)  9.254 ms
       5  gra-z1g1-a70.fr.eu (37.187.232.79)  7.419 ms gra-g2-a9.fr.eu (213.251.128.28)  9.201 ms  9.199 ms
       6  gra-z1g1-a70.fr.eu (37.187.232.79)  7.359 ms  7.316 ms gra-z1b5-a70.fr.eu (92.222.61.116)  7.257 ms
       7  92.222.61.42 (92.222.61.42)  7.309 ms gra-z1b5-a70.fr.eu (92.222.61.116)  7.462 ms 92.222.61.42 (92.222.61.42)  7.597 ms
       8  92.222.61.42 (92.222.61.42)  7.589 ms  7.550 ms  7.517 ms
       9  149.202.255.4 (149.202.255.4)  8.109 ms xx.ip-149-202-59.eu (149.202.59.xx)  8.467 ms 149.202.255.4 (149.202.255.4)  8.085 ms
      

      After (traceroute):

       1  188.166.64.253 (188.166.64.253)  0.309 ms  0.331 ms 188.166.64.254 (188.166.64.254)  0.243 ms
       2  5.101.110.229 (5.101.110.229)  0.272 ms 5.101.110.241 (5.101.110.241)  0.199 ms 5.101.110.237 (5.101.110.237)  0.245 ms
       3  5.101.110.249 (5.101.110.249)  0.232 ms *  0.200 ms
       4  * rbx-g2-a9.fr.eu (94.23.122.78)  6.307 ms *
       5  vac1-0-a9.fr.eu (178.33.100.151)  6.626 ms  6.861 ms  7.315 ms
       6  vac1-1-n7.fr.eu.firewall (178.33.100.152)  6.520 ms  6.608 ms vac1-0-a9.fr.eu (178.33.100.151)  6.612 ms
       7  vac1-2-n7.fr.eu.tilera (37.187.36.245)  6.234 ms vac1-1-n7.fr.eu.firewall (178.33.100.152)  6.973 ms  6.948 ms
       8  vac1-3-n7.fr.eu (91.121.215.13)  6.691 ms vac1-2-n7.fr.eu.tilera (37.187.36.245)  6.580 ms  6.935 ms
       9  * vac1-3-n7.fr.eu (91.121.215.13)  7.146 ms  6.794 ms
      10  * * *
      11  * * *
      12  * gra-z1b5-a70.fr.eu (92.222.61.116)  9.563 ms  9.453 ms
      13  gra-z1b5-a70.fr.eu (92.222.61.116)  9.459 ms 92.222.61.42 (92.222.61.42)  9.562 ms  9.499 ms
      14  149.202.255.4 (149.202.255.4)  9.966 ms 92.222.61.42 (92.222.61.42)  9.573 ms 149.202.255.4 (149.202.255.4)  9.918 ms
      15  xx.ip-149-202-59.eu (149.202.59.xx)  10.444 ms  9.706 ms 149.202.255.4 (149.202.255.4)  9.529 ms
      

      Clearly a pretty big difference with the firewall turned off and on (but that's expected xD)

      Speedtests (from FreeVPS Bench):

      Before:

      Download speed from CacheFly: 12.1MB/s
      Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 2.49MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 9.87MB/s
      Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 5.81MB/s
      Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 11.9MB/s
      Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 11.9MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 4.96MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 8.41MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 9.09MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 10.7MB/s
      

      After:

      Download speed from CacheFly: 12.0MB/s
      Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 2.69MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 8.87MB/s
      Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 5.97MB/s
      Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 11.9MB/s
      Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 11.9MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 5.58MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 7.39MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 9.33MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 10.1MB/s
      

      No noticeable changes/differences here with the speedtests.

      ioping tests (3x)

      1.
      
      ~# ioping -c 5 /
      4 KiB from / (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=1 time=3.13 ms
      4 KiB from / (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=2 time=596 us
      4 KiB from / (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=3 time=661 us
      4 KiB from / (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=4 time=663 us
      4 KiB from / (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=5 time=600 us
      
      --- / (ext3 /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
      5 requests completed in 4.01 s, 884 iops, 3.45 MiB/s
      min/avg/max/mdev = 596 us / 1.13 ms / 3.13 ms / 1.00 ms
      
      2.
      
      ~# ioping -c 5 /
      4 KiB from / (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=1 time=2.82 ms
      4 KiB from / (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=2 time=621 us
      4 KiB from / (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=3 time=639 us
      4 KiB from / (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=4 time=730 us
      4 KiB from / (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=5 time=647 us
      
      --- / (ext3 /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
      5 requests completed in 4.01 s, 916 iops, 3.58 MiB/s
      min/avg/max/mdev = 621 us / 1.09 ms / 2.82 ms / 863 us
      
      
      3.
      
      ~# ioping -c 5 /
      4 KiB from / (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=1 time=2.96 ms
      4 KiB from / (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=2 time=633 us
      4 KiB from / (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=3 time=612 us
      4 KiB from / (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=4 time=621 us
      4 KiB from / (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=5 time=682 us
      
      --- / (ext3 /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
      5 requests completed in 4.01 s, 906 iops, 3.54 MiB/s
      min/avg/max/mdev = 612 us / 1.10 ms / 2.96 ms / 931 us
      

      CPU Information:

      :~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
      processor       : 0
      vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
      cpu family      : 6
      model           : 42
      model name      : Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge)
      stepping        : 1
      microcode       : 0x1
      cpu MHz         : 2394.442
      cache size      : 4096 KB
      physical id     : 0
      siblings        : 1
      core id         : 0
      cpu cores       : 1
      apicid          : 0
      initial apicid  : 0
      fpu             : yes
      fpu_exception   : yes
      cpuid level     : 13
      wp              : yes
      flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nopl eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 fma cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm abm xsaveopt vnmi ept fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid
      bogomips        : 4788.88
      clflush size    : 64
      cache_alignment : 64
      address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
      power management:
      

      UnixBench (via serverbear, link below):

         #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
         #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
         #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
         #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
         #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
          ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
      
         Version 5.1.3                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
      
         Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                            Sunnyvale, CA, USA
         January 13, 2011                   johantheghost at yahoo period com
      
      
      1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
      
      1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
      
      1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
      
      1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
      
      1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
      
      1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
      
      1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
      
      1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
      
      1 x Process Creation  1 2 3
      
      1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
      
      1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
      
      1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
      
      1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
      
      1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
      
      1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
      
      1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
      
      1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
      
      1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
      
      1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
      
      1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
      
      1 x Process Creation  1 2 3
      
      1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
      
      1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
      
      1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
      
      ========================================================================
         BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
      
         System: ******************
         OS: GNU/Linux -- 3.16.0-4-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u3 (2015-08-04)
         Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
         Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
         CPU 0: Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge) (4788.9 bogomips)
                x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
         19:41:09 up  6:31,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.05; runlevel 5
      
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Benchmark Run: Sat Sep 05 2015 19:41:09 - 20:09:14
      1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
      
      Dhrystone 2 using register variables       35378232.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
      Double-Precision Whetstone                     4510.9 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
      Execl Throughput                               6360.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1361558.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          369757.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3960826.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      Pipe Throughput                             2578918.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
      Pipe-based Context Switching                 468435.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
      Process Creation                              14374.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   9600.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
      Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1254.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
      System Call Overhead                        5008377.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
      
      System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
      Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   35378232.0   3031.6
      Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4510.9    820.2
      Execl Throughput                                 43.0       6360.9   1479.3
      File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1361558.6   3438.3
      File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     369757.9   2234.2
      File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3960826.0   6829.0
      Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2578918.2   2073.1
      Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     468435.7   1171.1
      Process Creation                                126.0      14374.8   1140.9
      Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       9600.2   2264.2
      Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1254.6   2091.0
      System Call Overhead                          15000.0    5008377.8   3338.9
                                                                         ========
      System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2124.4
      
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Benchmark Run: Sat Sep 05 2015 20:09:14 - 20:37:18
      1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
      
      Dhrystone 2 using register variables       35837005.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
      Double-Precision Whetstone                     4554.1 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
      Execl Throughput                               6392.2 lps   (29.6 s, 2 samples)
      File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1335788.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          373193.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3476162.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      Pipe Throughput                             2585616.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
      Pipe-based Context Switching                 478237.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
      Process Creation                              16043.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   9667.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
      Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1264.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
      System Call Overhead                        5043687.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
      
      System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
      Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   35837005.3   3070.9
      Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4554.1    828.0
      Execl Throughput                                 43.0       6392.2   1486.5
      File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1335788.5   3373.2
      File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     373193.4   2254.9
      File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3476162.7   5993.4
      Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2585616.8   2078.5
      Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     478237.9   1195.6
      Process Creation                                126.0      16043.5   1273.3
      Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       9667.3   2280.0
      Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1264.4   2107.4
      System Call Overhead                          15000.0    5043687.3   3362.5
                                                                         ========
      System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2131.8

      ServerBear.com benchmark: http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2015/09/05/JsoQf3jep7ISpwq8

    • Is it possible to order additional IPs (Failover IPs)?

    • No - it says they aren't available for 2016 vpses

    • @boernd said:
      Is it possible to order additional IPs (Failover IPs)?

      Your be able to order/use Fail-over IP's/Subnets with them soon however.

    • Since @joodle forgot a geekbench (more detailed) here it is

      http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/3370533

      I AM BACK :)
      Working Windows Server 2012 R2 on 6GB! Beat that!

    • sinsin Member
      edited September 2015

      I'm probably going to purchase the $8.99/month OVH VPS Cloud 2016 later this week...do the regular 2016 SSD ones (that start at $3.49) have an SLA too?

    • @sin said:
      I'm probably going to purchase the $8.99/month OVH VPS Cloud 2016 later this week...do the regular 2016 SSD ones (that start at $3.49) have an SLA too?

      Nothing on the site says there is, very much doubt there is any, as there not using a HA environment on the standard one's.

      Thanked by 1sin
    • DylanDylan Member
      edited September 2015

      rm_ said: So it's not that Runabove is hands down better, more a case of "pick one or another depending on what you need".

      Apparently the new OVH lines are going to replace their RunAbove equivalents. They've already limited new RA accounts and at some point they're going to transition existing users over too (maybe once the 2016 line is rolled out worldwide?). The RunAbove brand will be "repositioned" for short-term Labs stuff.




    • LeeLee Member
      edited September 2015

      I wonder how this will affect VPS providers out of OVH, the price vs resource point is good, even if you are not a fan of OVH it's likely better to go direct than around.

      It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt

    • Lee said: the price vs resource point is good

      At least for now, while they are populating the new service and the advertised resources seem to be dedicated for the most part.

    • vladka24vladka24 Member
      edited September 2015

      So this doesn't include the VPS 2016?

      source: https://www.ovh.com/us/vps/faq-help.xml

    • image
      Mine shows SLA in the control panel?

    • @DeanKamitsis said:
      image
      Mine shows SLA in the control panel?

      My control panel also, maybe it's a global platform for both VPS and cloud ?

    • sinsin Member
      edited September 2015

      I ended up ordering the $3.49 OVH SSD VPS 2016 today to test it out. The only other service I have ever used from OVH is their $2.99 Classic VPS (OpenVZ) back in 2014 and I only had it for a couple of days before I canceled it early because the performance/uptime was absolutely terrible.

      I'm pretty happy with the peformance of this 2016 VPS and I did a freevps, Serverbear, and Geekbench incase anyone was interested.

      I plan on putting 1 production website on this VPS to see how it holds up and to see if the uptime is good and if the performance will stay the same.

      CPU model : Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge)
      Number of cores : 1
      CPU frequency : 2394.444 MHz
      Total amount of ram : 1962 MB
      Total amount of swap : 0 MB
      System uptime : 8 min,
      Download speed from CacheFly: 12.0MB/s
      Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 3.99MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 11.5MB/s
      Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 7.58MB/s
      Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 10.6MB/s
      Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 11.9MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 5.29MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 10.4MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 10.8MB/s
      Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 7.58MB/s
      I/O speed : 434 MB/s

      [email protected]:~# ioping . -c 10
      4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=1 time=349 us
      4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=2 time=480 us
      4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=3 time=435 us
      4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=4 time=463 us
      4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=5 time=505 us
      4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=6 time=463 us
      4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=7 time=462 us
      4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=8 time=534 us
      4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=9 time=465 us
      4 KiB from . (ext3 /dev/vda1): request=10 time=432 us

      --- . (ext3 /dev/vda1) ioping statistics ---
      10 requests completed in 9.01 s, 2.18 k iops, 8.51 MiB/s
      min/avg/max/mdev = 349 us / 458 us / 534 us / 46 us

      GeekBench3: http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/3402546

      ServerBear: http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2015/09/09/UZat48TLYJ2J8189

      [email protected]:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
      processor : 0
      vendor_id : GenuineIntel
      cpu family : 6
      model : 42
      model name : Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge)
      stepping : 1
      microcode : 0x1
      cpu MHz : 2394.444
      cache size : 4096 KB
      physical id : 0
      siblings : 1
      core id : 0
      cpu cores : 1
      apicid : 0
      initial apicid : 0
      fpu : yes
      fpu_exception : yes
      cpuid level : 13
      wp : yes
      flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nopl eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 fma cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm abm xsaveopt vnmi ept fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid
      bogomips : 4788.88
      clflush size : 64
      cache_alignment : 64
      address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
      power management:

    • does anyone know if those have virtual lan option?
      can i use the local lan to make a small load balancing cluster?

    • pbgbenpbgben Member, Provider

      OVH VPS 2014 - Cloud 50GB

    • anyone?

    • It only gets a single public IPv4 address currently.

      Core Asterisk Developer and Hater of Fax Machines

    • I got x2 VPS 2016 both got stuck on reinstall seems they have few issues with it.

    • Does OVH allow to send emails from these VPS ? Is it any restrictions?

    • why should they restrict something. you won't do mass mailing, would you?

      Thanked by 1inthecloudblog

      most recommended Provider: First-Root KVM Power-Edition /w SSD
      UltraVPS.eu KVM in US/UK/NL/DE: 15% off first 6 month | Netcup VPS/rootDS - 5€ off: 36nc15279180197 (ref)

    • They should block it by default

    • OVH have very good and strict automated anti spam stuff :)

    • VPSAddictVPSAddict Member
      edited January 2016

      I had their 2014 model in Canada, which was laggy but typical for it's price range. Then... In 2015 it got amazingly fast for the price. For 50 cents more (compared to 2014 price) you got 1GB more RAM, KVM instead of OpenVZ, plus the SSD.

      Loving CentOS 6 x86

    • marcosamarcosa Member
      edited January 2016

      Hosting some stuff on Canada, cheapest SSD line; LEMP, IRC and TS3 and about to setup Minecraft for my kids. Great performance, good latency, no problem.

    • @marcosa said:
      Hosting some stuff on Canada, cheapest SSD line; LEMP, IRC and TS3 and about to setup Minecraft for my kids. Great performance, good latency, no problem.

      Gotta love those $3.50 OVH servers. Nothing comes close.

      Loving CentOS 6 x86

    • GeekoineGeekoine Member
      edited January 2016

      I'm impressed by the fact that no one is complaining about any downtime on his vps ssd

    • @Geekoine said:
      I'm impressed by the fact that no one is complaining about any downtime on his vps ssd

      100% uptime here for the last ~3 months.

      Thanked by 1Geekoine
    • @joodle said:
      100% uptime here for the last ~3 months.

      Gravelines?

    • @Geekoine said:
      Gravelines?

      Yep :)

      Thanked by 1Geekoine
    • GeekoineGeekoine Member
      edited January 2016

      I have a really bad ioping on my GRA VPS cloud (support told me the issue will be fixed with a NVMe upgrade), and I'm considering to move everything there on a VPS SSD.

      @joodle said:
      Yep :)

    • sinsin Member

      Geekoine said: I'm impressed by the fact that no one is complaining about any downtime on his vps ssd

      Besides the 1 day major outage in BHS awhile back I have had 100% uptime on my $3.50/month SSD VPS in BHS

    • nfnnfn Member

      So do you prefer VPS SSD or Cloud VPS SDD line?

    • @nfn said:
      So do you prefer VPS SSD or Cloud VPS SDD line?

      Assuming you were talking to me, VPS cloud is better (and faster); but if VPS SSD is so good, in some cases I can bear those 5-10 euros less:-)

    • nfnnfn Member

      I was.referring to the Cloud SSD line that matches the.SSD VPS line.

      Thanked by 1Geekoine
    • Dumb one : how do I add a second vps ? Is it from the cp ?

    • @inthecloudblog said:
      Dumb one : how do I add a second vps ? Is it from the cp ?

      Main site, just walk through order process again and then you login during checkout.. I believe.

    • Has anyone had better luck with Gravelines over the Canada location? I have both, but it appears that the Gravelines location is a little better.

      Loving CentOS 6 x86

    • edited January 2016

      @mikeyur said:

      Attempted doing so with no luck .
      I'd been having issues with processing some orders ( hetzner dedi ) and tried from job computer and went fine.
      Maybe it's my computer but I doubt it's the same this time

    • nfnnfn Member
      edited January 2016

      VPS SSD Line -> https://www.ovh.com/us/vps/vps-ssd.xml

      Cloud SSD VPS -> https://www.ovh.com/us/cloud/instances/ (Bottom of the page and click the PLUS sign)

    • @VPSAddict said:
      Has anyone had better luck with Gravelines over the Canada location? I have both, but it appears that the Gravelines location is a little better.

      it seems (to me) that SBG is better than GRA or BHS

    • GM2015GM2015 Member
      edited January 2016

      Wat.

      You might have issues with spam complaints, but there are no issues with receiving emails.I've sent out a few emails to my outlook and zoho emails and all of them arrived, albeit in the spam first at outlook.

      Even if the message was "Test" with "Test" title.

      Gulf said: Does OVH allow to send emails from these VPS ? Is it any restrictions?

      inthecloudblog said: They should block it by default

      Go give Vultr(referral) a try. | GNU/Linux http://debian.org

    • Just out of curiosity, does ovh VPS support virtual network by any chance? The vRack seems only applicable to the Dedi.

      My site, powered by Netlify and Let's Encrypt.

    • @bookstack said:
      Just out of curiosity, does ovh VPS support virtual network by any chance? The vRack seems only applicable to the Dedi.

      It appears that this has not been implemented yet but, they say it's coming:

      https://www.ovh.com/us/news/articles/a2065.the-2016-product-roadmap-at-a-glance

    • austeniteaustenite Member, Provider

      Have used their dedicated and VPS in the past. I would use the dedicated servers again but had bad experiences with the VPS cloud platform so wouldn't be able to recommend it.

    • sinsin Member

      austenite said: Have used their dedicated and VPS in the past. I would use the dedicated servers again but had bad experiences with the VPS cloud platform so wouldn't be able to recommend it.

      You have used their 2016 VPS line? Their 2016 VPS line is a HUGE difference from their old VPSes and most people are very happy with them.

    • @sin said:

      I agree. Easily the best price in the hosting industry.

      Loving CentOS 6 x86

    • austeniteaustenite Member, Provider

      @sin said:
      You have used their 2016 VPS line? Their 2016 VPS line is a HUGE difference from their old VPSes and most people are very happy with them.

      I haven't tried the 2016 range, in that case I'll maybe give them another go at some point!

    • OVH VPS 2016 is really rock solid, and i can recommend their services for production applications. The OVH management done a lot of biggest changes, just to stay in game. And what they have for now? These guys continue building future by their services, and dictating a new rules and standart for other companies.

    Sign In or Register to comment.