New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Ah. Thanks for the info.
I am on Vodafone (Ex KabelDeutschland) here with native ipv6 support.
I've had a native /48 from Andrews & Arnold several years now. I reckon they're the best ISP in the UK.
No IPv6 here yet.
1&1 vdsl, native ipv6
My provider supports native IPv6, but if enabled they will only provider CGN IPv4 (DS-LITE). I decided to stay with native IPv4 and for IPv6 i'm using an own ASN & PI /48 at home with BGP tunnels to my 2 core locations (Zurich / Frankfurt). Much better than CGN.
BT Fibre: No
Verizon LTE - Yes
Verizon Fios - No (Some areas yes, just not mine)
Verizon LTE: yes
Time Warner Cable (Roadrunner): yes /64
Upstate NY
Mine's not yet, but most of the companies here in Greece already have ipv6 as default since 2015. I live in an island and the (smaller) company I have as an isp does not yet offer it in the island.
But the overall country coverage must be over 60-70%
Not on the crappy Aztech routers they sell, correct?
Aquiss in the UK, yes ipv6 for quite a long time now.
No, BT don't do IPv6.
...yes lol, I got it enabled on the 7003. Shitty ac range, but bo bian need use this router because need IPTV lol
Nope
yes, MTS india
Yes - Sky UK
No, since Spectrum bought out TWC they stopped supporting IPv6.
We get a /64 on the link and a /64 behind it, our DSL ISP is running a default config from the former state telco (which now assigns a /56 on fiber and a /64 on DSL).
It's ... 50:50 - The line (~15/3Mbit) only costs 25EUR and includes 8 static IPv4 and a 9999 number block with VOIP gateway and some minutes, so the actually working IPv6 is a bonus already.
We don't use it in production/office as without a second link the central router cannot switch to a redundant link in case of failure (and a tunnel is complicated on the setup).
lol. I'm using Spectrum and they've been neglecting it for ages. I send them a request about IPv6 updates probably once ever 6 months and it's always "no time frame, we're working on it, sorry". Annoys me, but what can I do. Not too big of a deal I guess.
yes
I don't understand why they would've stopped supporting it. One day I had it, the next I didn't. Confuses me on why they would've just 100% stopped supporting it. I don't know/don't care too much. The infrastructure is there for it, they just don't care to use it.
Nope, WideOpenWest Internet (Cox reseller AFAIK), doesn't have IPv6 and their routers block HE's tunnelbroker too
IPv6 has been working out of the box since I signed up for Time Warner Cable two years ago, for my home in California. Our home router gets a /64 from them. Our Time Warner Cable internet service is based on the old RoadRunner infrastructure. The upstream intermediate routers still have "rr.com" FQDNs. Time Warner Cable will soon become Spectrum for us.
Prior to that, I had AT&T DSL for many years. Somewhere around 2012, AT&T claimed to support IPv6 on my home account. I bought an AT&T-approved IPv6-compatible DSL modem, but could never get IPv6 to work with the router or even with a Macintosh computer connected directly to the modem. Based on my experience, I believe that AT&T never got IPv6 fully operational in my area during the time that I used them. In my opinion, AT&T was lying about it to hide their actual state of IPv6 readiness.
Off topic: When AT&T decided to implement a 150 gigabyte per month data cap on my account (with high overage fees), I left. The data cap was a disaster, by the way. Their website could not show current usage. It showed data usage from 3-4 days in the past or older, which made rationing usage harder at the end of each monthly period, because you did not really know how much you had left before exceeding the cap. Furthermore, their data usage accounting was inaccurate, in their favor of course. I measured it myself. I doubt that things have gotten better since I left.
The AT&T LTE cellular network near my home does not appear to support IPv6. My phone can use IPv6 from the WiFi network in our home, but not when it is connected to the cellular network.
No, it would be nice to see Virgin get it rolled out.
In Serbia still no IPv6 for home users. I see that ISPs have allocated IPv6 but I guess It's still experimental.
In Serbia still no IPv6 for home users. I see that ISPs have allocated IPv6 but I guess It's still experimental.
6to4 without VPN, and natively yes with VPN to my bouncer.
Bell hasn't taken IPv6 in consideration for a while
Only Bell business customers get IPv6, which is unfair, imo
VDSL with two different German ISPs, none of them is offering native IPv6.
"As long as we are able to serve you with a public (dynamic) IPv4 address, we do not see any reason to deploy IPv6".
Unfortunately those German ISPs offering native IPv6 only assign dynamic/changing IPv6 prefixes. I want a static prefix for my (network) gear. So far two 6in4 BGP tunnels provide my connection to the IPv6 world.