Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Dedicated Server + Good Anti DDoS
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Dedicated Server + Good Anti DDoS

wobadekewwobadekew Member
edited June 2016 in Requests

I am looking for a dedicated server.

Specs:

  • 1gbps (20tb - 30 tb)

  • 12~32gb ram

  • stogare up to 60 gb is ok

  • 4 cores

  • The ddos protection must be atleast stable more than 100 Gbps:

  • During mitigation no packet loss.

  • Be able to cover TCP and UDP open ports.

  • Allow Custom Rules on mitigation would be good but not required.

  • Budget: max 250 USD

  • Location doesn't matter aslong ping is less than 250 to south america and asia

  • No ovh.

«1

Comments

  • deployvmdeployvm Member, Host Rep

    What kind of application are you running? I assume game servers?

  • https://www.hyperfilter.com/dell-dedicated-servers/

    Hyperfilter, really good DDoS protection.

  • wobadekewwobadekew Member
    edited June 2016

    @deployvm said:
    What kind of application are you running? I assume game servers?

    Yes game servers, our lasted attack was 37 Gbps spoofed UDP (informed by Softlayer analyst)

    @professionalxen said:
    https://www.hyperfilter.com/dell-dedicated-servers/

    Hyperfilter, really good DDoS protection.

    They are up to my budget, since the cheapest server requires a special IP to use UDP protocol.

  • https://athenalayer.com/

    the best of the best.

  • pbgbenpbgben Member, Host Rep

    You say no OVH, have you tried their game anti ddos range?

  • @zafouhar said:
    https://athenalayer.com/

    the best of the best.

    Couldn't found dedicated servers in their website.

  • wobadekewwobadekew Member
    edited June 2016

    @pbgben said:
    You say no OVH, have you tried their game anti ddos range?

    Yes i had a game server with them MC-32 + Cisco ASA 5505.
    And it was a very bad experience.

  • @wobadekew said:

    take a look here: http://www.seflow.net/2/index.php/en/services/baremetalserver

    You can add protection for 9€ in sensor mode or 18€ always on protection and you will have

    • 4,2Tbps total capacity
    • full live mitigation stats
    • setup custom firewall rules
    • geoip firewalling allowed
    • ability to inspect packets of every attack

    DDoS Mitigation description http://www.seflow.net/2/index.php/en/services/ddosprotection/ispddosprotection

    To check latency http://www.seflow.net/2/index.php/en/services/baremetalserver/lookingglass

    Thanked by 1ManofServer
  • @matteob said:
    take a look here: http://www.seflow.net/2/index.php/en/services/baremetalserver
    You can add protection for 9€ in sensor mode or 18€ always on protection and you will have

    Awesome it's possible to get a better latency ?

    Resposta de 95.141.33.154: bytes=32 tempo=265ms TTL=52

    Resposta de 95.141.33.154: bytes=32 tempo=262ms TTL=52

    Resposta de 95.141.33.154: bytes=32 tempo=265ms TTL=52

    Resposta de 95.141.33.154: bytes=32 tempo=263ms TTL=52

  • @wobadekew Can you please copy me a traceroute?

  • @matteob said:
    @wobadekew Can you please copy me a traceroute?

    3 9 ms 6 ms 6 ms 10.216.250.105

    4 12 ms 6 ms 8 ms 10.216.250.1

    5 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms 10.223.238.73

    6 7 ms 6 ms 5 ms 149.3.181.17

    7 120 ms 120 ms 122 ms et-10-3-0.miami15.mia.seabone.net [89.221.41.177

    ]
    8 111 ms 111 ms 115 ms et-10-3-0.miami15.mia.seabone.net [89.221.41.177

    ]
    9 111 ms 124 ms 117 ms xe-11-0-0.edge2.miami1.Level3.net [63.209.150.16

    5]
    10 247 ms 247 ms 249 ms ae-0-11.bar2.Milan1.Level3.net [4.69.142.190]

    11 248 ms 248 ms 248 ms 212.73.241.250

    12 256 ms 242 ms 243 ms 95.141.47.253

    13 251 ms 250 ms 250 ms 154-33.141.95.serverdedicati.seflow.it [95.141.3
    3.154]

  • @wobadekew based on the traceroute there is now way to reach us with better latency because i see you coming from brazil and there is no direct connection between you and europe. To come in europe you need to pass trought Miami or L.A. and then come in europe.

    To have better latency you need to consider some U.S. company. EU company had all similar latency for you.

  • MivoCloudMivoCloud Member, Host Rep

    1 Gbps Unmetered?

  • wobadekewwobadekew Member
    edited June 2016

    @MivoCloud said:
    1 Gbps Unmetered?

    No 20 tb/30 tb

  • MivoCloudMivoCloud Member, Host Rep

    Location Moldova its OK for you?

  • @MivoCloud said:
    Location Moldova its OK for you?

    Can i test the latency?

  • CloudconeCloudcone Member, Patron Provider

    Let me know if the latency to quadcone.com is good for you, we have DDoS protection via Voxility (they claim to be 500Gbps+)

    ping quadcone.com

  • @Quadcone said:
    Let me know if the latency to quadcone.com is good for you, we have DDoS protection via Voxility (they claim to be 500Gbps+)

    ping quadcone.com

    May i know the latency under attack?

  • Given that you want low latency to both south america and asia with anti-ddos, you're pretty much stuck to LA and/or atlanta/florida, with LA probably being the better choice for asia. Find a dedi there instead of jumping on all these EU offers that will always route through the USA anyway.

  • wobadekewwobadekew Member
    edited June 2016

    @teamacc said:
    Given that you want low latency to both south america and asia with anti-ddos, you're pretty much stuck to LA and/or atlanta/florida, with LA probably being the better choice for asia. Find a dedi there instead of jumping on all these EU offers that will always route through the USA anyway.

    My best offer in USA was from ColoCrossing 30 Gbps, someone know if their protection is good?
    For 250$

  • SplitIceSplitIce Member, Host Rep
    edited June 2016

    Ideally you are going to want L.A, and someone with good quality bandwidth for Asia (think CU/CT for china, and reasonable carriers such as NTT and Tinet for the rest of Asia).

    You are absolutely going to need something thats located in the US and not EU for those latency requirements.

  • @wobadekew said:

    Couldn't found dedicated servers in their website.

    They act as a reverse proxy. So you get an ip from them and you stick any dedi of choice behind that ip.

  • @wobadekew said:

    @zafouhar said:
    https://athenalayer.com/

    the best of the best.

    Couldn't found dedicated servers in their website.

    Aaand we need a [sarcasm] tag.

  • @teamacc said:
    Aaand we need a [sarcasm] tag.

    hmm, yes xD

  • jh_aurologicjh_aurologic Member, Patron Provider
    edited June 2016

    We can do ddos mitigation up to 250Gbit/s in Frankfurt, Germany. Had successfully mitigated a few large attacks in the past, targeting customers for hours.

    Our mitigation plattform is completely self developed and has the ability to fight against attacks on every OSI Layer.

    Ping to South America is at around ~120-160ms, Asia around 200ms. You could check our network quality via our Looking Glass - see http://lg.combahton.net.

    We're happy to provide the following bladeserver: Intel Xeon L5520 / 16GB DDR3 ECC Ram / 2x 72GB 10k SAS / 1Gbit dedicated Uplink / 30TB Traffic

    Monthly: 190 EUR + a one time setup fee of 49 EUR

  • CloudconeCloudcone Member, Patron Provider

    wobadekew said: May i know the latency under attack?

    Sent you a PM.

  • @Quadcone said:

    wobadekew said: May i know the latency under attack?

    Sent you a PM.

    ok lemme take a look

  • matteobmatteob Barred
    edited June 2016

    @Kabeldamagement said:

    Ping to South America is at around ~120-160ms, Asia around 200ms. You could check our network quality via our Looking Glass - see http://lg.combahton.net.

    Have you a private cable between you and brazil? :-)

    latency between south/center europe to brazil is the same for all

    Your Network

    PING 149.3.181.17 (149.3.181.17) 56(84) bytes of data.

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_req=1 ttl=55 time=227 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_req=2 ttl=55 time=225 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_req=3 ttl=55 time=231 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_req=4 ttl=55 time=226 ms

    OVH strasbourg:

    ping -c5 149.3.181.17

    PING 149.3.181.17 (149.3.181.17) 56(84) bytes of data.

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=228 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=230 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=226 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=229 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=229 ms

    SeFlow Milan:

    ping -c5 149.3.181.17

    PING 149.3.181.17 (149.3.181.17) 56(84) bytes of data.

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=226 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=232 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=224 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=230 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=230 ms

    OP is asking better latency, and only U.S. based company can offer. There are NO european companies that can meets their needs

  • jh_aurologicjh_aurologic Member, Patron Provider

    No, but a better connectivity through two Tier 2 than others with two Tier 1 which basically have overcongested ports between them ;-)

    @matteob said:

    @Kabeldamagement said:

    Ping to South America is at around ~120-160ms, Asia around 200ms. You could check our network quality via our Looking Glass - see http://lg.combahton.net.

    Have you a private cable between you and brazil? :-)

    latency between south/center europe to brazil is the same for all

    Your Network

    PING 149.3.181.17 (149.3.181.17) 56(84) bytes of data.

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_req=1 ttl=55 time=227 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_req=2 ttl=55 time=225 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_req=3 ttl=55 time=231 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_req=4 ttl=55 time=226 ms

    OVH strasbourg:

    ping -c5 149.3.181.17

    PING 149.3.181.17 (149.3.181.17) 56(84) bytes of data.

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=228 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=230 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=226 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=229 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=229 ms

    SeFlow Milan:

    ping -c5 149.3.181.17

    PING 149.3.181.17 (149.3.181.17) 56(84) bytes of data.

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=226 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=232 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=224 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=230 ms

    64 bytes from 149.3.181.17: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=230 ms

    OP is asking better latency, and only U.S. based company can offer. There are NO european companies that can meets their needs

  • matteobmatteob Barred
    edited June 2016

    If you mean that you have better bandwidth then us and ovh.... do you know that your super fast tier 2 buy transit from our tier 1 for most transatlantic connection right? :-)

    Your customer for reaching you in core-backbone, use telia and telia use level3 transit to do us<->eu . Then to do u.s. <- brasil there is only one way, seabone. So your super fast uncongested ports use SAME super slow congested tier1 ports :-) . (knowledge is the power... lol)

    By the way i not want discuss those who have it longer , O.P. did a request and ALL EU companies are out of his requirements (my company included).... so sell is good, give good suggesion is better

    @wobadekew if you need good latency in south America please consider only U.S. companies and ignore every request from EU locations

    Thanked by 1FearHunter
Sign In or Register to comment.