Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Dual Xeon 5150
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Dual Xeon 5150

PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep
edited February 2013 in Help

What will that CPU be like for a small openvz node?

Comments

  • Well it all depends on the servers that are on it and what they are hosting. If they are just running small things it will be fine. If you can on the motherboard you are using upgrade to dual quads Id suggest it, it is really cheap to upgrade.

  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    The L5420 is also an option. I would not put any high ram customer machines on it, max of 1gb

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    I have a node with dual l5420's that are performing great, no matter that they are old.

  • JacobJacob Member
    edited February 2013

    I just ordered a batch of Intel Xeon 5150/60 both are good CPUs 5160 are 3.2Ghz but PLGA771 not LGA771.

    They are not suitable for a production node, I would recommend a E5440 or L5420 over them.

  • PacketVMPacketVM Member, Host Rep

    L5420 will probably be better then

  • RootNerdsRootNerds Member, Host Rep

    As we should all learnt, i/o is always the killer -> for a smaller node the CPU is fine. I guess you're asking this due to the Dacentec offer? They do at least offer 4*80GB -> smaller node -> fine :)

  • Perhaps go for a Dual E5520 or L5520. Pretty good value overall.

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran
    edited February 2013

    This CPU stuff is overrated.
    A full small OVZ node as we have with SSD (typical one):

     
    top - 02:16:39 up 104 days,  7:50,  1 user,  load average: 1.31, 1.29, 1.00
    Tasks: 2678 total,   4 running, 2669 sleeping,   0 stopped,   5 zombie
    Cpu(s): 21.2%us,  4.7%sy,  0.0%ni, 72.5%id,  0.2%wa,  0.0%hi,  1.5%si,  0.0%st
    Mem:  16287372k total, 15890448k used,   396924k free,   512920k buffers
    Swap:  4194296k total,  3301572k used,   892724k free,  6935752k cached
    
    
    free -m
                 total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
    Mem:         15905      15703        202          0        508       6857
    -/+ buffers/cache:       8337       7567
    Swap:         4095       3293        802
    
    processor       : 7
    vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
    cpu family      : 6
    model           : 42
    model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz
    stepping        : 7
    cpu MHz         : 1600.000
    cache size      : 8192 KB
    physical id     : 0
    siblings        : 8
    core id         : 3
    cpu cores       : 4
    apicid          : 7
    initial apicid  : 7
    fpu             : yes
    fpu_exception   : yes
    cpuid level     : 13
    wp              : yes
    flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
    bogomips        : 6784.58
    clflush size    : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    

    That has 4 real cores and 8 logical and here is the munin graph last week:
    image

    If you have fast storage and the CPU is not waiting on IO, the load can be handled by smaller CPUs, if you have a lot of iowait, no matter how good the CPU, will still spend the same amount of time waiting.

Sign In or Register to comment.