Free client management scripts

support123

Is there any good alternatives to whmcs?

gubbyte

WHMCS

BlazeMuis

@gubbyte said: WHMCS

+1!

What about Hostbill?

KuJoe

To save you time and headache: Many people have left WHMCS and tried something else, most return to WHMCS.

The only viable solution is to build your own if you don't want to use WHMCS. If you can't budget $15/month for the software that will be earning you money then I would rethink your business plan.

shovenose

Is this for hosting or for something like web design work?

agentmishra

why not try Blesta - paid
clientexec - paid

Acountlabplus - free

BK_

WHMCS is my first recommendation, but I've been experimenting with HostBill lately and actually like it because its different.

support123

I have already a whmcs license being used on another site.Not in a mood to buy another license

gubbyte

@ftpit said: I have already a whmcs license being used on another site.Not in a mood to buy another license

#wow #whoa

curtisg

@ftpit said: Not in a mood to buy another license

google: thehostingtool

support123

I know a low end dedicated server provider use a almost free client management panel

curtisg

@ftpit boxbilling pro ?

then again, boxbilling plans to open source soon according to @SonicVPS.

support123

@curtisg said: google: thehostingtool

Do not look like it will be much usable in my site.

support123

@curtisg said: then again, boxbilling plans to open source soon according to @SonicVPS.

Thanks this is what I am looking for.Anyone using them? any reviews of boxbilling?

shovenose

BoxBilling is a horrible piece of crap. Avoid!

Damian

@ftpit said: I have already a whmcs license being used on another site.Not in a mood to buy another license

You can specify a different systpl in all URLs pointing to that WHMCS installation. This allows for 'branding' based on different locations. See that http://tinyvz.com/ specifies systpl=tiny, to just build upon Ramhosts' WHMCS installation.

support123

@shovenose said: BoxBilling is a horrible piece of crap. Avoid!

Thanks for the info

support123

@Damian said: You can specify a different systpl in all URLs pointing to that WHMCS installation. This allows for 'branding' based on different locations. See that http://tinyvz.com/ specifies systpl=tiny, to just build upon Ramhosts' WHMCS installation.

Maybe I should use that way as well.Thanks for the tip

Damian

It has a caveat: it's persistent. If you go to tinyvz, and click on the order URL, THEN go to ramhost, and click on any of their order URLs, the WHMCS template will still be on tinyvz despite coming from ramhost and not tinyvz, because it's persistent. So the fix is to always specify a systpl= in every URL.

(edit) Looks like they've fixed that issue, so it can't be demonstrated. Just be sure to specify a systpl in every URL.

support123

@Damian said: It has a caveat: it's persistent. If you go to tinyvz, and click on the order URL, THEN go to ramhost, and click on any of their order URLs, the WHMCS template will still be on tinyvz despite coming from ramhost and not tinyvz, because it's persistent. So the fix is to always specify a systpl= in every URL.

Thanks

curtisg

@ftpit simply get a domain thats whitelabelled, get different themes, just do like what Damian said, for example:
clientzoneblablabla.com get SSL, then just do for example:
clientzoneblablabla.com/?systpl=host1
clientzoneblablabla.com/?systpl=host2
clientzoneblablabla.com/?systpl=host3

etc.

Then I'd hide every category that isn't like the primary website host, etc. then just have the direct link to hidden categorys.

Damian

http://docs.whmcs.com/Linking_to_WHMCS#Setting_the_Language.2FTemplate_via_the_URL has more info

support123

@curtisg
Nice tips bookmarked this thread for future

support123

My issue is resolved with the help of @Damian and @curtisg