Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Any experience with Berry.pw ?
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Any experience with Berry.pw ?

VPSAddictVPSAddict Member
in General

How is their network and do they suspend if you receive a DDoS attack?

Comments

  • theroyalstudenttheroyalstudent Member
    edited January 2016

    Would be interested too, they seem to be pretty sweet.

    Thanked by 7hostnoob VPSAddict Jonchun PrincessOfCats FlamesRunner yomero MikePT
  • hostnoobhostnoob Member

    I don't know, but they seem to be berry nice.

    Thanked by 6VPSAddict theroyalstudent sin PrincessOfCats yomero MikePT
  • VPSAddictVPSAddict Member

    They do seem to have cheap berries.

    Thanked by 1theroyalstudent
  • SimplexHostsSimplexHosts Member

    When I first saw their domain name, I thought they were renting Raspberry PI Servers..... Either way they look pretty cool

    Thanked by 2VPSAddict theroyalstudent
  • theroyalstudenttheroyalstudent Member

    @SimplexHosts said:
    When I first saw their domain name, I thought they were renting Raspberry PI Servers..... Either way they look pretty cool

    Well, even their (parent) brand sounds good, Epidrive.

  • VPSAddictVPSAddict Member

    @Epidrive - dazzle us! :)

  • Awmusic12635Awmusic12635 Member, Host Rep

    Didn't they recently attempt to sell the brand?

  • k0nslk0nsl Member

    Source?

    Anyway, my experience with them has been nothing but good. I cobbled together some generic benchmarks here and here if anyone wants to get a general idea.

    @Awmusic12635 said:
    Didn't they recently attempt to sell the brand?

  • Awmusic12635Awmusic12635 Member, Host Rep

    k0nsl said: Source?

    https://vpsboard.com/topic/7878-usa-vps-host-for-sale-huge-clientbase/

  • VPSAddictVPSAddict Member

    @k0nsl said:
    Source?

    Anyway, my experience with them has been nothing but good. I cobbled together some generic benchmarks here and here if anyone wants to get a general idea.

    Seems to be a very decent VPS if one would want a better CPU. Sadly, https://portal.catalysthost.com/cart.php?a=confproduct&i=1 seems to be a better deal at the moment.

  • k0nslk0nsl Member

    Maybe I am missing the "obvious"...but how is that in any way related to EpiDrive / BerryServers?

    What you linked to looks like some shady BS and in no way connected to the aforementioned company, or am I wrong?

    @Awmusic12635 said:
    https://vpsboard.com/topic/7878-usa-vps-host-for-sale-huge-clientbase/

  • Awmusic12635Awmusic12635 Member, Host Rep

    k0nsl said: Maybe I am missing the "obvious"...but how is that in any way related to EpiDrive / BerryServers?

    https://vpsboard.com/topic/7878-usa-vps-host-for-sale-huge-clientbase/?do=findComment&comment=101621

    Also looks like I emailed the address in the post at one point

    From: Web Host webhostforsale22@gmail.com
    10/8/15

    to me
    Hello Alex,

    This is Bryson. VPS host for sale is berry.pw

    So not sure if the they still own it.

    Thanked by 1Jonchun
  • hostnoobhostnoob Member

    @k0nsl said:
    Maybe I am missing the "obvious"...but how is that in any way related to EpiDrive / BerryServers?

    What you linked to looks like some shady BS and in no way connected to the aforementioned company, or am I wrong?

    read the comments, especialy drmike and domainbop

  • JonchunJonchun Member

    @k0nsl said:
    Maybe I am missing the "obvious"...but how is that in any way related to EpiDrive / BerryServers?

    What you linked to looks like some shady BS and in no way connected to the aforementioned company, or am I wrong?

    Let's be real here. This is a relatively "small" industry. Yes, it's oversaturated but when you're looking at a host that has ~700 clients, it basically cuts off the majority of the no-names that no one has ever heard of. On top of this, 870 services with an annual income of $5k? Assuming an average of $10/year per service (coincides perfectly with berry servers), you'd get ~$8k revenue annually. If you remove the cost of IPs and one or two very overloaded servers, it matches ~$5k. No matter how you look at it, at this price point anyone who hangs out around vpsboard/LET will have heard of them and the best-matching service is berry servers.

    Thanked by 1Epidrive
  • ManofServerManofServer Member

    They also seem to be getting berry few traffic

    Thanked by 1yomero
  • k0nslk0nsl Member

    Aha, thanks! The e-mail makes it clear to me.

    @Awmusic12635 said:
    Also looks like I emailed the address in the post at one point

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    I have a couple of the ultra-cheap berry.pw 128s. Can't really say anything bad about them - and the support when I did have an account question was really quick.

    I wouldn't run anything important on them...

    Thanked by 1Jonchun
  • VPSAddictVPSAddict Member

    @raindog308 said:
    I have a couple of the ultra-cheap berry.pw 128s. Can't really say anything bad about them - and the support when I did have an account question was really quick.

    I wouldn't run anything important on them...

    Would you mind posting the specs of your servers? How are their networks?

  • EpidriveEpidrive Member

    @VPSaddict We have couple of improvements in line for berry. Servers purchased now have high chance to be deployed in our e3-1271v3's. Depending on the severity of the DDoS, we normally suspend, or suspend with fee, or terminate.

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    VPSAddict said: Would you mind posting the specs of your servers? How are their networks?

    Sure. Here's the standard, with my IP and hostname removed. I haven't really used it much yet, so I can't answer beyond what you see below.

    Uptime would be due to me rebooting, not the provider. VPS is in Phoenix, AZ but I forget which DC.

    Benchmark started on Tue Jan 19 22:31:47 EST 2016
Full benchmark log: /root/bench.log

System Info
-----------
Processor   : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1271 v3 @ 3.60GHz
CPU Cores   : 2
Frequency   : 800.000 MHz
Memory      : 128 MB
Swap        : 128 MB
Uptime      : 9 days, 50 min,

OS      : Debian GNU/Linux 7
Arch        : i686 (32 Bit)
Kernel      : 2.6.32-042stab108.6


Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------

Location        Provider    Speed
CDN         Cachefly    71.8MB/s

Atlanta, GA, US     Coloat      44.7MB/s 
Dallas, TX, US      Softlayer   63.8MB/s 
Seattle, WA, US     Softlayer   59.4MB/s 
San Jose, CA, US    Softlayer   84.4MB/s 
Washington, DC, US  Softlayer   15.2MB/s 

Tokyo, Japan        Linode      12.8MB/s 
Singapore       Softlayer   11.6MB/s 

Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net     14.7MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb    83.2MB/s 


Disk Speed
----------
I/O (1st run)   : 137 MB/s
I/O (2nd run)   : 149 MB/s
I/O (3rd run)   : 129 MB/s
Average I/O : 138.333 MB/s

+ ioping -Dc 10 .
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=1 time=62 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=2 time=121 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=3 time=100 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=4 time=105 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=5 time=101 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=6 time=88 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=7 time=109 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=8 time=113 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=9 time=95 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=10 time=100 us

--- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
10 requests completed in 9.00 s, 10.1 k iops, 39.3 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 62 us / 99 us / 121 us / 15 us
+ ioping -Dc 10 -s 256k .
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=1 time=306 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=2 time=373.0 ms
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=3 time=316 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=4 time=278 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=5 time=323 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=6 time=330 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=7 time=309 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=8 time=332 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=9 time=303 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=10 time=335 us

--- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
10 requests completed in 9.38 s, 26 iops, 6.65 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 278 us / 37.6 ms / 373.0 ms / 111.8 ms
+ ioping -DR .

--- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
68.1 k requests completed in 3.00 s, 23.4 k iops, 91.6 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 30 us / 42 us / 289.7 ms / 1.16 ms
+ ioping -DR -s 256k .

--- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
11.1 k requests completed in 3.00 s, 3.91 k iops, 978.1 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 223 us / 255 us / 1.47 ms / 19 us
+ ioping -Cc 10 .
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=1 time=5 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=2 time=3 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=3 time=4 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=4 time=4 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=5 time=4 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=6 time=3 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=7 time=5 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=8 time=4 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=9 time=12 us
4 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=10 time=3 us

--- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
10 requests completed in 9.00 s, 212.8 k iops, 831.1 MiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 3 us / 4 us / 12 us / 2 us
+ ioping -Cc 10 -s 256k .
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=1 time=25 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=2 time=41 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=3 time=42 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=4 time=52 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=5 time=58 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=6 time=58 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=7 time=54 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=8 time=40 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=9 time=44 us
256 KiB from . (simfs /vz/private/1116): request=10 time=39 us

--- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
10 requests completed in 9.00 s, 22.1 k iops, 5.39 GiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 25 us / 45 us / 58 us / 9 us
+ ioping -CR .

--- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
2.13 M requests completed in 3.00 s, 912.6 k iops, 3.48 GiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0 us / 1 us / 543 us / 1 us
+ ioping -CR -s 256k .

--- . (simfs /vz/private/1116) ioping statistics ---
83.8 k requests completed in 3.00 s, 28.2 k iops, 6.88 GiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 15 us / 35 us / 297 us / 7 us
  • VPSAddictVPSAddict Member

    @Epidrive said:
    VPSaddict We have couple of improvements in line for berry. Servers purchased now have high chance to be deployed in our e3-1271v3's. Depending on the severity of the DDoS, we normally suspend, or suspend with fee, or terminate.

    Can we work out a deal on bandwidth upgrades?

  • EpidriveEpidrive Member

    @VPSAddict Yes, if you send in a ticket we can discuss about your requirements.

  • boxelderboxelder Member

    @k0nsl said:
    Maybe I am missing the "obvious"...but how is that in any way related to EpiDrive / BerryServers?

    What you linked to looks like some shady BS and in no way connected to the aforementioned company, or am I wrong?

    More explicitly stated than the vpsboard link: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1520891

    Thanked by 1k0nsl
Sign In or Register to comment.