Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Going to leave Buyvm - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Going to leave Buyvm

2»

Comments

  • dirkdirk Member
    edited November 2011

    I'm still going via HE too:
    2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 77.109.80.233.fix.adsl.edpnet.net [77.109.80.233
    ]
    3 12 ms 12 ms 12 ms bras05.sn.be.edpnet.net [213.219.132.17]
    4 12 ms 12 ms 13 ms router01.sn.be.edpnet.net [212.71.11.61]
    5 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms router03.adamtel.nl.edpnet.net [212.71.1.225]
    6 15 ms 23 ms 24 ms 20gigabitethernet1-3.core1.ams1.he.net [195.69.1
    45.150]
    7 94 ms 98 ms 100 ms 10gigabitethernet4-1.core1.nyc4.he.net [216.66.2
    4.153]
    8 164 ms 173 ms 174 ms 10.122.122.14
    9 166 ms 176 ms 172 ms 10gigabitethernet1-4.core1.sjc1.he.net [72.52.92
    .117]
    10 176 ms 174 ms 174 ms energy-group-networks-llc.10gigabitethernet1-3.c
    ore1.sjc1.he.net [64.71.150.22]
    11 164 ms 165 ms 164 ms 173.245.86.18
    12 164 ms 164 ms 165 ms node12.buyvm.net [205.185.112.112]

    Trace complete.

    Idem when tracing to node30

  • No GBLX for me, just tons of hops :D

    traceroute to xxx (205.185.122.x), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
     1  10.87.0.1 (10.87.0.1)  8.440 ms  8.320 ms  8.356 ms
     2  1611A-MX960-01-ae10.bielefeld.unity-media.net (81.210.130.33)  9.160 ms  9.118 ms  9.116 ms
     3  1111A-MX960-01-ae1.muenster.unity-media.net (80.69.107.149)  10.691 ms  10.657 ms  15.550 ms
     4  1111A-MX960-02-ae0.muenster.unity-media.net (80.69.107.145)  15.544 ms  15.596 ms  15.592 ms
     5  1211F-MX960-02-ae2.dortmund.unity-media.net (80.69.107.141)  16.409 ms  16.403 ms  16.394 ms
     6  1211F-MX960-01-ae0.dortmund.unity-media.net (80.69.107.209)  19.029 ms  15.019 ms  14.920 ms
     7  1411G-MX960-01-ae8.neuss.unity-media.net (80.69.107.9)  13.592 ms  13.502 ms  18.498 ms
     8  1411G-MX960-02-ae0.neuss.unity-media.net (80.69.107.206)  18.395 ms  18.376 ms  18.289 ms
     9  nl-ams05a-rd2-ae-2.aorta.net (84.116.131.141)  29.914 ms  29.968 ms  29.932 ms
    10  84.116.134.137 (84.116.134.137)  30.437 ms  30.335 ms  30.295 ms
    11  7-1.r1.am.hwng.net (209.197.1.241)  31.149 ms  39.448 ms  30.823 ms
    12  e5-1.r1.lo.hwng.net (209.197.0.230)  44.313 ms  41.305 ms  41.160 ms
    13  4-1.r1.ny.hwng.net (69.16.190.209)  104.850 ms  101.751 ms  104.671 ms
    14  1-3.r2.ny.hwng.net (69.16.191.94)  104.535 ms  109.317 ms  102.956 ms
    15  1-1.r2.ch.hwng.net (209.197.1.141)  116.546 ms  116.775 ms  116.738 ms
    16  1-3.r1.ch.hwng.net (209.197.1.137)  126.064 ms  126.018 ms  130.311 ms
    17  unknown.hwng.net (209.197.1.217)  183.801 ms  189.892 ms  189.802 ms
    18  216.151.186.154 (216.151.186.154)  182.623 ms  185.228 ms  183.335 ms
    19  173.245.86.18 (173.245.86.18)  180.848 ms  180.719 ms  180.106 ms
    20  205.185.112.138 (205.185.112.138)  182.727 ms  181.191 ms  174.876 ms
    21  205.185.122.143 (205.185.122.x)  179.539 ms  185.885 ms  185.841 ms
    
  • @ mitgib : do you still use rotary telephones too?

  • If his rotary still works and he's fine with using it, why not?

  • kylixkylix Member
    edited November 2011

    @Aldryic said: If his rotary still works and he's fine with using it, why not?

    You still have an analogue network and even pulse dialing technology? How old is your public telephone network?

  • You do know that there are rotary phones that work on tone, right? Such as antique replicas, etc?

  • @Aldryic said: You do know that there are rotary phones that work on tone, right? Such as antique replicas, etc?

    I thought you were talking about an old telephone. But besides that, don't these phones still need an analogue network?

  • The ones I'm referring to (googling hard to try and find you an example; I know I saw one on thinkgeek or some similar site awhile back) are nothing more than a standard tone-dial phone with some fancy mechanism for the rotary dial. Fully up to date and compliant... there was even a 'wireless' one.

  • Ah ok, so I guess it's still analogue and therefore I may not be able to use it. We have ISDN here.

  • albertdbalbertdb Member
    edited November 2011

    Who uses ISDN outside Germany*? ADSL over ISDN isn't very popular.

    *Germany has 20% ISDN world users.

  • The whole northern Europe uses ISDN. Southern Europe is still using analogue technology.

  • Who uses landline telephones anyway?

  • kylixkylix Member
    edited November 2011

    @rds100 said: Who uses landline telephones anyway?

    I guess people who want to have a reliable way of communication. I seriously can't think of any person I know that doesn't have a landline telephone connection. Especially when it comes to businesses.

  • @lylix

    I dont have a landline in either Business Premises neither at my private home. i use a cable connection and Cisco VOIP.

  • kylixkylix Member
    edited November 2011

    @DanielM said: have a landline in either Business Premises neither at my private home. i use a cable connection

    Ok I was used to the term "landline" as opposed to "mobile cellular ´´line´´". A "cable connection" is landline in this term. So I would consider that as landline.

  • @kylix said: "landline" as opposed to "mobile cellular ´´line´´". A "cable connection"

    FFFFFFFFFFF.... all those marks, I thought I was reading some really crappy perl again for a moment...

  • Haha, yeah. You found my roots! ;)

  • @rajprakash said: do you still use rotary telephones too

    No, I sure don't, I've been using VoIP since the late 90's actually, and if you visit the parent site http://dpvoice.com we have some sweet deals on SIP trunks and can deliver from locations across the US and India.

    I do remember having rotary phones at home until the mid 70's,maybe even the early 80's. But we also had black & white television until 1972.

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    As an update I replaced powerdns with a BIND setup. BIND is holding at 8% CPU and only ~50M RAM so the changes are huge.

    Performance seems at least as fast in the tests I've done.

    Francisco

  • Heh, there's a reason BIND is considered a gold standard. It may have been around a long time, but the folks at ISC are not clueless (vix has been doing this a long time), and the code has been in continual development for over 20 years. A majority of the roots still run BIND.

    Sometimes long-maintained software can be good software. *BSD is still around, after all.

  • unbound is pretty good if you want a low ressources dns resolver fran...

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @bobinfo said: unbound is pretty good if you want a low ressources dns resolver fran...

    BIND is running like a champ so I don't want to dick with what works :)

    I'll keep it in mind though.

    Francisco

  • @Francisco said: I don't want to dick with what works

    But but but.. You could be missing out on a 0.00003% performance improvement.

  • It would be more but well... sure that bind is not that bad :)

  • I'm quite happy with djbdns.

  • Ok, I did some pings to my buyvm boxes, and are the same. Two of them appear to be passing via some gblx...* hosts and one goes via other hosts, but some of them says gblx too o_O. At the end my pings are the same

  • @miTgiB
    Do you realy need to follow Dick with But?
    Hope you've been well mate? How was you week?

  • This is really amazing. I wasn't even sure if I was ALLOWED to complain about this when I was only paying $15 a year. The fact that the staff actually goes out of the way to fix such a small problem really puts a smile on my face. BuyVM for life!

Sign In or Register to comment.