All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Xen Security Advisory 138 (CVE-2015-5154) - QEMU heap overflow flaw while processing certain ATAPI c
Just received this on seclist mailing list,
Not sure if it has been posted yet but wanted to let y'all know if it wasn't.
From: Xen.org security team
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 12:03:06 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1Xen Security Advisory CVE-2015-5154 / XSA-138 version 2
QEMU heap overflow flaw while processing certain ATAPI commands.
UPDATES IN VERSION 2
Public release.
ISSUE DESCRIPTION
The QEMU security team has predisclosed the following advisory:
A heap overflow flaw was found in the way QEMU's IDE subsystem handled I/O buffer access while processing certain ATAPI commands. A privileged guest user in a guest with CDROM drive enabled could potentially use this flaw to execute arbitrary code on the host with the privileges of the host's QEMU process corresponding to the guest.
IMPACT
An HVM guest which has access to an emulated IDE CDROM device
(e.g. with a device with "devtype=cdrom", or the "cdrom" convenience
alias, in the VBD configuration) can exploit this vulnerability to
take over the qemu process elevating its privilege to that of the qemu
process.VULNERABLE SYSTEMS
All Xen systems running x86 HVM guests without stubdomains which have
been configured with an emulated CD-ROM driver model are vulnerable.Systems using qemu-dm stubdomain device models (for example, by
specifying "device_model_stubdomain_override=1" in xl's domain
configuration files) are NOT vulnerable.Both the traditional ("qemu-xen-traditional") or upstream-based
("qemu-xen") qemu device models are potentially vulnerable.Systems running only PV guests are NOT vulnerable.
ARM systems are NOT vulnerable.
MITIGATION
Avoiding the use of emulated CD-ROM devices altogether, by not
specifying such devices in the domain configuration, will avoid this
issue.Enabling stubdomains will mitigate this issue, by reducing the
escalation to only those privileges accorded to the service domain.
qemu-dm stubdomains are only available with "qemu-xen-traditional".CREDITS
This issue was discovered by Kevin Wolf of Red Hat.
RESOLUTION
Applying the appropriate attached patch resolves this issue.
xsa138-qemut-{1,2}.patch qemu-xen-traditional, Xen unstable, Xen 4.5.x,
Xen 4.4.x, Xen 4.3.x, Xen 4.2.x
xsa138-qemuu-{1,2,3}.patch qemu-upstream, xen unstable, Xen 4.5.x,
Xen 4.4.x, Xen 4.3.x
xsa138-qemuu-{1,3}.patch qemu-upstream, Xen 4.2.xNOTE: xsa138-qemuu-2.patch is not required for Xen 4.2.x.
$ sha256sum xsa138*.patch
7e385455379d88658b8ab0d4c1effffe9af21fff2e1dc0fe51cacc779afc83a4 xsa138-qemut-1.patch
c9a89082e36a0646a6fe002c6892d966d415d11ad5cfdcfea7e9c8d7a3f1316c xsa138-qemut-2.patch
a076808f543c82aeac2f0239a4a46d9baadcd4e4b0a2f9ae7ded99cf59cffde6 xsa138-qemuu-1.patch
ed16dca7d2c179d0931d6e2503264d6593547a803eb3f08f6db7fff2127509a9 xsa138-qemuu-2.patch
090bdec00ede1f0ace1af52833038a74971e060d0c176b42bfca08511d36c644 xsa138-qemuu-3.patch
$DEPLOYMENT DURING EMBARGO
Deployment of patches or mitigations is NOT permitted (except on
systems used and administered only by organisations which are members
of the Xen Project Security Issues Predisclosure List). Specifically,
deployment on public cloud systems is NOT permitted.The decision not to permit deployment was made by the group that, at
their discretion, disclosed the issue to the Xen Project Security
Team.Deployment is permitted only AFTER the embargo ends.
(Note: this during-embargo deployment notice is retained in
post-embargo publicly released Xen Project advisories, even though it
is then no longer applicable. This is to enable the community to have
oversight of the Xen Project Security Team's decisionmaking.)For more information about permissible uses of embargoed information,
consult the Xen Project community's agreed Security Policy:
http://www.xenproject.org/security-policy.html
Also, the Citrix advisory was updated today too
http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX201593
Comments
Thanks for posting. The rate of serious security flaws being discovered for Xen over the past year is alarming...