Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

CloudShards 1GB SSD Cached 45GB 600GB OpenVZ Benchmark
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

CloudShards 1GB SSD Cached 45GB 600GB OpenVZ Benchmark

edited November 2012 in Reviews

It seems a while after I submitted my last benchmark. This time, let's test our new provider, CloudShards

OpenVZ 1024MB
2 CPU
1024MB RAM / 1024MB VSwap
45GB RAID10 HDD
600GB Bandwidth @ 1gigabit
1 IPv4

CPU Info

# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 58
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
stepping        : 9
cpu MHz         : 3500.292
cache size      : 8192 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 8
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 4
apicid          : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 13
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms
bogomips        : 7000.58
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor       : 1
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 58
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
stepping        : 9
cpu MHz         : 3500.292
cache size      : 8192 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 8
core id         : 1
cpu cores       : 4
apicid          : 2
initial apicid  : 2
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 13
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms
bogomips        : 7000.58
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

Memory Info

# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal:        1048576 kB
MemFree:         1025752 kB
Cached:            13040 kB
Active:            18480 kB
Inactive:            668 kB
Active(anon):       5796 kB
Inactive(anon):      312 kB
Active(file):      12684 kB
Inactive(file):      356 kB
Unevictable:           0 kB
Mlocked:               0 kB
SwapTotal:       1048576 kB
SwapFree:        1048576 kB
Dirty:                 0 kB
Writeback:             0 kB
AnonPages:          6108 kB
Shmem:              2624 kB
Slab:               3636 kB
SReclaimable:       1472 kB
SUnreclaim:         2164 kB

Freevps.sh

# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
Number of cores : 2
CPU frequency :  3500.292 MHz
Total amount of ram : 1024 MB
Total amount of swap : 1024 MB
System uptime :   21:46,
Download speed from CacheFly: 24.9MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 10.4MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 7.39MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 5.34MB/s
Download speed from Linode, London, UK:
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 9.31MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 4.83MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 10.7MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 14.8MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 58.1MB/s
I/O speed :  554 MB/s

Download test

# wget  cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin
--2012-11-08 03:46:16--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.bin
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.bin'

100%[===================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 19.6M/s   in 5.2s

2012-11-08 03:46:21 (19.3 MB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600/104857600]

Comments

  • edited November 2012

    Inodes

    # df -i
    Filesystem            Inodes   IUsed   IFree IUse% Mounted on
    /dev/simfs           23592960   26139 23566821    1% /
    tmpfs                 131072       4  131068    1% /lib/init/rw
    tmpfs                 131072       1  131071    1% /dev/shm
    

    Disk Space

    # df -h
    Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
    /dev/simfs             45G  409M   45G   1% /
    tmpfs                 512M     0  512M   0% /lib/init/rw
    tmpfs                 512M     0  512M   0% /dev/shm
    

    DD Test

    # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync
    1024+0 records in
    1024+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.94821 s, 551 MB/s
    
    # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.90435 s, 564 MB/s
    
    ~# dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k oflag=dsync
    1024+0 records in
    1024+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.15111 s, 499 MB/s
    
    # dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 5.10421 s, 210 MB/s
    

    IOPING

    ***************************************************
    ioping code.google.com/p/ioping/
    ioping.sh 0.9.8
    shell wrapper script by George Liu (eva2000)
    http://vbtechsupport.com
    ***************************************************
    
    Virtuzzo or OpenVZ Virtualisation detected
    **********************************
    dd (sequential disk speed test)...
    **********************************
    dd if=/dev/zero of=testfilex bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 1.99437 s, 538 MB/s
    
    ************************
    starting ioping tests...
    ***************************************************
    ioping disk I/O test (default 1MB working set)
    ***************************************************
    disk I/O: /
    --- / (simfs /vz/private/111) ioping statistics ---
    5 requests completed in 4001.0 ms, 9653 iops, 37.7 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.1/0.0 ms
    
    **********************************************
    seek rate test (default 1MB working set)
    **********************************************
    seek rate: /
    --- / (simfs /vz/private/111) ioping statistics ---
    27494 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 20703 iops, 80.9 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.0/0.3/0.0 ms
    
    # ioping . -c 5
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/111): request=1 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/111): request=2 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/111): request=3 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/111): request=4 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/111): request=5 time=0.1 ms
    
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/111) ioping statistics ---
    5 requests completed in 4001.0 ms, 10707 iops, 41.8 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.1/0.0 ms
    
    # ioping . -R
    
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/111) ioping statistics ---
    27812 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 21067 iops, 82.3 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.0/1.7/0.0 ms
    [email protected]:~#
    

    traceroute cachefly.cachefly.net

    traceroute to cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    1 198.12.80.130 (198.12.80.130) 0.025 ms 0.007 ms 0.006 ms
    2 198.12.69.73 (198.12.69.73) 0.469 ms 0.859 ms 1.142 ms
    3 buf-b1-link.telia.net (213.248.96.41) 0.164 ms 0.220 ms 0.215 ms
    4 nyk-bb1-link.telia.net (80.91.246.37) 9.474 ms 9.478 ms 9.472 ms
    5 nyk-b5-link.telia.net (213.155.135.19) 37.660 ms 37.670 ms 37.663 ms
    6 globalcrossing-ic-126892-nyk-b5.c.telia.net (213.248.94.82) 9.094 ms 15.450 ms 15.554 ms
    7 xe-3-0-4.ar1.nyc3.us.nlayer.net (69.31.34.229) 14.904 ms 13.782 ms 13.778 ms
    8 vlan-75.ar2.ewr1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.34.129) 11.991 ms 12.002 ms 13.123 ms
    9 vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 10.312 ms 10.064 ms 10.296 ms

    Ping test to Cachefly

    # ping -c 10 cachefly.cachefly.net
    PING cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=1 ttl=55 time=10.4 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=2 ttl=55 time=10.0 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=3 ttl=55 time=9.97 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=4 ttl=55 time=10.2 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=5 ttl=55 time=9.99 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=6 ttl=55 time=10.0 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=7 ttl=55 time=10.4 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=8 ttl=55 time=10.2 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=9 ttl=55 time=10.3 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=10 ttl=55 time=10.2 ms
    
    --- cachefly.cachefly.net ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.971/10.210/10.493/0.185 ms
    
  • edited November 2012

    For some reason, I can't get the benchmark results in the Serverbear website, so I just post it here :

    http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/11/08/DbdRzibgIxOUOzf7

  • Unixbench

    make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/sb-bench/UnixBench-5.1.3'
    locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
    locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory
    locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
    locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
    locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory
    locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
    sh: 3dinfo: command not found
    
       #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
       #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
       #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
       #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
       #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
        ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
    
       Version 5.1.3                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
    
       Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                          Sunnyvale, CA, USA
       January 13, 2011                   johantheghost at yahoo period com
    
    
    1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Process Creation  1 2 3
    
    1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    2 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    2 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
    
    2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    2 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    2 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    2 x Process Creation  1 2 3
    
    2 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    ========================================================================
       BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
    
       System: ny: GNU/Linux
       OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab062.2 -- #1 SMP Wed Oct 10 18:28:35 MSK 2012
       Machine: i686 (unknown)
       Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
       CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.6 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.6 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       04:04:42 up 22:07,  0 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.04, 0.00; runlevel 2
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Thu Nov 08 2012 04:04:42 - 04:32:47
    2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       23710618.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     3470.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               5924.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        793107.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          208972.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2251979.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             1211855.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 214447.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                              18912.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   9932.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1440.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                         919249.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   23710618.7   2031.8
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3470.5    631.0
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5924.0   1377.7
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     793107.3   2002.8
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     208972.1   1262.7
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2251979.5   3882.7
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1211855.0    974.2
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     214447.8    536.1
    Process Creation                                126.0      18912.8   1501.0
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       9932.8   2342.6
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1440.6   2401.0
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0     919249.3    612.8
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1378.0
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Thu Nov 08 2012 04:32:47 - 05:00:53
    2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       47370225.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     6940.3 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                              12525.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1408328.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          365204.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3925095.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             2417173.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 300675.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                              32906.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  13716.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1355.5 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        1751756.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   47370225.4   4059.1
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       6940.3   1261.9
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0      12525.2   2912.8
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1408328.1   3556.4
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     365204.3   2206.7
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3925095.8   6767.4
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2417173.9   1943.1
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     300675.1    751.7
    Process Creation                                126.0      32906.3   2611.6
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      13716.5   3235.0
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1355.5   2259.2
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1751756.0   1167.8
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2331.5
    
    
    

    http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/11/08/DbdRzibgIxOUOzf7

  • Looking pretty nice, how full is this node @concerto49?

    Also when you say you can't get the results is something broken?

    ServerBear - Easy UnixBench/dd/IOPS/FIO (NEW) & Network Benchmarks | Example Report | Compare Low End Boxes
    Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
  • concerto49concerto49 Member
    edited November 2012

    @serverbear said: Looking pretty nice, how full is this node @concerto49?

    About 1/2 full. We weren't planning to submit these to ServerBear though. These are a bit lower spec specials. Our official plans have higher IO than this, especially random IO. We'd like to submit that.

    @ErawanArifNugroho
    Thanks for the great review! It's these plans here: http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/5609/openvz-256mb-3.25mo-512mb-5.75mo-ny-cloud-shards

    @serverbear said: Also when you say you can't get the results is something broken?

    Maybe we aren't listed? I did send an email in regards to it :)

    Edit:

    If anyone's interested, our upcoming Texas nodes look like (where we run our shared hosting right now):

    Download speed from CacheFly: 94.4MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 13.5MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 95.4MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 4.67MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 10.1MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 10.3MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 5.79MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 8.66MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 27.0MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 11.4MB/s

    Serving you the best VPS, Web hosting, dedicated servers and more - Cloud Shards | Query Foundry
    We operate the network AS62638 | Available in Syd AU and Dallas, Los Angeles and NYC USA
  • edited November 2012

    @serverbear I can get the benchmark.txt but can't view the online page in the website :)

    image

  • SimpleNodeSimpleNode Member, Provider
    edited November 2012

    I like red borders.

    SimpleNode | VPS Hosting | KVM and OpenVZ | Dallas, TX | PayPal and Bitcoin accepted

  • Aye that's a bug, will be fixed in a few hours. Sorry about that.

    ServerBear - Easy UnixBench/dd/IOPS/FIO (NEW) & Network Benchmarks | Example Report | Compare Low End Boxes
    Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
  • The benchmark is fixed now @ErawanArifNugroho :)

    ServerBear - Easy UnixBench/dd/IOPS/FIO (NEW) & Network Benchmarks | Example Report | Compare Low End Boxes
    Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
  • SimpleNodeSimpleNode Member, Provider

    @concerto49 Incero?

    SimpleNode | VPS Hosting | KVM and OpenVZ | Dallas, TX | PayPal and Bitcoin accepted

  • concerto49concerto49 Member
    edited November 2012

    This benchmark was from Colocrossing, Buffalo. As to the download results of Texas, no - @ Internap. We've got A+B redundant power supplies + network there. 100% network + 100% power on the servers.

    Feel free to compare it to Incero :) - it's in a different building too.

    Serving you the best VPS, Web hosting, dedicated servers and more - Cloud Shards | Query Foundry
    We operate the network AS62638 | Available in Syd AU and Dallas, Los Angeles and NYC USA
  • TazTaz Disabled

    Sounds like ionity ;)

    Time is good and also bad. Life is short and that is sad. Dont worry be happy thats my style. No matter what happens i won't lose my smile!

  • SimpleNodeSimpleNode Member, Provider

    @concerto49 said: compare it to Incero

    Seems very similar

    SimpleNode | VPS Hosting | KVM and OpenVZ | Dallas, TX | PayPal and Bitcoin accepted

Sign In or Register to comment.