Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


1GB/2GB VPS for $4/month :O - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

1GB/2GB VPS for $4/month :O

13567

Comments

  • @budingyun said: Even hostslim improved right now.

    can you open http://client.hostslim.eu/clientarea.php

    DOwn I am here?

    got oone mail from hostslim "New Invoice created" just now

    but ....how to pay my bill?

    what wrong there?

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran
    edited August 2012

    Beware, long text coming in 2 posts:

    Distro:
    Debian GNU/Linux 6.0 \n \l
    CPU Info:
    processor   : 0
    vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
    cpu family  : 6
    model       : 45
    model name  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
    stepping    : 7
    cpu MHz     : 1999.905
    cache size  : 15360 KB
    physical id : 0
    siblings    : 12
    core id     : 0
    cpu cores   : 6
    apicid      : 0
    initial apicid  : 0
    fpu     : yes
    fpu_exception   : yes
    cpuid level : 13
    wp      : yes
    flags       : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
    bogomips    : 3999.81
    clflush size    : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes   : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    
    Disk space: 
    Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
    /dev/simfs            83886080    502552  83383528   1% /
    tmpfs                   524288         0    524288   0% /lib/init/rw
    tmpfs                   524288         0    524288   0% /dev/shm
    total                 84934656    502552  84432104   1%
    Free: 
                 total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
    Mem:       1048576     186500     862076          0          0     165256
    -/+ buffers/cache:      21244    1027332
    Swap:      1048576          0    1048576
    dd 1Mx1k dsync: 1024+0 records in
    1024+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.66603 s, 403 MB/s
    dd 64kx16k dsync: 16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 8.27607 s, 130 MB/s
    dd 1Mx1k fdatasync: 1024+0 records in
    1024+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.09048 s, 514 MB/s
    dd 64kx16k fdatasync: 16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.05404 s, 523 MB/s
    IOPing I/O: 4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=1 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=2 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=3 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=4 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=5 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=6 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=7 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=8 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=9 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /vz/private/192): request=10 time=0.2 ms
    
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/192) ioping statistics ---
    10 requests completed in 9002.6 ms, 7502 iops, 29.3 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.2/0.0 ms
    IOPing seek rate: 
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/192) ioping statistics ---
    24032 requests completed in 3000.1 ms, 16486 iops, 64.4 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.1/63.0/0.5 ms
    IOPing sequential: 
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/192) ioping statistics ---
    7301 requests completed in 3000.0 ms, 3362 iops, 840.4 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/0.3/10.6/0.2 ms
    IOPing cached: 
    --- . (simfs /vz/private/192) ioping statistics ---
    51193 requests completed in 3000.0 ms, 343723 iops, 1342.7 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.0/0.0/0.0 ms 
    Download Cachefly: 75.0MB/s
    Download Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA: 17.7MB/s
    Download Linode, Dallas, TX, USA: 17.7MB/s
    Download Linode, Tokyo, JP: 6.30MB/s
    Download Linode, London, UK: 4.72MB/s
    Download OVH, Paris, France: 6.37MB/s
    Download SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands: 4.48MB/s
    Download Hetzner, Nuremberg, Germany: 11.1MB/s
    Download iiNet, Perth, WA, Australia: 893KB/s
    Download Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL, USA: 533KB/s
    Download Softlayer, Singapore: 3.41MB/s
    Download Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA: 15.0MB/s
    Download Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA: 4.18MB/s
    Download Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA: 27.9MB/s
    Traceroute (cachefly.cachefly.net): traceroute to cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
     1  10-209-231-199.scalabledns.com (199.231.209.10)  0.063 ms  0.019 ms  0.024 ms
     2  ip2.50-200-2.static.steadfastdns.net (208.100.50.2)  0.362 ms  0.375 ms  0.419 ms
     3  * ip45.208-100-32.static.steadfastdns.net (208.100.32.45)  74.323 ms  74.301 ms
     4  ae1-133.cr2.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.110.29)  0.190 ms  0.228 ms  0.194 ms
     5  ae2-30g.ar1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.138)  1.779 ms  1.837 ms  1.752 ms
     6  vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175)  1.676 ms  1.539 ms  1.606 ms
    Pings (cachefly.cachefly.net): PING cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=1 ttl=58 time=1.41 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=2 ttl=58 time=1.40 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=3 ttl=58 time=1.45 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=4 ttl=58 time=1.57 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=5 ttl=58 time=1.90 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=6 ttl=58 time=1.71 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=7 ttl=58 time=1.66 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=8 ttl=58 time=1.65 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=9 ttl=58 time=1.53 ms
    64 bytes from vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175): icmp_req=10 ttl=58 time=1.70 ms
    
    --- cachefly.cachefly.net ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.400/1.601/1.904/0.152 ms
    

    M

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran
       #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
       #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
       #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
       #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
       #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
        ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
    
       Version 5.1.3                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
    
       Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                          Sunnyvale, CA, USA
       January 13, 2011                   johantheghost at yahoo period com
    
    
    1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Process Creation  1 2 3
    
    1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3
    
    4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3
    
    4 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Process Creation  1 2 3
    
    4 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    
    4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3
    
    ========================================================================
       BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
    
       System: bigmao: GNU/Linux
       OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab059.7 -- #1 SMP Tue Jul 24 19:12:01 MSK 2012
       Machine: i686 (unknown)
       Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
       CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (3999.8 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (3999.8 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (3999.8 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (3999.8 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       12:08:59 up 58 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00; runlevel 2
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 21 2012 12:08:59 - 12:36:50
    4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       12390033.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     1958.4 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               2555.0 lps   (29.6 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        377416.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          104010.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        980298.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                              592889.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                  98088.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                               6860.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   4673.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1626.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                         484828.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   12390033.7   1061.7
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       1958.4    356.1
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2555.0    594.2
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     377416.6    953.1
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     104010.6    628.5
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     980298.1   1690.2
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     592889.8    476.6
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      98088.8    245.2
    Process Creation                                126.0       6860.8    544.5
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       4673.1   1102.1
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1626.1   2710.1
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0     484828.2    323.2
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                         700.5
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 21 2012 12:36:50 - 13:04:44
    4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       49170103.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     7883.1 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               9992.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        524528.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          138530.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1718982.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             2268052.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 252413.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                              21324.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  12309.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1283.1 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        1579608.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   49170103.9   4213.4
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       7883.1   1433.3
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       9992.2   2323.8
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     524528.2   1324.6
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     138530.7    837.0
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1718982.4   2963.8
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2268052.5   1823.2
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     252413.7    631.0
    Process Creation                                126.0      21324.4   1692.4
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      12309.2   2903.1
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1283.1   2138.5
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1579608.7   1053.1
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1701.1
    

    M

    Thanked by 1ErawanArifNugroho
  • @Andri said: 256MB, cancelled for better performance and cheaper price at Uncle Sal's. But over all, it was (just) okay.

    +1, but Uncle Sal only has shop in Italy. If only they'd open another DC.

    Thanked by 1NanoG6
  • budingyunbudingyun Member
    edited August 2012

    @Andri said: 256MB, cancelled for better performance and cheaper price at Uncle Sal's. But over all, it was (just) okay.

    Cheaper but high latency from my location. (-_-)

    @ynzheng said: can you open http://client.hostslim.eu/clientarea.php

    DOwn I am here?

    got oone mail from hostslim "New Invoice created" just now

    but ....how to pay my bill?

    what wrong there?

    Working fine here.

  • @Maounique said: Beware, long text coming in 2 posts:

    That 4096mb plan. Which location? :D

  • @budingyun said: Working fine here.

    well ,it should be clients.hostslim.eu

    seems worng link on www.hostslim.eu top banner with login and register

    laf

  • ynzhengynzheng Member
    edited August 2012

    it `s super fast !

    dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=1M count=4k oflag=dsync
    4096+0 records in
    4096+0 records out
    4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 10.2022 s, 421 MB/s

    dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=64k oflag=dsync
    65536+0 records in
    65536+0 records out
    4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 29.2337 s, 147 MB/s

    dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=64k conv=fdatasync
    65536+0 records in
    65536+0 records out
    4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 8.5442 s, 503 MB/s

    dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=1M count=4k conv=fdatasync
    4096+0 records in
    4096+0 records out
    4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 8.13189 s, 528 MB/s

    cannot believe this

    no one dd here just me on this server?

    Fire SSD ?

  • @ynzheng said: it `s super fast !

    dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=1M count=4k oflag=dsync

    4096+0 records in
    4096+0 records out
    4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 10.2022 s, 421 MB/s

    Fire SSD ?

    Which location?

  • @budingyun said: Which location?

    Los Angeles Node: dc03r02ds30.scalabledns.com

  • @ynzheng said: Los Angeles Node: dc03r02ds30.scalabledns.com

    In the same node as @giang and me then. :D

  • @concerto49 said: +1, but Uncle Sal only has shop in Italy. If only they'd open another DC.

    Hear hear.

  • @budingyun said: In the same node as @giang and me then. :D

    then let us see how the next few months

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    @ynzheng said: then let us see how the next few months

    Exactly, mine is in Chicago. It is not 4096 who said that :o 1 GB but it is not 4 dollars either, it is 4.99, meaning 5.
    Uncle Sal scored 3.2k in unix bench, but i can't say this one is really bad, actually it is quite alright for now. About same price as Uncle Sal but has more storage.
    For next week I will be in vacation and will leave this on with monitoring see how it goes.
    M

  • @Maounique said: Uncle Sal scored 3.2k in unix bench

    Which one is that M?

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    512 OVZ
    M

  • budingyunbudingyun Member
    edited August 2012

    @ynzheng said: then let us see how the next few months

    Let's hope it last.

    @Maounique said: Exactly, mine is in Chicago. It is not 4096 who said that :o 1 GB but it is not 4 dollars either, it is 4.99, meaning 5.

    Uncle Sal scored 3.2k in unix bench, but i can't say this one is really bad, actually it is quite alright for now. About same price as Uncle Sal but has more storage.
    For next week I will be in vacation and will leave this on with monitoring see how it goes.
    M

    Misunderstand, i though you got 6 core. (-_-)

  • bubiebubie Member
    edited August 2012
    Linux VPS (OpenVZ) - 128MB VPS
    
    128MB Ram
    256MB Ram Burst
    1 E5-2620 CPU Core
    10GB Disk Space
    500GB Bandwidth
    1 IPv4 IP Address
    1 IPv6 IP Address 
    

    For $15 a year.
    I might get one.
    The Chicago Server (155ms) has even better ping than the upcoming buyvm in Buffalo (165ms).

    Should I do it?
    I get 800KB/S or 6400kbit/s on their chicago test file.

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    I am not sure, so far it goes well, but we will check again in a couple of weeks, usually after the nodes fill performance degrades.
    If you need for vpn, try more testfiles around. Ping is not everything, throughput is important, after all a tenth of a second up or down is not much, but if you want to dl big files or watch movies speed is important, much more important than ping.
    M

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    @NanoG6 said: Which one is that M?

    I am really sorry, I wanted to say geekbench...
    M

  • @Maonique

    I tried some. Most of the better ones give me about 800KB/s download speed. (my internet connection is max. 1400KB/s or 11mbit/s)

    Some provide ~800KB/s then descent to 400 and climb to 1000. And sometimes the go down to 100KB/s but then rise instantly to 1100KB/s.

    So which server is better for video streaming and VPN.
    A Server that provides pretty constant 800KB/s and drops to 400-500 sometimes.
    Or a server that provides a little less often the average of 800 but skips more between 100 and 1100?

  • I grabbed one of these too (1gb), but it looks like people have posted benchmarks. The only thing I'll add is that it looked like auto-setup once your order is paid, and I had quick response to tickets. Their control panel for the account is Solus, and it has options to enable TUN/TAP and PPP.

    Looks pretty sweet so far.

  • @Soylent

    I had an LEB special in their Chicago center, but eventually had to let it go -- as the network slowed down and the VPS wasn't as stable as I would have liked. I gave up after the last time when it was offline almost two days.

    !(http://tinypic.com/r/2wgr4oo/6)

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    @connercg said: I gave up after the last time when it was offline

    Erf... 2 days downtime is certainly enough to "convince" anyone to give up if they really need the VPS...
    M

  • @connercg We moved datacenter facilities in Chicago to 350 E Cermak. Since then, uptime has been rock solid.

  • @nenolod said: We moved datacenter facilities in Chicago to 350 E Cermak. Since then, uptime has been rock solid.

    Any chance to revive that Xen 80% off deal as your welcome gift to LET members? :p

  • Also, on their site they have a 100% monthly uptime SLA, with a free day of service for any .1% below that. It's obviously debatable whether a month of free service is worth 1 day of down time, which gets back to the question of what you're willing to host on a LEB. For me it's a question of why, and how often. 24 hours of down time in a year because of a massive hardware failure or DC screwup or network provider problem is different to me than 2 hours of downtime a month because you don't know how to configure your nodes.

    It at least makes me feel better that they're confident enough to make the guarantee up front.

  • @Soylent said: enable TUN/TAP and PPP.

    just enalbed TUN/TAP and PPP for PPTP VPN

    but cannot connect by my iPhone4 after installing http://board.prometeus.net/myfiles/pptpvpn.sh

    the bash script is installed on buyVM,verything`s fine there

    anyone helps?

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran
    edited August 2012

    Maybe reinstall and look what error you get ?
    While the script is running, or in /var/log after you try to connect.
    "It doesn't work" is not enough to troubleshoot, unfortunately :(
    M

    Thanked by 1klikli
  • @Maounique said: Maybe reinstall and look what error you get ?

    no any error

    While the script is running, or in /var/log after you try to connect.
    "It doesn't work" is not enough to troubleshoot

    allright,Iam too lazy to google,just post the problem here to see if anyone met the same problem just like me

    Ok now got these :

    @ http://www.faqs.org/docs/linux_network/x7261.html
    @ http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/debugging-linux-pppd-pptp-vpn-problems.html
    @ http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/pppd-logging-to-var-log-ppp-log-problem-133098/

    I will do more test and debug on the BudegetVM host

    thanks anyway

Sign In or Register to comment.