New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
ChicagoVPS - OpenVZ Enterprise Benchmark
serverbear
Member
Just picked up one of these earlier using the $7 LEB offer, not a bad box for the price. Here's some benchmarks:
UnixBench
Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 10 2012 09:21:52 - 09:50:22
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 77876066.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 11637.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5783.0 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 383908.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 105315.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 961412.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3108370.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 977912.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 25058.7 lps (30.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11385.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1931.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2604317.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 77876066.2 6673.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11637.3 2115.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 5783.0 1344.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 383908.5 969.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 105315.6 636.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 961412.0 1657.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3108370.3 2498.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 977912.0 2444.8
Process Creation 126.0 25058.7 1988.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11385.2 2685.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1931.4 3219.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2604317.0 1736.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1975.9
IOPS
ioping -c 10 request=1 time=0.1 ms request=2 time=54.2 ms request=3 time=8.1 ms request=4 time=0.9 ms request=5 time=0.1 ms request=6 time=0.1 ms request=7 time=0.1 ms request=8 time=0.1 ms request=9 time=0.1 ms request=10 time=0.1 ms 10 requests completed in 9072.1 ms, 156 iops, 0.6 mb/s ioping -RD 1916 iops, 7.5 mb/s min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.5/440.9/11.2 ms
dd
dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync 12.9354 s, 83.0 MB/s dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16.83 s, 63.8 MB/s
Network
Cachefly 10.7 MB/s Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA 8.24 MB/s Linode, Dallas, TX, USA 6.33 MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 3.66 MB/s Linode, London, UK 3.01 MB/s OVH, Paris, France 3.48 MB/s SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands 4.67 MB/s Hetzner, Nuremberg, Germany 4.54 MB/s iiNet, Perth, WA, Australia 1.85 MB/s Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL, USA 3.60 MB/s Softlayer, Singapore 1.82 MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA 3.15 MB/s Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA 2.83 MB/s Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA 10.1 MB/s
Full benchmark report: http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/08/10/1AF8BE1gX2iBQgfV
Comments
good value for the price and resources you get
Yeah, excellent offer.
Yes true. Love the offer now please some suggest how I can use up 2gb of my vps with them.
@cosmicgate I know chris will hate me for this but "Minecraft"?
@cosmicgate Mines sitting idle, if you find a use please let the rest of us know :P
If you never need support all goes over rails. Since the most simple requeriment takes days.
Benchmarking? :P
I think this is the secret of Chris for the 2GB offer. He knows most of us will only use a small portion of it
@CVPS_Chris
http://gyazo.com/85cd007fcff0d7e1830515e395a1daeb
Are these real pic? Confused>
@NinjaHawk Jeez, reckon they could fit any more ads on that page?
I remember some dude came on frantech's irc channel and complained that his vps with cvps got suspended the moment he ran BT on it lol. He was finding ways to use the most out of his 2gb vps as well.
@serverbear Come one, they need to make money too
I saw that too and made me think how cute/hot Jeremiah is. Then later realized that he is not a female
Lol. I bet Jeremiah's wife/Gf would be really suspicious if they ever see this.
I did search in facebook how Jeremiah really looks like, and was dismayed that it was very different from the picture posted in their site.
NWNX's website is not finished. Chris and Jeremiah both confirmed it a while back.
That's what they'd like you to think.
@ihatetonyy
If I was a girl I'd pretend to be a guy on the Internet.
@HalfEatenPie: You're on the right track, but I have very reliable sources who have told me the whole of NWNX is really just Dan Fry.
Will the community order more if jshinkle is a girl?
@ihatetonyy @concernednetizen
/lawnchair
Given that P2P software is directly forbidden in their TOS, what else exactly did he expect?
... a peer 2 peer file sharing application such as Kazaa, Edonkey, WinMX or any other p2p file sharing application that demands high bandwidth and CPU resources. Use of these services negatively affects everyone on the main hardware node and will not be permitted.
So if I were their client I'd be relieved to know that there is an automated system that catches abusers so quickly and suspends them before they overload the node I'm on.
there are no girls on the internet.
also, obviously stock photo:
http://sjc.lt/x
Given that P2P software is directly forbidden in their TOS, what else exactly did he expect?
Atleast someone is smart enough to see this....
Jeremiah is not a girl, and like @Halfeatenpie said, the site is not done. Ive been trying really hard to get it done but something seems to come up and keeps pushing it back
Bah. Jeremiah is HOT ;P
Agree
You don't get serious any complaint acting as usually do fishy guys. Still your straight business can be affected for your personal methods. Please take a look on your support system.
benchmarks have always been pretty good on cvps. disk iops might get a little wonky but usually reasonable.