Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › RAMNODE launched LA location
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

RAMNODE launched LA location

hdpixelhdpixel Member
in General

https://clientarea.ramnode.com/announcements.php?id=389

Thanked by 2Droid Nick_A
«1

Comments

  • hostnoobhostnoob Member

    Nice to see Ramnode expanding

    Thanked by 1Nick_A
  • SakuraSakura Member

    The mtr to 202.96.0.133(the DNS of China Telecome Beijing)

    HOST: lg.la.ramnode.com Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev

    1. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    2. 63-218-51-165.static.pccwglobal.net 0.0% 10 2.0 0.9 0.6 2.0 0.4

    3. TenGE12-1.br02.lax04.pccwbtn.net 0.0% 10 0.5 14.3 0.5 127.8 39.9

    4. 0.xe-3-2-0.BR3.LAX15.ALTER.NET 0.0% 10 0.5 1.0 0.3 6.4 1.9

    5. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    6. 0.xe-9-3-0.GW2.LAX1.ALTER.NET 0.0% 10 0.6 5.7 0.5 42.8 13.3

    7. Internet-gw.customer.alter.net 0.0% 10 3.9 3.6 1.5 7.8 1.8

    8. 219.158.101.197 0.0% 10 148.7 147.3 145.7 149.1 1.4

    9. 219.158.96.221 0.0% 10 150.6 151.7 148.2 157.5 2.6

    10. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    11. 219.158.14.189 0.0% 10 223.5 239.2 223.5 245.7 7.1

    12. 124.65.194.34 0.0% 10 218.0 231.0 218.0 237.4 6.9

    13. 61.51.113.82 0.0% 10 219.2 231.5 219.2 237.9 6.6

    14. 202.106.193.46 0.0% 10 217.9 230.2 217.9 236.0 6.5

    Go through alter.net?

  • jcalebjcaleb Member

    which dc

  • jcalebjcaleb Member

    test ip?

  • ihatetonyyihatetonyy Member

    @jcaleb said:
    test ip?

    http://lg.la.ramnode.com/

    168.235.72.22

    Thanked by 1jcaleb
  • ihatetonyyihatetonyy Member
    edited January 2015

    Interesting routing from Comcast in CenCal: http://pastebin.com/ZrgNm2GF

    VIS-SMF-SJC-LAX

    Compared to ChicagoCrossing LAX: http://pastebin.com/GyTaMKk8

    VIS-FAT-LAX

  • hiphiphip0hiphiphip0 Member

    Got two, very fast from chinamobile.

    Thanked by 1Nick_A
  • hotsnowhotsnow Veteran

    @hiphiphip0 said:
    Got two, very fast from chinamobile.

    damn slow from chinaunicom, ping > 500ms :(

  • jcalebjcaleb Member

    Seems down both looking glass and the test ip

  • rds100rds100 Member

    jcaleb said: Seems down both looking glass and the test ip

    Probably the DDoS curse of LET.

    Thanked by 1Nick_A
  • manlivomanlivo Member
    edited January 2015

    From my network

    PING 168.235.72.22 (168.235.72.22) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 168.235.72.22: icmp_req=1 ttl=53 time=281 ms
64 bytes from 168.235.72.22: icmp_req=2 ttl=53 time=280 ms
64 bytes from 168.235.72.22: icmp_req=3 ttl=53 time=283 ms

http://lg.la.ramnode.com/100MB.test
100MB.test 15.0 KB/s - 2.0 MB of 95.4 MB, 2 hours left
  • DalekOfSkaroDalekOfSkaro Member

    8 Hops from Florida. Nice :-)

    BTW, congratulations, @Nick_A :)

    Thanked by 2Monsta_AU Nick_A
  • patrick7patrick7 Member, LIR

    From Zurich average 160ms, 2,77MB/s

  • Monsta_AUMonsta_AU Member
    edited January 2015

    Well done @Nick_A - my ISP has a few extra hops in it as they transit PCCW in San Jose back to LA. They do transit NTT in LA so maybe they are trying to use the cheaper PCCW link instead.

    My Crissic box beats you by a couple of hops and 8-10ms, but only as I am direct into LA & then Any2 Peer.

    I realise it is very very early days, but any chance of some quality peers in LA? Equinix & Any2 would be really good for any of us Aussies with iiNet/Internode.

    Ping from work's NTT bandwidth (GlobalSwitch, Sydney) is impressive:

    Tracing route to lg.la.ramnode.com [168.235.72.22]
    3 2 ms 4 ms 3 ms ge-0-0-0-107.a06.sydnau01.au.ra.gin.ntt.net [202.68.66.241]
    11 138 ms 138 ms 138 ms test.la.ramnode.com [168.235.72.22]

    I am probably going to push myself back to Amsterdam now for a diversity box as my Iniz NL box is massively overloaded and slow. The service on RamNode is always extremely good. It's not the cheapest, but it rates #1 on here for a reason.

    EDIT: RamNode Site under VERY HEAVY LOAD...... unsurprisingly!

  • nullnullnullnull Member

    Pure NTT inbound ？

  • Monsta_AUMonsta_AU Member

    @nullnull said:
    Pure NTT inbound ？

    No, he has PCCW and NTT. Did you not read the announcement link?

  • tr1ckytr1cky Member

    Voxility filtering in LA would be nice.

  • josephbjosephb Member

    @Monsta_AU said:
    my ISP has a few extra hops in it as they transit PCCW in San Jose back to LA. They do transit NTT in LA so maybe they are trying to use the cheaper PCCW link instead.

    PCCW Peering preferred over NTT Transit.

    Traceroute before Nick brought up PCCW here:

    http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=fLEV6Lai

  • Monsta_AUMonsta_AU Member

    josephb said: PCCW Peering preferred over NTT Transit.

    Yeah, just as I thought. PCCW is definitely cheaper bandwidth, but coming from NTT in AU it goes straight through as it should. Strangely, I go thru LA and via NTT to Seattle....

    Anyway, another peer in LA would be great, and hopefully another transit provider too.

  • josephbjosephb Member

    @Monsta_AU said:
    Anyway, another peer in LA would be great

    Peering at Equinix or Any2 would be pretty cool.

    Thanked by 1Monsta_AU
  • trexostrexos Member

    We want an EU location!:D

    Thanked by 1Quinten
  • DennisDDennisD Member

    @trexos said:
    We want an EU location!:D

    the Netherlands?

  • mpkossenmpkossen Member

    @DennisD said:
    the Netherlands?

    An additional EU location ;-)

  • trexostrexos Member

    @DennisD @mpkossen

    Yeah thats what I meant:P

  • Monsta_AUMonsta_AU Member

    mpkossen said: An additional EU location ;-)

    Maybe a non-US, non-EU location might be a better idea. Japan, Singapore, Australia.

    Unfortunately it might end up being Eastern Europe - costs are low there.

  • jcalebjcaleb Member
    edited January 2015

    Averate ping time from my place to LA. Similar to other host Ive been with:

    jon@laptop ~ $ ping 168.235.72.22
PING 168.235.72.22 (168.235.72.22) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 168.235.72.22: icmp_req=1 ttl=51 time=175 ms
64 bytes from 168.235.72.22: icmp_req=2 ttl=51 time=173 ms
64 bytes from 168.235.72.22: icmp_req=3 ttl=51 time=172 ms
64 bytes from 168.235.72.22: icmp_req=4 ttl=51 time=172 ms
64 bytes from 168.235.72.22: icmp_req=5 ttl=51 time=172 ms
64 bytes from 168.235.72.22: icmp_req=6 ttl=51 time=178 ms
64 bytes from 168.235.72.22: icmp_req=7 ttl=51 time=171 ms
  • J1021J1021 Member

    @jcaleb use pre tags!

    Thanked by 1jcaleb
  • matthewvzmatthewvz Member, Host Rep

    ~30ms ping via IPv6, ~55ms ping via IPv4.

  • Nick_ANick_A Member, Top Host, Host Rep

    Thanks everyone!

    We just launched this location with minimal routing optimization (waiting on feedback). Please send us a ticket if you see any routing issues, and we'll see what can be done. We always expect to have at least a few strange routes when launching a new location.

    @jcaleb said:
    Seems down both looking glass and the test ip

    Yeah someone felt like hitting the looking glass for the last 8 hours or so.

    @tr1cky said:
    Voxility filtering in LA would be nice.

    Too expensive and not much room to negotiation.

    @josephb said:
    Peering at Equinix or Any2 would be pretty cool.

    On the to do list :)

    Thanked by 1Monsta_AU
  • Nick_ANick_A Member, Top Host, Host Rep

    @hotsnow said:
    damn slow from chinaunicom, ping > 500ms :(

    Please send us a ticket or PM me with an MTR.

Sign In or Register to comment.