Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Mushkin Hyperion M.2 SSD Reaches 2.8GB/s and 350K IOPS
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Mushkin Hyperion M.2 SSD Reaches 2.8GB/s and 350K IOPS

Great things are happening at CES and the storage world might be seeing some of the greatest advances that it has seen in a while. Take the new Mushkin Hyperion M.2 SSD for example which, will not only reach just under 3GB/s and 350K IOPS but also, it can be had in capacities up to 1TB!

http://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/mushkin-hyperion-m-2-ssd-reaches-2-8gbs-350k-iops-ces-2015-update/

This is brutal! I wonder if we're going to see these in web hosting business, the 1TB capacity makes it interesting.

Comments

  • MicrolinuxMicrolinux Member
    edited January 2015

    Largely useless, very, very, very few applications would benefit from that kind of speed.

    Instead of focusing on things actually useful in the real world, such as NAND life, data integrity and cost, we get this load of crap. Thanks, consumerism.

  • Maybe they are loving DD porn

  • @Microlinux said:
    Instead of focusing on things actually useful in the real world, such as NAND life, data integrity and cost, we get this load of crap. Thanks, consumerism.

    NAND life/data integrity of modern drives is actually very good. It suffers in heavy write environments where this sort of speed would be useful. As for price...have you seen SSD prices lately? They've imploded.

    Thanked by 1Dylan
  • Now to wait for 10-20 years until the price drops.

  • @iwaswrongonce said:
    NAND life/data integrity of modern drives is actually very good. It suffers in heavy write environments where this sort of speed would be useful. As for price...have you seen SSD prices lately? They've imploded.

    Now imagine if any, or all, of those were even better.

  • @Microlinux said:
    Largely useless, very, very, very few applications would benefit from that kind of speed.

    Instead of focusing on things actually useful in the real world, such as NAND life, data integrity and cost, we get this load of crap. Thanks, consumerism.

    Flash based cache for enterprise storage solutions... higher OP/s... lower cost of entry?

  • MassNodes said: Flash based cache for enterprise storage solutions... higher OP/s... lower cost of entry?

    I can imagine that application existing, but it would be very niche. I think few such situations would benefit measurably from an increase in speed over what we currently have.

  • @Microlinux said:
    Now imagine if any, or all, of those were even better.

    If there were more money pursuing those endeavors, they would have directed their efforts there. That's the beauty of capitalism.

  • MicrolinuxMicrolinux Member
    edited January 2015

    @iwaswrongonce said:
    If there were more money pursuing those endeavors, they would have directed their efforts there. That's the beauty of capitalism.

    Not capitalism, consumerism.

  • @Microlinux said:
    Not capitalism, consumerism.

    It depends on who gets this. If this is for gaming computers they can just download the os and games again its no real loss to them but when high perfomance means everything to them then it makes sense. Also There is fatcache This is where you put your memcache in to ssd and these high perfomance drives can suck it up spit it out and die all day as long as the price is right for enterprises.

  • This means it needs a PCIe 3.0 x4 connection to the mSATA slot - Not many boards offer this at all and the ones that do are not enterprise.

  • @wojons said:
    If this is for gaming computers ... high perfomance means everything to them then it makes sense

    You will see no measurable difference in any game if you use any commonly available SSD or the SSD mentioned in this thread. Gamers would want this because they like to brag.

    @wojons said: There is fatcache

    This application would work also perfectly fine on any commonly available SSD with little to no measurable performance difference, save for niche high volume scenarios.

  • @Microlinux said:

    Not sure why you think cache is not about thoughtput. If i can get 2.0gbs of ssd output from a single ssd for service cache content then thats better then needing to get 4+ ssd to do the same thing. Clealy it sounds like ur crazy and hate samsung or high perfomance ssd that you dont see the benifit of having more speed.

  • @wojons said: Not sure why you think cache is not about thoughtput.

    You're not understanding what I am saying. The applications that would benefit from this speed are very niche.

    @wojons said: Clealy it sounds like ur crazy and hate samsung or high perfomance ssd

    I don't know where you are getting that.

    @wojons said : you dont see the benifit of having more speed.

    @Microlinux said: The applications that would benefit from this speed are very niche.

Sign In or Register to comment.