New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Ramnode or Crissic
Crissic is cheaper than Ramnode,but ramnode of the network is better than crissic.
My location is China.
Ramnode $15/y :
128MB SVZ 128 / 64 MB 1 Core 1 /64 12 GB 500 GB
Crissic $15/y:
100GB RAID-10 HDD Storage
2TB Bandwidth Monthly
512MB RAM
1 IPv4 Dedicated IP
/64 IPv6 Subnet
1Gbps Port
3 CPU Cores (Fair Share)
Which one is better?
Comments
ramnode seattle!
Specs wise? Crissic. Latency/Speed to China? Maybe Ramnode Seattle - but Crissic LA should be good as well.
Both are great, in this case I would go Crissic - just because you get a bit more bang for your buck. They're both quality providers.
Both of those are great providers, if you really want to get advantage of Gig port then go for ramnode, if you don't have any use of that, then go for crissic. Couldn't get any thing more than 300Mb/s on crissic.
Ramnode for performance, Crissic for resources. Some of Crissic's Jacksonville nodes once had ~50-75mb/s IO, LA could be better though. Ramnode's performance is always top-notch.
I would go with Crissic. And then you're safe about bandwidth
Here's a quick comparison, I have both of the plans you mentioned:
Ramnode Seattle -128MB SVZ
Crissic Los Angeles - 512MB OVZ HDD
Thanks.
RamNode
Apparently Crissic speed to Singapore is quite low, despite it is an Asia Optimised IP compared to Seattle. Don't know about latency and trace route though.
I will personally get both
Can you PM me your IP? That I/O is low and I want to take a look...
@Nick_A Sent.
I would say definitely RamNode. Their network is just better in general.
Don't think it is.
Crissic Jacksonville HDD
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz
Number of cores : 2
CPU frequency : 2660.061 MHz
Total amount of ram : 256 MB
Total amount of swap : 256 MB
System uptime : 62 days, 19:44,
Download speed from CacheFly: 55.8MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 25.0MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 15.5MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.82MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 4.64MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 1.43MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 5.62MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 9.86MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 18.8MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 24.8MB/s
I/O speed : 46.4 MB/s
Crissic Los Angeles HDD
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz
Number of cores : 2
CPU frequency : 2660.054 MHz
Total amount of ram : 256 MB
Total amount of swap : 256 MB
System uptime : 9:05,
Download speed from CacheFly: 50.6MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 7.38MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 26.2MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 2.12MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 1.43MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 13.6MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 10.6MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 62.5MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 72.4MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 22.0MB/s
I/O speed : 852 MB/s
Ramnode Seattle SVZ 128
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency : 3400.193 MHz
Total amount of ram : 128 MB
Total amount of swap : 64 MB
System uptime : 15 days, 22:15,
Download speed from CacheFly: 96.6MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 21.1MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 54.9MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 12.9MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 9.95MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 19.5MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 14.1MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 88.7MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 65.7MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 43.3MB/s
I/O speed : 976 MB/s
Ramnode Seattle SVZS512 old plan
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 0 @ 2.30GHz
Number of cores : 2
CPU frequency : 2300.202 MHz
Total amount of ram : 512 MB
Total amount of swap : 512 MB
System uptime : 130 days, 18:53,
Download speed from CacheFly: 59.7MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 5.30MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 25.5MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.10MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 6.95MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 4.06MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 6.31MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 80.5MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 56.1MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 23.8MB/s
I/O speed : 266 MB/s
RamNode has a great network and uptime, Crissic has cheaper servers with lower I/O and network. Both have good support, I get >5 min response times.
My Crissic VPS seems to reboot a little more also, but they have good pricing if you look for offers.
Ramnode:
10:35:52 up 220 days, 18:07, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00what are you using it for?
I have Ramnode and they are good. But SEA to Cambodia is 50ms slower than LA.
I also have Hostigation and Fliphost in LA but just moved some sites to DO Singapore .... 50ms or less from Phnom Penh-- rip snortin' fast .... compared to crossing the Pacific
I was recently in China and the guys I spoke to there are using Vultr in Japan, said it is fast. And even the guys with technical skills are using Witopia(sp?) for VPN as that provider has a lot of IPs in case one gets blocked.
Thus, might want to mention what you objectives are.
websites and vpn.
Ramnode, plus if you want more storage (so it's more like the Crissic box) then get a cached-SSD plan with 80GB space. I've found performance on their CVZ plans to still be amazing anyway.
does Crissic allow torrents from private trackers like Ramnode?
@charos pretty sure they don't allow torrents, think I saw that in the AUP - not sure on private-only though. @SkylarM
sign up with both and take it for a spin.
Both are great providers but I would consider crissic's support answers to be more useful most of the time.
ramenode +1