Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Looking for Reliable Storage VPS in Chicago
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Looking for Reliable Storage VPS in Chicago

agoldenbergagoldenberg Member, Host Rep

Would love something along the lines of 500GB of storage. The rest isn't really important. Gigabit port would be nice for fast transfers.

Let me know :)

Comments

  • Uh.. @drserver

    He has a 150GB promo, but I'm sure you could work something out with him.

  • drserverdrserver Member, Host Rep

    Hi,

    We can do that, please specify other specs so i can make you decent offer.

  • ausaus Member
    edited October 2014

    Backupsy. (500GB for $12)

  • agoldenbergagoldenberg Member, Host Rep

    @drserver I'd like maybe 1 gb of ram but aside from that doesn't matter what else..

  • drserverdrserver Member, Host Rep

    75 usd per year or 7.5 usd per month

    Xen pv - 4 cores - 1gb ram - 500 gb hdd - 3tb @ 1gbps, 3 ip addresses and 30 ipv6 addresses. It can be delivered as resource pool so you can create multiple vps servers from that resources.

  • agoldenbergagoldenberg Member, Host Rep

    @drserver I'll take it :)

  • drserverdrserver Member, Host Rep

    Pm-ed

  • agoldenbergagoldenberg Member, Host Rep

    Probably going to take a look at Backupsy. Got one from @DrServer but the IO is god awful and all I'm using this for is IO.

  • agoldenberg said: the IO is god awful

    Well, HDD + XEN PV = Modest I/O. If you need high I/O then you need SSD. Otherwise, get a low-end dedicated server with a decent CPU and HDD.

    Our of curiosity, what I/O did you get from @DrServer and what are your expectations?

  • agoldenbergagoldenberg Member, Host Rep

    @DalekOfSkaro Here's what I found:

    root@backup:~# bash bench.sh 
    CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
    Number of cores : 4
    CPU frequency : 2000.038 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 987 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime : 27 min, 
    Download speed from CacheFly: 95.8MB/s 
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 5.22MB/s 
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 65.9MB/s 
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 11.9MB/s 
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 9.30MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 22.4MB/s 
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 8.22MB/s 
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 41.6MB/s 
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 33.9MB/s 
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 73.2MB/s 
    I/O speed : 9.2 MB/s
    

    I'd like to have at least 90-100MB/s

  • @agoldenberg please try again. It should be better now that it is SSD Cached :)

  • DalekOfSkaroDalekOfSkaro Member
    edited October 2014

    agoldenberg said: I/O speed : 9.2 MB/s

    OK... That's a bit too low. For HDD and XENPV you should get something between 40~60 MB/s actually.

    agoldenberg said: I'd like to have at least 90-100MB/s

    For that you need either SSD-Cached or PureSSD, and I highly doubt you can find that in your price range...

    The best I could ever get on a HDD was this:

    dd if=/dev/zero of=1g bs=1M count=1024 oflag=direct
    1024+0 records in
    1024+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.18725 s, 491 MB/s

    Edited with a newer test result

    But this is VirtualBox, in New York, and it'd cost you a more than $7.5/mo.

    What you're looking for is out there, but probably not at the price you seek.

  • Something is not configured right on the node end or someone abusing the node like hell.

  • drserverdrserver Member, Host Rep

    we have little issue with "slow lorris attack"

    root@vesta-backup:~# ioping . -c 10
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=1 time=6.3 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=2 time=0.4 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=3 time=0.4 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=4 time=0.5 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=5 time=0.4 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=6 time=0.4 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=7 time=0.5 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=8 time=0.5 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=9 time=0.4 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/xvda1): request=10 time=0.4 ms
    
    --- . (ext3 /dev/xvda1) ioping statistics ---
    10 requests completed in 9011.9 ms, 981 iops, 3.8 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.4/1.0/6.3/1.8 ms
    
    root@vesta-backup:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm test
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 19.6024 s, 54.8 MB/s
    root@vesta-backup:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=8k conv=fdatasync && rm test
    8192+0 records in
    8192+0 records out
    536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 6.88777 s, 77.9 MB/s
    root@vesta-backup:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k conv=fdatasync && rm test
    4096+0 records in
    4096+0 records out
    268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.60143 s, 74.5 MB/s
    

    @agoldenberg please confirm

  • drserverdrserver Member, Host Rep

    aggressivenetworks said: Something is not configured right on the node end or someone abusing the node like hell.

    4 users preformed 150gb DD at the same time, everything colapsed, services are fully restored now

    Thanked by 1DalekOfSkaro
  • drserver said: 4 users preformed 150gb DD at the same time, everything colapsed, services are fully restored now

    You never fail to take care of issues the right way and maintain transparency, do you? Kudos!

  • drserverdrserver Member, Host Rep

    DalekOfSkaro said: You never fail to take care of issues the right way and maintain transparency, do you? Kudos!

    Thank you for kind words, however i have nothing to hide. Best pard EnhanceIO died due massive sequential writes. It is bad situation to be in. Solution is to disable sequential Write caching that would be saver however then famous dd tests will be slow. Best part we use raid 6 with 10 drives in total. Major problem here is raid6 write penalty. All vps servers on the node are preforming normal however there are situations with "bad" IO.

    I would like to apologize to all users affected by this.

  • vimalwarevimalware Member
    edited October 2014

    @drserver said:
    4 users preformed 150gb DD at the same time, everything colapsed, services are fully restored now

    :o New level for benchmark fetish unlocked: Spinning rust rape fetish .

    Thanked by 1drserver
  • @drserver do you have a website? I need a long term VPS and I want to use it for many years. Are you able to provide that?

    Thanks!

  • drserverdrserver Member, Host Rep

    @JoeBiss

    drserver.net - abusivecores.com - sugarvps.com - byteshack.net - xenstorage.com - dirtcheap.ninja

    What kind of specs are you looking for ?

    Thanked by 1DalekOfSkaro
  • I'm looking for the same spec as the OP. Can I upgrade later on to 1TB? location? do you allow torrents for private use? and do you accept other than Paypal? Thanks!

    Thanked by 1DalekOfSkaro
Sign In or Register to comment.