RamNode 512MB 6GB SSD 1000GB E3-1230v2s and Samsung 830s Benchmark
ErawanArifNugroho
Member
First of all, let me thank to @Nick_A at RamNode for giving me a vps for running the Benchmark :)
System: 2 Core 512mb/512mb vswap 6GB SSD 1000GB BW 1Gbit port Node DallasSSDVZ2 CentOS 5 64-bit
So, here we go with the results :
# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 3299.960 MHz Total amount of ram : 512 MB Total amount of swap : 512 MB System uptime : 0 min, Download speed from CacheFly: 79.0MB/s Download speed from Linode, Atlanta GA: 14.5MB/s Download speed from Linode, Dallas, TX: 81.7MB/s Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 7.75MB/s Download speed from Linode, London, UK: 9.25MB/s Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 12.3MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 8.35MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 26.4MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 43.2MB/s Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 30.6MB/s I/O speed : 425 MB/s
# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3299.960 cache size : 8192 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 8 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms bogomips : 6599.92 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 3299.960 cache size : 8192 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 8 core id : 1 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 2 initial apicid : 2 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms bogomips : 6598.97 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
Comments
Download Test :
IO Test :
IOPING :
Unix Bench :
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com 1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Process Creation 1 2 3 1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 2 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 x Process Creation 1 2 3 2 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: bench: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab057.1 -- #1 SMP Fri Jun 22 02:17:07 MSD 2012 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz (6599.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz (6599.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 07:19:49 up 5:27, 2 users, load average: 0.05, 0.05, 0.01; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Jul 05 2012 07:19:49 - 07:47:53 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21731071.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3914.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5331.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1047622.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 282793.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2519696.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2011217.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 224416.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 16923.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10059.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1475.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2575777.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21731071.5 1862.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3914.8 711.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 5331.9 1240.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1047622.2 2645.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 282793.2 1708.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2519696.6 4344.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2011217.2 1616.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 224416.3 561.0 Process Creation 126.0 16923.9 1343.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10059.5 2372.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1475.9 2459.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2575777.3 1717.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1645.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Jul 05 2012 07:47:53 - 08:15:58 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 43223170.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 7843.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 10957.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1321066.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 342657.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3796285.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 4028693.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 335950.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 29273.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13121.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1366.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4408179.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 43223170.0 3703.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7843.0 1426.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 10957.0 2548.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1321066.5 3336.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 342657.3 2070.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3796285.2 6545.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4028693.0 3238.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 335950.5 839.9 Process Creation 126.0 29273.1 2323.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13121.3 3094.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1366.9 2278.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4408179.1 2938.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2561.2:) Thanks for the post!
NYC - LA - ATL - SEA - NL - IPv6 - DDoS Protection - AS3842
Picked one up to
Really good connection!
Pretty amazing disk IO considering I'm paying $10 quarter :P
-Nick Perkins | Twitter = @nickpperk
what plan is that? (specs etc)
Check my blog for more cool *nix tips & tricks!
256MB RAM 256MB VSwap 1 Core @ 3.2GHz 4GB RAID10 SSD 500GB Bandwidth
-Nick Perkins | Twitter = @nickpperk
I think that fits our mission statement... "More power than you know what to do with at a price you can afford" etc.
:D
NYC - LA - ATL - SEA - NL - IPv6 - DDoS Protection - AS3842
So true. I don't know what to do with it! :o
Its like having too much ketchup packets with my fries!
Add three reboots first month to
We use RamNode VPS servers to provide DNS servers for our own customers and I can vouch that the performance and service is awesome!
Save them, it is inevitable you forget one time.
The Atlanta hardware performs ever better (sorry don't have a 256, just a 1GB):
http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/9/10/CG4KPcgbRUVTw4fd
Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
Old thread resurrection, nice.
NYC - LA - ATL - SEA - NL - IPv6 - DDoS Protection - AS3842
Didn't even notice that O_o
Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
Yep, we no longer offer new orders on the hardware in question here.
NYC - LA - ATL - SEA - NL - IPv6 - DDoS Protection - AS3842
Grabbed a 512KVM and migrated all of my VPS6 sites to it. IT. IS. SO. FREAKING. FAST.
@Nick_A - thanks for the flexibility on disk space by the way!
Another vps review by uncle Erawan.. +1.
Erawan does do some nice reviews. I need to visit his blog more :)
he is not uncle just yet, 20+ of age is not uncle :) right Erawan? =)
Right :D I'm just 26 :p
4 more years=) and i will call you uncle
I was an uncle at 22, so age isn't much of a factor.
Anyway, if this thread is going to stay alive, I think it's time for an updated benchmark... This one is very outdated.
NYC - LA - ATL - SEA - NL - IPv6 - DDoS Protection - AS3842
Careful or @Randy will start calling you daddy.
Hi daddy ;-) as requested ;-)
:/
:sigh:
NYC - LA - ATL - SEA - NL - IPv6 - DDoS Protection - AS3842
Hehehe... Sorry I was slept last night. Maybe I will post the benchmark of the KVM SSD 256MB.
I already have several cousin and nephew :D
One of the best hosts out there!
Amazing support, amazing servers, amazing uptime and stability. Just thought I'd share :)
where are exactly the servers of this plan located?
That particular VPS was/is in Dallas, but our current offerings are in Atlanta on different hardware (much improved). I only offer Dallas VPSs upon request at this time.
If you're interested in our current promos, check out our new thread in the Offers section.
NYC - LA - ATL - SEA - NL - IPv6 - DDoS Protection - AS3842
Abusing @Nick_A node yesterday. :p
http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/09/16/BH8Pam2mtADBJHrT
budingyun, make sure you use a different network card on your KVM! You're only getting 100Mbps! Use the Intel Pro or Virtio card to get 1Gbps. You can set it in SolusVM.
NYC - LA - ATL - SEA - NL - IPv6 - DDoS Protection - AS3842
@Nick_A I'm already used Virtio network card. Actually i'm getting good speed from my personal test, not sure why serverbear benchmark get lower network speed.
Strange, I'll run a quick test now just to make sure there's nothing wrong at our end.
Getting 112MB/s from Cachefly.
Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
@budingyun - did you reboot after changing cards? Try the Intel Pro?
NYC - LA - ATL - SEA - NL - IPv6 - DDoS Protection - AS3842
@Nick_A Can you run "wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash" on node 1? I want compare with my result.
Those speeds are more like it.
@ServerBear any ideas?
NYC - LA - ATL - SEA - NL - IPv6 - DDoS Protection - AS3842
Mind re-running our test & comparing results?
This is what I just got from Dallas:
Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
Comparing my network benchmark result http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/09/16/BH8Pam2mtADBJHrT and http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/09/12/vfN6BhumzwKpp7tG, there's no much different actually except download from cachefly. By the way i'm doing the serverbear benchmark at 3am local time or 3pm USA time (peak time). Maybe that's the reason. I'm installing Centos 6 netinstall and updating it so damn fast with fast mirror disabled. Dallas node got better connectivity though.
Yeah, you definitely have 1Gbps enabled. I should have paid closer attention to all of your results. I was just stunned by the 3.3 MB/s bandwidth benchmark it produced on ServerBear.com. My test on the same plan will finish in a bit. It will probably just confirm that it was a function of the timing of the benchmark.
NYC - LA - ATL - SEA - NL - IPv6 - DDoS Protection - AS3842
What time do you run your backups Nick? :P
Gleam - Run kick-ass viral competitions & rewards to grow your userbase. Free until Sept.
Newest benchmark taken from http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012/9/17/TPKYLdAL8WP64hsu by @Nick_A himself . Not that different from my result.
Backups on that node from 7PM - 12AM. I wonder if that's what it was.
Weird that it ranges from 8MB to 59MB on the same node, but oh well.
NYC - LA - ATL - SEA - NL - IPv6 - DDoS Protection - AS3842
@Nick_A Just reminded me. I messaged you but didnt hear back. Are backups on your owned hardware, sent through SSL, and/or stored encrypted? If not, can a VPS opt-out? Thanks
@bdtech I remember that question and I thought I sent a response. I'll PM you.
NYC - LA - ATL - SEA - NL - IPv6 - DDoS Protection - AS3842
Most likely ISP problem.