Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Soyoustart BHS speed issue
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Soyoustart BHS speed issue

I have recently acquired a soyoustart server in BHS, however, the network speed seems embarrassingly low and fluctuates wildly. Is this the norm for soyoustart (OVH at BHS) network?

@MCHPhil do you know what's going on with OVH? Do you have any issues right now?

System uptime :   10:53,
Download speed from CacheFly: 20.4MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 1.80MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 12.4MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.61MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 2.86MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 39.3MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 4.05MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 6.70MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 7.82MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 22.1MB/s
Download speed from CacheFly: 9.33MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 7.06MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 14.5MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.65MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 1.11MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 31.8MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 2.39MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 7.16MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 6.42MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 16.3MB/s
Download speed from CacheFly: 20.5MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 27.2MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 11.7MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.93MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 5.18MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 19.7MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 3.90MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 8.45MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 6.00MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 15.4MB/s

Comments

  • I don't honestly think that speed is a problem for the price paid.

  • edanedan Member

    Got this result:

    Download speed from CacheFly: 14.2MB/s
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 2.06MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 54.8MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 11.7MB/s
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 12.7MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 44.1MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 7.94MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 24.7MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 26.6MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 40.4MB/s
    Thanked by 1Caveman122
  • @edan said:
    Got this result:

    Thanks, so something is wrong with my server, configuration then. It's a Centos 7 installation and I have not done much to it. Did you have to optimize/alter the network config in any way?

  • edanedan Member
    edited August 2014

    @Caveman122 said:
    Thanks, so something is wrong with my server, configuration then. It's a Centos 7 installation and I have not done much to it. Did you have to optimize/alter the network config in any way?

    This still fresh install, CentOS 6.5 and already run yum update. One more time:

    Download speed from CacheFly: 13.0MB/s
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 37.7MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 47.1MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 11.5MB/s
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 11.3MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 49.7MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 8.18MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 25.3MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 28.5MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 40.5MB/s
    

    Surprisingly Japan and Singapore has much better speed compared to Roubaix DC.

    Thanked by 1Caveman122
  • Thanks again, I will contact support.

  • FredQcFredQc Member
    edited August 2014

    @Caveman122 said:
    Thanks again, I will contact support.

    Support ? You're joking, right ? :)

    Edit: To clarify things, you can wait days or even weeks before getting a reply from SYS... Good luck.

  • Caveman122Caveman122 Member
    edited August 2014

    @FredQc said:

    Nope, I know what you meant but this is likely a hardware issue and I hope they do respond to hardware issues. I don't have high hopes either but I will let you know.

    p.s. I have tried to install different distro as well and same result. I have played around with some tcp configs but none seem to change anything so. At the moment I have concluded it is hardware issue, be it a switch or my server.

    Lots mtr packet loss / random high ping too at my direct gateway. First hop.

    64 bytes from 198.27.-.253: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.740 ms
    64 bytes from 198.27.-.253: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=4.25 ms
    64 bytes from 198.27.-.253: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=63.1 ms
    64 bytes from 198.27.-.253: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=0.369 ms
    64 bytes from 198.27.-.253: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=0.367 ms
    64 bytes from 198.27.-.253: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=42.7 ms
    64 bytes from 198.27.-.253: icmp_seq=7 ttl=255 time=319 ms
    64 bytes from 198.27.-.253: icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=112 ms
    64 bytes from 198.27.-.253: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=128 ms
    64 bytes from 198.27.-.253: icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=0.362 ms
    
    Host                                Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
     1. 198.27.-.253                    10.0%   271    0.4  18.0   0.3 429.5  49.8
    
  • RizRiz Member
    edited August 2014

    I too noticed an issue when they activated my new server this morning. I am going overseas when I reside in NA.

    Tracing route to * [192.95.24.*]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:
      1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  * [*]
      2    81 ms    27 ms    21 ms  mpls-dsl-gw60.mpls.qwest.net [207.225.140.60]
      3    22 ms    24 ms    26 ms  mpls-agw1.inet.qwest.net [75.168.229.217]
      4    48 ms    33 ms    33 ms  chp-brdr-03.inet.qwest.net [67.14.8.194]
      5    56 ms    59 ms    59 ms  62.157.250.1
      6   141 ms   147 ms   140 ms  217.239.39.34
      7   143 ms     *        *     fra-1-6k.de.eu [94.23.122.153]
      8   149 ms   144 ms   143 ms  rbx-g2-a9.fr.eu [94.23.122.117]
      9   180 ms     *        *     ldn-5-6k.uk.eu [91.121.128.194]
     10   153 ms     *        *     nwk-2-6k.qc.ca [198.27.73.11]
     11   151 ms   152 ms   154 ms  bhs-g2-6k.qc.ca [198.27.73.207]
     12   160 ms   170 ms   162 ms  bhs-3a-6k.qc.ca [198.27.73.14]
     13   155 ms   154 ms   149 ms  * [*]
    
  • AnthonySmithAnthonySmith Member, Patron Provider

    You are probably just on a heavily subscribed port and from your results they are within SLA so seriously, don't expect an answer that you want to hear if you even get one :)

    Not trying to be harsh, but you are getting what you paid for.

  • RizRiz Member
    edited August 2014

    ...and from CC Chicago. Yep, something funky going on.

    > traceroute to * (192.95.24.*), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    >  1  23.94.34.* (23.94.34.*)  0.039 ms  0.009 ms  0.010 ms
    >  2  10ge-1.fu146.chi1.colocrossing.com (206.217.133.253)  0.723 ms 10ge-2.fu146.chi1.colocrossing.com (206.217.130.117)  0.686 ms  0.690 ms
    >  3  xe-0-1-0.ar1.ord6.us.scnet.net (50.31.170.121)  0.253 ms xe-2-1-3.ar2.ord6.us.scnet.net (50.31.154.181)  0.309 ms  0.290 ms
    >  4  72.ae1.cr2.ord6.us.scnet.net (204.93.204.154)  7.369 ms 71.ae3.cr1.ord6.us.scnet.net (204.93.204.152)  3.305 ms 72.ae1.cr2.ord6.us.scnet.net (204.93.204.154)  7.340 ms
    >  5  ae4.cr2.ord1.us.scnet.net (204.93.204.86)  1.156 ms  1.130 ms  1.082 ms
    >  6  ae-6.r06.chcgil09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.193.1)  3.104 ms * *
    >  7  ae1.chicago2.chi.seabone.net (195.22.222.150)  1.276 ms as6453.chi11.ip4.gtt.net (199.229.231.246)  1.262 ms ae1.chicago2.chi.seabone.net (195.22.222.150)  2.126 ms
    >  8  as6453.chi11.ip4.gtt.net (199.229.231.246)  2.105 ms  2.072 ms  2.040 ms
    >  9  if-22-2.tcore1.CT8-Chicago.as6453.net (64.86.79.2)  2.020 ms 198.27.73.179 (198.27.73.179)  26.446 ms chi-2-6k.il.us (178.32.135.146)  24.367 ms
    > 10  * bhs-g2-6k.qc.ca (198.27.73.7)  27.174 ms *
    > 11  bhs-g2-6k.qc.ca (198.27.73.7)  27.133 ms * *
    > 12  * (192.95.24.*)  26.183 ms bhs-3a-6k.qc.ca (198.27.73.14)  26.539 ms *
    
  • It's ok man, my impression of OVH was based on a few kimsufis I have both at RBX and BHS (same DC as my server in question). The network speed was always very consistent on kimsufis. As for over subscribing, I don't think that's happening on a larger scale, see http://weathermap.ovh.net/

    I will defiantly keep you guys posted.

    **RBX4 KS-2

    Download speed from CacheFly: 11.3MB/s
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 7.53MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 6.80MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 4.39MB/s
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 10.4MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 11.0MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 3.41MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 5.27MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 4.82MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 5.45MB/s
    

    **BHS1 KS-1

    Download speed from CacheFly: 11.2MB/s
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 11.0MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 10.8MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 4.79MB/s
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 9.60MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 10.6MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 3.76MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 7.70MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 10.4MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 10.8MB/s
    
  • Caveman122Caveman122 Member
    edited August 2014

    The yellow box is done with < pre > tag

  • RizRiz Member

    Thanks, I too did the same as you haha. Finally pulled the gun last night at Soyoustart. I haven't ever seen a ping <80ms from where I'm at usually.

  • MCHPhilMCHPhil Member
    edited August 2014

    said: @MCHPhil do you know what's going on with OVH? Do you have any issues right now?

    I've heard of not speed issues at this time. I will check things out and reply again shortly. This is a reminder to do so.

    Download speed from CacheFly: 15.0MB/s
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 34.9MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 37.7MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 10.4MB/s
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 8.27MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 14.2MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 6.42MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 20.6MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 21.8MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 38.9MB/s
    
    Thanked by 1Caveman122
  • Caveman122Caveman122 Member
    edited August 2014

    Update: 22/08/14

    In addition to the network issues, I also found memory module defective in rescue mode with the OVH provided tester. (Server could still run)

    The ticket regarding network speed was submitted 17/08/14 and was answered by 19/08/14 from what looks like communication department asking for more tests, I provided those tests and have not heard back from OVH yet.

    The ticket regarding faulty memory was submitted 18/08/14 and was answered by 20/08/14 asking for appropriate time to intervention. I said earliest time possible and the module was replaced on 22/08/14 in the early morning, the server was offline for 10 minutes.

    Network speed has returned to a respectable level since 20/08/14 except for Asia and European countries. Which remains around 2.5MB/s. I will still waiting to hear an answer regarding this.

    I am happy with the response time and service provided. I will let you know how the oversea connection issue goes.

Sign In or Register to comment.