Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Advertise on LowEndTalk.com
Tiktalik - Anyone used them?
New on LowEndTalk? Please read our 'Community Rules' by clicking on it in the right menu!

Tiktalik - Anyone used them?

I signed up and bought 5 PLN (~$1.60 USD) worth of credits (that's the minimum amount), I have not even created a instance yet, but what do you guys think of them?

They offer:

Tiktalik VPS Standard

>

0.011 PLN(~0.0032 USD) A hour, or 8 PLN (~$2.56 USD)
1 gig ram
2 cpu cores
20 GB Disk space
2 TB Bandwidth

Has anyone heard of them? I found them on google while I was searching for per hour vps servers.

Signature goes here.

Comments

  • Looks legit..Polish IP? Nice prices :)

    Yes, I can boogie

  • linuxglobelinuxglobe Member
    edited August 2014

    I'm interested also, if anybody tried this service,if are they legit...

    I like to install/manage/test vps servers, with -Cpanel- Directadmin- or Kloxo-MR webpanels.
    Programs/scripts translations to hungarian language.
    My preferred vps and hosting/reseller service

  • CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5639 @ 2.13GHz
    Number of cores : 2
    CPU frequency : 2133.450 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 998 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime : 11:09,
    Download speed from CacheFly: 11.2MB/s
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 1.44MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 2.49MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.41MB/s
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 3.49MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 4.07MB/s
    ^[[CDownload speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 1.02MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 2.22MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 2.18MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 1.44MB/s
    I/O speed : 85.9 MB/s

    Yes, I can boogie

  • StevieStevie Member
    edited August 2014

    @fitvpn - wow the download speeds are pretty bad, but the I/O seems decent.

    Have you used there support? if so does it take long for them to respond?
    Do you know whats there bandwidth overage fee?

    -- Oh it seems you just signed up recently, (just saw your first post on this thread)

    Signature goes here.

  • So far, for that prices performance is fine, guess for better they have Pro.. :)

    Yes, I can boogie

  • jvnadrjvnadr Member
    edited August 2014

    Just bought 5 PLN. I created an instance, it seem not too speedy in access with ssh, but here are the results of some primary benchs:

    dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 28.9404 s, 37.1 MB/s
    

    cat /proc/cpuinfo
    processor : 0
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 44
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5639 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 2
    cpu MHz : 2133.462
    cache size : 12288 KB
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 11
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm rep_good aperfmperf unfair_spinlock pni pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes hypervisor lahf_lm ida arat epb dts
    bogomips : 4266.92
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:

    processor : 1
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 44
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5639 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 2
    cpu MHz : 2133.462
    cache size : 12288 KB
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 11
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm rep_good aperfmperf unfair_spinlock pni pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes hypervisor lahf_lm ida arat epb dts
    bogomips : 4266.92
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:

    http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... xxx.xxx.xxx.133
    Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|xxx.xxx.xxx.133|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: “100mb.test”
    100%[===================================================================>] 104,857,600 2.02M/s   in 26s
    2014-08-17 00:15:14 (3.91 MB/s) - “100mb.test” saved [104857600/104857600]
    

    I/m running a full benchmark now and I;ll post results here

    P.S. It's XEN pv

  • Wow, worst benchmark ever! A cyrix 4x86 would had better results!

    System Benchmarks Index Score 81.5

    This is the whole post from serverbear:

    serverbear.com/benchmark/2014/08/16/PwkVxhAUDvIDFzEb

  • RamiRami Member

    Anyone have test IP??

  • @Rami - Ping their site and you will got test IP..

    Yes, I can boogie

  • RamiRami Member

    @fitvpn said:
    Rami - Ping their site and you will got test IP..

    Thanks, I found an IP

Sign In or Register to comment.