Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


GVH's version of a decent IO 28 MB/s
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

GVH's version of a decent IO 28 MB/s

GVH has been merging servers together and after they took everyone on two nodes servers offline for 84 hours to migrate them, then I got greeted to a IO of less then 10 MB/s. On the previous node I would receive 250 to 300 MB/s on a test. Just figured i would share what their support agents find acceptable, a 28 MB/s IO as fixed. Also here is where they at least 100MB/s IO for every client http://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/606419/#Comment_606419

Thanked by 1orak
«1

Comments

  • GreenHostBoxGreenHostBox Member
    edited July 2014

    "Oh dear God no. Hold on please" - Jon Nguyen

    I don't know why but that made me laugh. Their server must be overloaded to death especially since they advertise SSD accelerated disk space but can only push ~10 MB/s

    Thanked by 1linuxthefish
  • Not anther GVH thread. @mpkossen Please, smite 'em. (This thread, that is.)

  • PcJamesyPcJamesy Member
    edited July 2014

    @hostnoob i felt kinda bad opening it. Personally i haven't had major problems with them until they decided to merge the server i was on. But really it is a joke compared to the great server i was on. If this is what everyone else here has experienced with GVH i can see all the hate.

  • J1021J1021 Member

    Doesn't look like sequential I/O is the problem here.

  • where is your server located? I get 368 MB/s on one of the NY nodes. much better performance than I had before... not that I care about i/o anyway

    reply to their ticket saying they promise at least 100MB/s so that's what you should get

  • @hostnoob it's also in NY / Buffalo.

  • Quick question: Didn't Jon resign as an "executive"? His signature in the WHMCS tickets says "Director of Operations"

    Thanked by 1Pwner
  • @PcJamesy said:
    hostnoob it's also in NY / Buffalo.

    what's the URL for solusvm? I'll let you know what node I'm on you can be asked to be moved there.

    on another note, while looking for the solusvm link... @greenvaluehost what is this? http://gvh.myorderbox.com/kb/answer/91

  • Anyways now that i've said my opinion and got some of my anger out if any of the admins would like to close down the thread before it turns into a cesspool of comments. @mpkossen

    @gsrdgrdghd yes, and that thread is a nightmare.

    @hostnoob i'll message you.

  • MunMun Member
  • GreenHostBoxGreenHostBox Member
    edited July 2014

    @gsrdgrdghd said:
    Quick question: Didn't Jon resign as an "executive"? His signature in the WHMCS tickets says "Director of Operations"

    Lance Jessurun and Jonathan Nguyen are more of a partner as you can see below what I quoted from their website. Jon still has the same ownership power I believe.

    GreenValueHost was founded in October, 2012 by Lance Jessurun and Jonathan Nguyen and was incorporated in the state of Illinois as Green Value Hosting, Inc.

  • @Mun backups made weekly, I even know what host i'll be giving my business too next.

  • cassacassa Member

    @GreenHostBox Heh? Since when is Lance Jessurun there :O

  • @cassa said:
    GreenHostBox Heh? Since when is Lance Jessurun there :O

    I don't know but check it out yourself at http://www.greenvaluehost.com/aboutus.html

  • @pcjamesy I'm on node NY2V2 which has good i/o

    root@us:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.76512 s, 388 MB/s

  • PcJamesyPcJamesy Member
    edited July 2014

    Well this is the latest update, so it looks like it might be faulty hardware. To be honest jon is my favorite person to end up getting a support response from. He is one of the few people who actually will look into something to see what is wrong.


    I'm ticketing into CC because this looks to be hardware related.

    Regards,

    Jon Nguyen - Director of Operations
    GreenValueHost Management

    Thanked by 1luissousa
  • W3HostW3Host Member

    The fact that he thinks 27mb/s is fixed is beyond a joke in my eyes.

  • Hmm Paul thinks 27mb/s I/O is great? He need to be noob on linux or not even used it.

  • @XxNisseGamerxX said:
    Hmm Paul thinks 27mb/s I/O is great? He need to be noob on linux or not even used it.

    It means he (Paul) shouldn't be in the hosting business. The client had told him previously in the ticket he was promised 100 MB/s I/O, and he answered saying it was fixed, showing an I/O of 27 MB/s.

  • AlexanderMAlexanderM Member, Top Host, Host Rep

    Paul is obviously one of CC's Indian outsourced support

    Thanked by 1Jeffrey
  • What happend to Jaroslav? Now Jon is DOO again lol?

  • TheCTSTheCTS Member

    My VPS is ran off of a USB 2.0 flash drive.

    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 134.906 s, 8.0 MB/s

  • netomxnetomx Moderator, Veteran

    Mine's not bad

    dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=8k conv=fdatasync
    8192+0 records in
    8192+0 records out
    536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 5.31409 s, 101 MB/s
    
  • root@server:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=8k conv=fdatasync
    8192+0 records in
    8192+0 records out
    536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 2.63723 s, 204 MB/s
    root@server:~#
    

    Mine was supposed to be ssd before they migrated it :(

  • Not horrible

    dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=8k conv=fdatasync
    8192+0 records in
    8192+0 records out
    536870912 bytes (537 MB) copied, 2.65795 s, 202 MB/s

    but the network has been useless for a couple weeks (upload is even worse)

    wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    --2014-07-19 17:53:36--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
    Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: `100mb.test'
    
    100%[=================================================================>] 104,857,600 1011K/s   in 1m 45s
    
    2014-07-19 17:55:21 (974 KB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]
  • Do not sign up with this host, cancel all your existing services and host with someone who isn't such a joke.

  • @linuxthefish said:
    Do not sign up with this host, cancel all your existing services and host with someone who isn't such a joke.

    IMO, do sign up with this host if you want, but don't complain when you get what you pay for.

  • hotsnowhotsnow Veteran

    @mikeyur said:
    Not horrible
    but the network has been useless for a couple weeks (upload is even worse)

    it seems the speed to cachefly is abnormal...

    root@gvh:~# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
    CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           L5520  @ 2.27GHz
    Number of cores : 4
    CPU frequency :  1600.000 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 4048 MB
    Total amount of swap : 4144 MB
    System uptime :   37 days, 2:03,       
    Download speed from CacheFly: 821KB/s 
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 29.6MB/s 
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 48.2MB/s 
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 12.8MB/s 
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 8.53MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 16.9MB/s 
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 10.9MB/s 
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 75.5MB/s 
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 73.6MB/s 
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 32.3MB/s 
    I/O speed :  170 MB/s
    
This discussion has been closed.