Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Advertise on LowEndTalk.com
Community Review: KnightSwarm 128 MB OpenVZ Monthly
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

Community Review: KnightSwarm 128 MB OpenVZ Monthly

maxexcloomaxexcloo Member
edited June 2012 in Reviews

image
http://www.knightswarm.com/

KnightSwarm are a hosting company that are fairly new on the LEB scene. That said, they are a very professional company and I have high hopes for their prospects, LEB or not. The server I'm reviewing is an OpenVZ server and it performs very well (as you will see in this review).

Disclaimer: I am a friend of the owner of KnightSwarm but have not received payment or incentive for this review. It it was provisioned and tested on a standard node using a standard plan.

Basics:
The VPS plan is based in Chicago, Illinois and comes with 128 MB of RAM (192 MB burst), 250 GB of bandwidth (monthly) and 10 GB of disk space. The plan costs $6 a month which is fairly high when it comes to OpenVZ 128 MB plans. OpenVZ plans are managed by a standard SolusVM install (with SSL) and include commonly used templates in both 32 bit and 64 bit (Ubuntu, Debian, CentOS). Torrenting is disallowed but IRC seems to be allowed making the plans attractive for people in need of a bouncer.

Support:
Setup was fast and the welcome email contained all information necessary to get up and running with the VPS. Support was fairly fast with a staff member adding the requested OpenVZ template very quickly (4 minutes). Support is a major selling point of this host (they offer phone and email support) and they do a great job!

Setup:
Once my VPS was setup I proceeded to install Debian 6 as normal (installing nothing but the SSH server). After it was installed I used Minstall to clean out any unneeded packages and to set up SSH login protection. The setup went smoothly and fairly quickly!

Defaults:
This section is obsolete as my setup process involves cleaning the server, resulting in the same results everywhere.

Basic Information:
/proc/cpuinfo showed a processor matching the plan description:

[email protected]:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 42
model name      :           Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 3192.900
cache size      : 8192 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 8
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 4
apicid          : 0
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 13
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc ida nonstop_tsc arat pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm
bogomips        : 6385.80
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: [8]

processor       : 1
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 42
model name      :           Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 3192.900
cache size      : 8192 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 8
core id         : 1
cpu cores       : 4
apicid          : 2
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 13
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc ida nonstop_tsc arat pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm
bogomips        : 6385.39
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: [8]

processor       : 2
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 42
model name      :           Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 3192.900
cache size      : 8192 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 8
core id         : 2
cpu cores       : 4
apicid          : 4
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 13
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc ida nonstop_tsc arat pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm
bogomips        : 6385.41
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: [8]

processor       : 3
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 42
model name      :           Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 3192.900
cache size      : 8192 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 8
core id         : 3
cpu cores       : 4
apicid          : 6
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 13
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc ida nonstop_tsc arat pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm
bogomips        : 6385.52
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: [8]

/proc/meminfo showed some standard results:

[email protected]:~# cat /proc/meminfo 
MemTotal:       196608 kB
MemFree:        186296 kB
Buffers:             0 kB
Cached:              0 kB
SwapCached:          0 kB
Active:              0 kB
Inactive:            0 kB
HighTotal:           0 kB
HighFree:            0 kB
LowTotal:       196608 kB
LowFree:        186296 kB
SwapTotal:           0 kB
SwapFree:            0 kB
Dirty:             520 kB
Writeback:           0 kB
AnonPages:           0 kB
Mapped:              0 kB
Slab:                0 kB
PageTables:          0 kB
NFS_Unstable:        0 kB
Bounce:              0 kB
CommitLimit:         0 kB
Committed_AS:        0 kB
VmallocTotal:        0 kB
VmallocUsed:         0 kB
VmallocChunk:        0 kB
HugePages_Total:     0
HugePages_Free:      0
HugePages_Rsvd:      0
Hugepagesize:     2048 kB

Inode allocation was excellent:

[email protected]:~# df -i
Filesystem            Inodes   IUsed   IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/simfs           5242880   12724 5230156    1% /
tmpfs                  24576       3   24573    1% /lib/init/rw
tmpfs                  24576       1   24575    1% /dev/shm

vmstat showed low system activity:

[email protected]:~# vmstat
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
 r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy id wa
 1  0      0 186232      0      0    0    0   222  2026    0 1825  0  0 100  0

Comments

  • maxexcloomaxexcloo Member
    edited June 2012

    Tests:
    Each test was run three times and the middle ranked test was picked.

    The Cachefly test showed great results:

    [email protected]:~# wget -O /dev/null http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    --2012-06-01 22:56:16--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
    Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: `/dev/null'
    
    100%[====>] 104,857,600 11.2M/s   in 8.9s    
    
    2012-06-01 22:56:25 (11.2 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [104857600/104857600]
    

    Ping Tests (IPv6 works!):

    [email protected]:~# ping -c 3 google.com
    PING google.com (74.125.226.36) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from yyz06s06-in-f4.1e100.net (74.125.226.36): icmp_req=1 ttl=55 time=15.8 ms
    64 bytes from yyz06s06-in-f4.1e100.net (74.125.226.36): icmp_req=2 ttl=55 time=16.1 ms
    64 bytes from yyz06s06-in-f4.1e100.net (74.125.226.36): icmp_req=3 ttl=55 time=16.0 ms
    
    --- google.com ping statistics ---
    3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2000ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 15.896/16.046/16.165/0.111 ms
    
    [email protected]:~# ping6 -c 3 ipv6.google.com
    PING ipv6.google.com(dfw06s16-in-x13.1e100.net) 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from dfw06s16-in-x13.1e100.net: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=47.7 ms
    64 bytes from dfw06s16-in-x13.1e100.net: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=47.6 ms
    64 bytes from dfw06s16-in-x13.1e100.net: icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=47.6 ms
    
    --- ipv6.google.com ping statistics ---
    3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2002ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 47.652/47.684/47.724/0.180 ms
    

    Disk IO was great:

    [email protected]:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync; rm test
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 7.9703 s, 135 MB/s
    

    ioping showed acceptable results:

    [email protected]:~/ioping-0.6# ./ioping -c 10 .
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=1 time=22.4 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=2 time=10.5 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=3 time=0.3 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=4 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=5 time=15.6 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=6 time=0.3 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=7 time=0.3 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=8 time=4.8 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=9 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=10 time=0.3 ms
    
    --- . (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
    10 requests completed in 9063.1 ms, 182 iops, 0.7 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.2/5.5/22.4/7.6 ms
    
  • maxexcloomaxexcloo Member
    edited June 2012

    Geekbench results were really good:

    [email protected]:~/dist/Geekbench21-Linux# ./geekbench_x86_32 
    Geekbench 2.1.13 : http://www.primatelabs.ca/geekbench/
    
    System Information
      Platform:                  Linux x86 (32-bit)
      Compiler:                  GCC 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)
      Operating System:          Linux 2.6.32-274.7.1.el5.028stab095.1 i686
      Model:                     Linux PC (Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz)
      Motherboard:               Unknown Motherboard
      Processor:                 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
      Processor ID:              GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 42 Stepping 7
      Logical Processors:        4
      Physical Processors:       1
      Processor Frequency:       3.19 GHz
      L1 Instruction Cache:      0.00 B
      L1 Data Cache:             0.00 B
      L2 Cache:                  256 KB
      L3 Cache:                  0.00 B
      Bus Frequency:             0.00 Hz
      Memory:                    15.6 GB
      Memory Type:               N/A
      SIMD:                      1
      BIOS:                      N/A
      Processor Model:                     Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
      Processor Cores:           4
    
    Integer
      Blowfish
        single-threaded scalar    2228 ||||||||
        multi-threaded scalar     7848 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
      Text Compress
        single-threaded scalar    2964 |||||||||||
        multi-threaded scalar     8137 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
      Text Decompress
        single-threaded scalar    3139 ||||||||||||
        multi-threaded scalar     8956 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
      Image Compress
        single-threaded scalar    2458 |||||||||
        multi-threaded scalar     5513 ||||||||||||||||||||||
      Image Decompress
        single-threaded scalar    2450 |||||||||
        multi-threaded scalar     5982 |||||||||||||||||||||||
      Lua
        single-threaded scalar    4106 ||||||||||||||||
        multi-threaded scalar    10290 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    
    Floating Point
      Mandelbrot
        single-threaded scalar    2849 |||||||||||
        multi-threaded scalar     7332 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
      Dot Product
        single-threaded scalar    4675 ||||||||||||||||||
        multi-threaded scalar    19049 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        single-threaded vector    5551 ||||||||||||||||||||||
        multi-threaded vector    16743 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
      LU Decomposition
        single-threaded scalar    3719 ||||||||||||||
        multi-threaded scalar     5428 |||||||||||||||||||||
      Primality Test
        single-threaded scalar    4927 |||||||||||||||||||
        multi-threaded scalar    15525 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
      Sharpen Image
        single-threaded scalar   11343 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        multi-threaded scalar    24860 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
      Blur Image
        single-threaded scalar    8795 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        multi-threaded scalar    20545 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    
    Memory
      Read Sequential
        single-threaded scalar    7774 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
      Write Sequential
        single-threaded scalar   12157 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
      Stdlib Allocate
        single-threaded scalar    5348 |||||||||||||||||||||
      Stdlib Write
        single-threaded scalar    8572 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
      Stdlib Copy
        single-threaded scalar   16809 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    
    Stream
      Stream Copy
        single-threaded scalar    6713 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        single-threaded vector    8154 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
      Stream Scale
        single-threaded scalar    7133 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        single-threaded vector    7929 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
      Stream Add
        single-threaded scalar    6270 |||||||||||||||||||||||||
        single-threaded vector    7085 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
      Stream Triad
        single-threaded scalar    6852 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
        single-threaded vector    5239 ||||||||||||||||||||
    
    Integer Score:                5339 |||||||||||||||||||||
    Floating Point Score:        10810 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    Memory Score:                10132 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    Stream Score:                 6921 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    
    Overall Geekbench Score:      8370 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    

    Online View: http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/711612

  • maxexcloomaxexcloo Member
    edited June 2012

    UNIX Bench results also showed great performance:

    ========================================================================
       BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
    
       System: knightswarm: GNU/Linux
       OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-274.7.1.el5.028stab095.1 -- #1 SMP Mon Oct 24 20:49:24 MSD 2011
       Machine: i686 (unknown)
       Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
       CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.8 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.4 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.4 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.5 bogomips)
              Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
       00:15:06 up  1:30,  1 user,  load average: 0.30, 5.11, 5.18; runlevel 2
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Sat Jun 02 2012 00:15:06 - 00:43:12
    4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       20556163.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                     3325.2 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                               5907.3 lps   (29.7 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        731233.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          196084.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1783660.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             1202378.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 357212.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                              18431.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   8096.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2454.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                         899290.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   20556163.7   1761.5
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3325.2    604.6
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5907.3   1373.8
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     731233.0   1846.5
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     196084.5   1184.8
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1783660.4   3075.3
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1202378.4    966.5
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     357212.8    893.0
    Process Creation                                126.0      18431.8   1462.8
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       8096.6   1909.6
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2454.2   4090.3
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0     899290.8    599.5
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1403.1
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benchmark Run: Sat Jun 02 2012 00:43:12 - 01:11:31
    4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables       66787849.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone                    12457.1 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput                              17971.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        510967.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          125927.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1392781.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput                             4080754.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching                1227857.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation                              63800.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  24050.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   3299.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead                        2976331.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    
    System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   66787849.2   5723.0
    Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      12457.1   2264.9
    Execl Throughput                                 43.0      17971.7   4179.5
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     510967.6   1290.3
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     125927.6    760.9
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1392781.2   2401.3
    Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    4080754.1   3280.3
    Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0    1227857.6   3069.6
    Process Creation                                126.0      63800.6   5063.5
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      24050.6   5672.3
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       3299.9   5499.9
    System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2976331.5   1984.2
                                                                       ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2931.7
    

    Conclusion:
    KnightSwarm offer a very solid but more expensive VPS range backed by excellent support (unseen elsewhere in the LEB community from what I can tell). The only fault I can find apart from price is the small ioping issue and this is being worked on (I submitted a report). I'd recommend KnightSwarm as they are a professional and helpful company with great support and performance!

    Please give KnightSwarm a try and report on findings! Thanks for reading, tips and suggestions are appreciated!

  • @Jack said: Do you have a Test IP these look nice.

    Have a look here: http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/2904

  • @maxexcloo thanks for the excellent review. After seeing your disappointing ioping results, I went investigating as to the cause. Write caching was disabled on that controller (even though it has BBU). This has been resolved, and you should have far nicer ioping results now.

  • @KnightSwarm_Phillip said: @maxexcloo thanks for the excellent review. After seeing your disappointing ioping results, I went investigating as to the cause. Write caching was disabled on that controller (even though it has BBU). This has been resolved, and you should have far nicer ioping results now.

    'Tis true, you appear to have fixed it!

    [email protected]:~/ioping-0.6# ./ioping -c 10 .
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=1 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=2 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=3 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=4 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=5 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=6 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=7 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=8 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=9 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (simfs /dev/simfs): request=10 time=0.1 ms
    
    --- . (simfs /dev/simfs) ioping statistics ---
    10 requests completed in 9009.9 ms, 6570 iops, 25.7 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.2/0.2/0.0 ms
    
  • AsimAsim Member

    @maxexcloo said: It was performed...

    You mean to say "it was provisioned and tested..."

  • @Asim said: You mean to say "it was provisioned and tested..."

    Thanks for the tip, fixed <3

  • CVPS_ChrisCVPS_Chris Member, Provider

    @maxexcloo said: unseen elsewhere in the LEB community

    Time to test a real provider.

    Thanked by 1maxexcloo

    ColoCrossing.com - Premier Datacenter and Cloud Solutions for Business

Sign In or Register to comment.