Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


For your eyes only: 256M KVM on SSD
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

For your eyes only: 256M KVM on SSD

prometeusprometeus Member, Host Rep
edited May 2012 in Offers

IperWeb.com, a brand of Prometeus.com, since 1997 is focused solely on high-quality, high-reliability web services and professional consulting. Our network and servers are tuned specifically for maximum performance, and our policies ensure that we remain as efficient as possible.

We are located in Milan, Italy and have 5 racks colocated in the largest campus/internet exchange of Italy. We are LIR (RIPE NCC member) and do BGP with our Autonomous System Number (AS34971) and a total bandwidth capacity of 10Gb.

Common features
OS: Linux
ISO: debian 6 (32/64 bit), ubuntu 12.04 (32/64 bit), centos 6 (32/64 bit)
Control Panel: SolusVM
Virtualization: KVM
Storage type: RAID1 SSD
Type: Unmanaged
Provisioning: manual (less then 24H), after the payment is completed


This plan is for lowendtalk users. It's isn't listed by default in WHMCS, please use the included link to order.

Plan: KS2
CPU: 1 Core
RAM: 256MB
Hard Disk: 3GB
IP addresses: 1
Dedicated internet bandwidth: 1000 GB
Recurring discount for LET: 20%

Price: €3.12 Order here | $4.00 Order here / month



A few words about the hardware used for the KVM/SSD nodes
Nodes are blades of the new SuperMicro Microcloud SYS-5037MC-H8TRF with one E3-1270 and 16GB of RAM.

processor   : 7
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 6
model       : 42
model name  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz
stepping    : 7
cpu MHz     : 3391.264
cache size  : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings    : 8
core id     : 3
cpu cores   : 4
apicid      : 7
initial apicid  : 7
fpu     : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp      : yes
flags       : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips    : 6783.72
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:


The only accepted payment method is Paypal. VAT 21% is added if you are an EU citizen/company without a valid VAT ID.

Servers are located in Italy, Milan.

*** Download test can be run with the following urls ***

http://mirrors.prometeus.net/test/test10.bin
http://mirrors.prometeus.net/test/test100.bin
http://iperweb.net/test/test10.bin
http://iperweb.net/test/test100.bin

Test IPv4: 194.14.179.254 or 195.88.4.7
Test IPv6: 2a00:dcc0:eda:89::254:1

This should be all. If you need more info ask, PM, or open a ticket.

Thanks

S.

Edit: added some hardware details.

Comments

  • subinsubin Member

    @prometeus : what is the pros and cons of using RAID 1 SSD compared to RAID 10 SAS Drive?

  • prometeusprometeus Member, Host Rep
    edited May 2012

    @subin said: what is the pros and cons of using RAID 1 SSD compared to RAID 10 SAS Drive?

    Well, I consider this setup more balanced for the E3 architecture (1 socket, 16GB of ram) and the low density of VPS on the node we plan to sell.
    Consider that at least you would need 4 disks and a raid controller versus 2 x 240GB SSD disks in software raid in our setup.

    We will have 6 x 600GB SAS drives with the E5 (dual sockets, 64GB of ram) where the cpu and the ram allow you to increase the number of VPS you can put on each node.

  • subinsubin Member

    How about the disk I/O speed?

  • prometeusprometeus Member, Host Rep

    @subin said: How about the disk I/O speed?

    Both setup can sustain very high load and speed.
    SSD in some tests done with debian and proxmox did >400MB/s sequential write within a VM with virtio. On the final solusvm setup speed was 300MB/s.
    We expect these performances to stay high even when the disks are full.

    On the other hand SAS (as other disks with moving parts) give you best results when they are not full, but performacens tend to show a bit when heads need to move back and forth to get/write data.

    So SSD in RAID1 vs SAS in RAID10 don'r show immediate differences. But this change if you have a raid10 (or raid0) with SSD disks...
    Just for fun I tried a 2 disks raid0 and I got >500MB/s read speed :-)

  • KuroKuro Member

    @prometeus what kind of IOPS can we expect? Thinking of getting one of these for MySQL :)

  • prometeusprometeus Member, Host Rep

    @Kuro said: what kind of IOPS can we expect? Thinking of getting one of these for MySQL :)

    from one debian vps:

    
    root@ssd2:~# ioping .
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=1 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=2 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=3 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=4 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=5 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=6 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=7 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=8 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=9 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=10 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=11 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=12 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=13 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=14 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=15 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=16 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=17 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=18 time=0.2 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=19 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=20 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=21 time=0.1 ms
    4096 bytes from . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4): request=22 time=0.1 ms
    ^C
    --- . (ext3 /dev/disk/by-uuid/8b7d9eaf-ec7a-49f9-8ac6-724f8030f3a4) ioping statistics ---
    22 requests completed in 21966.4 ms, 10623 iops, 41.5 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.2/0.0 ms
    
  • subinsubin Member
    edited May 2012

    @prometeus : btw, you should also add 'iperweb' tag to this post and maybe your previous post.
    So, people will be easy to search information/post about your host

  • prometeusprometeus Member, Host Rep

    updated the tag in this post :-)

  • pcanpcan Member
    edited May 2012

    Very nice random i/o disk performance and CPU power, this is one of my fastest LEBs.
    I am now using it as graphical VNC remote desktop with Chromium browser, Libreoffice and some desktop games. 1024x768 pixel resolution at 24 bits gives a fast enough window refresh rate. 3 Gb disk space is not enough to complete a standard Debian Gnome desktop installation, but I figured out the correct sequence. I installed at first the base Debian 32 bits system. I selected manual disk partitioning and created no swap partion (but a 128 Mb partion is also ok). After that, I apt-get installed the following separate packages: gnome-session, eog, gnome-terminal, gedit, yelp and gdm. To access the graphical desktop without opening the VPS control panel, I use UltraVNC. VNC password is truncated at 8 characters; this seems to be a SolusVM limitation. Qemu keyboard mapping for the VNC session is set to USA international on the host side. I opened a ticket to enable international keyboard in the VNC window, now waiting.

    Edit: after less than 15 minutes, ticket was answered and the setup is complete. Time from the end of the countdown on Debian startup screen and complete loading of the Gnome login: 5 sec. Time from the enter key press and complete gnome desktop load: 3 sec. A complete reboot cycle from opened Debian desktop to open desktop again takes less than 40 seconds, including the waiting countown time at the Debian boot screen and the time spent to enter a long password. Actually, I checked again and the time needed to enter the password is about half of the total reboot time. This is fast.

  • subinsubin Member

    How is the network speed? 100mbit or gigabit?

  • prometeusprometeus Member, Host Rep

    Thanks pcan :)

    @subin gigabit

  • earlearl Member

    @pcan I installed Xfce desktop and is only using about 1gb of the hd, with a swap of 128mb, I still have about 1.7gb of space left on the hard drive..

    If anyone is interested, install the base Debian with ssh.. then

    aptitude install xorg xfce4 xdm

    Although the icon for iceweasel is shown in the desktop it does not actually work until you install it..

    aptitude install iceweasel

    Thanked by 1subin
  • subinsubin Member

    @earl said: If anyone is interested, install the base Debian with ssh.. then

    aptitude install xorg xfce4 xdm

    and then you access it through VNC?
    Is there any other better method than VNC?

  • earlearl Member

    @subin yes you can connect to your desktop by VNC through solusvm directly which can be kinda laggy but you don't need to install additional packages on your server..

    I installed a vncserver on the VPS and connect to it with ultravnc as the client..

    Not sure what you mean better method than VNC? an alternative would be freeNX, NoMachine.. never really tried it thought- I think the major difference is you can get audio which you cannot with VNC

  • pcanpcan Member

    My ping time to Prometeus is 55 ms and the VNC session published by Qemu (the solusvm VNC console) is not laggy. I also have an identical setup at Hostigation (220 ms ping time from my location) and the lag is very noticeable. The lag seems related to poor VNC local cursor emulation and excessive latency. I wonder if NX works better; RDP surely works better than VNC with high latency connections.
    Xfce is nice but I like Gnome more. The issue on Gnome installation with less than 5 Gb disk space is the bloat included in the standard package. With only individual core packages installed, the disk space required by Gnome is marginally more than Xfce. I also needed the full LibreOffice suite and Chromium; the residual free space on my setup is 390 Mb.

  • earlearl Member

    Maybe laggy was not a good term to use.. I was implying that connecting with QEMU vs ultravnc you can really feel a difference and this is on a local machine where ping was practically nil. I just installed NoMachine today and it's definitely faster than VNC, moving a window in VNC you see a little fragmentation while in NX it was smoother more like RDP I guess... The problem with NX is that I can't seem to get private key working so I have to enable password based logins which is not good!!

    The VPS is definetly snappy.. but if i recalled the DD test was pretty close to Hostigation's KVM at around 200 MB/s which was just sata drives not SSD.

    Overall it's a pretty good VPS, I put in a request yesterday for a Centos 5 image so I can try to install kloxo.. so far support has been really helpful, hopefully by tonight they will have the ISO loaded... Not much to complain about really they are a pretty good company for a budget host!!

  • earlearl Member

    And it's up.. less than a day and both 32 and 64 bit version of centos5 was loaded without me having to ask.. Just awesome support!! have not been with them long but so far it's been excellent!!

  • prometeusprometeus Member, Host Rep

    Hi folks, we have received some request for a 128M kvm plan. Since disk space is proportional to the ram, will a LET plan like this useful ?

    CPU: 1 Core
    RAM: 128MB
    Hard Disk: 2GB
    IP addresses: 1
    Dedicated internet bandwidth: 256 GB

    semi-annual: €10.00 / $ 13.00

  • pcanpcan Member
    edited May 2012

    Yes, I can think of some uses for a 128 Mb Ram / 2Gb SSD plan.

  • subinsubin Member

    @earl said: The VPS is definetly snappy.. but if i recalled the DD test was pretty close to Hostigation's KVM at around 200 MB/s which was just sata drives not SSD.

    From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid-state_drive : "SSDs do not employ any moving mechanical components..."
    So, IMHO, SSD performance will quite constant under high load

  • earlearl Member
    edited May 2012

    @subin said: So, IMHO, SSD performance will quite constant under high load

    I would think so.. or maybe the same since the Hostigation is Raid10 and the SSD is only Raid1, hard to say.. Also not sure how accurate a DD test is for real performance since some VPS I own have excellent specs but pages tend to load slower than a lower performing VPS where pages load instantly..

    I would like to try a SSD VPS in this type of configuration:

    Samsung SSD Awesomeness

  • prometeusprometeus Member, Host Rep

    dd sequential test is useful only when it show under 10MB write rate :-)

    SSD should give a more stable i/o and applications with database backend should benefit from this...

    Thanked by 1earl
  • marrcomarrco Member

    This offer was just too good to pass. So I got one and done a few test. This is fast. I already own 2 other vps with prometeus, both OVZ and work great, but this perform even better.

    CPU model :  QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
    Number of cores : 1
    CPU frequency :  3392.294 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 121 MB
    Total amount of swap : 175 MB
    System uptime :   8 days, 2:53,
    

    disk test is boring. running ioping returns a constant flow of "time: 0.1 ms" so no surprise this is the fastest real world i/o i ever experienced.

    10 requests completed in 9422.0 ms, 10204 iops, 39.9 mb/s
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.1/0.1/0.0 ms
    

    IMHO Prometeus is among the top quality vps provider in Europe, with OpenITC XenVZ and PC Smart Group XenSmart.

    Thanked by 1subin
  • marrcomarrco Member

    Short review after 2 more weeks: Still fast after they filled the node, never had a single problem yet, this vps rocks. Thanks Prometeus

Sign In or Register to comment.