Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


A quick question about server performance
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

A quick question about server performance

kyakykyaky Member
edited April 2014 in Help

I have two dual L5630 servers. I'm running 20 Windows 2008 instances on each server. I wonder if the I/O will not be an issue, will other factors be ok for running 40 windows 2008 instances on a dual L5639 server and roughly get the same performance like the instances are run on two servers? Thanks

Comments

  • zionvpszionvps Member
    edited April 2014

    It depends on several factors, the most important being simultanious read/ write speeds which is much higher in ssd than sas/sata

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    Well, you are pointing out the IO as a potential problem and didn't include the HDDs configuration in your post.

  • kyakykyaky Member
    edited April 2014

    @Alex_LiquidHost said:
    Well, you are pointing out the IO as a potential problem and didn't include the HDDs configuration in your post.

    I'm saying if I/O will not be the issue, will other factors do the same job? eg. will the dual L5639 CPU be able to handle 40 windows 2008 instances etc..

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    Oh, I've misread this. Anyway, it would be possible to run 40 instances, in my eyes, however don't expect a good performance.

  • kyakykyaky Member
    edited April 2014

    @Alex_LiquidHost said:
    Oh, I've misread this. Anyway, it would be possible to run 40 instances, in my eyes, however don't expect a good performance.

    sorry my bad, didn't express it clearly.

    so I guess the performance will be worst than running 40 instances on 2 separate dual L5630 servers?

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    For sure it would be worse. If you run 2 seperate nodes, running 20 machines each will have twice the computing power.

  • kyakykyaky Member

    @Alex_LiquidHost said:
    For sure it would be worse. If you run 2 seperate nodes, running 20 machines each will have twice the computing power.

    I thought 5639 could provide double performance or near to double of what L5520/5630 can provide.

    Thanks for your answers.

  • AlexBarakovAlexBarakov Patron Provider, Veteran

    Well, 5639 is 6 cores, the other one is 4 cores. However if you use 2 nodes with l5630, it would most likely outperform the l5639

  • qpsqps Member, Host Rep

    Each L5639 CPU is 6 cores/12 threads (60W max TDP), whereas each L5630 CPU is 4 cores/8 threads (40W max TDP). Everything else about the CPUs are the same (clock rate, architecture, etc).

  • kyakykyaky Member

    @Alex_LiquidHost said:
    Well, 5639 is 6 cores, the other one is 4 cores. However if you use 2 nodes with l5630, it would most likely outperform the l5639

    thanks, I've made up my mind I'm not gonna buy a L5639 to replace two L5630.

  • kyakykyaky Member

    @qps said:
    Each L5639 CPU is 6 cores/12 threads (60W max TDP), whereas each L5630 CPU is 4 cores/8 threads (40W max TDP). Everything else about the CPUs are the same (clock rate, architecture, etc).

    Cheers

Sign In or Register to comment.