Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In with OpenID
Advertise on LowEndTalk.com

In this Discussion

Which DNS site to use for domains

Which DNS site to use for domains

xprotoceptxprotocept Member
edited September 2011 in General

Ey

I was wondering, Wich DNS site/Provider (Free) Is the best. Because i need one for my new domain

Thanks!

Tagged:
«1

Comments

  • pointhq.com cloudns.net dns.he.net geoscaling.com

    That's my list ;)

    SellSSL.com - Comodo PositiveSSL from $7 per year!

    Cartika.com - 512MB, 200GB HDD, 10TB BW for $5 USD - Order via my aff link!

  • Awesome, thanks!

  • InfinityInfinity Member, Provider

    I think that dns.he.net has the best interface and network etc.

    But I personally use my VPS'(s). I only have one at the moment, but huh! I want to order a UK VPS soon.

  • yomeroyomero Member
    edited September 2011

    dotben said: s/wich/which

    sed: -e expression #1, char 12: unterminated `s' command

    Damn!

  • I hear good things about dns.he.net but never used them, i use the free dns servers provided and included by my domain registrar and seems to work well :)

    * Centmin Mod Project (HTTP/2 support + ngx_pagespeed + Nginx Lua + Vhost Stats)
    * Centmin Mod LEMP Stack Quick Install Guide
  • I use one of my BuyVM VPS's as the master with HE DNS slaves. HE has had a few too many outages in the past few months so I would caution you if you need reliability.

  • freedns.afraid.org? Just don't put it to public :P

  • I use CloudFlare for DNS - you can switch the CloudFlare protect off so it's just DNS if you want.

    www.cloudflare.com

  • I handle my own DNS. I have multiple VPSes, with different providers, in different parts of the country, and it's pretty easy to set up zone transfers, especially if you're using something like Webmin on your main server.

  • Ixape said: I use CloudFlare for DNS - you can switch the CloudFlare protect off so it's just DNS if you want.

    www.cloudflare.com

    Cloudflare network has a bit of history with alot of DDOS attacks, they'd affect DNS as well ???

    * Centmin Mod Project (HTTP/2 support + ngx_pagespeed + Nginx Lua + Vhost Stats)
    * Centmin Mod LEMP Stack Quick Install Guide
  • they'd affect DNS as well ?

    I seem to recall that's usually what the attack is.

    We discussed a few providers 9in this thread:

    http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/28

  • eva2000 said: I hear good things about dns.he.net but never used them, i use the free dns servers provided and included by my domain registrar and seems to work well :)

    Infinity said: I think that dns.he.net has the best interface and network etc.

    They have a lot of downtime, the last issue was their database has gone and it took them more than 24 hours to get everything back online :( I've moved most important domain to another provider.

    I've found that dnstrouble.com (by softlayer) is the best so far, because this is the only providers provide free anycast dns ;)

    SellSSL.com - Comodo PositiveSSL from $7 per year!

    Cartika.com - 512MB, 200GB HDD, 10TB BW for $5 USD - Order via my aff link!

  • ns1.dallas-idc.com ; ns2.dallas-idc.com :)

  • I use HE DNS, it works well :)

  • I like pointhq.com mainly because of the url redirection feature.

  • ExpertVMExpertVM Member, Provider

    I'm using HE DNS too, cool and easy to use =)

    ExpertVM.com - Singapore Based Low End Provider.
  • @eva2000 - CloudFlare provide you with two name servers to use - each on seperate boxes. So it SHOULD be redundant. I myself have actually never had any problems with them - but going by http://who.is/whois/cloudflare.com/ it seems they have a lot of name servers and so I could be a lucky user to be on some nice name servers :)

    Using CloudFlare also allows you to edit TTL value down to 5 minutes if you want. With this kind of setup having their CDN to hand could be useful. If you site gets a traffic spike you can enable the CDN protection (since you can just use DNS and point traffic directly at your server if you want - CDN protection doesn't have to be used) and have traffic flowing via their systems in minutes. Could also be useful for some types of attacks.

  • Did anyone ever come up with a method of round robin between VPSes? I know we were discussing it on one of the other forums.

  • kylixkylix Member
    edited September 2011

    What's so difficult about DNS-round robin? MaraDNS:

        server.example.com.   A  192.0.2.70
        server.example.com.   A  192.0.2.71
        server.example.com.   A  192.0.2.72
    
  • Round robin is automatically executed in the DNS server, just setup like kyliix says.

  • kylix said: What's so difficult about DNS-round robin? MaraDNS:

    Is it the case in BIND? Since if I'm right, you have to do a small change in config, not too sure, but I recall it didn't work out of the box when I tested round-robin with BIND I had to change some config and still it didn't function as it should, not sure why. Should it work out of the box in BIND as well?

    ☻☻ VPS ☺ as of now:- 384-256-128-512x2 ☺☺

  • Technically, multiple records of the same type like Kylix shows are just called an RRSet, and are supported by pretty much every DNS server (and service) there is. Round-robin is a specific sort of automated reordering of an RRSet by the server in a repeating circle. I think BIND defaults to always doing round-robin reordering of RRsets, but can be configured to do fixed ordering or random ordering, while NSD3 doesn't support any sort of reordering, I think, always using the order given in the zone file. MaraDNS seems pretty feature-ful, so I imagine it supports various reordering types too. Either way, in real life any of the stuff along the chain of a name resolution might change the order anyway, or the client might just ignore the ordering entirely.

    Round-robin was originally used for load-balancing, to distribute a load amongst all members of the RRset randomly and therefore somewhat equally, but the load distribution has never been guaranteed and it's very much out of favour. Additionally, round-robin for load-distribution has been getting less reliable and will continue to do so. Technically, a client is supposed to ignore round-robined RRset ordering completely and always choose the server with the IP address that looks like it might be nearest by, which breaks using round-robin for load balancing. Most OSes added that support for RFC 3484 Section 6 Rule 9 address selection on IPv4 and then dropped it when problems became apparent, but it continues to mean round-robin load balancing is useless over IPv6 and also on IPv4 on older OSes (e.g. Vista).

    As far as client-side failover across multiple records in an RRset, the order doesn't really matter, and it does seem to be silently somewhat supported by most everything (web browsers, ftp, telnet) now-a-days, but it's far from bullet-proof. Other solutions are much better than relying on the existence of client-side failover behaviour alone, but it can be beneficial when used in concert with some other solutions. Or if it's all you have available to you, it will provide better reliability than nothing at all.

    Thanked by 1Go59954
  • what about zoneedit.com? is it good?

  • InfinityInfinity Member, Provider

    ZoneEdit is free for only a few zones AFAIK, so useless for me..

  • LinodeDNS, but its premium.

    The Original Daniel.

  • @fanovpn: Very well info and explanation, thank you!
    And I came to know that one of other solutions was DNS failover, but I learned it isn't proven either :( because DNS at times doesn't work in harmony with frequent automatic changes of A records, meaning at times it's being useless for some clients because of ISPs and their cache, so effect might not show immediately for some of them! But even though, it's still being considered a more practical solution than Round-robin (if I'm not wrong)..

    ☻☻ VPS ☺ as of now:- 384-256-128-512x2 ☺☺

  • And why the hell did we have this big long discussion about it on the old forums where folks couldn't come up with an answer?....

  • fanovpnfanovpn Member
    edited September 2011

    @drmike: Because there's 8 million caveats and holes to client-side failover working, with problems possibly appearing if you use a proxy, or if Cache-Control headers are set, or if you're on a specific browser, or a specific OS, or the weather is looking a bit stormy, or any of the countless combinations of all those.

    Plus the terminology is different from person to person and company to company. I don't think any of us were talking about the same thing at the same time in those threads, mostly. Some folks use "Round-Robin" to mean an RRset in general, or any dynamic reordering of an RRset on the DNS server, or a specifically round-robin-style reordering of the RRset, or using an RRset to allow for client-side failover, and many other things too, I'm sure.

    @Go59952's term, "DNS failover", is also similarly abstract, something lots of companies claim to offer but no two services are quite the same idea. It sounds like in this instance it's a form of rewriting an RRset to remove a record when a host is down (and some companies call that whole service, again, "Round-Robin"!). To add to the confusion, that dnstrouble.com site has a blog entry which claims people are confused and "DNS failover" is actually another term for having an anycasted address for your DNS server!

    Anyway, @Go59952, if that is rewritting of your record(s) when a host is down, with a low TTL, I've never tried it myself but it does seem like one of the easier, cheaper ways to do failover. You'll not get 100% coverage, of course, but folks do claim that the number of ISPs, etc. with caching resolvers that ignore low TTLs has gone done quite a bit over the years. And of course, there's nothing stopping you from serving a full RRset to allow those browsers that do support client-side failover to do so, and then let the remainder catch up with the rewritten RRset after the TTL expires.

    Thanked by 1Go59954
  • fanovpn said: @drmike: Because there's 8 million caveats and holes to client-side failover working, with problems possibly appearing if you use a proxy, or if Cache-Control headers are set, or if you're on a specific browser, or a specific OS, or the weather is looking a bit stormy, or any of the countless combinations of all those.

    Yep, I remember that I posted some experiments about this :S

  • pointhq.com works well for me..

  • I started to use namecheap.com's free dns service for a domain I registered at internet.bs registrar - works fine with 5 nameservers :)

    * Centmin Mod Project (HTTP/2 support + ngx_pagespeed + Nginx Lua + Vhost Stats)
    * Centmin Mod LEMP Stack Quick Install Guide
  • I've been using Cloudns.net since everydns announced they're stopping their service. I haven't had any issues at all, great service if you need DNS for 3 or fewer domains.

  • twaintwain Member

    Do any of these DNS services? he.net etc.. allow you to point ns1/ns2.mydomain.com to their servers, etc?

  • Premium Cloudns.net they do it

  • Your registrar may also offer free DNS.

    My Advice: VPS Advice

    For LET support, please click here.

  • OneTwoOneTwo Member
    edited April 2012

    @giang said: geoscaling.com

    is cool. try it.

    i self host with maradns.

    Ponies are g&y.

  • no one mentioned zerigo.com? I'm using it and it's good. 6 NS on different ASN (?) pointhq is good also.

  • Does anyone know what Hurricane Electric's free DNS monthly query limit is? I've always been skeptical of any DNS service that doesn't make their limit public knowledge. I've been suspended from way too many DNS services for hitting some unknown limit (which is why I pay for dnsmadeeasy.com right now).

  • AdamAdam Member

    Haven't tried them yet, but I'm thinking of moving some domains to Dediserve: http://www.dediserve.com/dns/cloud-dns/

    50 zones for free, and TEMPLATES!!! (only downside is a 60min TTL, but that's not a big deal).

  • twaintwain Member

    Looks like http://freedns.afraid.org/ does the DNS branding (ie point ns1/ns1.mydomain.com to their servers) that I was asking about... anyone have experience with the afraid free DNS service?

  • afraid.org was ddosed too much when I used it around a year ago.

    FreeVPS.us - The oldest post to host VPS provider
  • twaintwain Member

    OK I'm thinking about trying self-hosted DNS, but I want a web-interface... so I'm thinking two VPS'es each with ISPConfig but for DNS only.. one VPS as primary with ISPConfig web interface+DNS, and another VPS as secondary/mirror with ISPConfig/DNS only... I won't need much disk space on the VPS'es but how much RAM do you think is needed for ISPconfig web interface/DNS on one and ISPConfig/DNS only on the other? 512 enough for each?

  • JackJack Member, Provider

    Hostigation has power dns in there VPS panel now..

  • Amazon Route 53 - http://aws.amazon.com/route53/

    $0.50 per hosted zone / month for the first 25 hosted zones $0.10 per hosted zone / month for additional hosted zones

    $0.500 per million queries – first 1 Billion queries / month $0.250 per million queries – over 1 Billion queries / month

  • @shaanl - you complete idiot. Most people will know what I'm on about.

    Thanked by 1Taz
  • TazTaz Disabled

    Jeesus (And I am not even Christian!) Dafuq is that? Almost a year old thread. DAMN Bro!

    Time is good and also bad. Life is short and that is sad. Dont worry be happy thats my style. No matter what happens i won't lose my smile!

  • KuroKuro Member

    @Taz_NinjaHawk said: Almost a year old thread.

    Because a year is obviously ~5 months long >_>

    Thanked by 1shaanl
  • It's just here for reference, sharing information, so people have more choices.

  • TazTaz Disabled
    edited August 2012

    @kuro started back in September 2011?

    Time is good and also bad. Life is short and that is sad. Dont worry be happy thats my style. No matter what happens i won't lose my smile!

Sign In or Register to comment.