Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Anyone interested in a LowEndChallenge?
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Anyone interested in a LowEndChallenge?

lawllawl Member
edited May 2012 in General

Okay, so I had a crazy idea.
I provide some UltraLowEnd OVZ Boxes. Say we start with 10MB ram or something.
Now you have to setup a blog or something on that box.
BUT there are a few things.
No outbound traffic. So you can't simply wget stuff, but have to get a little bit more creative to get things on the box.
You might have a restricted envorinment. So maybe like no python/perl whatever preinstalled. Maybe only gcc or something. No netcat too?
And some other things.

Then i thought we could lower the RAM over time and who's blog runns for the longest time wins.

Now my questions: Would anyone even be interested to participate?
Any more ideas for restrictions to make it more fun?

«1

Comments

  • yomeroyomero Member

    And where the heck I will get the 10MB ones

  • lawllawl Member

    @yomero
    I'll provide them for free during the contest.

  • SpencerSpencer Member

    When you SSH into a server it uses bandwidth. It shows up in solusvm. So you would have to add a little outbound.

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    2.6.18 or 2.6.32

  • lawllawl Member
    edited May 2012

    @PytoHost
    What i meant is like a NAT, so you can accept connections, but not connect other hosts.

    @Francisco
    No idea. I've never setup OVZ, but i figured it can't be that hard since i don't really need to provide a professional service. but what i heard 2.6.18 is more stable. So i'd probably go with that.

    I just want to know if anyone's even interested before i set any details in stone.

  • bretonbreton Member

    Sounds crazy and has no sense. Well, count me in!

    Thanked by 2Infinity netomx
  • rds100rds100 Member

    "640kb ought to be enough for anybody"

    Anyone remembers those 4k demos from back then? Amazing what one could do with just 4k of code...

    Thanked by 1djvdorp
  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    2.6.32 would give accurate ram so people would have more wiggle.

    Thanked by 2Infinity maxexcloo
  • rds100rds100 Member

    What features should the blog have?

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    If the goal is an ultra-low-memory setup, then wouldn't KVM be better? People can't customize the OvZ kernel.

    Thanked by 1Jeffrey
  • 10 mb ... you need that much for os ram.

  • NateN34NateN34 Member
    edited May 2012

    Sounds cool, but can Nginx even run off 5-10 megabytes or RAM?

  • lawllawl Member
    edited May 2012

    @Francisco
    Then .32 it -is- will be.

    @rds100
    No idea yet. You tell me!

    @raindog308
    True dat. But the thing is, i don't have a dedi. So i wanted to setup OVZ in KVM since it's just to play around anyways. And i think KVM in KVM will not work? Think it would be just qemu software emulation?

    @BassHost
    Are you kidding me? If it's OVZ you can easily get it down to 6mb, probably down to 4. that means 6mb to play around.

    @NateN34
    Yet it can, but you need the OS, your shell, the blog itself in there too. So i hope no nginx, that'd be too easy :D

  • SpencerSpencer Member

    @lawl said: True dat. But the thing is, i don't have a dedi. So i wanted to setup OVZ in KVM since it's just to play around anyways. And i think KVM in KVM will not work? Think it would be just qemu software emulation?

    You really do need a dedi. Myself or other hosts could prob give you a cheap dedi to run this on

  • vedranvedran Veteran

    Who needs nginx when you can make your own webserver

    Thanked by 1rds100
  • lawllawl Member

    @vedran
    That's the spirit.
    You can hack this in a few lines of C with a blog in it, since it doesn't need to be HTTP compilant anyways. Just grab the GET and serve the blog.

  • You can run a web server completely off Shell now-a-days anyway.

  • LAWL....what's the prize?

    Thanked by 1NanoG6
  • @quirkyquark said: LAWL....what's the prize?

    A 5MB VPS.

  • Mon5t3rMon5t3r Member

    @lawl said: And i think KVM in KVM will not work?

    see here.. http://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/54114#Comment_54114

  • lawllawl Member

    @Mon5t3r is that possible on any of the listed hosts here, was far as i understand it still depends if the host is patched?

  • Didn't we had such a competition already? I remeber @KuJoe creating some really low end plans (16MB) some time ago. Correct me if I'm complete wrong.

  • yomeroyomero Member

    @HerrMaulwurf said: creating some really low end plans (16MB)

    There is a 32/64 one.

  • AnthonySmithAnthonySmith Member, Patron Provider

    haha great fun idea, count me in.

  • yomeroyomero Member

    Well, and what happened with the project of @sleddog?

    Seems more funny

  • KuJoeKuJoe Member, Host Rep

    @HerrMaulwurf said: Didn't we had such a competition already?

    There was a lot of talk in the thread but no takers. I'd still love to sponsor a <16MB blog though. :)

  • BlueVMBlueVM Member
    edited May 2012

    I might be willing throw in (16 MB VPS)x25 for 30 days for this challenge.

  • MrDOSMrDOS Member

    I'm in! Sounds like a good times.

  • jcalebjcaleb Member

    will gcc run on small memory?

  • MrDOSMrDOS Member

    @jcaleb: Compile elsewhere, then copy and paste the base64-encoded binary to the target ;)

    ...that sounds incredibly painful...

Sign In or Register to comment.