Kimsufi: LowEndNetwork

raindog308

 1,189,852   4.25K/s  eta 20m 18s

That's France to Northwest U.S.

Oh wait...it bounced up to 7K/s...nope, back to 4...

fly

lol.

dwild

And from Canada, you got how much?
http://bhs.proof.ovh.net/1Gio.dat

Kairus

Hehe, what about to a server located in France? I thought the big appeal for French servers is all the local peering? Not so good for people located outside France...

raindog308

Still...4KB/sec? I get faster speeds talking to a server on the other end of a dialup in Hunan, China.

huluwa

4.25K/s
Good luck.

JTR

55697: And from Canada, you got how much?
http://bhs.proof.ovh.net/1Gio.dat

Not bad for me, although my dedi is in Canada. Slower than Cachefly though

[root@a304 ~]# wget -O /dev/null http://bhs.proof.ovh.net/1Gio.dat
--2012-04-27 19:49:56--  http://bhs.proof.ovh.net/1Gio.dat
Resolving bhs.proof.ovh.net... 8.7.244.2
Connecting to bhs.proof.ovh.net|8.7.244.2|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 1073741824 (1.0G) [application/x-ns-proxy-autoconfig]
Saving to: “/dev/null”

100%[====================================>] 1,073,741,824 19.0M/s   in 37s     

2012-04-27 19:50:33 (27.3 MB/s) - “/dev/null” saved [1073741824/1073741824]

Pings are decent.

[root@a304 ~]# ping -c 10 bhs.proof.ovh.net
PING bhs.proof.ovh.net (8.7.244.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from bhs.proof.ovh.net (8.7.244.2): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=22.6 ms
64 bytes from bhs.proof.ovh.net (8.7.244.2): icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=22.3 ms
64 bytes from bhs.proof.ovh.net (8.7.244.2): icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=22.4 ms
64 bytes from bhs.proof.ovh.net (8.7.244.2): icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=22.8 ms
64 bytes from bhs.proof.ovh.net (8.7.244.2): icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=22.3 ms
64 bytes from bhs.proof.ovh.net (8.7.244.2): icmp_seq=6 ttl=55 time=22.7 ms
64 bytes from bhs.proof.ovh.net (8.7.244.2): icmp_seq=7 ttl=55 time=22.7 ms
64 bytes from bhs.proof.ovh.net (8.7.244.2): icmp_seq=8 ttl=55 time=22.4 ms
64 bytes from bhs.proof.ovh.net (8.7.244.2): icmp_seq=9 ttl=55 time=22.4 ms
64 bytes from bhs.proof.ovh.net (8.7.244.2): icmp_seq=10 ttl=55 time=22.4 ms

--- bhs.proof.ovh.net ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9034ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.311/22.540/22.800/0.157 ms

prometeus

@raindog308 do you also loose packets? It's slow also for other US destinations?

raindog308

To be honest, it was a file some guy's box...but then, I'm sure OVH keeps their "proof" network very performant :-)

Hopefully what I saw was an outlier.

MrAndroid

@DotVPS said: Look at it go!!!

Looks like its on a 10Mbit connection.

Roph

This is hosted on a 128M OVZ box from minivps.co.uk (reselling ovh), what do you guys get from it?

From my home line (60mbit/s virgin media) I get about 40mbit/s from my minivps, 10mbit/s from Quickweb (phoenix), and about 2-4mbit/s from my BuyVM 128

HC_Ro

12.2/3.5 Comcast.

hostingwizard_net

My VPS at OVH is #6 for network performance:
http://www.hostingwizard.net/?t=10&h=PingVPS

Jacob

Jeesh, Are we that bad? http://www.hostingwizard.net/?t=10&h=EaseVPS
Could you add our Europe or Kansas Location to the list.

@hostingwizard_net said: My VPS at OVH is #6 for network performance:

rds100

He only adds services that he is using himself (i.e. purchased).

lbft

From a heavily loaded Kimsufi to BuyVM (San Jose, CA):

2012-04-28 22:33:54 (2.54 MB/s) - '/dev/null' saved [729067520/729067520]

...to SecureDragon (Tampa, FL):

2012-04-28 22:39:54 (3.62 MB/s) - '/dev/null' saved [729067520/729067520]

...to Amanah (Toronto, I think?):

2012-04-28 22:48:24 (3.58 MB/s) - '/dev/null' saved [729067520/729067520]

...to Turnkey Internet (New York):

2012-04-28 22:50:14 (4.59 MB/s) - '/dev/null' saved [729067520/729067520]

...to 123systems (Dallas, TX):

2012-04-28 22:57:27 (3.30 MB/s) - '/dev/null' saved [729067520/729067520]

Seems OK to me.

Edit: for comparison, to a VPS from IperWeb/Prometeus (Milan, Italy):

2012-04-28 23:00:38 (6.84 MB/s) - '/dev/null' saved [729067520/729067520]

TheLinuxBug

@raindog308 You should ping the host your downloading from, I would be willing to be the node is suffering packet loss.

I have a vps with minivps.co.uk and I have found recently that they have been taking a lot of DDOS causing the node I am on as well to slow to a crawl, if not go offline for small periods of time during the mitigation process. How they are not just getting auto null-routed is interesting, must pay for some top notch support or something. The performance for 15$/yr is about what I would expect, but I guess you get what you pay for when your on a node that probably is close to its fill and has some abusive people which attract DDOS to the node. I haven't been bothered enough recently to submit a ticket, but it is starting to get annoying.

Wintereise

The network on my OVH is p. high end, actually. I can do 12MB/s to Cali, good enough.

kalam

@Wintereise said: The network on my OVH is p. high end, actually. I can do 12MB/s to Cali, good enough.

Same with mine to here in Washington, I'm always able to max out the connection. There's obviously a lot of factors going on, but a blanket statement that their network is bad isn't necessarily true.

MartinD

@TheLinuxBug - stick a ticket in and I'll take a look. We're not experiencing any major ddos attacks at the moment and haven't for a while so I'd be curious to know what the problem is.

jar

I VNC into mine from Texas as well as stream HD video to myself. Without doing a speed test, safe to say I'm satisfied with the network.