Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Why do some providers use cogent as a major peer?
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Why do some providers use cogent as a major peer?

I've seen two dedicated server providers and a few vps providers that use cogent as a major peer, which basically means they are screwing over anyone with comcast later in the afternoon, as ping that should normally be about 40ms goes all of the way up to 100ms..

Comments

  • Cheap

  • @fizzyjoe908 said:
    Cheap

    True.. I wish comcast and cogent got along better.

  • qpsqps Member, Host Rep
    edited March 2014

    Cogent <-> Comcast is much better since Netflix started paying Comcast for direct peering.

    Cogent provides a lot of value for the money. They have some great routes to other providers and on-net routes are great. They also have a ton of peers and customers, so it's the cheapest way to reach most of those. They do have some issues with a few providers, mostly the US eyeball networks (Comcast, Verizon, etc).

  • dnwkdnwk Member

    how about HE? is it as cheap as cogent?

  • They are both 25-50c/Mbps networks - very cheap

  • He.net is cheaper and even worse than Cogent, at least here.

  • dnwkdnwk Member

    does any one here in LowEND market has a tier-1 peer?

  • @Dnwk - Depending on location we have Level 3, AboveNet, TeliaSonera, ChinaTelecom, etc

  • Nick_ANick_A Member, Top Host, Host Rep

    We have NTT, GTT, and Cogent (depending on location), and use Cogent sparingly.

  • @dnwk well, Cogent is a Tier-1. "Tier-1" is not the same as "good".

  • PatrickPatrick Member
    edited March 2014

    @dnwk said:
    does any one here in LowEND market has a tier-1 peer?

    Cogent is Tier 1.

    I've also seen a increase in networks starting to use Above.net as well (Zayo) recently.

  • dnwkdnwk Member

    @rds100 said:
    dnwk well, Cogent is a Tier-1. "Tier-1" is not the same as "good".

    Really? Cogent is tier-1? Woops.... they means they don't need to pay comcast

  • Primary Tier 1's are:

    ATT
    Cogent
    Deutsche Telecom
    Level 3
    Qwest (now CenturyLink)
    Sprint
    Teleglobe (now Tata)
    Telia
    Verizon (previously UUNet)
    XO

  • qpsqps Member, Host Rep

    rds100 said: Cogent is a Tier-1. "Tier-1" is not the same as "good".

    By the classic definition of Tier 1, even Level3 doesn't qualify any more as they are paying Comcast. The whole "Tier #" system doesn't really apply in today's bandwidth markets, as the big eyeball ISPs (Comcast, Verizon, AT&T, etc) have so much market power.

  • WilliamWilliam Member
    edited March 2014

    MarkTurner said: ATT Cogent Deutsche Telecom Level 3 Qwest (now CenturyLink) Sprint Teleglobe (now Tata) Telia Verizon (previously UUNet) XO

    Based on the original Tier system:

    DTAG: Not Tier1 - Never was. Pays for transit and peers public (even though limited).

    Cogent: Not Tier1 - Anymore. Pays Comcast, peers on public exchanges.

    Level 3 (and GBLX): Not Tier1 - Anymore. Pays Comcast, pays some latin american ISPs (via GBLX).

    Qwest/Sprint still are but smaller (not much info on them), TATA still is entirely, Telia is not (peers public extensively, pays for transit), Verizon pays at least for some ürivate peerings, XO never was Tier1 and always paid.

    By definition some older US/EU university/education networks also qualify as Tier1s with settlement/ratio free cost-free upstream from i.e. Level3.

    "Wannabe Tier1s" (that were not at one point T1) are for example UPC/Aorta, DTAG, TPSA and HE, PCCW also to some extent.

    The Tier system is not really actual anymore with todays large Tier2s like HE though.

  • netomxnetomx Moderator, Veteran

    And the network my beloved uncle manages? (Telmex/Carlos slim)?

  • @Void_Whisperer said:
    I've seen two dedicated server providers and a few vps providers that use cogent as a major peer, which basically means they are screwing over anyone with comcast later in the afternoon, as ping that should normally be about 40ms goes all of the way up to 100ms..

    Cogent has been having major peering issues with Comcast (and other carriers) in some markets. Chicago was experiencing terrible latency and lots of packet loss in particular. Though, it has been getting slightly better as of late.

    Overall, they are a good value for the money, in a mix. There is no single provider that has the best routes to every network. I've had crap routes through Level 3.

  • We have Internap, PCCW and Cogent. Working with Zayo, Tinet, Telia and a few others to add more transit. All takes time but they'll be online :)

    Cogent has some of the best routes to some locations (not all and many do suck of course). It's about making it work and not why Cogent.

    Every carrier has its use - it's about how it's used and why.

  • Cost is no doubt one of the biggest reasons - Cogent on a average commit comes in at 25c/Mbps - $250/Gbps. Whereas someone like Telia or Level3 will want about 10 times that $2500/Gbps.

    Cogent also has a number of good quality routes which are mostly their own network but if you properly manage your network/route optimise it then you can cherry pick the routes you want from them.

Sign In or Register to comment.