Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Did someone tried micronetvps.com ?
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Did someone tried micronetvps.com ?

Did someone tried micronetvps.com? Looks like a worst provider with terrible support ..any experience with them and reviews? Thanks

Comments

  • My review. Is about the same as what you said there.

    I signed up for a vps in Russia (it was my first vps ever infact)
    Provisioning was uber fast. Only because their system destroyed another persons vps to make mine. The connection on their Russia server was maybe 5-8mbit and io was worse then writing things in a notepad by hand.

    They told me that the person that had their vps destroyed wanted it back so they booted me off. And took me 3 days for them to agree to a refund (paid via skrill) and then took another 33 days for a refund to actually get processed.

    In all honesty if there is a specific location on there you want, you will find a 10x better provider on here. For less dosh, better support etc

    Thanked by 2GIANT_CRAB kerouac
  • cfgguycfgguy Member, Host Rep

    Stay Away from them. I bought 2 vps in India location. Everyday 6 hours downtime and speed was 1 mbps.

  • AutoSnipe said: io was worse then writing things in a notepad by hand

    lol

    Thanked by 1kerouac
  • Not surprised, same here, waiting 5 days for provision than got destroyed VPS, status shown as online but login refused and ping give 100% packets loss, support never reply to tickets..

  • I'm using these services for half year and I'm happy. Russian VPS is stable as hell - 100% uptime since I've got it.

    root@rus:~# uptime
    19:24:44 up 142 days, 17:57, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

    Disk IO isn't fast, but enough and stable:

    root@rus:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync && rm -f test
    16384+0 records in
    16384+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 10.8394 s, 99.1 MB/s

    The CPU:

    root@rus:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3430 @ 2.40GHz
    cpu MHz : 1197.000
    cache size : 8192 KB
    bogomips : 4799.62

    Network speed is 100 mbit:

    root@rus:~# wget -O /dev/null http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    --2014-02-21 19:31:31-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
    100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 10.4M/s in 9.4s

    2014-02-21 19:31:40 (10.6 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [104857600/104857600]

    The only bad thing is support - long time response and sometimes they don't know basics.

    Regards!

Sign In or Register to comment.