Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Favorite Website Control Panel
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Favorite Website Control Panel

gsxgsx Member
edited March 2012 in General

I'm going through website control panels (ispConfig, cPanel, Kloxo, etc.) to determine what might be best to run multiple domains. Just wondering what people might be using. I would prefer something open source. Primarily debating Kloxo and ispConfig.

«1

Comments

  • NickMNickM Member

    bash or zsh

  • nabonabo Member
    edited March 2012

    ISPConfig is nice. But I prefer Froxlor (ex SysCP).

  • I don't like ispConfig. I used kloxo for my old vps but I didn't really like that either, not updated regularly, half baked features.
    I just configure everything manually now.

  • clarity_64clarity_64 Member
    edited March 2012

    I like ISPConfig personally.

    Edit:
    ISPConfig3 that is.

  • For me: Bash
    For my pure code projects: Direct Admin
    For my cheap/poor clients: Kloxo
    For my shared/higher end clients: cpanel

  • SolusVM

  • nabonabo Member

    @Naruto said: SolusVM

    How do you manage websites with domains using SolusVM?

  • clarity_64clarity_64 Member
    edited March 2012

    He's just trolling.

    I almost certain he practices his role play chat here.

    Thanked by 2nabo Mon5t3r
  • Carnt believe no one suggested Plesk.

  • @DanielM said: Carnt believe no one suggested Plesk.

    Plesk is a joke. Just saying.

    Thanked by 1yomero
  • I misunderstood the question. Wasn't trolling. I use .htaccess and rewrite rules for multiple domains on the same IP.

  • Virtualmin

  • ZeroZero Member

    I'm using ispCP on CentOS with some little modifications, I feel pretty happy with it.

  • jhjh Member

    I don't like any of them, sorry!

  • ISPConfig 3 and Froxlor.

    but i prefer Script from guys from here.. :D

  • tuxtux Member

    @nabo said: How do you manage websites with domains using SolusVM?

    He use SolusVM console.

  • @tux said: He use SolusVM console.

    Yeah. I could have said that and made you look silly.

  • @BlueVM said: Plesk is a joke. Just saying.

    Plesk is awesome. Its much better than cpanel.

  • @Naruto said: I use .htaccess

    apache >_<

  • @DanielM said: Plesk is awesome. Its much better than cpanel.

    Not to hurt your feelings, but I think you'd be in the 1% on that.

    Thanked by 1TheHackBox
  • Fixed.

  • @Naruto said: apache <3

    must... not.... rage.

  • @DanielM said: Plesk is awesome. Its much better than cpanel.

    Hands down, troll of the month goes to you!

  • RophRoph Member

    I ran webmin on my old eNetSouth box, it was alright I guess. A little barebones, though I guess that's what they're going for.

    Nowadays I use the set of Minstall scripts by maxexcloo, they work great for all the functions I'm after :)

    Thanked by 1TheHackBox
  • Why do people want control panels for their websites?

  • gsxgsx Member

    @Naruto It makes life easy and reduces deployment time. Well, if your running 30 some websites it does.

  • NarutoNaruto Member
    edited March 2012

    @gsx said: @Naruto It makes life easy and reduces deployment time. Well, if your running 30 some websites it does.

    I'd rather have each site in a separate folder in /var/www/html and use .htaccess with the following:

    RewriteEngine On

    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^siteone.com$ [NC]
    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/siteone/ [NC]
    RewriteRule ^(.*)?$ /siteone/$1 [QSA,L]

    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^sitetwo.com$ [NC]
    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/sitetwo/ [NC]
    RewriteRule ^(.*)?$ /sitetwo/$1 [QSA,L]

    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^sitethree.com$ [NC]
    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/sitethree/ [NC]
    RewriteRule ^(.*)?$ /sitethree/$1 [QSA,L]

  • Why don't you use virtual host with apache @Naruto?

  • @dclardy said: Why don't you use virtual host with apache @Naruto?

    I don't know how. Haven't tried finding out how either. Is it better to do that?

    I think the httpd.conf has something about it in the bottom. Either way, seems a lot easier than using a control panel... unless you use the control panel for traffic statistics and stuff.

  • You can set the directory from there and you don't have to do all that htaccess trickery. Either way works though.

Sign In or Register to comment.