New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
"LowEndTalk was worth a fortune to my company." - Sandye Q.
raindog308
Administrator, Veteran
in General
"I'm good to go. LowEndTalk has got everything I need. Thank you for making it painless, pleasant and most of all hassle free!" - Lyndsey H.
"We were treated like royalty. I would like to personally thank you for your outstanding product. I love LowEndTalk." - Coreen Z.
"I love your system. We can't understand how we've been living without LowEndTalk. LowEndTalk is worth much more than I paid. I am so pleased with this product." - Cherice Q.
https://testimonial-generator.com/
Summer hosts, take note of this critical resource for your business.
Comments
"It really saves me time and effort. Involucrated is exactly what our business has been lacking. I would also like to say thank you to all your staff. We've seen amazing results already." - Allyn K.
"Fantastic, I'm totally blown away by Involucrated." - Jack F.
"This is unbelievable. After using Involucrated my buisness skyrocketed!" - Rick E.
Seal of approval Involucrated
"I STRONGLY recommend Alpha Racks to EVERYONE interested in running a successful online business! It's just amazing. "
So you don't have to give away free swag or double the RAM to get good reviews these days?
Could have saved some companies here a lot of money.
"We have no regrets! It really saves me time and effort. WebShop is exactly what our business has been lacking. Just what I was looking for."
"Push-up specialist impressed me on multiple levels." - Elaina O.
"Since I invested in push-up specialist I made over 100,000 dollars profits." - Chelsae H.
"Push-up specialist is great. I love push-up specialist." - Phylis A.
P.S. I made a map of the "push-ups delivery network".
Just curious to know how it works
Is it ai based or huge amount of pre generated testimonials just replacing the brand name?
"Let me tell my mum about this" - Jad. H
"Great job, I will definitely be ordering again! JailSuicides is the next killer app."
Caritta W.
This goes very well with the corporate gibberish generator http://www.andrewdavidson.com/gibberish/
Add a stereotype business stock photo, like
, and copy&paste the ToS/AUP from a random competitor (why waste money on a lawyer, when they already did?), and you're in business!
You should give a bit of info on which provider and VPS spec!
Well, it's not just for summer hosts.
Well that thread backfired quickly lemme copy this into a draft and post so I still have this saved
I like Google and its iron-clad Privacy Policy which keeps my information secure in my hands!
This would only be helpful for the owner of the real thesummerhost and any seasonal related
host
Sometime i feel kiddo for using the testimonialgenerator with the word "anal"... Can't stop laughing.
I don't think I'd call this "AI". More like a madlibs-style php script that replaces placeholders with whatever string you give it.
https://www.termsofservicegenerator.net
I have some very startling, very radical—some might say censorious—insights into LowEndTalk’s latest hastily mounted campaigns. Before I begin talking about specifics, let me just mention that what we’re involved in with LowEndTalk is not a game. It’s the most serious possible business, and every serious person—every person with any shred of a sense of responsibility—must concern himself with it. If I am doomed to get torn apart by wild dogs then LowEndTalk will obviously cause (or at least contribute to) a variety of social ills quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "parallelogrammatical". In any case, there is something in the way of "natural law" that can be stated awkwardly as follows: "Even children are not safe from LowEndTalk’s muzzy-headed ebullitions." Please do not quote me on that. Instead, work it into a better natural law and enunciate it in clearer and more concise terms. It is immaterial who is credited with the words; the objective is to elevate the level of discourse on the topic. Doing so will at least prove that I have in fact told it that it is bound to have a rude awakening when it finally realizes how few people approve of its saturnine, offensive chrestomathies. Unfortunately, there really wasn’t anything to its response. I suppose LowEndTalk just doesn’t want to admit that it prefers to see problems talked to death instead of solved. But the problems with its soliloquies don’t end there.
Reason dictates that LowEndTalk’s quarrelsome anecdotes have been helping an indolent fringe take over the government because the central preconception in its paranoid style is the belief in the existence of a vast, ignominious, preternaturally effective international conspiratorial network designed to exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in managing both the news and the entertainment that gets presented to us. There’s no point in searching high and low for a tortured or convoluted alternative explanation for something that is so simple and so obvious. It should be clear to everyone that LowEndTalk insists at every opportunity that it would never fill the air with recrimination and rancor. Wow! Isn’t that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, "They’re not in here!"?
Someone needs to appeal for comity between us and LowEndTalk. Who’s going to do it? LowEndTalk? I think not. Just because nitpicky, filthy yahooism exists and has for a long time, there is no reason for us to accept it from LowEndTalk. Even people who consider themselves cynical sapheads generally agree that there is no more noble activity than embarking on a new path towards change. The interest of that portion of social arrangement is a trust in the hands of all those who compose it; and as none but unforgiving simps would justify it in abuse, none but schemers would barter it away for their own personal advantage. The implication, of course, is that back when our policemen were guardians, not enforcers, they would have protected us from LowEndTalk’s klatch of ruthless, crabby dopeheads. Today, it seems that most officers of the law are content to sit back and let LowEndTalk lock all the exits from our present state to the world of constructive reason. That’s why we must spread the news about how I once heard some of LowEndTalk’s hangers-on make a rather surprising announcement that they intend to foster mutual understanding. Immediately, a red flag went up in my mind. Sure enough, further investigation revealed that this announcement was intended solely to distract people from noticing that in our post-truth era, people have already decided what they want to believe, regardless of the facts. For example, many people, especially snippy good-for-nothings (especially the rude type), actually believe this narrative: Women are crazed Pavlovian sex-dogs who will salivate at any object even remotely phallic in shape. Have you ever heard anything so vile? Here’s a dose of truth as an antidote for such falsehoods: One of the great mysteries of modern life is, How big of a chunk has been excised from LowEndTalk’s cerebral cortex for it to think that everyone with a different set of beliefs from its is going to get a one-way ticket to Hell? Well, while you’re deliberating over that, let me ask you another question: When it looks in the mirror in the morning, does LowEndTalk see more than the bossy, lousy face of a ridiculous, gutless nymphomaniac? Now, not to bombard you with too many questions, but LowEndTalk is getting ever closer to maintaining social control by eliminating rights and freedoms. Such a move would be unprecedented. LowEndTalk’s condemners will rightly claim it amounts to hoodlumism, and I’ll be the first to point out that we are observing the change in our society’s philosophy and values from freedom and justice to corruption, decay, cynicism, and injustice. All of these "values" are artistically incorporated in one person: LowEndTalk.
If you disagree, then consider that LowEndTalk wants to get me thrown in jail. It can’t cite a specific statute that I’ve violated, but it does believe that there must be some statute. This tells me that I once tried to explain to LowEndTalk that its subliminal psywar campaigns will inject even more fear and divisiveness into political campaigns. Rather than feel ashamed of itself, LowEndTalk got angry at me. What this says is that LowEndTalk has no shame. Never had it, never will. Some critics have called LowEndTalk ill-tempered. A handful insist it’s wily. Its drudges, on the other hand, consider it to be one of the great minds of this century.
LowEndTalk avers that the reason it wants me to abandon all hope is not out of hatred for me but merely because it’s disappointed that I’m not living up to my own ideals. That’s indubitably a lie of biblical proportions. The truth is that some of us have an opportunity to come in contact with bloody-minded blatherers on a regular basis at work or in school. We therefore may be able to gain some insight into the way they think, into their values; we may be able to understand why they want to confiscate other people’s rightful earnings. I have to confess that I, like everyone around me at the time, failed to do anything when we had the opportunity to stop LowEndTalk from wiretapping all of our telephones and computers. This is something that I’m embarrassed about and that I’m ashamed of. To rectify the situation, I intend to transcend traditional thinking, to make it clear that I don’t know what to do about the rise in nosism I see all around me. LowEndTalk’s solution. not surprisingly, is to enable delirious, splenetic troublemakers to punch above their weight. This is one case in which the cure is inarguably worse than the disease. If we intend to defend democracy, we had best learn to recognize its primary enemy and not be afraid to stand up and call it by name. That name is LowEndTalk.
This is a letter of love and peace; I will not lash out against anyone, and I will not use specific names of individuals or organizations that have a serious destabilizing effect on our institutions. That said, let me merely point out that LowEndTalk is a sore loser. For openers, LowEndTalk keeps saying we should have an honest conversation about Dadaism. As you could probably guess, it actually has no interest in having what an ordinary person would think of as an honest conversation. The only topics allowed in LowEndTalk’s version are those that concur with its belief that it’s a secular saint whose every pronouncement is a gospel truth that only the sinful or the sinister would question. In a truly honest conversation one would be allowed to present the inconvenient (to LowEndTalk) fact that LowEndTalk has been denying us the opportunity to restore our righteous rage and singular purpose to prevail over its ungrateful, louche platoon of libidinous, worthless wankers. That is a fundamental violation of common law and demonstrates that there is no place in this country where we are safe from LowEndTalk’s Prætorian Guard, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack. As you know, LowEndTalk exhibits a mixture of bombast, braggadocio, and brashness. Oh, you didn’t know that? That’s because LowEndTalk has been trying to keep that fact hidden from the public so as to prevent people from realizing that it holds onto power like the eunuch mandarins of the Forbidden City—sterile obstacles to progress who deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols. In such a brief letter as this, I certainly cannot refute all the tirades of feebleminded leighsters but perhaps I can brush away some of their most deliberate and flagrant hot takes. Please let me explain that if we are to lead the way to the future, not to the past, then we must be guided by a healthy and progressive ideology, not by the uneducated and longiloquent ideologies that LowEndTalk promotes.
As you may have noticed, I routinely use some rather impolite words to convey what I think of LowEndTalk. But how would you describe an organization that is intent on treating people like chthonic, indelicate dingbats? If you can think of a better label for such an organization than "baleful, aspish urban guerrilla" I’ll consider using it in future letters. Since this is one of those "don’t say I didn’t warn you" letters, I want also to note that if it successfully prevents us from indicating in a rough and approximate way the two unholy tendencies that I believe are the main driving force of modern wowserism, we will rise up again, stronger, firmer, mightier. We will take the mechanisms, language, ideology, and phraseology for determining what is right and what is wrong out of the hands of it and its associates and put them back in the hands of ordinary people and encourage others to do the same. We will ensure that everyone knows that LowEndTalk has been censoring by caricature and preempting discussion by stereotype. Should doing so buy it the right to dialogue, negotiation, concessions, and power? I say no because if LowEndTalk believes that courtesy and manners don’t count for anything, then it’s obvious why it claims that big emotions come from big words. My counterargument is that aberrant, mingy lunatics who allege that LowEndTalk would sooner give up money, fame, power, and happiness than perform a lubricious act often cite authority figures who agree with them. This is entertaining, but it may not yield reliable information. The fact of the matter is that LowEndTalk makes a lot of exaggerated claims. All of these claims need to be scrutinized as carefully as a letter of recommendation from a job applicant’s mother. Consider, for example, LowEndTalk’s claim that "metanarratives" are the root of tyranny, lawlessness, overpopulation, racial hatred, world hunger, disease, and rank stupidity. What balderdash! What impudence! What treachery!
In the course of my work I regularly come in contact with intolerant perjurers, and most of them also feel that LowEndTalk used to complain about being persecuted. Now it is our primary persecutor. This reversal of roles reminds me that LowEndTalk’s memoranda never cease to amaze me. Like their author, they’re crafty, counterproductive, caustic, brown-nosing, and unforgiving. And I’m sure if you read them yourself you’ll come up with additional relevant adjectives of your own. That being said, LowEndTalk’s campaigns of demagoguery and disinformation are about as useful to society as a hundred deutsche marks were in 1923 Germany. That would call for no comment if not for the observation that it’s best just to ignore it. I learned long ago never to wrestle with a pig: You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it. Instead, we should stop LowEndTalk’s encroachments on our heritage. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people understood that some people insist that LowEndTalk is purposely publishing blatantly conceited rhetoric as "education" for children to learn in school. Others believe that it does do only inadvertently. Whether its actions are intentional or unintentional, the reality remains the same: LowEndTalk asserts that it’s inappropriate to teach children right from wrong. It goes on to claim that the world is crying out to labor beneath its firm but benevolent heel. The correct response to both of those sevidical beliefs is the assertion that there is a problem here. A large, feckless, ophidian problem.
Unsettling as that is, the more infuriating fact is that it has been said that LowEndTalk is battening on us. I, in turn, aver that there appears to be some disagreement in the community regarding the number of times that LowEndTalk has been seen altering, rewriting, or ignoring past events to make them consistent with its current "reality". Some say once; some say five times; some say a dozen times or more. The point is not to quibble over numbers or anything like that but rather to clarify that the Earth presents a wonderful example of variety in all classes of the animal and vegetable kingdoms. People, beasts, and plants belonging to distinct classes all exhibit special qualities and peculiarities. Unfortunately, LowEndTalk’s special quality is that it maintains that it has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring itself to help disseminate the True Faith of entryism. While rational argument has never been LowEndTalk’s strong suit, this line of argument makes absolutely no sense. LowEndTalk is effectively suggesting that foul wantwits of one sort or another are more deserving of honor than our nation’s war heroes. The point is that it doesn’t realize that there are two sides to every story. So when LowEndTalk asserts that its manuscripts symbolize peace and tolerance and are consistent with human rights, it should also consider that it has separate, oftentimes antipodal, interests from ours. For instance, LowEndTalk is intererested in gagging the innocent accused from protesting boosterism-motivated prosecutions. In contrast, my interests—and perhaps yours as well—include telling people that LowEndTalk has been trying its darndest to force me to languish along beneath the thousand eyes of slovenly ultracrepidarians. I do not say this as one of those negative critics who can always find something wrong with anything. Rather, I say it as someone who firmly believes that LowEndTalk’s pertinacious, wretched stratagems make me completely ropeable. Well, that’s another story. To get back to my main point, I ought to mention that I’ve known some battologists who were impressively nerdy. However, LowEndTalk is linguacious and that trumps nerdy every time.
Breaking medical news: LowEndTalk has tested positive for being an uncontrollable simpleton. It must be quarantined to prevent the spread of its massive stupidity. Until a cure is found, we must cast a gimlet eye on LowEndTalk’s pranks. Only by behaving thus will we reach our full potential as a community, as a country, and as the human race. Now stay with me a moment here; I am making a point. Specifically, LowEndTalk should stop telling everyone that its bromides are innovative. More apt words for them might be "static" or "stale" or perhaps the phrase, "been done" with the possible addition, "too often." What I’m getting at is that one way of conceptualizing the psychodynamics of LowEndTalk’s fastidious slogans is to imagine them as a besotted, morbid sybarite who wants only to impose a uniformity of thought and behavior on all members of our community. Under this analogy it is clear that there’s undoubtedly no point in arguing with LowEndTalk. This just goes to show (to me, at least) that as a personal endeavor I contacted some of its auxiliaries to see if we could find common ground. It turns out there exists no common ground. These people won’t even acknowledge that sinister forces, backed by LowEndTalk, seek to indoctrinate the worst kinds of insurrectionists there are with ready-made conclusions on controversial subjects. I choose to fight those forces, and I unquestionably hope a majority of my readers will do the same.
One might conclude that flippant Drawcansirs have an insatiable appetite for LowEndTalk’s dulcet but base-minded piffle. Alternatively, one might conclude that LowEndTalk has rightly earned the scorn and derision with which it is viewed in many quarters. In either case, it’s difficult to know exactly why predatory ethnocentrism has burst forth so powerfully in the past few years. Perhaps it’s because LowEndTalk calls all of my ideas superficial. Declaring ideas superficial does not make them so, especially because it is far from clear that LowEndTalk remotely understands what I’m proposing. I also don’t think it understands that I recently received quite a bit of flak from the local commentariat for reporting that a number of dysfunctional doomsday prophets have succumbed to excessive drug use, alcoholism, and other addictive behavior indicating maladaptive mechanisms. The criticism I received is surprising because I was merely pointing out what is generally accepted, that there are two important points I’d like to bring up here. First, I’m really afraid of unbridled pseudologists. Second, my personal safety depends upon your starting to drive off and disperse the avowedly fickle slanderers who open the floodgates of sectarianism, just as your personal safety depends upon my doing the same. To the average man, neither of these two points is of any particular importance. "So what?", he might ask. "There’s no harm in extracting obscene salaries and profits from corporations that exploit other cultures for self-entertainment." How wrong the average man would be. In actuality, our duty should be to listen, find compassion, and collaborate. To create a situation so crisis-packed that it will inevitably open the door to Chekism is alien to this duty. That’s why I want you to know that in our post-truth era, people have already decided what they want to believe, regardless of the facts. For example, many people, especially witless, clueless omadhauns, actually believe this narrative: Elected national governments are not accountable to their own people. Have you ever heard anything so treacherous? Here’s a dose of truth as an antidote for such falsehoods: The world is full of people who use Mohockism as a more destructive form of Satanism. We don’t need any more people like that. What we need are people who are willing to advance a clear, credible, and effective vision for dealing with our present dilemma and its most peremptory manifestations. We need people who understand that many of the disloyal, blathering skybalds I’ve encountered are convinced that it’s illegal to sound the bugle of liberty—or, if it isn’t illegal, then it ought to be. This view is virulent by any stretch of the imagination and reflects how it is of vital importance that we speak out against behavior and speech that is intended to wipe out our history, defame our heroes, erase our values, and indoctrinate our children. It is a matter of life and death, a road either to safety or to ruin. That’s why I profess that only a fool or a liar would avow that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty. That is an absolutely sincere statement. I’ve believed that my entire life. I will always believe it. And I will never stop believing it or believing that it almost goes without saying that human life is full of artificiality, perversion, and misery, much of which is caused by third-rate, unregenerate schmucks. There is only one possible conclusion one can draw from that: Perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of malapert, unrestrained peddlers of snake-oil remedies. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that there is another side to the issue. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life.
In effect, implying that the media should "create" news rather than report it is no different from implying that defying the international enslavement of entire peoples is something to be regulated, policed, feared, and controlled. Both statements are ludicrous. Can you believe that LowEndTalk wants to use paid informants and provocateurs to reduce universities to little sesquipedalianism factories? You can’t make up stuff as nugatory as that. Even with the increasing number of namby-pamby, unscrupulous crooks, it promises its representatives that as soon as it’s finished planting strife and chaos, they’ll all become rich beyond their wildest dreams. There’s an obvious analogy here to the way that vultures eat a cadaver and from its rottenness insects and worms suck their food. The point is that LowEndTalk cheers on members of the world’s most violent totalitarian movements as "freedom fighters" while labeling as the scum of the earth anyone who seeks peacefully to elevate the level of discourse on the topic. I hope you don’t think of that task as impossible. Through bold and concrete actions, we can move mountains! That said, it may be easier to move a mountain than to convince LowEndTalk’s debauched, offensive advocates that LowEndTalk populates various unaccountable think tanks with members of its gang. One such organization, the Institute for Sexism Research, recently wrote a 500-page report condoning exercising both subtlety and thoroughness in managing both the news and the entertainment that gets presented to us. Despite the report’s slatternly message, LowEndTalk recently went through a hedonism phase in which it tried repeatedly to reduce history to an overdetermined, wireframe sketch of what are, in reality, complex, dynamic events. In fact, I’m not convinced that this phase of its has entirely passed. My evidence is that LowEndTalk motivates people to join its league of demented, despicable oiks by using words like "humanity", "compassion", and "unity". This is a great deception. What LowEndTalk really wants to do is keep essential documents hidden from the public until they become politically moot. That’s why epistemic jingoism weakens political determination and gives comfort to tribalism. To overcome this, the question of the role played by LowEndTalk’s peuplade must be broached directly. Let me suggest we do so by examining the way that before LowEndTalk once again claims that our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups, it should do some real research rather than simply play a game of bias reinforcement with its votarists.
In light of what I just stated, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of LowEndTalk". In it, I chronicle all of LowEndTalk’s views from the bitter to the fusty and conclude that if I may be so bold, I am truly at a loss for words when LowEndTalk asserts that children don’t need as much psychological attentiveness, protection, and obedience training as the treasured household pet. It can’t possibly be serious. I suspect that the real story here is that LowEndTalk has not increased our safety, security, or happiness by shouting obscenities at passers-by. All it’s increased by doing that is the girth of its bloated ego.
It will never be possible for me to erase from my memory the feelings of weighty sadness and disgust that overcame me when I first saw LowEndTalk playing racial, ethnic, and religious groups against one another. The best I can do now is to bring meaning, direction, and purpose into our lives. While this approach is practical, it is rife with pitfalls because it fails to acknowledge that my cause is to build an inclusive circle of love. I call upon men and women from all walks of life to support my cause with their life-affirming eloquence and indomitable spirit of human decency and moral righteousness. Only then will the whole world realize that many people are incredulous when I tell them that LowEndTalk intends to deny minorities a cultural voice. "How could LowEndTalk be so insincere?", they ask me. "It doesn’t seem possible." Well, it is honestly possible, and now I’ll explain exactly how LowEndTalk plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that it likes tapping into the national resurgence of overt paternalism, which puts it somewhere between an irremediably directionless reaver and an inveterate, barbarous troll on the Bonapartism org chart.
Let me go on record as saying that some day, in the far, far future, LowEndTalk will realize that it is not difficult to see the undercurrents of cannibalism in its self-fulfilling prophecies. This realization will sink in slowly but surely and will be accompanied by a comprehension of how in one of its anti-democratic rants, LowEndTalk lambasted its opponents as "truculent rantipoles who wouldn’t think twice before gaining a virtual stranglehold on many facets of our educational system." One pro-LowEndTalk columnist tamely described this outburst as being merely "indelicate" and "lacking nuance". Imagine that! What do you think the chances are that LowEndTalk will eventually stop hurting people’s feelings? I assure you, the likelihood of that is slim to none. The reason is that what we’re involved in with LowEndTalk is not a game. It’s the most serious possible business, and every serious person—every person with any shred of a sense of responsibility—must concern himself with it. To recap the main points made in this letter: 1) not everyone agrees with LowEndTalk, 2) anyone who denies this and insists on looking at issues from a single perspective is a participant in a flat, simplistic, and incomplete world, and 3) LowEndTalk has no qualms about using "enhanced interrogation techniques" to coerce its censurers into stating that the few of us who complain regularly about its words are simply spoiling the party.
The end is nigh.
I got through 3 sentences and gave up.
TLDR please and thanks!
(Yes I really did quote that long-ass text)
I want to know what generator was used, because I am in love with it.
There is no place you are safe The LPG has already been dispatched. They will find you. Just after you fall asleep...
powered by blockchains ofcourse
"If you aren't sure, always go for Boomer vps."
https://www.pakin.org/complaint?firstname=LowEndTalk¶graphs=10&gender=c&shorttype=f
@raindog308, are you familiar with the rules? Flagged, should be in off-topic, otherwise Tutorials. Heh heh
Need a way to embed these on your site with 5 stars like Trustpilot. The stars show it's legit.
And source some headshots from flickr.