Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

SSD Shared Hosting offers With Free .com .net .org .ca domains plus much more - servaRICA
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

SSD Shared Hosting offers With Free .com .net .org .ca domains plus much more - servaRICA

servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Provider

Hi All

So this is our first SSD based shared hosting offer

Those offers are CPanel based with free .com/.org/.net/ca and others domains included

The plans and all our special VPS offers are here
https://servarica.com/clients/store/special-group-2021

A) SSD Shared Hosting DEALS

1- SSD PLUS (Annual) (limited)

25 GB SSD Storage 
1 free domain  **(the domain fees are non refundable)**
2 TB bandwidth
3 websites
unlimited subdomains
5 databases
20 email accounts
cPanel
PHP, Ruby, Python
Weekly backups
LVE Specifications
SPEED=200%
PMEM=3GB
VMEM=0
IO=10MB/s
IOPS=1024
NPROC=200
EP=200
35$/year

[https://servarica.com/clients/cart.php?a=add&pid=471 "https://servarica.com/clients/cart.php?a=add&pid=471")

2- Shared SSD 2 (limited)

50GB SSD Storage 
1 free domain with yearly payment **(the domain fees are non refundable)**
Domains 20
Subdomains Unlimited
FTP Accounts Unlimited
Databases 20
Email accounts 100
Unmetered Bandwidth
Free SSL
LVE Specifications
SPEED=200%
PMEM=3GB
VMEM=0
IO=10MB/s
IOPS=1024
NPROC=200
EP=200
6$/Month or 66$/year (yearly payment gets free domain)

https://servarica.com/clients/cart.php?a=add&pid=467

Also Our SSD , NVMe and storage VPS are all in stock for first time in long period :)

B ) Storage VPS DEALS

Not all Storage deals can be shown here check the link for full list
https://servarica.com/clients/store/special-group-2021

1- Polar Bear Storage Offer (Annual) (limited)

2 CPU cores
2 GB RAM
2TB disk
Unlimited transfer on 100mbps or 4TB limit on 1gbps
1x IPv4
IPv6 available by request
48$/year

https://servarica.com/clients/cart.php?a=add&pid=459

C) SSD VPS DEALS

Again not all SSD deals can be shown here check the link for full list
https://servarica.com/clients/store/special-group-2021

1- Flying Fish SSD Offer (Annual) (limited)

4 CPU cores
4GB RAM
200GB SSD disk
Unlimited transfer on 100mbps or 4TB limit on 1gbps
1x IPv4
IPv6 available by request
48$/year

https://servarica.com/clients/cart.php?a=add&pid=461

D) NVMe VPS DEALS

Again not all NVMe deals can be shown here check the link for full list
https://servarica.com/clients/store/special-group-2021

1- NVMe Cheetah

4 CPU cores
6GB RAM
80GB NVme disk
Unlimited transfer on 100mbps or 4TB limit on 1gbps
1x IPv4
IPv6 available by request
7$/month

[https://servarica.com/clients/cart.php?a=add&pid=408]https://servarica.com/clients/cart.php?a=add&pid=408 "https://servarica.com/clients/cart.php?a=add&pid=408")

About Us
For anyone who does not know us here are some info about us
servaRICA is VPS provider located in Montreal, Canada. We own and operate our own network and we are not reseller to any other company. We have been in business since 2010 (more than 10 years ago) .

Location
Montreal , Quebec , Canada
Looking glass: https://ping.servarica.com

FAQ:
- Where can we find your Terms of Service/Legal documents:
TOS and AUP: https://servarica.com/terms-of-service/

  • What are your accepted payment methods: We accept Paypal, Alipay, Credit Cards and crypto currencies like (BTC , ETH etc)

  • What raid level you use for storage servers

  • All the offers you see here are based on raidz2 pools (some servers are pure SSD storage and some are normal disks storage)

Node Specs
- 2x Intel Xeon (E5-2650 / E5-2650v2 / E5-2680v4) CPU or better
- 128GB RAM or more
- SAN Storage or local SSD/NVMe storage
- Raidz2
- 20Gbps uplink

Please let us know what you think

Thanks
Hani

Thanked by 1Ganonk

VPS and shared hosting
http://servarica.com

Comments

  • cyberpunkcyberpunk Member
    edited April 12

    So, I went ahead and purchased NVMe Tiger vps:

    4 CPU cores
    10GB RAM
    150gb NVMe disk
    $10/Month
    

    Here is yabs (edit: updated yabs result to include GB5):

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-12-29                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Apr 12 19:46:31 EDT 2021
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2394.470 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 9.5 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 150.0 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 25.05 MB/s    (6.2k) | 164.42 MB/s   (2.5k)
    Write      | 25.06 MB/s    (6.2k) | 165.29 MB/s   (2.5k)
    Total      | 50.11 MB/s   (12.5k) | 329.71 MB/s   (5.1k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 233.92 MB/s    (456) | 234.19 MB/s    (228)
    Write      | 246.35 MB/s    (481) | 249.79 MB/s    (243)
    Total      | 480.28 MB/s    (937) | 483.99 MB/s    (471)
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 310                           
    Multi Core      | 1194                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/7393060
    

    And to be honest, those disk speeds are pretty low even by SSD standards, let alone NVMe. Also, the GB5 score is not great either. The network speed is nice tho.

  • corbpiecorbpie Member

    Considering the SSD speeds I’m not surprised by the NVMe disk speed

    grape

  • Daniel15Daniel15 Member
    edited April 13

    The really weird thing with Servarica is that I've seen faster read/write speeds on their storage VPSes vs their SSD or NVMe VPSes, which doesn't really make sense... Eeven if the HDD storage is SSD-cached, it should still be slower than pure SSD 🤔

    Here's a YABS from a Polar Bear Storage (2TB disk) VPS I picked up around Black Friday last year. It's much faster than my LA-based HostHatch storage VPS for small block sizes (eg. for 4k block size I'm seeing ~31 MB/s read/write vs ~4 MB/s with HostHatch), but slower for 1m block size (~150 MB/s with 147 IOPS read with Servarica vs ~190 MB/s read with 184 IOPS with HostHatch).

    Overall the benchmark results do seem to reflect reality and matches the feel of the server for me - Programs are faster to start with less iowait on the Servarica compared to the HostHatch one, but HostHatch performs better when writing large backup files.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-12-29                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon 12 Apr 2021 04:52:10 PM PDT
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2593.766 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 988.0 MiB
    Disk       : 1.9 TiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 31.24 MB/s    (7.8k) | 123.33 MB/s   (1.9k)
    Write      | 31.28 MB/s    (7.8k) | 123.98 MB/s   (1.9k)
    Total      | 62.52 MB/s   (15.6k) | 247.31 MB/s   (3.8k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 111.74 MB/s    (218) | 151.02 MB/s    (147)
    Write      | 117.67 MB/s    (229) | 161.07 MB/s    (157)
    Total      | 229.42 MB/s    (447) | 312.09 MB/s    (304)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 951 Mbits/sec   | 933 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 948 Mbits/sec   | 924 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 933 Mbits/sec   | 933 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 444 Mbits/sec   | 16.3 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 973 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 877 Mbits/sec   | 958 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 851 Mbits/sec   | 942 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 368 Mbits/sec   | 512 Mbits/sec
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 949 Mbits/sec   | 918 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 854 Mbits/sec   | 904 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 911 Mbits/sec   | 917 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 960 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 931 Mbits/sec   | 586 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 562
    Multi Core      | 1059
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/7393117
    
  • GayRunGayRun Member

    Web Hosting Resource Limits?

  • sliixsliix Member

    I've been using the RDP server (Flying Fish) since the new year offer first announced (entering the 4th month now I guess). Gotta say I really love it. Totally a steal. Keep it up!

    Thanked by 1servarica_hani
  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Provider

    @cyberpunk @corbpie

    There are few reasons why disk access is lower than what is expected

    1- The main reason is xen disk access code , the code is is not optimized for fast disk access , it is mainly optimized for fair sharing
    so if there are many vms accessing the disk together the performance will be distributed nicely but it does not allow 1 vm to gain much speed if no other vm is using the disks

    Currently we are experimenting with few other options and hopefully we will have solution for this issue (no results yet)

    2- ZFS vs hardware raid: some of the SSD servers contain 26x SSD disks and we are faced with option to create one hardware raid6 for all of them or using raidz of 4 + 2
    using hardware raidz2 we gain significant performance compared to raidz2 and we even get more disk space (in raidz2 we 33% of the disk space is lost on parity protection while on hardware raid6 only 8% lost for 26 disks example )
    But we felt having only 2 disks on spare for 26 disks is too risky plus not fan of the rebuild times of hardware raid when replacing disk so we decided to still go with zfs although we will use performance and space

    as i said above we are actively working on fixing the disk access speed

    @Daniel15

    Correct , sometime the normal disks perform near the SSD disks not because they are faster but due to xen code reaching its max limits before even reaching the SSD , NVMe or HDDs arrays max IOPS

    But the difference is that for HDDs the total IOPS the storage array can deliver is much less than SSD and NVMe systems , so if if from single test perspective they appear near each other , if some other neighbour started to hammer the disks you will feel nothing in NVMe and SSD but you will notice it in HDDs disks

    For the performance in 4k compared to large file thats actually intentional , we spent long time optimizing the storage array to deliver better in smaller block sizes as that gives much more gain in terms of the usability of the storage compared to gaining few extra MB/s for large files

    Thanks

    Thanked by 1Daniel15

    VPS and shared hosting
    http://servarica.com

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Provider

    @GayRun said:
    Web Hosting Resource Limits?

    Do you mean cloudlinux limits ? they are here
    LVE Specifications
    SPEED=200%
    PMEM=3GB
    VMEM=0
    IO=10MB/s
    IOPS=1024
    NPROC=200
    EP=200

    If you mean something else please let me know

    VPS and shared hosting
    http://servarica.com

  • daozhidaozhi Member

    Do you support interlinks between different vps?For example, mount a storage vps to a ssd or nvme vps via nfs, and the traffic is free?

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Provider

    @daozhi said:
    Do you support interlinks between different vps?For example, mount a storage vps to a ssd or nvme vps via nfs, and the traffic is free?

    all inter traffic between our vps is free and not counted toward your total

    VPS and shared hosting
    http://servarica.com

Sign In or Register to comment.