Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Connection refused even though port is open and a service is listening
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Connection refused even though port is open and a service is listening

jokjokjokjok Member
edited January 2021 in Help

Hello,

thanks to help of some people I got the idea to install a min.io server. After many hours I managed to install and run it. (Soon I will become a server admin, lol) At least it works via the browser. But the connection is refused when I try to reach it from another server to use it as a S3 storage.

[xxx@centos ~]# netstat -plnt
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name
tcp 0 0 xx.xx.xxx.xxx:9000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1180/minio
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1177/sshd
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1150/master
tcp6 0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN 1177/sshd
tcp6 0 0 ::1:25 :::* LISTEN 1150/master

[xxx@centos ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-port=9000/tcp --permanent
Warning: ALREADY_ENABLED: 9000:tcp
success

And I disabled SELinux.

[xxx@centos ~]# setsebool -P httpd_can_network_connect on
setsebool: SELinux is disabled.

So when I try to reach it, it says:
# nc -v xx.xx.xxx.xxx 9000
Ncat: Version 7.50 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connection refused.

From my site:
AWS HTTP error: cURL error 7: Failed connect to xx.xx.xxx.xxx:9000; Connection refused (see http://curl.haxx.se/libcurl/c/libcurl-errors.html)

I am not sure what else I can do at this point. Maybe the host of my server blocks it? I got a pretty cheap storage VPS deal from here to test out things. I am a beginner and have no clue what I am doing, please help.

Should I contact them? Or what can I do?

Thank you.

«1

Comments

  • DataIdeas-JoshDataIdeas-Josh Member, Patron Provider

    It is a possibility that it's being blocked up stream.
    You can also check via https://canyouseeme.org/

    Thanked by 1jokjok
  • @DataIdeas-Josh said:
    It is a possibility that it's being blocked up stream.
    You can also check via https://canyouseeme.org/

    I can't use the tool. It doesn't let me enter the server's IP, it takes my IP.
    And what does "blocked up stream" mean?

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran
    edited January 2021

    From another VPS, try this:

    nmap -p9000 (your IP)
    

    You may have to install nmap - all major distros have it in their package managers.

    You should get something like this if the port is open (obviously, different port/service name):

    PORT    STATE SERVICE
    443/tcp open  https
    
    Thanked by 1jokjok
  • @raindog308 said:
    From another VPS, try this:

    > nmap -p9000 (your IP)
    > 

    I tried 3 different ways, not sure which one is correct.

    [00:51][xxx@xxx ~]# nmap -p9000 xx.xx.xxx.xxx:9000
    Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2021-01-26 00:52 UTC
    Failed to resolve "xx.xx.xxx.xxx:9000"

    [00:52][xxx@xxx ~]# nmap -p9000 xx.xx.xxx.xxx
    Nmap scan report for xx.xx.xxx.xxx
    Host is up (0.030s latency).
    PORT STATE SERVICE
    9000/tcp filtered cslistener

    [00:53][xxx@xxx ~]# nmap -p9000 xx.xx.xxx.xxx 9000
    Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2021-01-26 00:54 UTC
    setup_target: failed to determine route to 9000 (0.0.35.40)
    Host is up (0.028s latency).
    PORT STATE SERVICE
    9000/tcp filtered cslistener

  • risharderisharde Patron Provider, Veteran

    Not sure if this will help, but ia there a setting to bind the server to 0.0.0.0:9000 instead of the xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:9000, that might work?

    Thanked by 1jokjok
  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran
    edited January 2021

    From the nmap docs:

    “ Filtered means that a firewall, filter, or other network obstacle is blocking the port so that Nmap cannot tell whether it is open or closed. ”

    I think you indicated you’re using centos....sorry, I can’t help with firewalld but perhaps someone else can. You could temporarily turn firewalld off to see if that fixes it.

    Thanked by 1jokjok
  • @risharde said:
    Not sure if this will help, but ia there a setting to bind the server to 0.0.0.0:9000 instead of the xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:9000, that might work?

    I don't know, you tell me? :)

    @raindog308 said:
    I think you indicated you’re using centos....sorry, I can’t help with firewalld but perhaps someone else can. You could temporarily turn firewalld off to see if that fixes it.

    I disabled firewalld, still same problem.

    Do you think I should not go CentOS? I heard it is safer why I went CentOS but could switch to Ubuntu probably?

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    SELinux perhaps?

    What is the result of 'sestatus'? If it says "enabled" then you can either learn SELinux or disable it. To disable it, edit /etc/sysconfig/selinux and change SELINUX from "enforcing" to either "permissive" or "disabled". You will need to reboot to have this take effect.

    Thanked by 1jokjok
  • jokjokjokjok Member
    edited January 2021

    @raindog308 said:
    SELinux perhaps?

    What is the result of 'sestatus'? If it says "enabled" then you can either learn SELinux or disable it. To disable it, edit /etc/sysconfig/selinux and change SELINUX from "enforcing" to either "permissive" or "disabled". You will need to reboot to have this take effect.

    If you check my 1st post, SELinux is disabled already.

    I am not sure what else to do here. Could it be that my VPS provider is blocking things before hand?

    [xxx@centos ~]# sestatus
    SELinux status: disabled

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    image

    Thanked by 1jokjok
  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy

    What virtualization is it?

    Thanked by 1jokjok
  • @thedp said:
    What virtualization is it?

    CentOS 7

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy

    @jokjok said:

    @thedp said:
    What virtualization is it?

    CentOS 7

    I mean is that a KVM or OVZ?

    It’s not a NAT VPS is it?

    Just making sure.

    Thanked by 1jokjok
  • @thedp said:

    I mean is that a KVM or OVZ?

    It’s not a NAT VPS is it?

    Just making sure.

    Oh, sorry. It is KVM VPS.

  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy

    @jokjok said:

    @thedp said:

    I mean is that a KVM or OVZ?

    It’s not a NAT VPS is it?

    Just making sure.

    Oh, sorry. It is KVM VPS.

    What did you get and from who?

    Sorry but I think this whole thing would make sense if this was a NAT VPS.

    Thanked by 1jokjok
  • So the other server where you are connecting from, does that also have the same port open?

    Thanked by 1jokjok
  • @thedp said:

    What did you get and from who?

    Sorry but I think this whole thing would make sense if this was a NAT VPS.

    I mean I am a noob when it comes to server things, so I didn't want to name the hoster, because it might be actually me the problem here. So it would not be fair. It is the 512 GB plan.

    @seriesn said:
    So the other server where you are connecting from, does that also have the same port open?

    Does it need to be? Let me check. It looks like it is.

    [00:54][xxx@xxx ~]# netstat -plnt
    Active Internet connections (only servers)
    Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name
    tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:443 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 4805/nginx: master
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9991 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 4821/php-fpm: maste
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 4821/php-fpm: maste
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9002 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 4821/php-fpm: maste
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9003 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 4821/php-fpm: maste
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:11211 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 19294/memcached
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9004 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 4821/php-fpm: maste
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:9005 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 4821/php-fpm: maste
    tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 4805/nginx: master
    tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:21 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 19012/pure-ftpd (SE
    tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1522/sshd
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1443/master
    tcp6 0 0 :::3306 :::* LISTEN 15495/mysqld
    tcp6 0 0 ::1:9200 :::* LISTEN 1529/java
    tcp6 0 0 127.0.0.1:9200 :::* LISTEN 1529/java
    tcp6 0 0 ::1:9300 :::* LISTEN 1529/java
    tcp6 0 0 127.0.0.1:9300 :::* LISTEN 1529/java
    tcp6 0 0 :::21 :::* LISTEN 19012/pure-ftpd (SE
    tcp6 0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN 1522/sshd
    tcp6 0 0 ::1:25 :::* LISTEN 1443/master
    `

  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy

    Not sure what it is really. Looks like you’ve got everything the way it should be - at least from what you’ve shown.

    Maybe restart MinIO?

    Thanked by 1jokjok
  • awoooooolawooooool Member
    edited January 2021

    @jokjok said:
    [xxx@centos ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-port=9000/tcp --permanent
    Warning: ALREADY_ENABLED: 9000:tcp
    success

    Did you firewall-cmd --reload after that? I'm guessing you added it to the permanent rule and not the runtime. The runtime is "temporary" you might say, if you reload the firewall, it'll replace the runtime rule with the permanent one.

    Thanked by 2jokjok TimboJones
  • jokjokjokjok Member
    edited January 2021

    @thedp said:
    Not sure what it is really. Looks like you’ve got everything the way it should be - at least from what you’ve shown.

    Maybe restart MinIO?

    Yeah, like this is how unlucky I am. First time installing something on a first time storage VPS, and I get sth. like this to deal with... Googling for hours a solution... I am not a server guy.

    I did restart the server and did restart the minio.service. Are there any other ways to restart?
    Tomorrow I'll dig into the min.io logs someone send me in a private pm. But minio runs fine from the browser as I have access, just no access from the server. I think it is something before minio which blocks it.

    Also one question, if I type my server IP in my browser, it finds nothing and times out. Is it maybe I didn't allow the main IP (without the port) to have access to sth.? But i have no files on /home folder or something. I dont know.

    @awooooool said:

    @jokjok said:
    [xxx@centos ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-port=9000/tcp --permanent
    Warning: ALREADY_ENABLED: 9000:tcp
    success

    Did you firewall-cmd --reload after that? I'm guessing you added it to the permanent rule and not the runtime. The runtime is "temporary" you might say, if you reload the firewall, it'll replace the runtime rule with the permanent one.

    I think I did but now since you said it, I did again. No change.

  • @jokjok said:

    @awooooool said:

    @jokjok said:
    [xxx@centos ~]# firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-port=9000/tcp --permanent
    Warning: ALREADY_ENABLED: 9000:tcp
    success

    Did you firewall-cmd --reload after that? I'm guessing you added it to the permanent rule and not the runtime. The runtime is "temporary" you might say, if you reload the firewall, it'll replace the runtime rule with the permanent one.

    I think I did but now since you said it, I did again. No change.

    Can you curl xx.xx.xx.xx:9000 in your storage KVM? HostSolutions gave public IP for storage KVMs so NAT shouldn't be an issue.

    Thanked by 1jokjok
  • Could be MinIO itself, run some simple service and bind on 0.0.0.0:9000 (e.g. python3 -m http.server --bind 0.0.0.0 9000) see if that's reachable.

    Thanked by 2jokjok raindog308
  • jokjokjokjok Member
    edited January 2021

    @awooooool said:
    Can you curl xx.xx.xx.xx:9000 in your storage KVM? HostSolutions gave public IP for storage KVMs so NAT shouldn't be an issue.

    [xxx@centos ~]# curl xx.xx.xxx.xxx:9000
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <Error><Code>AccessDenied</Code><Message>Access Denied<Resource>/</Resource>
    <RequestId>165DAAF091A78E83</RequestId><HostId>25eca351-4ec9-48f9-9776-a01427eae071</HostId></Error>

  • @jmgcaguicla said:
    Could be MinIO itself, run some simple service and bind on 0.0.0.0:9000 (e.g. python3 -m http.server --bind 0.0.0.0 9000) see if that's reachable.

    [xxx@centos ~]# python3 -m http.server --bind 0.0.0.0 9000
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/runpy.py", line 193, in _run_module_as_main "__main__", mod_spec)
    ....
    File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/socketserver.py", line 470, in server_bind self.socket.bind(self.server_address)
    OSError: [Errno 98] Address already in use

  • @jokjok said:

    @awooooool said:
    Can you curl xx.xx.xx.xx:9000 in your storage KVM? HostSolutions gave public IP for storage KVMs so NAT shouldn't be an issue.

    [xxx@centos ~]# curl xx.xx.xxx.xxx:9000
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <Error><Code>AccessDenied</Code><Message>Access Denied<Resource>/</Resource>
    <RequestId>165DAAF091A78E83</RequestId><HostId>25eca351-4ec9-48f9-9776-a01427eae071</HostId></Error>

    firewall-cmd --list-all, what's the output?

    Thanked by 1jokjok
  • jokjokjokjok Member
    edited January 2021

    @awooooool said:
    firewall-cmd --list-all, what's the output?

    [xxx@centos ~]# firewall-cmd --list-all
    public (active)
    target: default
    icmp-block-inversion: no
    interfaces: eth0
    sources:
    services: dhcpv6-client ssh
    ports: 9000/tcp
    protocols:
    masquerade: no
    forward-ports:
    source-ports:
    icmp-blocks:
    rich rules:

  • @jokjok said:

    @jmgcaguicla said:
    Could be MinIO itself, run some simple service and bind on 0.0.0.0:9000 (e.g. python3 -m http.server --bind 0.0.0.0 9000) see if that's reachable.

    [xxx@centos ~]# python3 -m http.server --bind 0.0.0.0 9000
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/runpy.py", line 193, in _run_module_as_main "__main__", mod_spec)
    ....
    File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/socketserver.py", line 470, in server_bind self.socket.bind(self.server_address)
    OSError: [Errno 98] Address already in use

    Scratch that, I somehow missed half the thread. After re-reading, it seems you have a problem with the server you're trying to connect from (could be an upstream issue, e.g. someone's blocking HostSolution IPs) instead of the one hosting MinIO . Do you have other servers (ideally from different providers/DCs) you can test from?

    Thanked by 1jokjok
  • @jmgcaguicla said:

    Scratch that, I somehow missed half the thread. After re-reading, it seems you have a problem with the server you're trying to connect from (could be an upstream issue, e.g. someone's blocking HostSolution IPs) instead of the one hosting MinIO . Do you have other servers (ideally from different providers/DCs) you can test from?

    Unfortunately I don't have any access to any other server. Only these two. But your point is actually interesting. I didn't think about that. Maybe everything is fine with the storage server, but my real server is the problem.

    We already checked if the main server has port 9000 open and it does. Any other idea how to check it or find out?

  • jmgcaguiclajmgcaguicla Member
    edited January 2021

    @jokjok said:
    We already checked if the main server has port 9000 open and it does.

    From where did you check it from, your personal computer? If that is the case, then it's all pointing to the server you're trying to connect from.

    @jokjok said:
    Any other idea how to check it or find out?

    https://portchecker.co/
    https://www.portcheckers.com/

    Thanked by 1jokjok
  • jokjokjokjok Member
    edited January 2021

    @jmgcaguicla said:

    @jokjok said:
    We already checked if the main server has port 9000 open and it does.

    From where did you check it from, your personal computer? If that is the case, then it's all pointing to the server you're trying to connect from.

    @jokjok said:
    Any other idea how to check it or find out?

    https://portchecker.co/
    https://www.portcheckers.com/

    I checked everything through the server my main website is at. I want to use min.io for storage so I got this storage server. But the main site server can't get a connection to that storage server. I did not use my personal computer to check anything. And I believe those tools are for that.

Sign In or Register to comment.